Mitigation Strategy: Securely Store Database Credentials for pghero
-
Mitigation Strategy: Securely Store Database Credentials for pghero using Environment Variables and Secrets Management.
-
Description:
- Identify all locations where database credentials for pghero are currently stored (e.g., pghero configuration files, application code).
- Remove hardcoded credentials from all files and code related to pghero configuration.
- Set database connection details as environment variables on the server or environment where pghero is deployed. Use environment variables specifically read by pghero, such as
PGHERO_DATABASE_URL
,PGHERO_USERNAME
,PGHERO_PASSWORD
,PGHERO_HOST
,PGHERO_PORT
. - Optionally, for enhanced security, use a secrets management system:
- Configure a secrets management system (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager) to store the database credentials used by pghero.
- Modify the pghero application configuration to retrieve credentials from the secrets management system instead of directly from environment variables. This might require code changes within the application to integrate with the chosen secrets manager.
- Ensure proper authentication and authorization for the pghero application to access the secrets management system.
-
List of Threats Mitigated:
- Hardcoded Credentials Exposure (High Severity): If credentials for pghero are hardcoded and the codebase or configuration files are compromised, attackers can gain direct access to the PostgreSQL database via the pghero user.
- Accidental Credential Leakage (Medium Severity): Hardcoded credentials for pghero can be accidentally exposed through logs, commit history, or configuration backups.
-
Impact:
- Hardcoded Credentials Exposure: High risk reduction. Eliminates the primary vulnerability of directly exposed credentials used by pghero.
- Accidental Credential Leakage: Medium risk reduction. Environment variables are less likely to be accidentally committed than hardcoded values. Secrets management further reduces this risk.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Environment Variables: Partially implemented. Database connection details for pghero are currently read from environment variables in production.
- Secrets Management: Not implemented.
-
Missing Implementation:
- Secrets Management: Missing in all environments. Consider implementing secrets management for production and staging for enhanced security of pghero's database credentials.
Mitigation Strategy: Principle of Least Privilege for pghero Database User
-
Mitigation Strategy: Implement Principle of Least Privilege for the dedicated pghero Database User.
-
Description:
- Connect to the PostgreSQL database as a superuser or a user with sufficient privileges.
- Create a dedicated PostgreSQL user specifically for pghero. Choose a descriptive username, e.g.,
pghero_monitor
. - Revoke all default privileges from this newly created pghero user.
- Grant
CONNECT
privilege to the databases that pghero needs to monitor. - Grant
SELECT
privileges only on the specific PostgreSQL system tables and views required by pghero. Refer to pghero documentation or source code to identify the necessary tables and views (e.g.,pg_stat_statements
,pg_locks
, etc.). - Do not grant any
INSERT
,UPDATE
,DELETE
, orDDL
privileges to the pghero_monitor user.
-
List of Threats Mitigated:
- SQL Injection via pghero (Low Severity): Limiting privileges minimizes potential damage if a vulnerability in pghero were to be exploited for SQL injection, even though pghero is designed for read-only operations.
- Accidental or Malicious Data Modification (Medium Severity): Restricting privileges prevents accidental or malicious modification or deletion of database data through the pghero user account if it were compromised.
- Lateral Movement after pghero Compromise (Medium Severity): Limiting privileges restricts an attacker's ability to escalate privileges or move laterally within the database system if pghero or its credentials are compromised.
-
Impact:
- SQL Injection via pghero: Low risk reduction. Defense-in-depth measure.
- Accidental or Malicious Data Modification: Medium risk reduction. Significantly reduces potential data integrity issues.
- Lateral Movement after pghero Compromise: Medium risk reduction. Limits attacker capabilities within the database.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Partially implemented. A dedicated
pghero
user exists, but specific privileges granted have not been strictly limited to the minimum required for pghero.
- Partially implemented. A dedicated
-
Missing Implementation:
- Privilege Review and Restriction: Missing in all environments. Need to audit and restrict the privileges of the
pghero
user to the absolute minimum required for its monitoring functions.
- Privilege Review and Restriction: Missing in all environments. Need to audit and restrict the privileges of the
Mitigation Strategy: Implement Authentication for pghero Dashboard
-
Mitigation Strategy: Implement Robust Authentication for pghero Dashboard Access.
-
Description:
- Choose an authentication mechanism suitable for a Rails application like pghero (e.g.,
devise
,clearance
). - Integrate the chosen authentication gem into the pghero application.
- Implement user registration and login functionality within pghero.
- Protect the pghero dashboard routes by requiring authentication. Use authentication filters to ensure only authenticated users can access the pghero dashboard.
