Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
174 lines (120 loc) · 17.8 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

174 lines (120 loc) · 17.8 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for ultralytics/yolov5

Objective: Compromise Application Using YOLOv5

Attack Tree Visualization

Root: Compromise YOLOv5 Application [CRITICAL NODE]
    + Exploit Vulnerabilities in YOLOv5 Dependencies [CRITICAL NODE]
        - Exploit Vulnerabilities in PyTorch [CRITICAL NODE]
            * Exploit known CVEs in PyTorch framework [HIGH-RISK PATH]
            * Trigger vulnerabilities through crafted input data that PyTorch processes (images, model files) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        - Exploit Vulnerabilities in OpenCV (if used for image processing) [CRITICAL NODE]
            * Exploit known CVEs in OpenCV library [HIGH-RISK PATH]
            * Trigger vulnerabilities through crafted input images processed by OpenCV before YOLOv5 [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        - Exploit Vulnerabilities in other YOLOv5 Requirements (e.g., CUDA, cuDNN, Python libraries)
            * Target specific versions with known vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH if outdated dependencies are used]
    + Malicious Input to YOLOv5 Model [CRITICAL NODE]
        - Input Crafting for Denial of Service (DoS) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
            * Send excessively large or complex images/videos [HIGH-RISK PATH]
            * Send malformed images/videos [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    + Model Manipulation/Poisoning
        - Model Replacement (If application allows model updates from untrusted sources) [CRITICAL NODE]
            * Replace legitimate YOLOv5 model with a backdoored or manipulated model [HIGH-RISK PATH if update mechanism is insecure]
    + Exploiting Weaknesses in Application Logic Around YOLOv5 [CRITICAL NODE]
        - Vulnerabilities in Input Handling before YOLOv5 [HIGH-RISK PATH]
            * Bypass input validation checks (e.g., file type, size limits) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
            * Inject malicious payloads through image metadata (EXIF, etc.) that are processed by the application [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        - Resource Exhaustion through Repeated YOLOv5 Calls [HIGH-RISK PATH]
            * Flood the application with requests to process images/videos [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    + Supply Chain Attacks [CRITICAL NODE]
        - Compromise of YOLOv5 Repository or Dependencies [CRITICAL NODE]
            * Inject malicious code into the official YOLOv5 repository or its dependencies (PyTorch, OpenCV, etc.) [CRITICAL NODE]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Root: Compromise YOLOv5 Application [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: This is the ultimate goal of the attacker and the entry point for all potential attack paths. Compromising the application means achieving unauthorized access, disrupting service, or manipulating application functionality.
  • Why Critical: Represents the overall security objective and encompasses all vulnerabilities within the application and its dependencies.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Vulnerabilities in YOLOv5 Dependencies [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Targeting vulnerabilities within the libraries that YOLOv5 relies upon (PyTorch, OpenCV, etc.). These dependencies are often complex and may contain known or zero-day vulnerabilities.
  • Why Critical: Dependencies are a common attack surface in modern applications. Exploiting vulnerabilities here can lead to severe consequences like Remote Code Execution (RCE).

Attack Tree Path: 2.1. Exploit Vulnerabilities in PyTorch [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Focusing specifically on vulnerabilities within the PyTorch framework, which is core to YOLOv5's operation.
  • Why Critical: PyTorch is a large and complex framework. Vulnerabilities here can have a direct and significant impact on YOLOv5 applications.

Attack Tree Path: 2.1.1. Exploit known CVEs in PyTorch framework [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Utilizing publicly known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) in PyTorch. Attackers can search vulnerability databases for known weaknesses in specific PyTorch versions used by the application.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), allowing the attacker to gain control of the server or application. Data breaches, service disruption.
  • Mitigation: Regularly update PyTorch to the latest stable versions, implement vulnerability scanning, and patch known CVEs promptly.

