Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
319 lines (239 loc) · 218 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

319 lines (239 loc) · 218 KB

Okay, I understand the task. I will perform a deep security analysis of an application using Searchkick based on the provided security design review.

Here's the deep analysis:

Deep Security Analysis of Searchkick Application

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The primary objective of this deep security analysis is to identify and evaluate potential security vulnerabilities and risks associated with the integration of the Searchkick gem into the Ruby application, focusing on the search functionality and its interaction with Elasticsearch. This analysis aims to provide actionable, Searchkick-specific security recommendations and mitigation strategies to enhance the overall security posture of the application.

Scope:

This analysis encompasses the following components and aspects as outlined in the security design review:

  • Components:
    • Ruby Application (specifically the search functionality utilizing Searchkick)
    • Searchkick Gem
    • Elasticsearch Cluster
    • Interactions and data flow between these components.
  • Security Domains:
    • Authentication and Authorization related to search operations.
    • Input validation and sanitization of search queries.
    • Data protection (confidentiality, integrity) of indexed data in Elasticsearch.
    • Availability and resilience of the search functionality.
    • Security of the build and deployment process related to Searchkick.
    • Compliance considerations for sensitive data indexed and searched.
  • Diagrams and Documentation:
    • C4 Context, Container, and Deployment diagrams.
    • Security Design Review document sections (Business Posture, Security Posture, Design, Build, Risk Assessment, Questions & Assumptions).

Methodology:

This deep analysis will employ a risk-based approach, following these steps:

  1. Decomposition and Architecture Inference: Analyze the provided C4 diagrams and descriptions to understand the architecture, components, and data flow of the application using Searchkick. Infer the interaction points and data exchange mechanisms between the Ruby Application, Searchkick Gem, and Elasticsearch Cluster.
  2. Threat Modeling: Based on the architecture and data flow, identify potential security threats relevant to each component and interaction point. This will include considering common web application vulnerabilities, Elasticsearch-specific threats, and risks associated with third-party dependencies like Searchkick.
  3. Vulnerability Analysis: Examine the security implications of each key component, focusing on potential vulnerabilities that could be exploited. This will involve considering:
    • Ruby Application: Input validation weaknesses, authorization bypass, web server vulnerabilities.
    • Searchkick Gem: Dependency vulnerabilities, API security, potential for code injection if misused.
    • Elasticsearch Cluster: Access control misconfigurations, network exposure, data encryption weaknesses, Elasticsearch injection if queries are not properly handled by Searchkick.
  4. Control Assessment: Evaluate the existing and recommended security controls outlined in the security design review. Assess their effectiveness in mitigating the identified threats and vulnerabilities.
  5. Risk Prioritization: Prioritize identified risks based on their potential impact on the business (as defined in Business Posture) and the likelihood of exploitation.
  6. Recommendation and Mitigation Strategy Development: For each significant risk, develop specific, actionable, and Searchkick-tailored security recommendations and mitigation strategies. These strategies will focus on practical steps that the development team can implement to enhance the security of the application's search functionality.
  7. Documentation and Reporting: Document the findings of the analysis, including identified threats, vulnerabilities, risks, recommendations, and mitigation strategies in a clear and structured manner.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Based on the provided design review, let's break down the security implications of each key component:

A. Ruby Application:

  • Security Implications:
    • Input Validation Vulnerabilities: The application is responsible for handling user search queries. If input validation and sanitization are insufficient, it becomes vulnerable to Elasticsearch injection attacks. Malicious users could craft queries to bypass intended search logic, access unauthorized data, or even potentially impact the Elasticsearch cluster itself.
    • Authorization Flaws: The application must enforce authorization to ensure users can only search data they are permitted to access. Weak or missing authorization checks could lead to data breaches where users can retrieve sensitive information they should not have access to.
    • Web Server Vulnerabilities: Standard web server vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10) apply to the Web Server container. These could be exploited to compromise the application and potentially gain access to underlying systems or data, including data indexed by Searchkick.
    • Session Management and Authentication: While Searchkick doesn't handle authentication, the application's authentication and session management mechanisms are crucial. Weaknesses here could allow unauthorized users to perform searches as authenticated users, bypassing intended access controls.
    • Logging and Monitoring Gaps: Insufficient logging of search queries and application activity can hinder security auditing, incident response, and detection of malicious activities related to search functionality.

