Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
256 lines (201 loc) · 27.6 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

256 lines (201 loc) · 27.6 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Quivr Application

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

This deep security analysis aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the security posture of the Quivr application, based on the provided security design review and inferred architecture from the codebase description and diagrams. The objective is to identify potential security vulnerabilities and risks associated with Quivr's design, components, and deployment, and to recommend specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to the project. This analysis will focus on ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the Quivr knowledge base and user data.

Scope:

The scope of this analysis encompasses the following key components of the Quivr application, as identified in the design review and C4 diagrams:

  • Web Application Frontend (Next.js): Client-side application responsible for user interface and interaction.
  • Web Application Backend (Python FastAPI): Server-side API responsible for business logic, data access, and API management.
  • Vector Database (ChromaDB): Database for storing and searching vector embeddings of knowledge base content.
  • Relational Database (PostgreSQL): Database for storing application data, user information, and metadata.
  • Message Queue (Redis/RabbitMQ): System for asynchronous task processing.
  • Background Task Processor: Worker application for processing tasks from the message queue.
  • LLM API (e.g., OpenAI): External Large Language Model API for natural language processing.
  • Data Sources (Web Pages, Documents): External sources of knowledge base data.
  • Deployment Infrastructure (AWS EKS): Cloud-based containerized deployment environment.
  • Build Process (GitHub Actions): CI/CD pipeline for building and deploying the application.

The analysis will focus on security considerations related to:

  • Authentication and Authorization
  • Input Validation and Sanitization
  • Data Protection (Encryption at rest and in transit)
  • API Security
  • Dependency Management
  • Infrastructure Security
  • Build Pipeline Security
  • Logging and Monitoring
  • Incident Response

Methodology:

This analysis will employ the following methodology:

  1. Architecture Review: Analyze the provided C4 Context, Container, Deployment, and Build diagrams to understand the application's architecture, components, data flow, and deployment environment.
  2. Security Design Review Analysis: Thoroughly review the provided security design review document, focusing on business posture, security posture, existing controls, accepted risks, recommended controls, and security requirements.
  3. Component-Based Security Assessment: For each key component identified in the scope, analyze potential security vulnerabilities and risks based on common security best practices and known vulnerabilities associated with the technologies used (Next.js, FastAPI, ChromaDB, PostgreSQL, Redis/RabbitMQ, Docker, Kubernetes, AWS).
  4. Threat Modeling (Implicit): While not explicitly stated as a formal threat model, the analysis will implicitly consider potential threats based on the identified vulnerabilities and the nature of the application (knowledge base, handling user data, external API integrations).
  5. Recommendation and Mitigation Strategy Development: Based on the identified risks and vulnerabilities, develop specific, actionable, and tailored security recommendations and mitigation strategies for the Quivr project. These recommendations will be prioritized based on their potential impact and feasibility of implementation.
  6. Tailoring to Quivr: Ensure all recommendations and mitigations are directly relevant to Quivr's architecture, technology stack, and business context as a personal AI-powered knowledge base. Avoid generic security advice and focus on project-specific solutions.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

2.1 Web Application Frontend (Next.js)

  • Security Implications:
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): Next.js, while offering some protection, is still vulnerable to XSS if developers don't properly handle user inputs and output encoding. If the frontend renders user-provided content or data from the backend without proper sanitization, malicious scripts could be injected and executed in users' browsers.
    • Client-Side Input Validation Bypass: Client-side validation in Next.js can be bypassed. Security checks must be enforced on the backend.
    • Sensitive Data Exposure in Client-Side Code: Accidental inclusion of API keys, secrets, or sensitive logic in the frontend code, which is accessible to users.
    • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Next.js projects rely on npm packages, which can have known vulnerabilities. Outdated or vulnerable dependencies can expose the frontend to attacks.
    • Session Management Vulnerabilities: Improper handling of session tokens or cookies in the frontend can lead to session hijacking or fixation attacks.