Attack Tree Path: 2.1.2. Trigger vulnerabilities through crafted input data that PyTorch processes (images, model files) [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Crafting malicious input data (images, potentially manipulated model files if the application handles them) that exploits parsing or processing vulnerabilities within PyTorch itself. This could be memory corruption bugs, buffer overflows, etc.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), Denial of Service (DoS), application crashes.
  • Mitigation: Robust input validation and sanitization, using secure coding practices, and keeping PyTorch updated.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2. Exploit Vulnerabilities in OpenCV (if used for image processing) [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Targeting vulnerabilities in OpenCV, a common library for image processing that might be used in conjunction with YOLOv5 for pre-processing or post-processing images.
  • Why Critical: OpenCV, like PyTorch, is a complex library and can have vulnerabilities, especially in image parsing and processing routines.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2.1. Exploit known CVEs in OpenCV library [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Exploiting publicly known CVEs in OpenCV. Similar to PyTorch CVE exploitation, attackers look for known weaknesses in the OpenCV version used.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), Denial of Service (DoS), application crashes.
  • Mitigation: Regularly update OpenCV, implement vulnerability scanning, and patch known CVEs.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2.2. Trigger vulnerabilities through crafted input images processed by OpenCV before YOLOv5 [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Crafting malicious images designed to trigger vulnerabilities in OpenCV's image processing functions before the image is passed to YOLOv5. This could exploit image format parsing bugs, buffer overflows, etc.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), Denial of Service (DoS), application crashes.
  • Mitigation: Robust input validation and sanitization of images before OpenCV processing, using secure coding practices, and keeping OpenCV updated.

Attack Tree Path: 2.3. Exploit Vulnerabilities in other YOLOv5 Requirements (e.g., CUDA, cuDNN, Python libraries)

  • 2.3.1. Target specific versions with known vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH if outdated dependencies are used] * Attack Vector: If the application uses outdated versions of other dependencies (CUDA, cuDNN, Python libraries), attackers can target known vulnerabilities in those specific versions. * Impact: System instability, privilege escalation, potential Remote Code Execution depending on the vulnerability. * Mitigation: Maintain an inventory of all dependencies, regularly update them, and use dependency scanning tools to identify outdated and vulnerable components.

Attack Tree Path: 2.3.1. Target specific versions with known vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH if outdated dependencies are used]

  • Attack Vector: If the application uses outdated versions of other dependencies (CUDA, cuDNN, Python libraries), attackers can target known vulnerabilities in those specific versions.
  • Impact: System instability, privilege escalation, potential Remote Code Execution depending on the vulnerability.
  • Mitigation: Maintain an inventory of all dependencies, regularly update them, and use dependency scanning tools to identify outdated and vulnerable components.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Malicious Input to YOLOv5 Model [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Directly feeding malicious input (images or videos) to the YOLOv5 model to cause unintended behavior, specifically focusing on Denial of Service attacks in this high-risk path section.
  • Why Critical: YOLOv5 processes user-supplied data, making input a direct attack vector.

Attack Tree Path: 3.1. Input Crafting for Denial of Service (DoS) [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: Overloading the application or YOLOv5 processing with resource-intensive or malformed input.
  • Why High-Risk: DoS attacks are relatively easy to execute and can quickly disrupt service availability.

Attack Tree Path: 3.1.1. Send excessively large or complex images/videos [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Sending extremely large images or videos, or images/videos with very high complexity (e.g., very high resolution, extremely detailed scenes). This can overwhelm server resources (CPU, memory, GPU) during YOLOv5 processing.
  • Impact: Service disruption, application slowdown, resource exhaustion, potential server crash.
  • Mitigation: Implement input size limits, resource limits for YOLOv5 processing, rate limiting on image/video processing requests.

Attack Tree Path: 3.1.2. Send malformed images/videos [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Sending intentionally malformed or corrupted images/videos designed to trigger parsing errors, exceptions, or crashes in image processing libraries or within YOLOv5 itself.
  • Impact: Application crashes, instability, service disruption.
  • Mitigation: Robust input validation and sanitization, using libraries to validate image formats, error handling in image processing and YOLOv5 integration.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Model Replacement (If application allows model updates from untrusted sources) [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: If the application has a mechanism to update the YOLOv5 model, and this mechanism is not secure, attackers can replace the legitimate model with a malicious one.
  • Why Critical: Replacing the model gives the attacker significant control over the object detection functionality and potentially the application itself.