B. Searchkick Gem:

  • Security Implications:
    • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Searchkick relies on other Ruby gems. Vulnerabilities in these dependencies could be indirectly exploited through Searchkick. Regular dependency scanning and updates are crucial.
    • API Misuse: Improper use of Searchkick's API by developers could inadvertently introduce vulnerabilities. For example, constructing raw Elasticsearch queries manually instead of using Searchkick's query builders increases the risk of injection vulnerabilities.
    • Gem Vulnerabilities: Although less likely, vulnerabilities could exist within the Searchkick gem itself. Relying on a well-maintained and actively developed gem reduces this risk, but regular updates are still important.
    • Information Disclosure through Error Handling: Verbose error messages from Searchkick or Elasticsearch, if exposed to users, could reveal sensitive information about the application's internal workings or Elasticsearch configuration.

C. Elasticsearch Cluster:

  • Security Implications:
    • Access Control Misconfigurations: Elasticsearch's built-in security features (role-based access control, authentication) must be properly configured. Misconfigurations could lead to unauthorized access to indexed data, allowing attackers to read, modify, or delete sensitive information.
    • Network Exposure: If the Elasticsearch cluster is not properly isolated within a private network (e.g., VPC private subnet as shown in the deployment diagram) and is directly accessible from the internet, it becomes a prime target for attacks.
    • Data Encryption Weaknesses: Failure to enable encryption at rest and in transit for Elasticsearch data exposes sensitive data to interception and unauthorized access if storage media is compromised or network traffic is intercepted.
    • Elasticsearch Injection (Indirect): While Searchkick aims to prevent direct Elasticsearch injection, vulnerabilities in the Ruby Application's query construction or misuse of Searchkick could still lead to the generation of malicious Elasticsearch queries.
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Elasticsearch clusters can be resource-intensive. Maliciously crafted or excessive search queries could overload the cluster, leading to denial of service for the application's search functionality and potentially impacting other application features relying on Elasticsearch.
    • Unsecured API Access: Elasticsearch exposes a powerful REST API. If this API is not properly secured (e.g., through authentication and authorization), it could be exploited to bypass application-level security controls and directly interact with the data.

3. Architecture and Data Flow Inference

Based on the diagrams and descriptions, the architecture and data flow can be inferred as follows:

  1. User Interaction: Users initiate search requests through the Ruby Application's Web Server (via HTTP/HTTPS).
  2. Request Processing: The Web Server forwards the request to the Application Logic.
  3. Search Query Construction: The Application Logic processes the user's search input. It's crucial that this stage includes input validation and sanitization. The Application Logic then uses the Searchkick Library to construct search queries. Ideally, Searchkick's query builders should be used to parameterize queries and avoid raw query construction.
  4. Communication with Elasticsearch: The Searchkick Library translates the Ruby-based search request into Elasticsearch-compatible queries and communicates with the Elasticsearch Cluster over the network. This communication should be secured with TLS/SSL.
  5. Search Execution: The Elasticsearch Cluster receives the query, executes the search against the indexed data, and returns the search results to the Searchkick Library.
  6. Result Processing and Display: The Searchkick Library passes the results back to the Application Logic. The Application Logic processes the results (potentially applying authorization filtering) and renders them for the Web Server to display to the user.
  7. Data Indexing Flow (Inferred): Although not explicitly detailed in the search flow, the application also needs to index data into Elasticsearch. This likely happens through the Application Logic using Searchkick to send indexing requests to the Elasticsearch Cluster. Security considerations for indexing are equally important, ensuring only authorized data is indexed and sensitive data is protected during indexing.

