-
Threat: Unvalidated Predicates and Attributes
- Description: An attacker crafts malicious URL parameters or form inputs using unexpected Ransack predicates (e.g.,
_sql
, complex_matches
, or deeply nested_or
) or attempts to query non-whitelisted attributes. They might try to guess attribute names or use fuzzing techniques. This leverages Ransack's core functionality of dynamically building queries. - Impact:
- Denial of Service (DoS): Database overload due to computationally expensive queries generated by Ransack.
- Information Disclosure: Exposure of sensitive data or database schema details through error messages or query results returned by Ransack.
- Potential (rare) Code Execution: In specific, poorly configured scenarios, and depending on how custom predicates interact with the database, SQL injection might be possible through Ransack's
ransacker
feature if it's used insecurely.
- Affected Ransack Component:
Ransack::Search
object creation and query building,ransackable_attributes
,ransackable_predicates
, customransacker
definitions. This directly involves Ransack's core mechanisms. - Risk Severity: Critical (if code execution is possible) or High (for DoS and information disclosure).
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Strict Whitelisting: Use
ransackable_attributes
andransackable_associations
to explicitly define allowed attributes and associations. Never returntrue
ornil
from these methods without understanding the implications. This directly controls Ransack's behavior. - Predicate Whitelisting: Use
ransackable_predicates
to control allowed predicates. Avoid overly permissive predicates. This is a Ransack-specific control. - Custom Predicate Sanitization: Thoroughly sanitize and validate user input within custom
ransacker
definitions. This addresses vulnerabilities within Ransack's custom predicate feature. - Input Validation: Validate the values of search parameters (e.g., ensure an ID is an integer), even with whitelisting.
- Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting on search endpoints to mitigate DoS attacks exploiting Ransack's query generation.
- Strict Whitelisting: Use
- Description: An attacker crafts malicious URL parameters or form inputs using unexpected Ransack predicates (e.g.,
Threat: Unauthorized Attribute Access
-
Threat: Unauthorized Attribute Access
- Description: An attacker attempts to query attributes that exist in the database but are not included in the
ransackable_attributes
whitelist. They are directly interacting with Ransack's query-building capabilities to try and bypass restrictions. - Impact: Information Disclosure: Exposure of sensitive data that should not be accessible through search, facilitated by Ransack.
- Affected Ransack Component:
Ransack::Search
object, query building based onransackable_attributes
. This is a direct misuse of Ransack's intended functionality. - Risk Severity: High.
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Comprehensive Whitelisting: Ensure
ransackable_attributes
is complete and covers all searchable attributes. Regularly review. This is the primary Ransack-specific defense. - Generic Error Handling: Configure Ransack and Rails to return generic error messages, not revealing database details that could aid further attacks against Ransack.
- Authorization Checks: Combine Ransack with an authorization framework (e.g., Pundit) to enforce access control in addition to Ransack's whitelisting.
- Comprehensive Whitelisting: Ensure
- Description: An attacker attempts to query attributes that exist in the database but are not included in the
Threat: Unauthorized Association Access
-
Threat: Unauthorized Association Access
- Description: An attacker tries to search through associations that are not explicitly allowed via
ransackable_associations
, directly exploiting Ransack's ability to traverse relationships. - Impact: Information Disclosure: Access to data from related models that should be restricted, made possible by Ransack's association handling.
- Affected Ransack Component:
Ransack::Search
object, query building based onransackable_associations
. This is a direct attack on Ransack's association features. - Risk Severity: High.
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Strict Association Whitelisting: Use
ransackable_associations
to explicitly list allowed associations. Be very restrictive. This is the key Ransack-specific mitigation. - Authorization Checks: Use an authorization framework to ensure users can only search through permitted associations, complementing Ransack's controls.
- Strict Association Whitelisting: Use
- Description: An attacker tries to search through associations that are not explicitly allowed via
Threat: Reliance on Default Behavior
-
Threat: Reliance on Default Behavior
- Description: Using Ransack without explicitly configuring whitelisting methods (
ransackable_attributes
,ransackable_associations
, etc.) relies on potentially overly permissive defaults, making the application vulnerable to various Ransack-specific attacks. - Impact: Increased risk of all other Ransack-related vulnerabilities (Unvalidated Predicates, Unauthorized Access).
- Affected Ransack Component: All Ransack components related to attribute and association access, predicate handling, and sorting. This is a fundamental issue with how Ransack is (not) configured.
- Risk Severity: High.
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Explicit Configuration: Always explicitly configure Ransack's whitelisting methods. Never rely on defaults without understanding them. This is the most crucial preventative measure for Ransack.
- Description: Using Ransack without explicitly configuring whitelisting methods (