Attack Tree Path: 4.1. Replace legitimate YOLOv5 model with a backdoored or manipulated model [HIGH-RISK PATH if update mechanism is insecure]

  • Attack Vector: Exploiting an insecure model update mechanism to upload and deploy a malicious YOLOv5 model. This malicious model could be backdoored to misclassify objects, fail to detect specific objects, or even contain code to exfiltrate data or execute commands.
  • Impact: Complete compromise of object detection functionality, potential for data exfiltration, further attacks, manipulation of application behavior based on detection results.
  • Mitigation: Secure model update mechanism with authentication and authorization, model integrity verification (e.g., cryptographic signatures), restrict model updates to authorized personnel and secure channels.

Attack Tree Path: 5. Exploiting Weaknesses in Application Logic Around YOLOv5 [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Targeting vulnerabilities in the application code that handles input to and output from YOLOv5, or the overall application logic surrounding its use.
  • Why Critical: Application-specific vulnerabilities are often unique and can be easily overlooked during general security assessments.

Attack Tree Path: 5.1. Vulnerabilities in Input Handling before YOLOv5 [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: Exploiting weaknesses in how the application processes user input before it is passed to YOLOv5. This includes bypassing input validation or exploiting vulnerabilities in metadata processing.
  • Why High-Risk: Input handling is a common source of web application vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Path: 5.1.1. Bypass input validation checks (e.g., file type, size limits) [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Finding ways to circumvent input validation checks implemented by the application (e.g., file type restrictions, size limits). This could allow attackers to upload malicious files or oversized inputs that would normally be blocked.
  • Impact: Bypassing security measures, potential for uploading malicious payloads, DoS attacks, exploitation of other vulnerabilities.
  • Mitigation: Robust and comprehensive input validation, server-side validation, secure coding practices, regular security testing.

Attack Tree Path: 5.1.2. Inject malicious payloads through image metadata (EXIF, etc.) that are processed by the application [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Injecting malicious code or payloads into image metadata (EXIF, IPTC, XMP) and exploiting vulnerabilities in how the application processes or displays this metadata. This could lead to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), or other vulnerabilities if the application doesn't properly sanitize metadata.
  • Impact: XSS attacks, SSRF attacks, information disclosure, potential for further exploitation depending on metadata processing logic.
  • Mitigation: Sanitize or strip image metadata before processing or displaying it, use secure libraries for metadata handling, implement Content Security Policy (CSP) to mitigate XSS risks.

Attack Tree Path: 5.2. Resource Exhaustion through Repeated YOLOv5 Calls [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: Overloading the application by sending a large number of requests to process images/videos, specifically targeting the YOLOv5 processing component.
  • Why High-Risk: Relatively easy to execute and can quickly lead to service disruption.

Attack Tree Path: 5.2.1. Flood the application with requests to process images/videos [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Sending a flood of requests to the application's image/video processing endpoint, causing the server to become overloaded by repeatedly invoking YOLOv5 processing.
  • Impact: Service disruption, application slowdown, resource exhaustion, Denial of Service (DoS).
  • Mitigation: Rate limiting on image/video processing requests, implementing queuing mechanisms, resource management, and monitoring for unusual traffic patterns.

Attack Tree Path: 6. Supply Chain Attacks [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Targeting the broader supply chain of YOLOv5, including the official repository or its dependencies.
  • Why Critical: Successful supply chain attacks can have a widespread and severe impact, affecting many applications that rely on the compromised component.

Attack Tree Path: 6.1. Compromise of YOLOv5 Repository or Dependencies [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Attackers attempt to inject malicious code directly into the official YOLOv5 repository on GitHub or into its upstream dependencies (PyTorch, OpenCV, etc.).
  • Why Critical: If successful, this can compromise a large number of applications using YOLOv5 or the affected dependencies.

Attack Tree Path: 6.1.1. Inject malicious code into the official YOLOv5 repository or its dependencies (PyTorch, OpenCV, etc.) [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector: Gaining unauthorized access to the official repositories or maintainer accounts and injecting malicious code. This is a highly sophisticated attack requiring significant resources and expertise.
  • Impact: Widespread compromise of applications using affected versions of YOLOv5 or dependencies, potential for data breaches, supply chain disruption, reputational damage.
  • Mitigation: Robust security practices for maintaining open-source repositories, code signing, security audits, and community monitoring. For application developers, using trusted sources, verifying checksums/signatures of downloaded packages, and staying informed about security advisories.