2.2 Web Application Backend (Python FastAPI)

  • Security Implications:
    • Injection Attacks (SQL Injection, Command Injection, NoSQL Injection): FastAPI applications interacting with databases or external systems are vulnerable to injection attacks if input validation and parameterized queries are not implemented correctly.
    • Authentication and Authorization Flaws: Weak or improperly implemented authentication and authorization mechanisms can lead to unauthorized access to APIs and data. Lack of RBAC can result in privilege escalation.
    • API Security Vulnerabilities: Exposed API endpoints without proper rate limiting, input validation, or authorization can be abused for denial-of-service attacks, data breaches, or other malicious activities.
    • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Python FastAPI applications rely on Python packages, which can have known vulnerabilities.
    • Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): If the backend fetches data from URLs based on user input without proper validation, it could be vulnerable to SSRF attacks, potentially allowing access to internal resources or external systems on behalf of the server.
    • Insecure Deserialization: If the backend deserializes data from untrusted sources, it could be vulnerable to insecure deserialization attacks, leading to remote code execution.
    • Logging and Monitoring Deficiencies: Insufficient logging and monitoring can hinder incident detection and response.

2.3 Vector Database (ChromaDB)

  • Security Implications:
    • Unauthorized Access: If ChromaDB is not properly secured, unauthorized users or processes could gain access to the vector embeddings and potentially infer information about the knowledge base content.
    • Data Injection/Manipulation: Malicious actors could attempt to inject or modify vector embeddings in ChromaDB, potentially corrupting the knowledge base or manipulating search results.
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Attacks targeting ChromaDB could lead to performance degradation or unavailability of the knowledge base search functionality.
    • Data Exposure in Logs/Backups: Sensitive information might be inadvertently exposed in ChromaDB logs or backups if not properly secured.
    • Network Security: If ChromaDB is exposed on a network without proper firewall rules and network segmentation, it could be vulnerable to network-based attacks.

2.4 Relational Database (PostgreSQL)

  • Security Implications:
    • SQL Injection: As mentioned in the Backend section, SQL injection is a major risk if parameterized queries are not used consistently.
    • Unauthorized Access: Weak database credentials, default configurations, or misconfigured access controls can lead to unauthorized access to the relational database, potentially exposing user data, application secrets, and other sensitive information.
    • Data Breach: A successful database breach could result in the exfiltration of all data stored in PostgreSQL, including user credentials, personal information, and potentially structured knowledge base content.
    • Data Integrity Issues: Unauthorized modification or deletion of data in PostgreSQL can compromise the integrity of the application and its data.
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Database attacks can lead to performance degradation or unavailability of the application.
    • Backup Security: Database backups must be securely stored and access-controlled to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data.

2.5 Message Queue (Redis/RabbitMQ)

  • Security Implications:
    • Unauthorized Access: If the message queue is not properly secured, unauthorized users or processes could access the queue, potentially reading sensitive messages, injecting malicious messages, or disrupting task processing.
    • Message Tampering: Malicious actors could intercept and modify messages in the queue, potentially leading to data corruption or unexpected application behavior.
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Attacks targeting the message queue could overwhelm the system and prevent background tasks from being processed.
    • Data Exposure in Transit/At Rest: Messages in the queue might contain sensitive information and should be protected in transit and at rest if the message queue supports encryption.

2.6 Background Task Processor

  • Security Implications:
    • Code Execution Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in the task processing logic could be exploited to execute arbitrary code on the server.
    • Privilege Escalation: If the task processor runs with elevated privileges, vulnerabilities could be exploited to gain unauthorized access to the system.
    • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Similar to the backend, the task processor relies on dependencies that could have vulnerabilities.
    • Resource Exhaustion: Malicious tasks could be injected into the queue to consume excessive resources and cause denial of service.
    • Data Integrity Issues: Errors or vulnerabilities in task processing logic could lead to data corruption in databases or the vector database.

2.7 LLM API (e.g., OpenAI)

  • Security Implications:
    • API Key Compromise: If the API key for the LLM API is compromised, unauthorized users could access and abuse the LLM service, potentially incurring costs or performing malicious actions.
    • Data Privacy Concerns: Sending user queries and knowledge base content to a third-party LLM API raises data privacy concerns, especially if sensitive information is involved. Data processing and storage policies of the LLM provider need to be carefully reviewed.
    • API Availability and Reliability: Dependency on an external API introduces a point of failure. If the LLM API is unavailable or experiences performance issues, Quivr's functionality will be impacted.
    • Rate Limiting and Abuse: Lack of proper rate limiting on API calls to the LLM API could lead to service disruptions or unexpected costs.

