Mitigation Strategy: Sanitize User-Controlled Input Rendered by Rich
-
Mitigation Strategy: Sanitize User-Controlled Input Rendered by Rich
-
Description:
- Identify Rich Input Points: Locate all places in your application code where user-provided data is directly passed to
rich
rendering functions such asconsole.print()
,console.log()
, or when rendering Markdown content usingrich
. - Choose Sanitization Method for Rich: Select a sanitization technique specifically aimed at mitigating risks within
rich
's rendering context. This primarily involves handling ANSI escape codes and potentially other formatting characters thatrich
interprets. Options include:- ANSI Escape Code Stripping: Use regular expressions (e.g., Python's
re
module) to remove ANSI escape codes from user input before passing it torich
. This prevents users from manipulating terminal output formatting throughrich
. - Character Whitelisting/Blacklisting (for Rich Context): If finer control is needed, implement whitelisting or blacklisting of specific characters relevant to
rich
's formatting, beyond just ANSI codes.
- ANSI Escape Code Stripping: Use regular expressions (e.g., Python's
- Implement Rich Sanitization Function: Create a dedicated function that takes user input as a string and applies the chosen sanitization method specifically for use with
rich
. This function should be called before any user input is rendered byrich
. - Apply Rich Sanitization Before Rendering: In your code, ensure that the rich sanitization function is consistently applied to user input immediately before it is passed to any
rich
rendering function. - Testing with Rich Rendering: Thoroughly test the sanitization function in conjunction with
rich
rendering. Verify that malicious ANSI escape codes and other potentially harmful formatting attempts are effectively neutralized when displayed usingrich
.
- Identify Rich Input Points: Locate all places in your application code where user-provided data is directly passed to
-
Threats Mitigated:
- ANSI Escape Code Injection via Rich (High Severity): Malicious users inject ANSI escape codes that are interpreted by
rich
to manipulate terminal output. This can lead to denial-of-service (resource exhaustion during rendering), misleading displays generated byrich
, or potentially exploiting vulnerabilities ifrich
or the terminal emulator has parsing flaws. - Resource Exhaustion via Long Strings in Rich Rendering (Medium Severity): Extremely long strings, when processed by
rich
for rendering, can consume excessive resources, leading to slowdowns or denial-of-service specifically duringrich
's rendering process. - Cosmetic Output Manipulation via Rich (Low Severity): Users inject formatting codes that
rich
interprets to alter the intended appearance of output displayed byrich
, causing confusion or misrepresentation within therich
output.
- ANSI Escape Code Injection via Rich (High Severity): Malicious users inject ANSI escape codes that are interpreted by
-
Impact:
- ANSI Escape Code Injection via Rich: Significantly reduces risk. Effective sanitization tailored for
rich
eliminates the ability to inject malicious formatting codes thatrich
would interpret. - Resource Exhaustion via Long Strings in Rich Rendering: Reduces risk if combined with input length limits applied before passing to
rich
. Sanitization alone might not prevent resource exhaustion ifrich
still processes very long, but safe, strings. - Cosmetic Output Manipulation via Rich: Eliminates or greatly reduces the ability to manipulate output appearance specifically through formatting codes that
rich
would render.
- ANSI Escape Code Injection via Rich: Significantly reduces risk. Effective sanitization tailored for
-
Currently Implemented:
- Location: Basic string escaping is implemented in the application's logging module before logging, which might indirectly sanitize some input that could be rendered by
rich
if logs are displayed in the terminal. However, this is not specifically designed forrich
's rendering context.
- Location: Basic string escaping is implemented in the application's logging module before logging, which might indirectly sanitize some input that could be rendered by
-
Missing Implementation:
- Areas: Dedicated sanitization specifically for
rich
rendering is missing. User input displayed directly in the terminal interface usingrich
during interactive sessions is not sanitized withrich
in mind. Markdown rendering of user-provided descriptions in help messages, when usingrich
for display, also lacks sanitization tailored forrich
.
