Here are the combined vulnerabilities in a markdown format, with duplicates removed and information merged to provide a comprehensive description for each vulnerability:
This document outlines the identified vulnerabilities, detailing their descriptions, impacts, ranks, mitigations, preconditions, source code analysis, and security test cases.
This vulnerability exposes an unprotected user registration endpoint, allowing unauthorized users to create accounts.
-
Vulnerability Name: Unprotected User Registration Endpoint
-
Description:
- The
UserViewSet
inbackend/users/views.py
is configured as aModelViewSet
and exposed via an API endpoint.ModelViewSet
automatically includes acreate
action, which, if not explicitly restricted, can allow unauthenticated user registration, even when default permissions are set toIsAuthenticated
. An external attacker can send a POST request to the/api/users/
endpoint with user registration data. If public user registration is not intended, this endpoint allows anyone to create new user accounts without authentication.
- The
-
Impact:
- Unauthorized user account creation allows malicious actors to create numerous accounts, potentially leading to resource exhaustion on the server, spam or abuse of application functionalities, and potential for further attacks using created accounts.
-
Vulnerability Rank: High
-
Currently implemented mitigations:
- Default
REST_FRAMEWORK
permissions are set toIsAuthenticated
inbackend/project_name/settings/base.py
. - Django Defender is included for brute-force login protection, but it does not protect the registration endpoint.
- Default
-
Missing mitigations:
- Explicitly control permissions for the
create
action inUserViewSet
to prevent unauthorized user registration. This can be achieved by setting permissions to explicitly deny unauthenticated access to thecreate
action or by removing thecreate
action if public user registration is not intended.
- Explicitly control permissions for the
-
Preconditions:
- A publicly accessible instance of the Django React Boilerplate application is required to exploit this vulnerability.
-
Source code analysis:
backend/users/views.py
:from rest_framework import viewsets from .models import User from .serializers import UserSerializer class UserViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet): queryset = User.objects.all() serializer_class = UserSerializer
UserViewSet
inherits fromModelViewSet
, which includes default CRUD actions, includingcreate
.
backend/users/routes.py
:from .views import UserViewSet routes = [ {"regex": r"users", "viewset": UserViewSet, "basename": "user"}, ]
- Registers
UserViewSet
to be accessible under/api/users/
endpoint.
- Registers
backend/project_name/urls.py
:from rest_framework.routers import DefaultRouter # ... router = DefaultRouter() routes = common_routes + users_routes # users_routes includes users endpoint for route in routes: router.register(route["regex"], route["viewset"], basename=route["basename"]) urlpatterns = [ path("api/", include(router.urls), name="api"), # API endpoints are under /api/ # ... ]
- Registers API routes using
DefaultRouter
, makingUserViewSet
accessible via the API.
- Registers API routes using
backend/project_name/settings/base.py
:REST_FRAMEWORK = { # ... "DEFAULT_PERMISSION_CLASSES": [ "rest_framework.permissions.IsAuthenticated", ], # ... }
- Sets default permission
IsAuthenticated
for all REST API endpoints, but this default may not prevent unauthenticated access to thecreate
action inModelViewSet
if not explicitly overridden.
- Sets default permission
- Vulnerability Flow:
- An external attacker sends a POST request to
/api/users/
. - Django REST Framework routes the request to
UserViewSet.create
action. - The
create
action, lacking explicit permission configuration, bypasses the defaultIsAuthenticated
permission and allows unauthenticated user creation. - A new user is created in the database without authentication.
- An external attacker sends a POST request to
-
Security test case:
- Deploy the Django React Boilerplate application to a publicly accessible environment.
- Use a tool like
curl
or Postman to send a POST request to/api/users/
. - Set the
Content-Type
header toapplication/json
. - Include the following JSON payload in the request body:
{ "email": "[email protected]", "password": "P@$$wOrd123" }
- Send the request without any authentication credentials.
- Check the HTTP response status code. A
201 Created
status code indicates a successful, and thus vulnerable, user registration. A403 Forbidden
or401 Unauthorized
response indicates that the vulnerability is mitigated. - If the response status code is
201 Created
, verify in the Django admin panel or directly in the database if a new user with the email "[email protected]" has been created. - Successful user creation without authentication confirms the vulnerability.
This vulnerability allows authenticated non-admin users to escalate their privileges by modifying sensitive fields in their user profile via the User API.
- Vulnerability Name: Mass Assignment / Privilege Escalation in User API
- Description:
- The User API, implemented using a default DRF
ModelViewSet
for users, utilizes a serializer that exposes sensitive fields such asis_staff
andis_superuser
without marking them as read-only. An authenticated attacker (even a normal user) can send a crafted PUT or PATCH request to the user endpoint (e.g.,/api/users/<user_id>/
) to modify these fields and escalate their privileges to administrative levels.
- The User API, implemented using a default DRF
- Impact:
- Successful exploitation allows an attacker to grant themselves or other accounts administrative privileges, leading to full system compromise, including unauthorized data access, modification, and control over backend functions.
- Vulnerability Rank: Critical
- Currently implemented mitigations:
- The project uses DRF’s default
IsAuthenticated
permission on all API endpoints, requiring users to be signed in to access the API. However, there are no object-level access restrictions or field-level protections applied in the User serializer to prevent mass assignment.
- The project uses DRF’s default
- Missing mitigations:
- Mark sensitive fields (e.g.,
is_staff
,is_superuser
,is_active
) as read-only in theUserSerializer
or use a dedicated "update" serializer that excludes these fields. - Implement additional object-level permission checks in the
UserViewSet
to restrict updates to only the user's own account or require admin rights for modifications to other users' accounts.
