Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
69 lines (60 loc) · 6.2 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

69 lines (60 loc) · 6.2 KB

Threat Model Analysis for pypa/pipenv

Threat: Dependency Confusion / Substitution

  • Description: An attacker publishes a malicious package on a public repository (e.g., PyPI) with the same name as a private package used internally, or a very similar name to a popular public package (typosquatting). The attacker might use a higher version number. Pipenv, during dependency resolution (pipenv install, pipenv update), might inadvertently install the malicious package instead of the intended one, especially if private repository configuration is incorrect or resolution order is manipulated.
    • Impact:
      • Execution of arbitrary code on development machines or production servers.
      • Data exfiltration or modification.
      • Complete system compromise.
    • Pipenv Component Affected:
      • Dependency resolution process (pipenv install, pipenv update).
      • Pipfile and Pipfile.lock (malicious entries here lead to the threat).
      • Interaction with package indexes (PyPI, private indexes).
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Explicit Index Configuration: Use --index-url and --extra-index-url in Pipfile to explicitly define the order of package indexes, prioritizing the private repository. Secure the private repository with authentication and access controls.
      • Version Pinning: Use strict version pinning in Pipfile (e.g., package = "==1.2.3"). Avoid wildcard versions (*) or overly broad ranges.
      • Hash Verification: Use --require-hashes in Pipfile. This forces Pipenv to verify the cryptographic hash of downloaded packages against Pipfile.lock, preventing installation of tampered packages.
      • Private Package Index: Use a private package index (e.g., DevPI, Artifactory) to host internal packages securely.
      • Namespace Packages (for internal packages): Use Python's namespace packages to create a unique namespace unlikely to be duplicated.
      • Regular Audits: Regularly audit Pipfile.lock for unexpected package sources or versions.

Threat: Installation of Packages with Known Vulnerabilities

  • Description: A package in Pipfile (or a transitive dependency) has a known, publicly disclosed vulnerability (CVE). An attacker exploits this. This often happens if Pipfile.lock isn't updated, or a vulnerable version is pinned. Pipenv installs the vulnerable package.
    • Impact:
      • Varies, but can range from denial of service to remote code execution and data breaches.
    • Pipenv Component Affected:
      • Pipfile and Pipfile.lock (contain vulnerable dependency information).
      • Dependency resolution and installation (pipenv install, pipenv update).
    • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the vulnerability)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Regular Updates: Run pipenv update regularly to update Pipfile.lock with the latest secure versions. Automate this in your CI/CD pipeline.
      • Vulnerability Scanning: Integrate a vulnerability scanning tool (e.g., Safety, Snyk, Dependabot, Ochrona) into your workflow. These tools scan Pipfile.lock for vulnerabilities and often provide automated pull requests.
      • pipenv check: Use pipenv check to scan for known vulnerabilities.
      • Vulnerability Database Monitoring: Stay informed about new vulnerabilities by monitoring databases (e.g., CVE, NVD) and security advisories.
      • Policy Enforcement: Establish a policy for addressing vulnerabilities, including patching timelines.

Threat: Malicious Code in Transitive Dependencies

  • Description: A direct dependency (in Pipfile) depends on other packages (transitive dependencies). An attacker compromises a transitive dependency, injecting malicious code. The developer may be unaware of the vulnerability. Pipenv installs these dependencies.
    • Impact:
      • Similar to direct dependency vulnerabilities: code execution, data breaches, denial of service.
    • Pipenv Component Affected:
      • Pipfile.lock (contains the full dependency tree).
      • Dependency resolution process.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Vulnerability Scanning (Deep): Use tools that analyze transitive dependencies.
      • Dependency Tree Review: Regularly review Pipfile.lock to understand the full dependency tree. Use pipenv graph to visualize it.
      • SBOM Generation: Consider tools that generate a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) to track all dependencies.
      • Dependency Minimization: Prefer packages with fewer transitive dependencies.
      • Auditing Key Dependencies: Prioritize auditing and vetting of critical or widely used dependencies, even transitive ones.

Threat: Tampering with Pipfile or Pipfile.lock

  • Description: An attacker gains access (development environment, source control, CI/CD) and modifies Pipfile or Pipfile.lock to introduce malicious dependencies or vulnerable versions.
    • Impact:
      • Installation of malicious/vulnerable packages: code execution, data breaches.
    • Pipenv Component Affected:
      • Pipfile and Pipfile.lock files.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Source Control Security: Strong access controls, authentication (including MFA), and authorization for repositories.
      • Code Reviews: Mandatory code reviews, including scrutiny of Pipfile and Pipfile.lock changes.
      • Integrity Checks: Digital signatures or other integrity checks (e.g., Git hooks) to verify Pipfile and Pipfile.lock.
      • CI/CD Pipeline Security: Secure the CI/CD pipeline to prevent unauthorized modifications.
      • Principle of Least Privilege: Developers and build systems have only minimum necessary permissions.