Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
205 lines (151 loc) · 23.6 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

205 lines (151 loc) · 23.6 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Pghero Performance Monitoring Application

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

This deep security analysis aims to comprehensively evaluate the security posture of Pghero, a PostgreSQL performance monitoring application, based on the provided security design review. The objective is to identify potential security vulnerabilities and risks associated with Pghero's architecture, components, and deployment, and to recommend specific, actionable mitigation strategies to enhance its security. This analysis will focus on understanding the inherent security characteristics of Pghero and its dependencies, particularly PostgreSQL, and how they interact within a typical deployment environment.

Scope:

The scope of this analysis encompasses the following aspects of Pghero:

  • Architecture and Components: Analyzing the web application (Ruby on Rails), internal PostgreSQL database (Pghero DB), interaction with monitored PostgreSQL databases, and the deployment environment (Docker container on cloud infrastructure).
  • Data Flow: Examining the flow of data between users, Pghero components, and monitored databases, focusing on sensitive data like database credentials and performance metrics.
  • Security Controls: Evaluating existing and recommended security controls as outlined in the security design review, including authentication, authorization, input validation, cryptography, and secure credential storage.
  • Threat Modeling: Identifying potential threats and vulnerabilities based on the OWASP Top 10, common web application security risks, and specific risks related to database monitoring tools.
  • Mitigation Strategies: Proposing tailored and actionable mitigation strategies to address identified threats and enhance Pghero's security posture.

The analysis will not cover:

  • Detailed code review: This analysis is based on the design review and inferred architecture, not a line-by-line code audit.
  • Penetration testing: This is a design review, not a live security assessment.
  • Security of the underlying operating system or cloud infrastructure beyond the context of Pghero deployment.

Methodology:

This deep security analysis will employ the following methodology:

  1. Document Review: Thoroughly review the provided security design review document, including business posture, security posture, C4 diagrams (Context, Container, Deployment, Build), risk assessment, questions, and assumptions.
  2. Architecture Inference: Based on the C4 diagrams and descriptions, infer the detailed architecture of Pghero, including component interactions, data flow paths, and technology stack (Ruby on Rails, PostgreSQL, Docker).
  3. Component-Based Security Analysis: Break down Pghero into its key components (Web Application, Pghero DB, Monitored PGSQL, Deployment Environment, Build Process) and analyze the security implications of each component individually and in interaction with others.
  4. Threat Identification: Identify potential security threats relevant to each component and the overall system, considering common web application vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10), database security risks, and risks specific to monitoring tools (e.g., credential exposure, data breaches).
  5. Risk Assessment (Qualitative): Qualitatively assess the likelihood and impact of identified threats based on the provided risk assessment and general security knowledge.
  6. Mitigation Strategy Development: For each identified threat, develop specific, actionable, and tailored mitigation strategies applicable to Pghero and its deployment context. These strategies will align with the recommended security controls in the design review and aim to address the identified risks effectively.
  7. Recommendation Prioritization: Prioritize mitigation strategies based on risk level and feasibility of implementation, focusing on high-impact and readily implementable controls.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Based on the C4 diagrams and descriptions, the key components of Pghero and their security implications are analyzed below:

2.1. Web Application (Ruby on Rails)

  • Component Description: This is the core of Pghero, providing the user interface and backend logic. It's built using Ruby on Rails and handles user requests, data collection from monitored databases, data processing, and storage in the Pghero database.
  • Security Implications:
    • Web Application Vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10): As a web application, it is susceptible to common vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), insecure authentication and authorization, and others. The use of Ruby on Rails framework provides some built-in security features, but misconfigurations or custom code vulnerabilities can still introduce risks.
    • Session Management: Insecure session management can lead to unauthorized access. If sessions are not properly secured (e.g., using HTTPS, HTTP-only and Secure flags, appropriate session timeout), they can be hijacked.
    • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Ruby on Rails applications rely on numerous dependencies (gems). Vulnerabilities in these dependencies can be exploited if not regularly updated and managed.
    • Input Validation and Output Encoding: Lack of proper input validation can lead to injection attacks (SQL, command injection). Insufficient output encoding can result in XSS vulnerabilities.
    • Authentication and Authorization: The design review highlights the lack of dedicated authentication and authorization as an accepted risk. This is a significant security gap, as it could allow unauthorized users to access sensitive performance data and potentially modify configurations.