- Areas: Dedicated sanitization specifically for
Mitigation Strategy: Control Rich Features Used with User Input
-
Mitigation Strategy: Control Rich Features Used with User Input
-
Description:
- Review Rich Feature Usage with User Data: Identify all instances in your application where
rich
features like rendering file links, clickable URLs, or Markdown are used to display user-controlled data. - Assess Rich Feature Necessity for User Input: Determine if these specific
rich
features are genuinely necessary and beneficial when displaying user-provided content. If they are not essential for the user experience in these contexts, consider disabling them for user-provided content rendered byrich
. - Implement Rich Feature Restriction: If certain
rich
features are deemed necessary for user input display, implement controls within yourrich
usage to restrict their potential misuse:- Disable Unnecessary Rich Features: Configure
rich
's rendering context to explicitly disable features like file links or clickable URLs when rendering user input if they are not required. Consultrich
's documentation for options to control feature rendering. - Parameter Validation for Rich Features: If specific
rich
features are used with user input, validate and sanitize the parameters passed to thoserich
features. For example, if usingrich
to render file links based on user input:- File Links in Rich: Validate that file paths provided by users, when used in
rich
's file link rendering, are within expected directories and do not allow access to sensitive system files. Implement path canonicalization before passing paths torich
's file link rendering. - URLs in Rich: If
rich
is used to render URLs from user input as clickable links, validate URL schemes (allow onlyhttp
andhttps
) beforerich
renders them. Potentially use a URL safelist to restrict allowed domains thatrich
will render as clickable links.
- File Links in Rich: Validate that file paths provided by users, when used in
- Disable Unnecessary Rich Features: Configure
- Safe Markdown Rendering with Rich (if applicable): If you render user-provided content as Markdown using
rich
, and this is a necessary feature, investigate ifrich
offers any "safe mode" or options to limit potentially risky Markdown features during rendering. If not, consider using a separate Markdown sanitization library before passing the sanitized Markdown torich
for rendering.
- Review Rich Feature Usage with User Data: Identify all instances in your application where
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Malicious File Link Injection via Rich (Medium Severity): Users could inject file links that
rich
renders, potentially pointing to sensitive local files. Whilerich
itself doesn't execute these links, if the application or users interact with these rendered links in an unsafe way, it could lead to information disclosure (threat is indirect viarich
's rendering). - Malicious URL Injection via Rich (Medium Severity): Users could inject malicious URLs that
rich
renders as clickable links. If users click these links, it could lead to phishing attacks or redirection to harmful websites (threat is indirect, via user interaction withrich
's output). - Markdown Injection via Rich (Low to Medium Severity): While
rich
's Markdown rendering is generally considered safer than browser-based rendering, malicious Markdown input, when rendered byrich
, could still be used for cosmetic manipulation of the terminal output or, in less likely scenarios, to exploit potential parsing vulnerabilities withinrich
's Markdown rendering engine.
- Malicious File Link Injection via Rich (Medium Severity): Users could inject file links that
-
Impact:
- Malicious File Link Injection via Rich: Significantly reduces risk by preventing or validating file links rendered by
rich
, limiting potential for indirect information disclosure. - Malicious URL Injection via Rich: Reduces risk of phishing and malicious redirection by validating URL schemes and potentially using URL safelists before
rich
renders URLs as clickable links. - Markdown Injection via Rich: Reduces risk of cosmetic manipulation and potential parser vulnerabilities in
rich
's Markdown rendering by disabling or sanitizing Markdown features before rendering withrich
.
- Malicious File Link Injection via Rich: Significantly reduces risk by preventing or validating file links rendered by
-
Currently Implemented:
- Location: Clickable URLs are generally disabled in application logs displayed in the terminal, which are often rendered using
rich
.
- Location: Clickable URLs are generally disabled in application logs displayed in the terminal, which are often rendered using
-
Missing Implementation:
- Areas: File links are currently rendered by
rich
without validation in certain debug output sections. Markdown rendering in help messages, when displayed usingrich
, does not have specific feature restrictions or sanitization beyond general input sanitization, and no specific controls onrich
's Markdown rendering features are in place.
- Areas: File links are currently rendered by