2.8 Data Sources (Web Pages, Documents)

  • Security Implications:
    • Malicious Content Ingestion: Ingesting data from untrusted or compromised data sources could introduce malicious content into the knowledge base, potentially leading to XSS vulnerabilities or other attacks when users interact with this content.
    • Data Integrity Issues: Data from external sources might be inaccurate or manipulated, compromising the integrity of the knowledge base.
    • Data Availability Issues: If data sources become unavailable or change their structure, the data ingestion process could fail, impacting the knowledge base update process.

2.9 Deployment Infrastructure (AWS EKS)

  • Security Implications:
    • Misconfiguration of Kubernetes and AWS Services: Incorrectly configured Kubernetes clusters, IAM roles, security groups, or network policies can create security vulnerabilities and expose the application to attacks.
    • Container Image Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in container images used to deploy Quivr components can be exploited to compromise the application or the underlying infrastructure.
    • Insecure Secrets Management: Improperly managing secrets (API keys, database credentials) in Kubernetes can lead to unauthorized access if secrets are exposed or not encrypted.
    • Network Security Issues: Lack of proper network segmentation, firewall rules, and network policies within the EKS cluster can allow lateral movement and unauthorized access between components.
    • Kubernetes Component Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in Kubernetes itself or its components (kubelet, API server, etc.) could be exploited to compromise the cluster and the applications running on it.
    • Logging and Monitoring Gaps: Insufficient logging and monitoring of the Kubernetes cluster and deployed applications can hinder security incident detection and response.

2.10 Build Process (GitHub Actions)

  • Security Implications:
    • Compromised Build Pipeline: If the GitHub Actions workflow or the build environment is compromised, malicious code could be injected into the application build artifacts, leading to supply chain attacks.
    • Exposure of Secrets in CI/CD: Accidental exposure of secrets (API keys, credentials) in GitHub Actions workflows or build logs.
    • Dependency Vulnerabilities Introduced During Build: Vulnerabilities in build tools or dependencies used during the build process could be introduced into the final application.
    • Lack of Code Integrity Verification: Absence of mechanisms to verify the integrity of the code and build artifacts can make it difficult to detect tampering.

3. Actionable and Tailored Mitigation Strategies

Based on the identified security implications, here are actionable and tailored mitigation strategies for Quivr:

3.1 Web Application Frontend (Next.js)

  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement Content Security Policy (CSP): Configure CSP headers to restrict the sources from which the browser is allowed to load resources, mitigating XSS attacks.
    • Input Sanitization and Output Encoding: Sanitize user inputs on the frontend to prevent basic XSS attempts, but always perform server-side validation and sanitization as the primary defense. Use appropriate output encoding (e.g., HTML escaping) when rendering user-provided content.
    • Regular Dependency Updates and Vulnerability Scanning: Use tools like npm audit or yarn audit to regularly scan frontend dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them promptly. Integrate dependency scanning into the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Secure Session Management: Use secure cookies with HttpOnly and Secure flags. Consider using a robust session management library if needed. Avoid storing sensitive data in local storage or session storage if possible.
    • Subresource Integrity (SRI): Implement SRI for external JavaScript libraries to ensure that browsers only execute scripts that haven't been tampered with.

3.2 Web Application Backend (Python FastAPI)

  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Parameterized Queries and ORM: Use an ORM (like SQLAlchemy) or parameterized queries for all database interactions to prevent SQL injection vulnerabilities.
    • Input Validation and Sanitization (Server-Side): Implement robust input validation and sanitization using Pydantic schemas in FastAPI to validate all API requests. Sanitize user inputs to prevent injection attacks.
    • Authentication and Authorization (RBAC): Implement a secure authentication mechanism (e.g., JWT-based authentication). Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) to manage user permissions and restrict access to API endpoints and data based on user roles. Use FastAPI's dependency injection for authorization checks.
    • API Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting middleware in FastAPI to protect API endpoints from abuse and denial-of-service attacks.
    • Dependency Vulnerability Scanning and Updates: Use tools like pip-audit or safety to regularly scan Python dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them promptly. Integrate dependency scanning into the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Implement Output Encoding: Encode data before sending it in API responses to prevent injection vulnerabilities on the client-side.
    • Prevent SSRF: Validate and sanitize URLs provided by users before making external requests. Use allowlists of trusted domains if possible.
    • Secure Deserialization: Avoid deserializing data from untrusted sources if possible. If deserialization is necessary, use secure deserialization libraries and techniques.
    • Comprehensive Logging and Monitoring: Implement detailed logging for authentication, authorization, API requests, errors, and security events. Integrate with a monitoring system to detect anomalies and security incidents.

