Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
137 lines (118 loc) · 16.7 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

137 lines (118 loc) · 16.7 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for saltstack/salt

Mitigation Strategy: Enforce SSL/TLS for ZeroMQ Communication

1. Enforce SSL/TLS for ZeroMQ Communication

  • Mitigation Strategy: Enforce SSL/TLS for ZeroMQ Communication
  • Description:
    1. Edit Salt Master Configuration: Open the Salt Master configuration file, typically located at /etc/salt/master.
    2. Enable SSL: Find the ssl: setting and set it to True. If the setting doesn't exist, add ssl: True to the configuration file.
    3. Restart Salt Master: Restart the Salt Master service for the changes to take effect.
    4. Edit Salt Minion Configuration: Open the Salt Minion configuration file, typically located at /etc/salt/minion.
    5. Enable SSL: Find the ssl: setting and set it to True. If the setting doesn't exist, add ssl: True to the configuration file.
    6. Restart Salt Minion: Restart the Salt Minion service for the changes to take effect.
    7. Verify Connection: After restarting, monitor Salt Master and Minion logs for any errors related to SSL/TLS. Verify that Minions are still connecting to the Master.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks (High Severity): Prevents attackers from intercepting and reading sensitive data transmitted between the Salt Master and Minions, such as commands, configuration, and secrets, which are core SaltStack operations.
    • Data Eavesdropping (High Severity): Protects confidential information exchanged within the SaltStack infrastructure from being passively monitored during transmission.
  • Impact: High Reduction for both MITM Attacks and Data Eavesdropping. Encrypting the communication channel within SaltStack significantly hardens the security of Salt operations.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. SSL is enabled for ZeroMQ communication between Salt Master and Minions in the staging environment.
  • Missing Implementation: Missing in the production environment. SSL needs to be enabled in the production Salt Master and Minion configurations and verified to secure production SaltStack communication.

Mitigation Strategy: Utilize PAM Authentication for Salt Master

2. Utilize PAM Authentication for Salt Master

  • Mitigation Strategy: Utilize PAM Authentication for Salt Master
  • Description:
    1. Edit Salt Master Configuration: Open the Salt Master configuration file, typically located at /etc/salt/master.
    2. Enable External Authentication: Locate the external_auth: section. If it doesn't exist, add it.
    3. Configure PAM: Within the external_auth: section, add a pam: subsection. Under pam:, define user groups and their associated Salt permissions. For example: 
      external_auth:
  pam:
    'saltdevs':
      - '*'
      This configures Salt to use PAM for authentication, allowing integration with system-level authentication. Adjust group names and Salt permissions as needed based on your SaltStack user roles.
    4. Restart Salt Master: Restart the Salt Master service for the changes to take effect.
    5. Test Authentication: Attempt to authenticate to the Salt Master using a user account that is part of the configured PAM group. Verify successful authentication through SaltStack.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Weak Password Attacks on Salt Master Authentication (Medium Severity): Leverages system-level password policies enforced by PAM for Salt Master authentication, potentially including stronger password requirements and account lockout policies for Salt access.
    • Unauthorized Access to Salt Master (Medium Severity): Integrates Salt Master authentication with existing system user management, making it harder for unauthorized users to gain access to Salt Master functionalities if system accounts are well-managed.
  • Impact: Medium Reduction for Weak Password Attacks and Unauthorized Access to Salt Master. PAM integration strengthens Salt Master authentication by leveraging existing system security mechanisms.
  • Currently Implemented: Not Implemented. Salt Master is currently using the default Salt authentication mechanism.
  • Missing Implementation: PAM authentication needs to be configured in the Salt Master configuration file and tested in both staging and production environments to enhance Salt Master access security. PAM groups and corresponding Salt permissions need to be defined based on SaltStack user roles.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) using Salt ACLs

3. Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) using Salt ACLs

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) using Salt ACLs
  • Description:
    1. Define Salt User Roles: Identify different user roles within the SaltStack environment (e.g., Salt administrators, Salt developers, Salt operators).
    2. Define Salt Permissions per Role: Determine the necessary Salt functions, targets, and environments each role needs access to within SaltStack.
    3. Configure ACLs in Salt Master: Edit the Salt Master configuration file (/etc/salt/master).
    4. Define ACL Rules: Within the configuration, use the acl: section to define rules that map user groups (or usernames) to specific Salt permissions. For example: 
      acl:
  group_saltadmins:
    - '*'
  group_developers:
    - test.*
    - state.:
      - tgt: 'os:CentOS'
      - fun:
        - apply
        - highstate
      This example configures Salt ACLs to grant different levels of access to different user groups within SaltStack.
    5. Apply ACLs to Salt Authentication: Ensure that the authentication mechanism (e.g., PAM, eauth) is configured to provide user group information that can be used by the Salt ACL system.
    6. Test Salt ACLs: Thoroughly test the configured Salt ACLs by logging in as users belonging to different roles and verifying that they only have access to the permitted Salt functions and targets.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Privilege Escalation within SaltStack (High Severity): Prevents users or services from gaining access to Salt functions or resources beyond their authorized scope within the SaltStack environment, limiting potential damage from compromised Salt accounts.
    • Accidental Misconfiguration via SaltStack (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of unintended changes within the managed infrastructure through SaltStack by limiting who can perform critical Salt operations.
    • Lateral Movement within SaltStack Managed Infrastructure (Medium Severity): If a Salt account is compromised, RBAC limits the attacker's ability to move laterally within the SaltStack environment and managed systems through Salt functionalities.
  • Impact: High Reduction for Privilege Escalation within SaltStack, Medium Reduction for Accidental Misconfiguration via SaltStack and Lateral Movement within SaltStack managed infrastructure. Granular access control within SaltStack significantly limits the impact of unauthorized actions performed through Salt.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Basic Salt ACLs are defined for administrative users, but not for all Salt user roles.
  • Missing Implementation: Need to fully define Salt user roles and corresponding Salt permissions. Salt ACL rules need to be expanded to cover all relevant Salt roles (developers, operators, etc.) and tested thoroughly in staging and production to fully implement SaltStack RBAC.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Sanitization and Validation in Salt States and Modules

4. Input Sanitization and Validation in Salt States and Modules

  • Mitigation Strategy: Input Sanitization and Validation in Salt States and Modules
  • Description:
    1. Identify Salt Input Points: Review all custom Salt states and modules to identify points where external data is used as input within SaltStack logic (e.g., grains, pillar data, external data sources, user-provided parameters passed to Salt states).
    2. Implement Salt Input Validation: For each Salt input point, implement validation logic within Salt states and modules to ensure the input data conforms to expected formats, types, and values within the Salt context. Use Jinja templating and Salt's built-in functions for validation within Salt states (e.g., type, regex_match, in).
    3. Implement Salt Input Sanitization: Sanitize input data within Salt states and modules to remove or escape potentially harmful characters or code before using it in Salt commands or configurations. Use Jinja filters like escape or custom Jinja filters within Salt states to sanitize data.
    4. Salt Error Handling: Implement proper error handling within Salt states and modules for invalid input. Fail gracefully within Salt states and log errors instead of proceeding with potentially unsafe Salt operations.
    5. Salt Code Reviews: Conduct code reviews of Salt states and modules to ensure input validation and sanitization are implemented correctly and consistently within the SaltStack codebase.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Command Injection via Salt States/Modules (High Severity): Prevents attackers from injecting malicious commands by manipulating input data that is used in shell commands or other system calls executed by Salt states or modules.
    • Code Injection within Salt States/Modules (High Severity): Prevents attackers from injecting malicious code into Salt states or modules by manipulating input data that is interpreted as code within the SaltStack context.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Salt API responses (Medium Severity - if Salt API is exposed): Sanitizing output data within Salt API responses can prevent XSS vulnerabilities if Salt API responses are directly rendered in web interfaces.
  • Impact: High Reduction for Command Injection and Code Injection via Salt, Medium Reduction for XSS in Salt API responses. Proper input handling within Salt states and modules is crucial to prevent injection vulnerabilities within the SaltStack managed environment.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Basic validation is present in some core Salt states, but custom Salt states and modules lack comprehensive input sanitization and validation.
  • Missing Implementation: Systematic review and update of all custom Salt states and modules to implement robust input validation and sanitization within the SaltStack codebase. Establish Salt coding guidelines and conduct regular Salt code reviews to enforce these practices.