2.2. Pghero Database (PostgreSQL)

  • Component Description: This is an internal PostgreSQL database used by Pghero to store its configuration, collected performance data, and potentially user session data.
  • Security Implications:
    • Database Security Misconfiguration: Like any PostgreSQL database, misconfigurations (weak passwords, default credentials, open ports, lack of access controls) can lead to unauthorized access and data breaches.
    • Data at Rest Encryption: Sensitive data like database connection credentials and potentially performance metrics should be encrypted at rest to protect confidentiality in case of physical media compromise or unauthorized database access.
    • Access Control: Proper access control within the Pghero database is crucial. Only the Pghero web application should have necessary access. User access to this database should be strictly controlled and ideally not directly granted.
    • Backup and Recovery: Regular backups are essential for data integrity and availability. Secure backup procedures are needed to prevent data loss and ensure business continuity.
    • SQL Injection (Internal): While less likely to be directly user-facing, vulnerabilities within the Pghero application code that interact with its own database could still lead to SQL injection if queries are not properly parameterized.

2.3. Monitored PostgreSQL Database

  • Component Description: These are the external PostgreSQL databases that Pghero monitors. Pghero connects to these databases to collect performance metrics.
  • Security Implications:
    • Credential Exposure: Pghero needs to store credentials to connect to monitored databases. If these credentials are not securely stored and managed, they could be exposed, leading to unauthorized access to the monitored databases.
    • Least Privilege Access: Pghero should connect to monitored databases with the least privileges necessary to collect performance metrics. Overly permissive database users for Pghero increase the potential impact of a Pghero compromise.
    • Network Security: Network access to monitored databases from Pghero should be restricted using firewalls and network segmentation to limit the attack surface.
    • Performance Impact: While not directly a security vulnerability, poorly optimized queries from Pghero to monitored databases could negatively impact the performance and availability of those databases, indirectly affecting security by disrupting services.

2.4. Deployment Environment (Docker Container on Cloud Infrastructure)

  • Component Description: Pghero is deployed as a Docker container on cloud infrastructure (e.g., AWS, Azure, GCP). This environment includes components like Load Balancer, Container Instance, and potentially managed database services (RDS PostgreSQL).
  • Security Implications:
    • Container Security: Vulnerabilities in the Docker image itself (base image vulnerabilities, outdated packages, misconfigurations) can be exploited. Secure Docker image building practices are essential.
    • Host OS Security: The underlying host operating system of the container instance needs to be secured and regularly patched.
    • Cloud Infrastructure Security: Misconfigurations in cloud infrastructure (e.g., overly permissive security groups, exposed storage buckets) can create vulnerabilities.
    • Network Security (Cloud): Proper configuration of Virtual Private Clouds (VPCs), subnets, security groups, and Network ACLs is crucial to isolate Pghero and its components and control network traffic.
    • Secrets Management (Cloud): Cloud providers offer secrets management services (e.g., AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, GCP Secret Manager) that should be used to securely store and manage sensitive credentials like database passwords and API keys.
    • Logging and Monitoring (Cloud): Cloud monitoring and logging services are essential for security monitoring, incident detection, and auditing. Proper configuration and access control to these services are important.

2.5. Build Process (CI/CD Pipeline)

  • Component Description: The build process involves code repository, CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions), build process (unit tests, SAST, Docker build), and artifact registry.
  • Security Implications:
    • Code Repository Security: Compromised code repository access can lead to malicious code injection. Secure access control, branch protection, and code review are vital.
    • CI/CD Pipeline Security: Insecure CI/CD pipelines can be exploited to inject malicious code into builds or leak secrets. Secure pipeline configuration, access control to secrets, and audit logging are necessary.
    • SAST Tool Effectiveness: The effectiveness of SAST tools depends on their configuration and coverage. False positives and negatives can occur. SAST should be part of a layered security approach, not the sole security measure.
    • Docker Image Build Security: Building Docker images from untrusted sources or with insecure practices can introduce vulnerabilities. Using minimal base images, vulnerability scanning, and following security best practices for Dockerfile creation are important.
    • Artifact Registry Security: Compromised artifact registry access can lead to distribution of malicious Docker images. Secure access control and vulnerability scanning of images in the registry are crucial.
    • Dependency Management Security: Vulnerabilities in project dependencies can be introduced during the build process if dependency scanning and management are not implemented.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow Inference

Based on the provided diagrams and descriptions, the inferred architecture, components, and data flow are as follows:

Architecture: Pghero follows a typical three-tier web application architecture:

  • Presentation Tier: User Browser - Interacts with the Web Application via HTTPS.
  • Application Tier: Web Application (Ruby on Rails) - Handles user requests, business logic, data processing, and interacts with the database tiers.
  • Data Tier:
    • Pghero Database (PostgreSQL) - Stores Pghero's configuration, collected performance data, and potentially user session data.
    • Monitored PostgreSQL Databases - External databases from which Pghero collects performance metrics.

