Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
148 lines (120 loc) · 16.6 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

148 lines (120 loc) · 16.6 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of PgHero based on the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of PgHero's key components, identify potential vulnerabilities, assess their impact, and provide actionable mitigation strategies. The analysis will focus on the application's architecture, data flow, and interactions with the PostgreSQL database, aiming to minimize the risks of data breaches, unauthorized modifications, denial of service, and compliance violations. We will specifically examine how PgHero interacts with the database and how its design choices impact security.

  • Scope: The analysis will cover the PgHero application itself, its interaction with the PostgreSQL database, and the recommended deployment configuration (Docker on Kubernetes). We will not cover the security of the underlying Kubernetes cluster, operating system, or network infrastructure except where PgHero's configuration directly impacts them. We will focus on the Ruby on Rails application and its database interactions. We will also consider the build process.

  • Methodology:

    1. Architecture and Data Flow Review: Analyze the provided C4 diagrams and descriptions to understand the application's components, their interactions, and the flow of data. We'll infer details from the codebase structure (as implied by being a Rails app) and the pghero library's intended use.
    2. Component-Specific Threat Modeling: For each key component (Web Application, Database Connection, Build Process), we will identify potential threats based on common attack vectors and the component's specific responsibilities.
    3. Vulnerability Analysis: Based on the identified threats, we will analyze potential vulnerabilities in PgHero's design and implementation, considering both the application code and its dependencies.
    4. Mitigation Strategy Recommendation: For each identified vulnerability, we will propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to PgHero and its deployment environment.
    5. Risk Assessment: We will categorize the risks based on their likelihood and impact, considering the existing and recommended security controls.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

We'll break down the security implications based on the components identified in the C4 diagrams and build process description.

  • 2.1 Web Application (Ruby on Rails)

    • Threats:

      • SQL Injection: Even with Rails' built-in protections, vulnerabilities can arise if raw SQL is used or if input sanitization is bypassed. PgHero must construct SQL queries to fetch performance data.
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): If PgHero displays user-supplied data (e.g., database names, query snippets) without proper escaping, it could be vulnerable to XSS.
      • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): While Rails has CSRF protection, it needs to be properly configured and maintained.
      • Authentication Bypass: Weaknesses in the authentication mechanism (basic auth) could allow attackers to gain unauthorized access.
      • Session Management Vulnerabilities: Improper session handling (e.g., predictable session IDs, lack of proper timeouts) could lead to session hijacking.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Resource exhaustion attacks targeting the web application could make PgHero unavailable.
      • Exposure of Sensitive Information: Error messages or debug information could inadvertently reveal sensitive details about the database or application.
      • Logic Flaws: Bugs in the application's logic could lead to unintended behavior, potentially allowing unauthorized access or data manipulation.

    • Vulnerabilities (Inferred/Potential):

      • SQL Injection: The most critical vulnerability to consider. PgHero's core function is to query the database. Any user-controlled input that influences these queries (e.g., time ranges, database selection, filtering options) is a potential injection point. We need to examine how pghero constructs these queries.
      • XSS: If PgHero displays query snippets or database object names without proper sanitization, it's vulnerable.
      • Authentication Weakness: Basic authentication is inherently vulnerable to brute-force and credential stuffing attacks.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Parameterized Queries (Prepared Statements): Crucially, PgHero must use parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database interactions. This is the primary defense against SQL injection. The pghero library should be reviewed to ensure this is enforced. Never construct SQL queries by string concatenation with user input.
      • Input Validation and Sanitization: Strictly validate and sanitize all user input, even if it's not directly used in SQL queries. Use Rails' built-in helpers for escaping output to prevent XSS.
      • Strong Authentication: Implement strong password policies. Strongly recommend integrating with a more robust authentication system (LDAP, OAuth, or a dedicated authentication service) instead of relying solely on basic auth. Consider multi-factor authentication (MFA).
      • Session Management: Ensure Rails' session management is configured securely (secure cookies, HTTPOnly flags, appropriate timeouts).
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting to mitigate DoS attacks and brute-force attempts against the authentication endpoint.
      • Error Handling: Configure custom error pages to avoid exposing sensitive information. Log errors securely.
      • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strict CSP to mitigate XSS and other code injection attacks.
      • Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and address vulnerabilities.
      • Principle of Least Privilege: Ensure that the application only requests and uses the minimum necessary data from the database.