3.3 Vector Database (ChromaDB)

  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Access Control Lists (ACLs): Configure ChromaDB's access control mechanisms to restrict access to authorized users and processes only.
    • Network Segmentation and Firewall Rules: Deploy ChromaDB in a private network segment and configure firewall rules to restrict network access to only necessary components (e.g., backend application).
    • Data Encryption at Rest: Enable encryption at rest for ChromaDB if supported by the deployment environment or configure underlying storage encryption.
    • Regular Security Updates: Keep ChromaDB updated to the latest version to patch known vulnerabilities.
    • Secure Configuration Management: Follow security best practices for configuring ChromaDB, disabling default accounts and unnecessary features.
    • Monitoring and Logging: Monitor ChromaDB logs for suspicious activity and performance issues.

3.4 Relational Database (PostgreSQL)

  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strong Database Credentials: Use strong, randomly generated passwords for database users. Rotate credentials regularly.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Grant database users only the necessary privileges required for their tasks.
    • Network Segmentation and Firewall Rules: Deploy PostgreSQL in a private network segment and configure firewall rules to restrict network access to only necessary components (e.g., backend application).
    • Data Encryption at Rest: Enable encryption at rest for PostgreSQL using database-level encryption features or underlying storage encryption (e.g., AWS EBS encryption).
    • Data Encryption in Transit: Enforce encrypted connections (TLS/SSL) for all communication with PostgreSQL.
    • Regular Security Updates and Patching: Keep PostgreSQL updated to the latest version to patch known vulnerabilities.
    • Database Auditing and Logging: Enable database auditing to track database activities and detect suspicious behavior. Implement comprehensive logging.
    • Regular Backups and Secure Backup Storage: Implement regular database backups and store backups in a secure and access-controlled location.

3.5 Message Queue (Redis/RabbitMQ)

  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Access Control: Configure access control mechanisms in Redis/RabbitMQ to restrict access to authorized components only. Use authentication and authorization features.
    • Network Segmentation and Firewall Rules: Deploy the message queue in a private network segment and configure firewall rules to restrict network access.
    • Secure Communication Channels: If supported by the message queue, enable encryption for communication channels between components and the message queue (e.g., TLS for Redis).
    • Message Encryption (If Sensitive Data): If sensitive data is transmitted through the message queue, consider encrypting messages before they are placed in the queue and decrypting them upon consumption.
    • Regular Security Updates: Keep Redis/RabbitMQ updated to the latest version to patch known vulnerabilities.
    • Monitoring and Logging: Monitor the message queue for performance issues and suspicious activity.

3.6 Background Task Processor

  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Run the background task processor with the minimum necessary privileges. Avoid running it as root.
    • Input Validation for Task Data: Validate and sanitize data received from the message queue before processing tasks to prevent injection attacks or unexpected behavior.
    • Secure Coding Practices: Follow secure coding practices when developing task processing logic to prevent code execution vulnerabilities and other security flaws.
    • Dependency Vulnerability Scanning and Updates: Regularly scan and update dependencies used by the background task processor.
    • Resource Limits and Monitoring: Implement resource limits for the task processor to prevent resource exhaustion. Monitor resource usage and task processing for anomalies.
    • Error Handling and Logging: Implement robust error handling and logging in the task processor to detect and respond to errors and potential security issues.

3.7 LLM API (e.g., OpenAI)

  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure API Key Management: Store API keys securely using a secrets management service (e.g., AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault). Avoid hardcoding API keys in the codebase or configuration files. Rotate API keys regularly.
    • Data Minimization and Anonymization: Minimize the amount of sensitive data sent to the LLM API. Anonymize or pseudonymize data where possible.
    • Review LLM Provider's Data Privacy Policy: Carefully review the data privacy policy of the LLM API provider to understand how data is processed, stored, and used. Ensure compliance with relevant data privacy regulations.
    • API Rate Limiting and Monitoring: Implement rate limiting on API calls to the LLM API to prevent abuse and control costs. Monitor API usage and error rates.
    • Error Handling and Fallback Mechanisms: Implement robust error handling for API calls to the LLM API. Implement fallback mechanisms in case the API is unavailable or experiences errors.