- Mark sensitive fields (e.g.,
- Preconditions:
- The attacker must be authenticated as a regular (non-admin) user.
- The attacker needs to know or be able to enumerate user IDs or be able to target their own user ID.
- Source code analysis:
backend/users/serializers.py
:class UserSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer): class Meta: model = User fields = [ "id", "email", "is_active", "is_staff", "is_superuser", "created", "modified", "last_login", ]
- The
UserSerializer
includes sensitive fields without explicitly marking them as read-only, allowing update operations to modifyis_staff
andis_superuser
.
- The
backend/users/views.py
:class UserViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet): queryset = User.objects.all() serializer_class = UserSerializer
- The
UserViewSet
does not override the update logic or queryset to restrict modifications to a user’s own record or implement permission checks to prevent privilege escalation.
- The
- Security test case:
- Log in to the application with a normal (non-admin) user account and obtain a valid session or authentication token.
- Identify the current user's ID (or a target user's ID) using a GET request to
/api/users/
. - Send a PATCH request to
/api/users/<user_id>/
with the following JSON payload:{ "is_superuser": true, "is_staff": true }
- Verify that the response is
200 OK
. - Perform a subsequent GET request to
/api/users/<user_id>/
or attempt to access admin-only functionalities to confirm that the user’s account now has elevated privileges. - If the user record is updated with admin-level privileges without proper authorization, the vulnerability is confirmed.
This vulnerability arises from an overly permissive ALLOWED_HOSTS
setting, making the application susceptible to host header attacks.
-
Vulnerability Name: Insecure ALLOWED_HOSTS Configuration
-
Description:
- The default
ALLOWED_HOSTS
setting in therender.yaml
configuration file is set to'*'
, which signifies that the Django application will accept requests from any host. In production settings, the value forALLOWED_HOSTS
is sourced from an environment variable, and the default value is set to"*"
. This permissive configuration bypasses Django's built-in protection against host header attacks. An attacker can exploit this by sending requests with a forgedHost
header to manipulate absolute URLs (e.g., in password reset links, error emails) or facilitate host header poisoning and cache poisoning attacks.
- The default
-
Impact:
- An insecure
ALLOWED_HOSTS
configuration can lead to various attacks:- Password reset poisoning: Attackers can initiate password reset requests and manipulate the
Host
header to ensure password reset links point to malicious domains. - Cache poisoning: If the application uses host-based caching, attackers can poison the cache with content from a malicious host.
- Host header injection: Attackers may be able to inject malicious content by controlling the hostname used in the application's responses.
- Redirection to malicious sites: Users can be redirected to attacker-controlled sites.
- Session security compromise: Host header manipulation can sometimes interfere with session security.
- Password reset poisoning: Attackers can initiate password reset requests and manipulate the
- An insecure
-
Vulnerability Rank: High
-
Currently implemented mitigations:
- Production settings use environment variables for
ALLOWED_HOSTS
(viaconfig("ALLOWED_HOSTS", cast=Csv())
). - The
README.md
file contains instructions to modify theALLOWED_HOSTS
setting after the initial deployment, but the default configuration is insecure.
- Production settings use environment variables for
-
Missing mitigations:
- The default
ALLOWED_HOSTS
setting inrender.yaml
should be changed from'*'
to a more secure configuration, ideally an empty list[]
or a placeholder hostname like'your-app-name.onrender.com'
to encourage users to update it. - The environment configuration should restrict
ALLOWED_HOSTS
to a whitelist of known and trusted domain(s) (e.g.,["{{project_name}}-a1b2.onrender.com", "example.org"]
). - The project bootstrap section in
README.md
should strongly emphasize the importance of changing theALLOWED_HOSTS
setting to the actual domain(s) of the deployed application before going to production. - The
render_build.sh
script could include a check to ensure thatALLOWED_HOSTS
is not set to'*'
and warn the user or fail the build if it is.
- The default
-
Preconditions:
- The application is deployed in a publicly accessible production environment using the default
render.yaml
configuration. - The environment variable for
ALLOWED_HOSTS
is not properly overridden with a secure, domain-specific list.
- The application is deployed in a publicly accessible production environment using the default
-
Source code analysis:
backend/project_name/settings/production.py
:ALLOWED_HOSTS = config("ALLOWED_HOSTS", cast=Csv())
ALLOWED_HOSTS
is configured to be read from the environment variableALLOWED_HOSTS
.
/code/render.yaml
:envVarGroups: - name: python-services envVars: - key: PYTHON_VERSION value: 3.12.0 - key: POETRY_VERSION value: 2.0.1 - key: SECRET_KEY generateValue: true - key: DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE value: {{project_name}}.settings.production - key: ALLOWED_HOSTS value: '*'
- The
render.yaml
file sets the default value of theALLOWED_HOSTS
environment variable to'*'
. This default value is used when deploying to Render.com unless overridden.
- The
- When
ALLOWED_HOSTS
is set to'*'
, Django disables host header validation, making the application vulnerable to host header attacks.
-
Security test case:
- Deploy the Django application to Render.com using the provided
render.yaml
file without modifying the defaultALLOWED_HOSTS
setting. - Once deployed and accessible, use
curl
or browser developer tools to send a request to the application with a manipulatedHost
header. For example:curl https://your-app-name.onrender.com -H "Host: malicious.example.com"
- Observe the application's response. If vulnerable, the application will respond normally despite the
Host
header being set tomalicious.example.com
. - To demonstrate password reset poisoning: Initiate a password reset request for a user. Intercept the password reset email and examine the reset link. If vulnerable, the reset link will use
malicious.example.com
instead of the legitimate application domain, confirming the attacker's ability to control hostnames in password reset emails.
- Deploy the Django application to Render.com using the provided