  • 2.2 PostgreSQL Database Connection

    • Threats:

      • Unauthorized Database Access: If the database credentials used by PgHero are compromised, an attacker could gain direct access to the monitored database.
      • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attack: If the connection between PgHero and the database is not encrypted, an attacker could intercept and potentially modify the data in transit.
      • Privilege Escalation: If PgHero connects to the database with a user that has excessive privileges, an attacker who compromises PgHero could gain those privileges.

    • Vulnerabilities (Inferred/Potential):

      • Weak Database Credentials: Using default or easily guessable passwords for the PgHero database user.
      • Unencrypted Connection: Not using TLS/SSL to encrypt the connection between PgHero and the database.
      • Excessive Privileges: The PgHero database user having more permissions than necessary (e.g., write access, access to all databases).

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Strong, Unique Credentials: Use a strong, unique password for the PgHero database user. Store this password securely (e.g., using environment variables or a secrets management solution, not in the PgHero configuration file).
      • Enforce TLS/SSL: Require TLS/SSL encryption for the database connection. Configure PostgreSQL to enforce this. Verify the certificate to prevent MitM attacks.
      • Principle of Least Privilege: Create a dedicated PostgreSQL user for PgHero with the absolute minimum required privileges. This user should only have SELECT access to the necessary system views and functions (e.g., pg_stat_activity, pg_stat_statements). Do not grant this user any write permissions or access to user data tables. Explicitly revoke access to any unnecessary schemas or functions.
      • Connection Pooling: Use connection pooling to efficiently manage database connections and prevent resource exhaustion. Rails' database connection pool should be properly configured.
      • Network Segmentation: Deploy PgHero and the PostgreSQL database in separate network segments to limit the impact of a compromise. Use firewall rules to restrict network access between them.
      • Regularly Audit Database Permissions: Periodically review the permissions granted to the PgHero database user to ensure they remain minimal.

  • 2.3 Build Process

    • Threats:

      • Dependency Vulnerabilities: PgHero depends on third-party Ruby gems, which could have known security vulnerabilities.
      • Compromised Build System: If the CI system is compromised, an attacker could inject malicious code into PgHero.
      • Insecure Artifact Storage: If the built Docker image is stored in an insecure registry, an attacker could tamper with it.

    • Vulnerabilities (Inferred/Potential):

      • Outdated Gems: Using outdated versions of gems with known vulnerabilities.
      • Weak CI System Security: The CI system having weak access controls or being vulnerable to attack.
      • Insecure Docker Image: The Docker image containing unnecessary tools or sensitive information.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Dependency Scanning: Use tools like bundler-audit, Dependabot, or Snyk to automatically scan for known vulnerabilities in Ruby gems. Update dependencies regularly.
      • SAST (Static Application Security Testing): Integrate a SAST tool like Brakeman into the CI pipeline to identify potential security vulnerabilities in the PgHero code itself.
      • Secure CI System: Secure the CI system with strong access controls, multi-factor authentication, and regular security updates.
      • Minimal Docker Image: Use a minimal base image for the Docker container (e.g., a slim or alpine image). Avoid including unnecessary tools or libraries.
      • Docker Image Scanning: Use a container image scanning tool (e.g., Trivy, Clair) to scan the built Docker image for vulnerabilities.
      • Secure Container Registry: Use a secure container registry with access controls and image signing.
      • Code Reviews: Enforce mandatory code reviews for all changes to the PgHero codebase, with a focus on security.

3. Inferred Architecture, Components, and Data Flow

Based on the provided information and the nature of PgHero as a Rails application interacting with PostgreSQL, we can infer the following:

  • Architecture: Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, typical of Rails applications.
  • Components:
    • Models: Represent data and interact with the database (likely using ActiveRecord). These models will encapsulate the logic for querying PostgreSQL's system views.
    • Views: Render the dashboards and display the performance data.
    • Controllers: Handle user requests, interact with models, and render views.
    • Database Adapter: Handles the connection to the PostgreSQL database (likely using the pg gem).
    • Background Jobs (Potentially): PgHero might use background jobs (e.g., Sidekiq, Resque) to periodically collect performance data.
  • Data Flow:
    1. User accesses PgHero through a web browser (HTTPS).
    2. The request is routed to the appropriate controller.
    3. The controller interacts with models to fetch data from the database.
    4. The models use the database adapter to execute SQL queries against PostgreSQL's system views.
    5. The database returns the results.
    6. The models process the data.
    7. The controller passes the data to the view.
    8. The view renders the dashboard and sends it back to the user's browser.