3.8 Data Sources (Web Pages, Documents)

  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Source Validation and Whitelisting: Validate and whitelist data sources to ensure that data is ingested only from trusted and reputable sources.
    • Content Scanning and Sanitization: Scan ingested content for malicious code or scripts before adding it to the knowledge base. Sanitize content to prevent XSS vulnerabilities.
    • Data Integrity Checks: Implement mechanisms to verify the integrity of ingested data and detect potential manipulation.
    • Error Handling and Monitoring for Data Source Issues: Implement error handling and monitoring for data ingestion processes to detect and respond to issues with data sources.

3.9 Deployment Infrastructure (AWS EKS)

  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Kubernetes Security Hardening: Follow Kubernetes security best practices to harden the EKS cluster, including:
      • Network Policies: Implement network policies to restrict network traffic between pods and namespaces.
      • RBAC and Principle of Least Privilege: Implement Kubernetes RBAC to control access to Kubernetes resources and apply the principle of least privilege.
      • Security Contexts: Use security contexts for pods and containers to enforce security settings like user IDs, capabilities, and SELinux profiles.
      • Pod Security Admission Controllers: Enable and configure Pod Security Admission controllers to enforce security policies for pod deployments.
      • Regular Security Audits and Vulnerability Scanning: Conduct regular security audits of the Kubernetes cluster and perform vulnerability scanning of Kubernetes components and worker nodes.
    • AWS Security Best Practices: Follow AWS security best practices for EKS and related services, including:
      • IAM Roles and Least Privilege: Use IAM roles for service accounts (IRSA) to grant pods only the necessary AWS permissions. Apply the principle of least privilege for IAM roles.
      • Security Groups: Use security groups to control network traffic to and from EKS nodes and other AWS resources.
      • VPC and Subnet Segmentation: Deploy EKS in a Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) and use subnet segmentation to isolate different components.
      • Encryption for EBS Volumes and Secrets: Enable encryption for EBS volumes used by EKS nodes and use AWS KMS to encrypt Kubernetes secrets.
      • AWS Config and CloudTrail: Use AWS Config to monitor configuration changes and AWS CloudTrail for audit logging of API calls.
    • Container Image Security Scanning: Integrate container image scanning into the CI/CD pipeline and container registry to identify and address vulnerabilities in container images before deployment.
    • Secure Secrets Management in Kubernetes: Use Kubernetes Secrets or a dedicated secrets management solution (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager) to securely manage secrets in Kubernetes. Avoid storing secrets in container images or configuration files.
    • Monitoring and Logging for Kubernetes and AWS: Implement comprehensive monitoring and logging for the EKS cluster, worker nodes, and deployed applications. Integrate with security information and event management (SIEM) systems for security analysis and incident detection.

3.10 Build Process (GitHub Actions)

  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure GitHub Repository: Enable branch protection rules, enforce code reviews, and use access control to restrict access to the GitHub repository.
    • Secure GitHub Actions Workflows:
      • Principle of Least Privilege for Workflow Permissions: Grant GitHub Actions workflows only the necessary permissions.
      • Secrets Management in GitHub Actions: Use GitHub Secrets to securely store API keys and credentials used in workflows. Avoid hardcoding secrets in workflow files.
      • Workflow Code Review and Auditing: Review and audit GitHub Actions workflow code for security vulnerabilities and misconfigurations.
      • Dependency Pinning and Vulnerability Scanning in Build Environment: Pin dependencies used in the build environment and perform vulnerability scanning of build dependencies.
    • Static Application Security Testing (SAST) in CI/CD: Integrate SAST tools into the GitHub Actions workflow to automatically scan the codebase for security vulnerabilities during the build process.
    • Dependency Vulnerability Scanning in CI/CD: Integrate dependency vulnerability scanning tools into the GitHub Actions workflow to automatically scan project dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
    • Container Image Scanning in CI/CD and Container Registry: Integrate container image scanning into the GitHub Actions workflow and container registry to scan Docker images for vulnerabilities before deployment.
    • Code Signing and Artifact Verification: Implement code signing for build artifacts and container images to ensure code integrity and prevent tampering.

By implementing these tailored mitigation strategies, the Quivr project can significantly enhance its security posture and mitigate the identified risks, ensuring a more secure and reliable knowledge base application. It is crucial to prioritize these recommendations based on risk assessment and business impact and to continuously monitor and adapt security measures as the project evolves.