Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
42 lines (35 loc) · 5.6 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

42 lines (35 loc) · 5.6 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for ultralytics/yolov5

Attack Surface: 1. Malicious Image/Video Input

  • Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities in underlying image/video processing libraries (used by YOLOv5) through crafted input files, leading to crashes or code execution.
  • YOLOv5 Contribution: YOLOv5 relies on libraries like OpenCV and PIL to decode and process image and video data before object detection. Vulnerabilities in these libraries are directly exposed through YOLOv5's input processing pipeline.
  • Example: An attacker uploads a specially crafted TIFF image to an application using YOLOv5. This image exploits a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the TIFF decoding function of OpenCV, triggered during YOLOv5's preprocessing, leading to potential remote code execution on the server.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), Denial of Service (DoS), Application Crash, Potential Data Breach.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Input Validation: Validate file types and sizes rigorously before passing them to YOLOv5. Only accept expected image/video formats.
    • Secure Image Processing Libraries: Consider using hardened or sandboxed image processing libraries if possible.
    • Dependency Updates (Crucial): Immediately update OpenCV, PIL, and other image/video processing dependencies to the latest versions to patch known vulnerabilities. Regularly monitor security advisories for these libraries.
    • Resource Limits: Implement resource limits (memory, CPU time) for the image/video processing stage to mitigate DoS attempts.

Attack Surface: 2. Malicious Model Injection/Substitution

  • Description: Replacing legitimate YOLOv5 model files with malicious ones to compromise the application's functionality or security.
  • YOLOv5 Contribution: YOLOv5 loads model weights from files (typically .pt files). If the application allows loading models from untrusted sources or lacks integrity checks, malicious models can be injected.
  • Example: An attacker with access to the server's filesystem replaces the legitimate yolov5s.pt model file with a modified version. This malicious model is designed to subtly alter detection results, causing the application to misclassify objects or leak sensitive information based on manipulated detections. In a more extreme scenario, a vulnerability in the model loading process itself (within PyTorch or related libraries used by YOLOv5) could be exploited by a crafted model file to achieve code execution.
  • Impact: Data Manipulation, Information Leakage, Denial of Service, Potential System Compromise (through model loading vulnerabilities).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Model Storage and Access Control: Store YOLOv5 model files in secure, protected directories with restricted access permissions.
    • Model Integrity Verification: Implement cryptographic integrity checks (e.g., using hashes or digital signatures) to verify the authenticity and integrity of loaded model files before YOLOv5 uses them.
    • Trusted Model Sources Only: Load YOLOv5 models only from trusted and verified sources. Avoid allowing users or external systems to specify arbitrary model paths.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Run the application with the minimum necessary privileges to limit the impact if a malicious model is somehow loaded.

Attack Surface: 3. Denial of Service (DoS) via Resource Exhaustion during YOLOv5 Processing

  • Description: Overloading the application by sending inputs that are excessively computationally expensive for YOLOv5 to process, leading to resource exhaustion and service disruption.
  • YOLOv5 Contribution: YOLOv5 object detection, especially with high-resolution inputs, complex models, or specific configurations, can be resource-intensive (CPU, GPU, memory). Attackers can exploit this by sending inputs designed to maximize resource consumption.
  • Example: An attacker floods the application with requests to process extremely high-resolution 4K videos using a large YOLOv5 model. This rapidly exhausts the server's GPU and CPU resources, causing legitimate requests to be delayed or denied, effectively creating a Denial of Service.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), Application Unavailability, Performance Degradation.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Input Size and Complexity Limits: Enforce strict limits on input image/video resolution, duration, and file size. Reject requests exceeding these limits.
    • Rate Limiting and Throttling: Implement rate limiting on API endpoints or input processing mechanisms to restrict the number of requests from a single source within a given timeframe.
    • Resource Monitoring and Auto-Scaling: Continuously monitor server resource utilization (CPU, GPU, memory) and implement auto-scaling to dynamically adjust resources based on demand.
    • Asynchronous Processing and Queues: Use asynchronous task queues to handle YOLOv5 processing in the background, preventing blocking of the main application thread and improving responsiveness under load.
    • Optimize YOLOv5 Configuration: Carefully choose YOLOv5 model size and inference parameters (e.g., image size, confidence threshold, NMS threshold) to balance accuracy and performance, avoiding unnecessary resource consumption.