Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
63 lines (52 loc) · 7.35 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

63 lines (52 loc) · 7.35 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for ray-project/ray

Attack Surface: Unauthenticated Ray Client API Access

  • Description: Unauthorized access to the Ray client API, allowing execution of arbitrary code and control over the Ray cluster.
  • Ray Contribution: Ray client API can be exposed without authentication by default, making it accessible to anyone who can reach the network port.
  • Example: An attacker on the same network (or internet if exposed) connects to the Ray client API without credentials and submits a malicious Ray task that executes arbitrary code on worker nodes.
  • Impact: Critical. Arbitrary code execution on Ray cluster nodes, potential data breaches, cluster takeover, denial of service.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Enable Authentication: Configure Ray client authentication mechanisms (e.g., using tokens or custom authentication). Refer to Ray documentation for authentication options.
    • Network Segmentation: Restrict network access to the Ray client API using firewalls or network policies. Only allow access from trusted networks or clients.
    • Secure Communication Channels: Enable TLS/SSL encryption for communication between Ray clients and the Ray head node to protect against eavesdropping and tampering.

Attack Surface: Unauthenticated Ray Dashboard Access

  • Description: Unauthorized access to the Ray Dashboard web interface, exposing cluster information and potentially allowing control actions.
  • Ray Contribution: The Ray Dashboard can be exposed without authentication by default, making it publicly accessible if the port is open.
  • Example: An attacker accesses the Ray Dashboard through a publicly exposed port and gains visibility into cluster status, resource utilization, and potentially application-specific data. In some cases, the dashboard might allow actions that could disrupt the cluster.
  • Impact: High. Information disclosure about the Ray cluster and applications, potential for control plane manipulation depending on dashboard features and vulnerabilities.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Enable Authentication: Configure authentication for the Ray Dashboard. Ray might offer options for password-based authentication or integration with existing identity providers.
    • Restrict Network Access: Use firewalls or network policies to limit access to the Ray Dashboard to authorized users and networks only. Avoid exposing it to the public internet.
    • Regularly Update Dashboard: Keep the Ray installation and dashboard components updated to patch known web application vulnerabilities (XSS, CSRF, etc.).

Attack Surface: Insecure Inter-Node Communication

  • Description: Unencrypted or otherwise insecure communication between Ray nodes (head node, worker nodes, object stores), allowing eavesdropping or manipulation of data and commands.
  • Ray Contribution: Inter-node communication within a Ray cluster might not be encrypted by default, especially in older versions or default configurations.
  • Example: An attacker on the same network as the Ray cluster intercepts unencrypted communication between worker nodes and the object store, potentially gaining access to sensitive data being transferred or modifying commands.
  • Impact: High. Data breaches through eavesdropping, command injection by manipulating inter-node communication, cluster disruption.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Enable Encryption (TLS/SSL): Configure Ray to use TLS/SSL encryption for all inter-node communication. Consult Ray documentation for specific configuration options related to network security and encryption.
    • Secure Network Infrastructure: Deploy Ray clusters in secure network environments, ideally isolated from untrusted networks. Use network segmentation and access control lists to limit network exposure.

Attack Surface: Arbitrary Code Execution via Ray Tasks and Actors

  • Description: Exploiting Ray's distributed execution capabilities to inject and execute malicious code on worker nodes through tasks or actors.
  • Ray Contribution: Ray's core functionality is to execute user-provided code in a distributed manner. If input validation or security measures are lacking, this can be abused.
  • Example: An attacker crafts a malicious Ray task (e.g., through a vulnerable client application or by manipulating task definitions) that, when executed on a worker node, performs unauthorized actions like accessing sensitive files, installing malware, or compromising the node.
  • Impact: Critical. Arbitrary code execution on Ray worker nodes, full compromise of worker nodes, potential lateral movement within the infrastructure, data breaches.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Input Validation and Sanitization: Carefully validate and sanitize all inputs to Ray tasks and actors, especially if they originate from untrusted sources.
    • Code Review and Security Audits: Conduct thorough code reviews and security audits of Ray applications to identify and mitigate potential code injection vulnerabilities.
    • Sandboxing and Isolation (Limited): While Ray doesn't offer strong sandboxing by default, explore options for process isolation or containerization to limit the impact of compromised tasks.
    • Least Privilege Principle: Run Ray worker processes with the minimum necessary privileges to reduce the impact of successful exploits.
    • Secure Dependency Management: Ensure that all dependencies used by Ray applications are from trusted sources and are regularly updated to patch vulnerabilities.

Attack Surface: Dependency Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Exploiting known vulnerabilities in Ray's dependencies or in user-provided dependencies used by Ray applications.
  • Ray Contribution: Ray relies on various Python packages and system libraries. Applications built on Ray also introduce their own dependencies. Vulnerabilities in any of these can affect Ray deployments.
  • Example: A known vulnerability in a Python package used by Ray (or a user application) is exploited by an attacker to gain code execution on a Ray node.
  • Impact: High. Arbitrary code execution, data breaches, system compromise, depending on the vulnerability and the affected component.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regularly Update Dependencies: Keep Ray and all its dependencies, as well as application dependencies, updated to the latest versions to patch known vulnerabilities.
    • Dependency Scanning and Vulnerability Management: Use dependency scanning tools to identify known vulnerabilities in Ray and application dependencies. Implement a vulnerability management process to address identified issues promptly.
    • Secure Dependency Sources: Ensure that dependencies are sourced from trusted repositories and use dependency pinning to ensure consistent and controlled dependency versions.