Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
57 lines (48 loc) · 5.81 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

57 lines (48 loc) · 5.81 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for pytorch/pytorch

Attack Surface: Arbitrary Code Execution via Model Loading

  • Description: Malicious actors can craft PyTorch model files (.pth, .pt, etc.) that contain arbitrary Python code. This code executes when the model is loaded using torch.load().
  • How PyTorch Contributes: PyTorch's reliance on pickle (or a custom unpickler) for model serialization makes it inherently vulnerable to this type of attack. The library provides the mechanism (torch.load()) that triggers the execution. This is a direct contribution.
  • Example: An attacker uploads a seemingly legitimate model file to a platform that uses PyTorch. The file contains hidden code that, upon loading, opens a reverse shell.
  • Impact: Complete system compromise. The attacker gains the privileges of the process loading the model.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Never load models from untrusted sources. This is paramount.
    • Use torch.load(..., map_location='cpu'): Defense-in-depth, limits direct GPU access.
    • Sandboxing/Containerization: Isolate the model loading process.
    • Input Validation: Strictly validate and sanitize any user input that influences model selection.
    • Consider safer serialization (if feasible): Explore alternatives like ONNX, but understand their limitations.

Attack Surface: Denial of Service (DoS) via Model Loading

  • Description: Attackers can provide excessively large or specially crafted model files that consume vast amounts of memory or disk space during loading, causing crashes or unresponsiveness.
  • How PyTorch Contributes: PyTorch's model loading mechanism (torch.load()) doesn't inherently enforce size limits, making it susceptible to resource exhaustion. This is a direct contribution.
  • Example: An attacker uploads a multi-terabyte model file, causing the server to run out of memory and crash when torch.load() is called.
  • Impact: Application unavailability.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement strict size limits on loaded models.
    • Resource Monitoring: Monitor memory/disk usage during loading and terminate if limits are exceeded.
    • Timeout Mechanisms: Implement timeouts for torch.load() to prevent indefinite hangs.

Attack Surface: Vulnerabilities in Custom Operations (C++/CUDA)

  • Description: Custom C++/CUDA operations, often used for performance, can introduce vulnerabilities like buffer overflows, integer overflows, and race conditions.
  • How PyTorch Contributes: PyTorch provides the framework and APIs for creating and integrating these custom operations (e.g., torch.autograd.Function, torch.utils.cpp_extension). While the code itself is written by the developer, PyTorch's framework directly enables the use of this potentially vulnerable code.
  • Example: A custom CUDA kernel for a new attention mechanism has a buffer overflow. An attacker crafts specific input tensors to trigger the overflow, leading to code execution.
  • Impact: Varies from denial of service to arbitrary code execution, potentially including GPU-specific vulnerabilities.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the vulnerability)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Rigorous Code Review and Testing: Thoroughly review and test all custom C++/CUDA code.
    • Use Safe Libraries and Idioms: Employ best practices and safe libraries.
    • Memory Safety Tools: Use AddressSanitizer (ASan) and Valgrind (for CPU code).
    • CUDA-Specific Tools: Use cuda-memcheck.
    • Fuzzing: Apply fuzzing techniques.
    • Static Analysis: Use static analysis tools.

Attack Surface: Distributed Training Vulnerabilities (Specific Aspects)

  • Description: Security issues arising from the communication and coordination between nodes in a distributed training setup, specifically related to PyTorch's distributed training mechanisms.
  • How PyTorch Contributes: PyTorch provides frameworks for distributed training (e.g., torch.distributed, torch.nn.parallel.DistributedDataParallel). Vulnerabilities can arise from improper use of these frameworks or weaknesses in their underlying implementations. This is a direct contribution.
  • Example: An attacker exploits a vulnerability in PyTorch's torch.distributed.rpc framework to inject malicious gradients during federated learning, poisoning the global model. Or, an attacker leverages a misconfiguration in DistributedDataParallel to cause a denial-of-service by disrupting communication.
  • Impact: Model poisoning, denial of service, potentially data leakage (depending on the specific vulnerability).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Communication Protocols: Use TLS/SSL for encrypted communication even when using PyTorch's built-in mechanisms.
    • Authentication and Authorization: Ensure only authorized nodes can participate, verifying identities within the PyTorch distributed context.
    • Proper Configuration: Carefully review and configure PyTorch's distributed training settings (e.g., init_method, backends) according to security best practices.
    • Input Validation (Gradients/Updates): If possible, implement checks on the gradients or model updates exchanged between nodes to detect anomalies.
    • Monitor PyTorch Distributed Logs: Pay close attention to logs generated by PyTorch's distributed components for errors or unusual activity.