4. Tailored Security Considerations

The following considerations are specifically tailored to PgHero:

  • SQL Query Construction: The most critical security aspect of PgHero is how it constructs SQL queries. The pghero library's source code must be reviewed to ensure that it always uses parameterized queries and never concatenates user input directly into SQL strings. This is non-negotiable.
  • Database User Privileges: The documentation should explicitly state the minimum required PostgreSQL privileges for the PgHero user. A script or detailed instructions should be provided to help users create this user with the correct permissions. The application should not function if the user has excessive privileges (e.g., write access).
  • Query Snippet Handling: If PgHero displays query snippets, it must sanitize them to prevent XSS and potentially redact sensitive information. Consider providing options to disable the display of query snippets or to limit their length.
  • Time Range Input: The handling of time range input is a potential SQL injection vector. Ensure that these values are properly validated and used as parameters in prepared statements.
  • Database Selection: If PgHero allows users to select which database to monitor, this input must be validated and sanitized to prevent injection attacks.
  • Configuration Options: Any configuration options that affect security (e.g., enabling/disabling features, setting thresholds) should be carefully reviewed for potential vulnerabilities.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Tailored to PgHero)

These are specific, actionable steps, building on the previous sections:

  1. Code Audit: Conduct a thorough code audit of the pghero library, focusing on SQL query construction. Verify that all database interactions use parameterized queries. Add automated tests to specifically check for SQL injection vulnerabilities.
  2. Privilege Verification: Implement a check within PgHero that verifies the privileges of the connected database user. If the user has excessive privileges, display a prominent warning and prevent PgHero from functioning until the privileges are reduced.
  3. Query Sanitization: Implement robust sanitization of query snippets before displaying them in the UI. Use a dedicated HTML escaping library and consider redacting sensitive information.
  4. Input Validation: Add strict input validation for all user-supplied parameters, including time ranges, database names, and any filtering options. Use Rails' built-in validation helpers and consider using regular expressions to enforce specific formats.
  5. Dependency Management: Integrate bundler-audit or a similar tool into the CI pipeline to automatically check for vulnerable dependencies. Establish a process for regularly updating gems.
  6. SAST Integration: Integrate Brakeman (or a comparable SAST tool) into the CI pipeline to automatically scan for security vulnerabilities in the PgHero code.
  7. Docker Security: Use a minimal base image for the Docker container. Scan the image for vulnerabilities using a tool like Trivy.
  8. Documentation Updates: Update the PgHero documentation to clearly state the security recommendations, including:
    • The importance of using a dedicated PostgreSQL user with minimal privileges.
    • The necessity of using TLS/SSL for both the web application and the database connection.
    • The need to regularly update PgHero and its dependencies.
    • Instructions for configuring a reverse proxy with HTTPS.
    • Guidance on strong password policies.
  9. Authentication Enhancement: Prioritize adding support for more robust authentication mechanisms (e.g., OAuth, LDAP) to replace or augment basic authentication.
  10. Auditing: Implement logging of key events, such as user logins, configuration changes, and potentially failed queries. Store these logs securely and monitor them for suspicious activity.
  11. Security Headers: Ensure that the application sets appropriate security headers, including:
    • Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS)
    • X-Content-Type-Options
    • X-Frame-Options
    • X-XSS-Protection
    • Content-Security-Policy (CSP)
  12. Penetration Testing: Regularly perform penetration testing, focusing on SQL injection, XSS, and authentication bypass.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for PgHero, focusing on its specific functionality and architecture. By implementing the recommended mitigation strategies, the developers can significantly reduce the risk of security vulnerabilities and protect the sensitive data handled by the application. The most critical areas to address are SQL injection prevention, database user privileges, and secure configuration of the database connection.