Data Flow Diagram (Simplified):

User --> Web Server (HTTPS) --> Application Logic (Input Validation, Authorization, Searchkick API) --> Searchkick Library --> Elasticsearch Cluster (TLS/SSL) <-- Searchkick Library <-- Application Logic <-- Web Server --> User
                                                                                                  ^
                                                                                                  | Indexing Data Flow (Application Logic -> Searchkick -> Elasticsearch)

4. Specific and Tailored Security Considerations and Recommendations

Here are specific security considerations and tailored recommendations for this Searchkick application:

A. Input Validation and Sanitization (Ruby Application & Searchkick Usage):

  • Consideration: Prevent Elasticsearch injection attacks.
  • Recommendation:
    • Strict Input Validation: Implement robust input validation on the Ruby Application side before passing search queries to Searchkick. Define allowed characters, data types, and patterns for search inputs. Reject any input that does not conform to these rules.
    • Use Searchkick Query Builders: Always utilize Searchkick's query builders and DSL (Domain Specific Language) to construct search queries. Avoid constructing raw Elasticsearch queries manually using string interpolation or concatenation. Searchkick's DSL is designed to help prevent injection vulnerabilities.
    • Sanitize Input for Display: When displaying search queries back to the user (e.g., in search bars or logs), sanitize the input to prevent potential XSS (Cross-Site Scripting) vulnerabilities.

B. Authorization and Access Control (Ruby Application & Elasticsearch):

  • Consideration: Prevent unauthorized access to search functionality and sensitive data.
  • Recommendation:
    • Application-Level Authorization: Implement granular authorization checks within the Ruby Application's Application Logic before executing any search operation. Verify that the authenticated user has the necessary permissions to search the requested data.
    • Elasticsearch Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Leverage Elasticsearch's built-in RBAC features to further restrict access at the data level. Define roles with specific privileges for accessing indices and data. Assign these roles to users or application service accounts that interact with Elasticsearch.
    • Data-Level Security (if applicable): If very fine-grained access control is needed (e.g., row-level security), explore Elasticsearch's document-level security features or implement application-level filtering of search results based on user permissions.

C. Network Security (Elasticsearch Cluster & Communication):

  • Consideration: Protect Elasticsearch cluster from unauthorized network access and eavesdropping.
  • Recommendation:
    • VPC Isolation: Deploy the Elasticsearch Cluster within a private subnet of a Virtual Private Cloud (VPC), as depicted in the Deployment Diagram. Ensure it is not directly accessible from the public internet.
    • Security Groups/Network ACLs: Configure security groups and Network ACLs to restrict network access to the Elasticsearch Cluster. Only allow necessary traffic from the Application Servers on the required ports (typically 9200 and 9300).
    • TLS/SSL Encryption: Enforce TLS/SSL encryption for all communication between the Ruby Application, Searchkick Gem, and Elasticsearch Cluster. This protects data in transit from eavesdropping. Configure both the Elasticsearch cluster and the Searchkick client to use TLS/SSL.

D. Data Encryption (Elasticsearch Cluster):

  • Consideration: Protect sensitive data at rest and in transit.
  • Recommendation:
    • Elasticsearch Encryption at Rest: Enable Elasticsearch's encryption at rest feature to encrypt data stored on disk. This protects data confidentiality if storage media is compromised.
    • Encrypt Sensitive Fields (if needed): If Elasticsearch's encryption at rest is not considered sufficient for highly sensitive data, consider encrypting specific sensitive data fields before indexing them using application-level encryption. Ensure proper key management for encryption keys.

E. Rate Limiting and DoS Prevention (Web Server & Application Logic):

  • Consideration: Mitigate Denial of Service attacks targeting search functionality.
  • Recommendation:
    • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting on the Web Server or Application Logic level for search endpoints. Limit the number of search requests from a single IP address or user within a specific time window.
    • Request Throttling: Implement request throttling to prevent excessive load on the Elasticsearch cluster from search queries. Queue or reject requests if the system is under heavy load.
    • Query Complexity Limits: If possible, implement limits on the complexity of search queries (e.g., maximum number of clauses, aggregations) to prevent resource-intensive queries that could lead to DoS.

