Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
105 lines (79 loc) · 8.78 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

105 lines (79 loc) · 8.78 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for textualize/rich

Objective: Compromise Application via Rich Vulnerabilities (Focus on High-Risk Vectors)

Attack Tree Visualization

**Compromise Application via Rich Vulnerabilities**
├───==>[1.0] Exploit Input Handling in Rich==>
│   └───**[1.1] Rich Markup Injection**
│       └───==>[1.1.2] Output Manipulation / Misleading Information==>
│           └───==>[1.1.2.a] Inject markup to alter displayed information (e.g., hide critical warnings, misrepresent data)==>
├───==>[2.0] Exploit Rich's Dependencies (Supply Chain Attack - Less Direct, but Relevant)==>
│   └───==>[2.1] Compromise a Rich Dependency==>
│       └───==>**[2.1.1] Exploit known vulnerabilities in Rich's dependencies**==>
│           └───==>**[2.1.1.a] Identify and exploit outdated or vulnerable versions of Rich's dependencies**==>
└───==>**[3.0] Exploit Misconfiguration or Misuse of Rich in the Application**==>
    └───==>**[3.1] Expose Rich output directly to untrusted users without sanitization**==>
        └───==>**[3.1.a] Application directly renders user-controlled input using Rich without proper escaping or validation**==>

Attack Tree Path: 1. ==>[1.0] Exploit Input Handling in Rich==>**

  • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities arising from how the application handles user-provided input when using the rich library. This is a broad category encompassing markup injection and data injection issues.
  • Risk Level: High
  • Mitigation Focus: Prioritize input sanitization and validation for all user-controlled data before using it with rich.

Attack Tree Path: 2. [1.1] Rich Markup Injection

  • Attack Vector: Injecting malicious rich markup into the application's input, which is then rendered by rich without proper sanitization. This can lead to various impacts, from Denial of Service to output manipulation.
  • Risk Level: High
  • Mitigation Focus: Implement strict input sanitization to remove or escape potentially harmful rich markup from user input.

Attack Tree Path: 3. ==>[1.1.2] Output Manipulation / Misleading Information==>**

  • Attack Vector: Specifically targeting the manipulation of displayed information by injecting rich markup. Attackers aim to alter the intended output to mislead users, hide critical information, or misrepresent data.
  • Risk Level: High
  • Mitigation Focus: Sanitize input to prevent markup injection that could alter the meaning or presentation of critical information. Context-aware output validation can also help detect manipulation.

Attack Tree Path: 4. ==>[1.1.2.a] Inject markup to alter displayed information (e.g., hide critical warnings, misrepresent data)==>**

  • Attack Vector: A specific instance of output manipulation where the attacker's goal is to directly change the displayed information, for example, by hiding warnings, altering numerical data, or changing status indicators.
  • Risk Level: High
  • Attack Details:
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: Moderate (Misinformation, User Error)
    • Effort: Low
    • Skill Level: Novice
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Output monitoring, context-aware checks)
  • Mitigation Focus: Robust input sanitization, and potentially output validation to ensure critical information is displayed as intended and not altered by injected markup.

Attack Tree Path: 5. ==>[2.0] Exploit Rich's Dependencies (Supply Chain Attack - Less Direct, but Relevant)==>**

  • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in the dependencies used by the rich library. This is a supply chain attack vector, where the application is indirectly compromised through a vulnerability in a third-party library.
  • Risk Level: Medium to High (Impact can be very high)
  • Mitigation Focus: Rigorous dependency management, including regular updates, vulnerability scanning, and potentially supply chain security measures.

Attack Tree Path: 6. ==>[2.1] Compromise a Rich Dependency==>**

  • Attack Vector: Specifically targeting the compromise of a dependency of rich. This could be through exploiting known vulnerabilities or, in more sophisticated attacks, through supply chain poisoning.
  • Risk Level: Medium to High (Impact can be very high)
  • Mitigation Focus: Proactive dependency management, vulnerability monitoring, and considering measures to verify the integrity of dependencies.

Attack Tree Path: 7. ==>[2.1.1] Exploit known vulnerabilities in Rich's dependencies==>**

  • Attack Vector: Exploiting publicly known vulnerabilities in rich's dependencies, such as pygments or commonmark.py. This is often achieved by targeting applications that use outdated versions of these dependencies.
  • Risk Level: High (if dependencies are not updated)
  • Mitigation Focus: Maintain up-to-date dependencies. Implement automated dependency scanning and update processes.

Attack Tree Path: 8. ==>[2.1.1.a] Identify and exploit outdated or vulnerable versions of Rich's dependencies==>**

  • Attack Vector: The specific action of identifying and exploiting outdated and vulnerable versions of rich's dependencies. This is a common and relatively easy attack if dependency management is neglected.
  • Risk Level: High (if dependencies are not updated)
  • Attack Details:
    • Likelihood: Medium (Outdated dependencies are common)
    • Impact: Moderate to Critical (Depends on vulnerability, RCE possible)
    • Effort: Low (Public exploits may exist)
    • Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate (Depending on exploit complexity)
    • Detection Difficulty: Easy (Vulnerability scanners)
  • Mitigation Focus: Regularly update dependencies, use vulnerability scanners, and implement a robust patch management process.

Attack Tree Path: 9. ==>[3.0] Exploit Misconfiguration or Misuse of Rich in the Application==>**

  • Attack Vector: Vulnerabilities arising from incorrect configuration or improper usage of the rich library within the application's code. This often involves developers unintentionally creating security gaps through misuse.
  • Risk Level: High
  • Mitigation Focus: Developer education on secure rich usage, code reviews to identify misconfigurations, and clear security guidelines for using rich.

Attack Tree Path: 10. ==>[3.1] Expose Rich output directly to untrusted users without sanitization==>**

  • Attack Vector: Directly rendering user-controlled input using rich without any sanitization or escaping. This is a common and easily exploitable mistake that leads to markup injection vulnerabilities.
  • Risk Level: Very High
  • Mitigation Focus: Absolutely avoid directly rendering unsanitized user input with rich. Implement mandatory input sanitization for all user-provided content.

Attack Tree Path: 11. ==>[3.1.a] Application directly renders user-controlled input using Rich without proper escaping or validation==>**

  • Attack Vector: The most specific and critical action: the application code directly takes user input and passes it to rich for rendering without any form of security processing.
  • Risk Level: Very High
  • Attack Details:
    • Likelihood: High (Common developer mistake)
    • Impact: Moderate to Significant (Markup injection vulnerabilities)
    • Effort: Minimal (No special effort needed by attacker)
    • Skill Level: Novice
    • Detection Difficulty: Easy (Code review, security testing)
  • Mitigation Focus: Mandatory input sanitization. Code reviews specifically targeting rich usage and input handling. Automated security testing for markup injection vulnerabilities.