Components:

  1. User Browser: Client-side interface for users (DBAs, Developers, Ops) to access Pghero.
  2. Load Balancer (Optional, for scaled deployments): Distributes traffic to Web Application instances and provides SSL termination.
  3. Web Application (Ruby on Rails): Core application logic, web server, and UI.
  4. Pghero Database (PostgreSQL): Internal database for Pghero's data.
  5. Monitored PostgreSQL Databases: Target databases being monitored.
  6. Container Instance (Docker): Runtime environment for the Web Application and potentially Pghero Database.
  7. Cloud Monitoring & Logging Services: Centralized logging and monitoring for Pghero and infrastructure.
  8. Build Pipeline (GitHub Actions, etc.): Automated build, test, and deployment process.
  9. Artifact Registry (Docker Hub, etc.): Storage for built Docker images.

Data Flow:

  1. User Access: User Browser sends HTTPS requests to the Load Balancer (if present) or directly to the Web Application.
  2. Authentication (if implemented): Web Application authenticates the user against a user store (potentially within Pghero DB or external).
  3. Authorization (if implemented): Web Application authorizes user actions based on roles and permissions.
  4. Data Collection: Web Application connects to Monitored PostgreSQL Databases using PostgreSQL protocol and provided credentials to collect performance metrics.
  5. Data Storage: Web Application stores collected performance metrics and its own configuration data in the Pghero Database.
  6. Data Retrieval and Visualization: Web Application retrieves data from the Pghero Database and Monitored Databases (potentially for real-time metrics) to display performance dashboards and reports in the User Browser.
  7. Logging: Web Application and infrastructure components send logs and metrics to Cloud Monitoring & Logging Services.
  8. Build and Deployment: Developers commit code to Code Repository, triggering CI/CD Pipeline to build, test, and deploy the Web Application as a Docker image from Artifact Registry to the Deployment Environment.

4. Specific Security Considerations and Tailored Recommendations

Based on the analysis and the security design review, here are specific security considerations and tailored recommendations for Pghero:

4.1. Authentication and Authorization for Web Interface:

  • Security Consideration: The lack of dedicated authentication and authorization for the Pghero web interface is a significant risk. Without access control, anyone with network access to Pghero can view sensitive database performance data and potentially modify configurations if such features are added in the future.
  • Tailored Recommendation:
    • Implement a robust authentication mechanism: Integrate a proven authentication solution into the Pghero web application. Consider using Devise gem for Ruby on Rails, which provides comprehensive authentication features. Support strong password policies (complexity, length, expiration) and consider multi-factor authentication (MFA) for enhanced security.
    • Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Define roles (e.g., viewer, administrator) with different levels of access to Pghero features and data. Implement RBAC to restrict access based on user roles. For example, viewer role might only have read-only access to dashboards, while administrator role can manage database connections and settings.
    • Enforce HTTPS: Mandate HTTPS for all communication with the Pghero web interface to protect authentication credentials and sensitive data in transit. This is already a recommended control in the design review.

4.2. SQL Injection Vulnerabilities:

  • Security Consideration: Potential for SQL injection vulnerabilities exists if Pghero's queries are not properly parameterized or sanitized. This could allow attackers to bypass authentication, access unauthorized data, or even modify data in the Pghero database or potentially the monitored databases if queries are constructed dynamically based on user input and executed against monitored databases (though less likely in a monitoring context).
  • Tailored Recommendation:
    • Utilize Parameterized Queries (Prepared Statements): Ensure all database queries within the Pghero application, especially those involving user input or external data, are constructed using parameterized queries or prepared statements. This is a standard practice in Rails and should be enforced throughout the codebase.
    • Input Validation and Sanitization: Implement robust input validation on all user inputs to the web application. Sanitize inputs before using them in any database queries or system commands. Use Rails' built-in sanitization helpers and validation mechanisms.
    • Regular Code Review and SAST: Conduct regular code reviews, focusing on database interaction points, to identify and remediate potential SQL injection vulnerabilities. Integrate SAST tools into the CI/CD pipeline to automatically detect SQL injection flaws during development.

4.3. Secure Storage of Database Connection Credentials:

  • Security Consideration: Database connection credentials for monitored PostgreSQL databases are highly sensitive. If stored insecurely (e.g., in plain text configuration files, environment variables without encryption), they could be exposed, leading to unauthorized access to critical databases.
  • Tailored Recommendation:
    • Utilize Secrets Management Solution: Integrate with a secrets management solution (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, GCP Secret Manager) to securely store and manage database connection credentials. Retrieve credentials at runtime from the secrets manager instead of hardcoding them or storing them in configuration files.
    • Encryption at Rest for Pghero Database: Encrypt the Pghero database at rest to protect sensitive data, including potentially stored credentials and performance metrics. Cloud-managed database services (like RDS PostgreSQL) typically offer encryption at rest options.
    • Principle of Least Privilege for Credentials: Ensure the PostgreSQL users used by Pghero to connect to monitored databases have the minimum necessary privileges required for performance monitoring. Avoid using overly privileged users like postgres or superuser roles.