F. Monitoring and Logging (Ruby Application, Searchkick, Elasticsearch):

  • Consideration: Enhance security auditing, incident response, and detect malicious activities.
  • Recommendation:
    • Comprehensive Logging: Implement detailed logging of:
      • Search queries received by the Ruby Application (after sanitization, but before sending to Searchkick).
      • Search queries sent to Elasticsearch (generated by Searchkick).
      • Elasticsearch cluster activity logs (including access attempts, errors, and security events).
      • Application-level authorization decisions related to search.
    • Security Monitoring: Set up security monitoring and alerting for:
      • Suspicious search queries (e.g., queries containing SQL-like syntax or unusual characters after sanitization).
      • Failed authorization attempts for search operations.
      • Anomalous Elasticsearch cluster activity (e.g., high error rates, performance degradation, unauthorized access attempts).
      • Application errors related to Searchkick or Elasticsearch communication.

G. Dependency Management and Vulnerability Scanning (Searchkick Gem & Ruby Application):

  • Consideration: Address vulnerabilities in Searchkick and its dependencies.
  • Recommendation:
    • Regular Dependency Scanning: Integrate automated dependency scanning tools into the CI/CD pipeline to regularly scan the Ruby Application and Searchkick gem dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
    • Dependency Updates: Keep Searchkick and its dependencies up-to-date with the latest security patches. Follow Searchkick's release notes and security advisories.
    • Gem Integrity Verification: When deploying the application, verify the integrity of the Searchkick gem downloaded from the Gem Registry (e.g., using gem signatures or checksums).

H. Elasticsearch Security Configuration:

  • Consideration: Secure the Elasticsearch cluster itself.
  • Recommendation:
    • Follow Elasticsearch Security Best Practices: Adhere to Elasticsearch's official security guidelines and best practices for hardening the cluster. This includes:
      • Enabling authentication and authorization (using Elasticsearch Security features).
      • Disabling unnecessary features and plugins.
      • Regularly patching and updating Elasticsearch to the latest secure version.
      • Implementing audit logging in Elasticsearch.
      • Reviewing and hardening the elasticsearch.yml configuration file.

5. Actionable and Tailored Mitigation Strategies

Here are actionable mitigation strategies applicable to the identified threats, tailored to Searchkick:

| Threat | Mitigation Strategy ## Deep Analysis of Searchkick Security Considerations

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

To conduct a thorough security analysis of the Searchkick gem and its integration within a Ruby application, aiming to identify potential vulnerabilities and security risks. The analysis will focus on the security implications arising from the design, deployment, and usage of Searchkick, ultimately providing specific and actionable recommendations to mitigate identified risks and enhance the application's security posture.

Scope:

This analysis will cover:

  • Searchkick Gem: Security aspects of the gem itself, including potential vulnerabilities in its code and dependencies.
  • Ruby Application Integration: Security implications of how the Ruby application utilizes Searchkick, including query construction, data handling, and interaction with Elasticsearch.
  • Elasticsearch Interaction: Security considerations related to the communication and data exchange between Searchkick and the Elasticsearch cluster.
  • Deployment Environment: Security aspects of the deployment infrastructure, particularly concerning the interaction between the application, Searchkick, and Elasticsearch in a cloud-based environment (AWS example).
  • Build Process: Security considerations within the build and deployment pipeline for applications using Searchkick.

This analysis will not cover:

  • In-depth code review of the entire Searchkick gem codebase.
  • Penetration testing of a live application.
  • Security analysis of the underlying operating systems or hardware.
  • General Ruby on Rails application security best practices not directly related to Searchkick.

Methodology:

The analysis will employ a combination of techniques:

  1. Architecture Review: Analyze the provided C4 diagrams and descriptions to understand the system architecture, data flow, and component interactions.
  2. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats and attack vectors based on the architecture and component responsibilities. This will include considering common web application vulnerabilities, Elasticsearch-specific risks, and vulnerabilities related to gem dependencies.
  3. Security Design Review Analysis: Deep dive into the provided Security Design Review document, focusing on identified business risks, security posture, recommended controls, and security requirements.
  4. Codebase and Documentation Review (Limited): Review publicly available Searchkick codebase (on GitHub) and documentation to understand its functionalities, security features, and potential areas of concern.
  5. Best Practices and Standards Review: Compare the design and recommended controls against industry best practices for web application security, Elasticsearch security, and secure software development.
  6. Risk-Based Approach: Prioritize identified security issues based on their potential impact and likelihood, focusing on high-risk areas.
  7. Actionable Recommendations: Formulate specific, actionable, and tailored security recommendations and mitigation strategies directly applicable to the Searchkick context.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

