Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
53 lines (44 loc) · 4.81 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

53 lines (44 loc) · 4.81 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for pypa/pipenv

Attack Surface: 1. Malicious Packages in Pipfile / Pipfile.lock

  • Description: Attackers inject malicious packages or vulnerable versions directly into the project's dependency files.
    • Pipenv Contribution: Pipenv uses these files to manage and install dependencies, making them a direct target for dependency manipulation. Pipfile.lock's precise version pinning increases the risk if compromised.
    • Example: An attacker modifies Pipfile.lock to include a backdoored version of requests (e.g., requests==2.28.1-malicious).
    • Impact: Code execution, data exfiltration, system compromise.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Code Reviews: Mandatory, multi-person reviews for all changes to Pipfile and Pipfile.lock.
      • SCA Scanning: Integrate Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools into the CI/CD pipeline to automatically scan for known vulnerabilities in dependencies before deployment.
      • Dependency Pinning Policies: Enforce strict policies, potentially using tools beyond Pipfile.lock for greater control (e.g., signed packages, curated lists).
      • Repository Security: Strong access controls (MFA, least privilege) for the source code repository.
      • Regular Audits: Periodic audits of dependencies for vulnerabilities and outdated packages.

Attack Surface: 2. Dependency Confusion

  • Description: Attackers publish malicious packages on public repositories with the same names as internal, private packages.
    • Pipenv Contribution: Pipenv might install the malicious public package if the private package index is not properly configured.
    • Example: An internal package named mycompany-utils is not configured with a private index. An attacker publishes mycompany-utils on PyPI. Pipenv install pulls the malicious package.
    • Impact: Code execution, data exfiltration, system compromise.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Private Package Indexes: Always explicitly configure private package indexes in Pipfile using the [[source]] section with url and verify_ssl = true.
      • Scoped Packages: Use scoped package names (e.g., @mycompany/mycompany-utils) to minimize naming conflicts.
      • Package Repository Manager: Employ a dedicated package repository manager (Artifactory, Nexus) for robust security and access control.
      • Public Repository Monitoring: Regularly monitor public repositories for potentially confusing package names.

Attack Surface: 3. Compromised Package Index

  • Description: The package index itself (e.g., a custom index or, less likely, PyPI) is compromised, serving malicious packages.
    • Pipenv Contribution: Pipenv relies on the integrity of the configured package index to download safe packages.
    • Example: An attacker gains control of a company's internal package index and replaces a legitimate package with a trojanized version.
    • Impact: Code execution, data exfiltration, system compromise.
    • Risk Severity: High (Critical for custom indexes, High for PyPI)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Secure Custom Indexes: Harden and regularly patch custom package index servers. Implement strong authentication and authorization.
      • HTTPS: Enforce HTTPS (verify_ssl = true in Pipfile) for all package index interactions.
      • Repository Manager Security: Use a package repository manager with built-in security features and vulnerability scanning.
      • Index Integrity Monitoring: Monitor the integrity of the package index itself.

Attack Surface: 4. Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks

  • Description: Attackers intercept the communication between Pipenv and the package index, injecting malicious code.
    • Pipenv Contribution: Pipenv handles the download of packages, making it susceptible to MitM if SSL verification is disabled.
    • Example: An attacker on the same network as a developer uses a tool like mitmproxy to intercept pipenv install and replace a downloaded package.
    • Impact: Code execution, data exfiltration, system compromise.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • SSL Verification: Never disable SSL verification (verify_ssl = true in Pipfile – this is the default).
      • Secure Networks: Use VPNs or other secure network connections, especially in untrusted environments.