- Enforce strong password policies for pghero dashboard users.
- Consider implementing Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for enhanced security of pghero dashboard access.
- Choose an authentication mechanism suitable for a Rails application like pghero (e.g.,
-
List of Threats Mitigated:
- Unauthorized Access to Performance Metrics (High Severity): Without authentication on the pghero dashboard, anyone with the URL can view potentially sensitive database performance metrics.
- Information Disclosure (High Severity): Performance metrics exposed by pghero can indirectly reveal sensitive information.
-
Impact:
- Unauthorized Access to Performance Metrics: High risk reduction. Authentication is the primary control to prevent unauthorized pghero dashboard access.
- Information Disclosure: High risk reduction. Limits information disclosure by controlling access to the pghero dashboard.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Not implemented. The pghero dashboard is currently accessible without any authentication.
-
Missing Implementation:
- Authentication Implementation: Missing in all environments. Requires development effort to integrate authentication into the pghero application.
Mitigation Strategy: Review and Limit Exposed Metrics in pghero
-
Mitigation Strategy: Review and Limit Exposed Performance Metrics Displayed by pghero.
-
Description:
- Identify all metrics collected and displayed by pghero. Review the pghero dashboard and documentation.
- Assess the sensitivity of each metric displayed by pghero.
- If sensitive metrics are identified:
- Investigate if pghero allows for disabling or customizing metric collection. Check pghero configuration options or code.
- If customization within pghero is limited, consider the risk-benefit trade-off.
- If risks are too high, consider alternative monitoring solutions if pghero's metric exposure is a critical issue.
- Document the rationale for metrics exposed or limited by pghero.
-
List of Threats Mitigated:
- Information Disclosure through Metrics (Medium Severity): Pghero exposing overly detailed metrics could reveal sensitive information.
- Competitive Intelligence Leakage (Low to Medium Severity): Metrics displayed by pghero could provide competitors with insights.
-
Impact:
- Information Disclosure through Metrics: Medium risk reduction. Limiting pghero's metric exposure reduces potential leakage.
- Competitive Intelligence Leakage: Low to Medium risk reduction. Minimizes risk of sharing competitive intelligence via pghero's data.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Not implemented. No specific review or limitation of pghero's exposed metrics has been performed.
-
Missing Implementation:
- Metric Review and Sensitivity Assessment: Missing in all environments. A review of pghero metrics is needed to address potential information disclosure risks.
Mitigation Strategy: Secure Access to pghero Dashboard Data
-
Mitigation Strategy: Secure Access to pghero Dashboard Data through Access Control and User Education.
-
Description:
- Reinforce authentication and authorization controls for the pghero dashboard (as described in Mitigation Strategy 3).
- Implement role-based access control (RBAC) for pghero dashboard access if possible with the chosen authentication mechanism.
- Provide security awareness training to users who have access to the pghero dashboard. Educate them about the sensitivity of pghero's performance metrics.
- Implement audit logging for access to the pghero dashboard. Log successful and failed login attempts to pghero.
-
List of Threats Mitigated:
- Unauthorized Access to Sensitive Metrics Data (High Severity): Weak access controls to the pghero dashboard can lead to unauthorized access.
- Insider Threats (Medium Severity): Malicious or negligent insiders with pghero dashboard access could misuse data.
-
Impact:
- Unauthorized Access to Sensitive Metrics Data: Medium risk reduction. RBAC and user education enhance security of pghero dashboard access.
- Insider Threats: Medium risk reduction. Reduces insider misuse of pghero data. Audit logging provides accountability.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Partially implemented. Basic network restrictions are in place, but authentication and RBAC for pghero dashboard are missing. User education is informal.
-
Missing Implementation:
- RBAC Implementation for pghero Dashboard: Missing. Implement RBAC for more granular pghero dashboard access control.
- Formal User Security Awareness Training: Missing. Train users with pghero dashboard access on data sensitivity.
- Audit Logging for pghero Dashboard: Missing. Implement audit logging for pghero dashboard access.
Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update pghero Application
-
Mitigation Strategy: Implement Regular Updates for pghero Application.
-
Description:
- Establish a process for regularly checking for updates to pghero.
- Subscribe to security mailing lists or release notes for pghero to receive notifications about new releases and security advisories specific to pghero.
- Test pghero updates in a staging environment before deploying to production.
- Apply pghero updates promptly after testing, especially security patches for pghero.
- Document the pghero update process and schedule.
-
List of Threats Mitigated:
- Exploitation of Known pghero Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Outdated pghero software is vulnerable to known exploits.
- Zero-Day Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): Staying updated reduces the window for zero-day exploits in pghero.