Mitigation Strategy: Utilize Salt's Pillar System with Proper Permissions for Secrets Management

5. Utilize Salt's Pillar System with Proper Permissions for Secrets Management

  • Mitigation Strategy: Utilize Salt's Pillar System with Proper Permissions for Secrets Management
  • Description:
    1. Store Secrets in Salt Pillar Data: Move secrets from Salt states, configuration files managed by Salt, or hardcoded locations into Salt Pillar data.
    2. Structure Salt Pillar Data: Organize Salt pillar data logically, separating secrets from other configuration data within the Salt Pillar structure.
    3. Restrict Salt Pillar Access with ACLs: Use Salt ACLs to restrict access to pillar data containing secrets. Grant access only to authorized Salt users, services, or minions that require those secrets through SaltStack's ACL mechanism.
    4. Encrypt Salt Pillar Data in Transit (SSL/TLS): Ensure SSL/TLS is enabled for Master-Minion communication (as described in Mitigation Strategy 1) to encrypt pillar data during transmission within the SaltStack infrastructure.
    5. Consider Salt Pillar Data Encryption at Rest: Explore options to encrypt pillar data at rest on the Salt Master server for enhanced security of secrets stored within SaltStack. This might involve using encrypted filesystems or specialized Salt pillar backends.
    6. Regularly Review Salt Pillar Access: Periodically review and update Salt pillar ACLs to ensure access to secrets within SaltStack remains appropriately restricted.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Exposure of Secrets in Plain Text within SaltStack Configurations (High Severity): Prevents secrets from being stored in easily accessible locations within SaltStack configurations like state files or configuration files managed by Salt.
    • Unauthorized Access to Secrets Managed by SaltStack (High Severity): Salt ACLs on pillar data restrict access to secrets to only authorized entities within the SaltStack environment.
    • Data Breach of Secrets Managed by SaltStack (High Severity): Encrypting pillar data in transit and at rest (if implemented) reduces the risk of secrets being compromised in case of network interception or Salt Master server compromise.
  • Impact: High Reduction for Exposure of Secrets and Unauthorized Access to secrets managed by SaltStack, Medium Reduction for Data Breach of Secrets managed by SaltStack (if encryption at rest is implemented). Salt Pillar system with ACLs provides a more secure way to manage secrets within SaltStack compared to storing them directly in Salt states or files.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Salt Pillar system is used for some secrets, but not consistently across all Salt states and modules. Salt ACLs are not fully implemented for pillar data.
  • Missing Implementation: Migrate all secrets to the Salt pillar system. Implement granular Salt ACLs to restrict access to sensitive pillar data. Evaluate and implement Salt pillar data encryption at rest to enhance secrets management within SaltStack.

Mitigation Strategy: Restrict Access to Salt API via Salt Configuration

6. Restrict Access to Salt API via Salt Configuration

  • Mitigation Strategy: Restrict Access to Salt API via Salt Configuration
  • Description:
    1. Edit Salt Master Configuration: Open the Salt Master configuration file, typically located at /etc/salt/master.
    2. Configure interface setting: Locate the interface: setting. Set it to the specific IP address that the Salt API should listen on. Binding to 127.0.0.1 (localhost) restricts access to only the local machine. Binding to a specific internal network IP limits access to that network.
    3. Configure client_acl or external_auth for API Authentication and Authorization: Implement strong authentication and authorization mechanisms for the Salt API. Use client_acl for basic IP-based ACLs directly within Salt, or leverage external_auth to integrate with external authentication and authorization providers for more robust control over Salt API access.
    4. Restart Salt Master: Restart the Salt Master service for the changes to take effect.
    5. Test API Access Restrictions: Verify that access to the Salt API is restricted as configured by attempting to access it from different locations and with different credentials (if authentication is enabled).
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Access to Salt API (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized users or attackers from accessing the Salt API by limiting the network interface it listens on and enforcing authentication and authorization through SaltStack configurations.
    • Brute-Force Attacks on Salt API (Medium Severity): Reduces the attack surface for brute-force attacks by limiting network accessibility and requiring proper authentication for Salt API access.
  • Impact: High Reduction for Unauthorized Access to Salt API, Medium Reduction for Brute-Force Attacks on Salt API. Configuring Salt API access restrictions directly within SaltStack enhances the security of the Salt API endpoint.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. The Salt API is bound to a specific internal network interface in the staging environment.
  • Missing Implementation: Need to implement more granular access control using client_acl or external_auth for the Salt API in both staging and production environments. Review and harden the interface setting in production to ensure it aligns with intended API access patterns.