Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
46 lines (37 loc) · 6.27 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

46 lines (37 loc) · 6.27 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for activemerchant/active_merchant

Attack Surface: Gateway-Specific Vulnerabilities

  • 1. Gateway-Specific Vulnerabilities

    • Description: Flaws or weaknesses in the specific payment gateway's API or implementation, accessible through active_merchant's integration code. This is the most direct and critical risk associated with using the library.
    • How active_merchant Contributes: active_merchant is the direct interface to the potentially vulnerable gateway. The library's integration code for a specific gateway might be outdated, contain bugs, or fail to properly handle security features of the gateway's API. This is a core concern.
    • Example: An outdated active_merchant integration for "GatewayX" doesn't implement a new security protocol required by GatewayX, allowing an attacker to bypass authentication and make fraudulent transactions. Or, a zero-day vulnerability in "GatewayY" is exploited via applications using active_merchant before a patch is available and integrated.
    • Impact: Data breaches (credit card details, PII), fraudulent transactions, financial loss, significant reputational damage.
    • Risk Severity: Critical to High (severity depends on the specific gateway and the nature of the vulnerability).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Aggressive Updates: Maintain active_merchant and all its gateway-specific components at the absolute latest versions. This is non-negotiable. Automate dependency updates and security checks, prioritizing updates related to active_merchant and the specific gateways in use.
      • Gateway Selection & Due Diligence: Thoroughly research the security history and track record of any payment gateway before integration. Choose reputable, actively maintained gateways with a strong security posture. Continuously monitor for security advisories related to your chosen gateways.
      • Targeted Penetration Testing: Penetration testing must specifically target the payment processing flow, including interactions with the chosen gateway(s) through active_merchant. This should be a regular and high-priority activity.
      • Configuration Hardening: Regularly audit and secure all gateway configuration settings (API keys, secrets, encryption settings, etc.). Enforce the principle of least privilege for all credentials.
      • Response Validation (Beyond active_merchant): Implement robust server-side validation of all responses received from the gateway, even if active_merchant performs some validation. Never blindly trust data returned from the gateway.

Attack Surface: Sensitive Data Mishandling (Directly Related to active_merchant Usage)

  • 2. Sensitive Data Mishandling (Directly Related to active_merchant Usage)

    • Description: Improper handling of sensitive data specifically within the context of active_merchant interactions, even if the library itself aims for secure handling. This focuses on errors directly related to how the application uses the library.
    • How active_merchant Contributes: While active_merchant attempts to handle sensitive data securely, the application's code interacting with active_merchant is still a critical point of vulnerability. This includes how data is passed to and received from the library.
    • Example: The application code incorrectly retrieves and logs raw response data from active_merchant before active_merchant has had a chance to mask or redact sensitive information. Or, API keys used by active_merchant are exposed due to insecure configuration practices.
    • Impact: Data breaches (credit card details, PII), compliance violations (PCI DSS), financial loss, severe reputational damage.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strict Input/Output Handling: Carefully review and control all data passed to and received from active_merchant. Avoid unnecessary logging or storage of raw response data.
      • Secrets Management (for active_merchant Credentials): Use a dedicated secrets management solution (e.g., Vault, AWS Secrets Manager) to store and manage the API keys and secrets required by active_merchant. Never hardcode these credentials. Ensure secure access control to these secrets.
      • Tokenization (When Applicable): If storing card details is absolutely necessary (e.g., for recurring billing), always use tokenization provided by the payment gateway, accessed through active_merchant. This replaces the actual card number with a non-sensitive token.
      • Input Sanitization: Sanitize all data before passing to active_merchant.

Attack Surface: Dependency-Related Vulnerabilities

  • 3. Dependency-Related Vulnerabilities
    • Description: Security flaws in the Ruby gems that active_merchant depends on (directly or transitively).
    • How active_merchant Contributes: active_merchant introduces these dependencies into the application's environment. A vulnerability in any of these dependencies can be exploited.
    • Example: A gem used by active_merchant for HTTP requests has a vulnerability that allows for request smuggling. An attacker exploits this to bypass security controls and access sensitive data.
    • Impact: Varies widely depending on the specific dependency and vulnerability, but can range from information disclosure to remote code execution.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Dependency Auditing: Use tools like bundler-audit or similar to automatically scan for known vulnerabilities in all dependencies. Integrate this into the CI/CD pipeline.
      • Dependency Locking: Use a Gemfile.lock to enforce the use of specific, known-good versions of all dependencies. This prevents accidental upgrades to vulnerable versions.
      • Vulnerability Monitoring: Actively monitor security advisories and vulnerability databases for new issues affecting your dependencies.