4.4. Dependency Vulnerabilities and Software Updates:

  • Security Consideration: Pghero, being a Ruby on Rails application, relies on numerous dependencies (gems). Vulnerabilities in these dependencies can be exploited if not regularly updated. Outdated Pghero application itself can also contain known vulnerabilities.
  • Tailored Recommendation:
    • Regularly Update Pghero and Dependencies: Establish a process for regularly updating Pghero and its dependencies (gems). Monitor security advisories for Ruby on Rails and its dependencies and apply patches promptly.
    • Automated Dependency Scanning: Integrate dependency scanning tools (e.g., Bundler Audit, Gemnasium) into the CI/CD pipeline to automatically identify vulnerabilities in dependencies during the build process.
    • Version Pinning and Dependency Management: Use a dependency management tool (Bundler) to pin dependency versions and ensure consistent builds. Regularly review and update dependency versions, testing for compatibility and security.

4.5. Build Process Security:

  • Security Consideration: Compromised build process can lead to the introduction of vulnerabilities or malicious code into the deployed Pghero application.
  • Tailored Recommendation:
    • Secure CI/CD Pipeline: Harden the CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions). Implement access control, secure secret management for pipeline credentials, and audit logging of pipeline activities.
    • SAST and DAST Integration: Integrate both Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) into the CI/CD pipeline. SAST to identify vulnerabilities in code, and DAST to test the running application for vulnerabilities.
    • Docker Image Security Scanning: Implement Docker image security scanning in the CI/CD pipeline to scan built Docker images for vulnerabilities before pushing them to the artifact registry. Use tools like Clair, Trivy, or cloud provider's container scanning services.
    • Secure Base Images: Use minimal and trusted base images for building Docker containers. Regularly update base images to patch vulnerabilities.

4.6. Network Security and Deployment Environment:

  • Security Consideration: Insecure network configuration and deployment environment can expose Pghero and monitored databases to unauthorized access and attacks.
  • Tailored Recommendation:
    • Network Segmentation: Deploy Pghero components (Web Application, Pghero DB) in private subnets within a Virtual Private Cloud (VPC). Restrict network access to these subnets using security groups and Network ACLs.
    • Firewall Configuration: Implement firewalls to control network traffic to and from Pghero components and monitored databases. Only allow necessary ports and protocols.
    • Load Balancer Security: If using a load balancer, configure it securely. Use HTTPS termination, enable DDoS protection (if available from cloud provider), and restrict access to the load balancer management interface.
    • Regular Security Audits and Penetration Testing: Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing of the deployed Pghero application and infrastructure to identify and address any security weaknesses.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies and Prioritization

Here's a summary of actionable mitigation strategies, prioritized based on risk and feasibility:

High Priority (Immediate Action Recommended):

  1. Implement Authentication and Authorization for Web Interface: This is critical to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data and functionalities. Use Devise gem for Rails, implement RBAC, and enforce HTTPS.
  2. Secure Storage of Database Connection Credentials: Migrate to a secrets management solution (e.g., Vault, AWS Secrets Manager) to store credentials securely. Encrypt the Pghero database at rest.
  3. Utilize Parameterized Queries: Review and refactor code to ensure all database queries are parameterized to prevent SQL injection.
  4. Enforce HTTPS for Web Interface: Configure the web server and load balancer to enforce HTTPS for all traffic.

Medium Priority (Implement in Near Term):

  1. Regularly Update Pghero and Dependencies: Establish a process for regular updates and integrate dependency scanning into the CI/CD pipeline.
  2. Implement Input Validation and Sanitization: Enhance input validation and sanitization throughout the application.
  3. Docker Image Security Scanning: Integrate Docker image scanning into the CI/CD pipeline.
  4. Network Segmentation and Firewall Configuration: Deploy Pghero in a segmented network environment with appropriate firewall rules.

Low Priority (Longer Term and Continuous Improvement):

  1. SAST and DAST Integration: Implement SAST and DAST in the CI/CD pipeline for ongoing vulnerability detection.
  2. Regular Security Audits and Penetration Testing: Schedule periodic security audits and penetration testing.
  3. Code Repository and CI/CD Pipeline Security Hardening: Continuously improve security practices for code repository and CI/CD pipeline.

By implementing these tailored mitigation strategies, the development team can significantly enhance the security posture of Pghero and mitigate the identified risks, ensuring a more secure and reliable performance monitoring solution for PostgreSQL databases.