-
Impact:
- Exploitation of Known pghero Vulnerabilities: High risk reduction. Regular pghero updates are crucial for patching vulnerabilities.
- Zero-Day Vulnerabilities: Medium risk reduction. Reduces exposure to zero-day exploits in pghero.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Partially implemented. pghero updates are generally done periodically, but a formal process is lacking.
-
Missing Implementation:
- Formal pghero Update Process and Schedule: Missing. Establish a documented process and schedule for pghero updates.
Mitigation Strategy: Monitor for pghero Specific Vulnerabilities
-
Mitigation Strategy: Proactive Monitoring for pghero Specific Vulnerabilities.
-
Description:
- Actively monitor security advisories and release notes specifically for pghero. Check the pghero GitHub repository, community forums, and security mailing lists.
- Set up alerts or notifications for new pghero releases and security-related announcements.
- Regularly review security scanning reports and vulnerability databases for any mentions of pghero.
- If a pghero-specific vulnerability is identified:
- Assess the severity and impact of the vulnerability on your pghero deployment.
- Apply the recommended mitigation steps for the pghero vulnerability.
- Communicate the vulnerability and mitigation steps to relevant teams.
-
List of Threats Mitigated:
- Exploitation of pghero Specific Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Proactive monitoring and patching are essential for pghero vulnerabilities.
- Delayed Patching of Critical Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): Without monitoring, critical pghero patches might be missed.
-
Impact:
- Exploitation of pghero Specific Vulnerabilities: High risk reduction. Proactive monitoring is crucial for pghero-specific issues.
- Delayed Patching of Critical Vulnerabilities: Medium risk reduction. Ensures timely patching of pghero.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Not implemented. No formal process for monitoring pghero-specific security advisories.
-
Missing Implementation:
- Vulnerability Monitoring Process for pghero: Missing. Establish a process for monitoring pghero security information.
- Alerting and Notification System for pghero: Missing. Set up alerts for pghero releases and security announcements.
Mitigation Strategy: Configure Appropriate pghero Polling Intervals
-
Mitigation Strategy: Configure Appropriate pghero Polling Intervals.
-
Description:
- Review the current polling interval configured for pghero. Check pghero configuration files or environment variables.
- Assess the impact of the current polling interval on database performance due to pghero's queries.
- Adjust the polling interval to a reasonable frequency for pghero.
- Monitor database performance after adjusting the pghero polling interval.
- Document the chosen pghero polling interval and rationale.
-
List of Threats Mitigated:
- Database Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Excessive pghero polling can overload the database.
- Denial of Service (DoS) against Database (Medium Severity): Aggressive pghero polling could cause DoS.
-
Impact:
- Database Resource Exhaustion: Medium risk reduction. Appropriate pghero polling prevents unnecessary database load.
- Denial of Service (DoS) against Database: Medium risk reduction. Reduces DoS risk from pghero's queries.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Default configuration. pghero's polling interval is likely default, potentially not optimal.
-
Missing Implementation:
- Polling Interval Review and Optimization for pghero: Missing in all environments. Optimize pghero's polling interval based on database performance.
Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limits for pghero Application
-
Mitigation Strategy: Implement Resource Limits for pghero Application.
-
Description:
- Identify the deployment environment for pghero.
- Configure resource limits (CPU, memory) specifically for the pghero application.
- For containerized deployments, use container orchestration features to set resource limits for the pghero container.
- For VM-based deployments, monitor and adjust VM or application-level resource limits for pghero.
- Monitor pghero application resource usage after implementing limits.
-
List of Threats Mitigated:
- Resource Exhaustion on Application Server (Medium Severity): pghero resource leaks could exhaust server resources.
- Denial of Service (DoS) against Application Server (Medium Severity): pghero resource exhaustion could cause DoS.
- Impact on Neighboring Applications (Low to Medium Severity): Resource-hungry pghero could impact other applications.
-
Impact:
- Resource Exhaustion on Application Server: Medium risk reduction. Resource limits prevent pghero from consuming excessive resources.
- Denial of Service (DoS) against Application Server: Medium risk reduction. Reduces DoS risk from pghero resource exhaustion.
- Impact on Neighboring Applications: Low to Medium risk reduction. Protects other applications from pghero's resource usage.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Partially implemented. VM-level limits exist, but container-level limits for pghero might be missing.
-
Missing Implementation:
- Container-Level Resource Limits for pghero: Missing in containerized deployments. Define resource limits for the pghero container.
- Resource Monitoring and Optimization for pghero: Missing. Monitor pghero's resource usage and optimize limits.