A. Ruby Application:

  • Security Implications:
    • Elasticsearch Injection Vulnerabilities: The primary security risk is Elasticsearch injection. If the application doesn't properly sanitize and validate user input before constructing search queries using Searchkick, attackers could inject malicious Elasticsearch queries. This could lead to unauthorized data access, data manipulation, or even denial of service of the Elasticsearch cluster.
    • Authorization Bypass: If the application's authorization logic is flawed or missing when handling search requests, users might be able to access data they are not permitted to see through search functionality.
    • Information Disclosure: Verbose error messages from Searchkick or Elasticsearch, if exposed to users, could reveal sensitive information about the application's internal workings or Elasticsearch configuration.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) via Query Complexity: Poorly designed or excessively complex search queries generated by the application (even unintentionally) could overload the Elasticsearch cluster, leading to performance degradation or DoS.

B. Searchkick Gem:

  • Security Implications:
    • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Searchkick relies on other Ruby gems. Vulnerabilities in these dependencies could be exploited if not properly managed and updated.
    • Gem Vulnerabilities: While less common, vulnerabilities could exist within the Searchkick gem itself. Using an outdated version or a compromised gem source could introduce security risks.
    • Misconfiguration/Misuse: Developers might misuse Searchkick's API or configuration options in a way that introduces security vulnerabilities, such as constructing raw queries instead of using safe query builders.

C. Elasticsearch Cluster:

  • Security Implications:
    • Unauthorized Access: If Elasticsearch is not properly secured with authentication and authorization mechanisms, unauthorized users or applications could gain access to sensitive indexed data.
    • Data Breaches: Lack of encryption at rest and in transit for Elasticsearch data could lead to data breaches if storage media is compromised or network traffic is intercepted.
    • Network Exposure: If the Elasticsearch cluster is exposed to the public internet without proper network security controls (firewalls, VPC isolation), it becomes a target for attacks.
    • Denial of Service (DoS): An unsecured or misconfigured Elasticsearch cluster is vulnerable to DoS attacks, potentially impacting the application's search functionality and overall performance.
    • Data Integrity Issues: Unauthorized modifications or deletions of indexed data in Elasticsearch could compromise data integrity and lead to inaccurate search results.

D. Build Process:

  • Security Implications:
    • Compromised Dependencies: If the build process relies on compromised or vulnerable dependencies (including Searchkick or its dependencies), the resulting application will inherit these vulnerabilities.
    • Supply Chain Attacks: If the gem registry (RubyGems.org) or code repository (GitHub) is compromised, malicious code could be injected into the Searchkick gem or its dependencies, affecting applications that use them.
    • Insecure CI/CD Pipeline: Vulnerabilities in the CI/CD pipeline (e.g., insecure secrets management, lack of access controls) could be exploited to inject malicious code or compromise build artifacts.

3. Focus on Architecture, Components, and Data Flow Inference

Based on the provided diagrams and descriptions, the architecture is a typical three-tier web application setup in a cloud environment.

  • Data Flow for Search:

    1. User sends a search request to the Load Balancer.
    2. Load Balancer forwards the request to an Application Server.
    3. Web Server on the Application Server receives the request and passes it to the Application Logic.
    4. Application Logic (Ruby code) processes the request, potentially authenticates and authorizes the user, and constructs a search query using the Searchkick Library.
    5. Searchkick Library communicates with the Elasticsearch Cluster (via network) to execute the search query.
    6. Elasticsearch Cluster returns search results to the Searchkick Library.
    7. Searchkick Library passes results back to the Application Logic.
    8. Application Logic processes and formats the results.
    9. Web Server sends the formatted search results back to the Load Balancer.
    10. Load Balancer returns the response to the User.

  • Key Components and Interactions:

    • User <-> Load Balancer <-> Application Server (Web Server & Application Logic) <-> Searchkick Library <-> Elasticsearch Cluster.
    • The Ruby Application (Application Logic) is the central component responsible for handling user requests, security checks (authentication, authorization, input validation), and interacting with Searchkick.
    • Searchkick Gem acts as an abstraction layer, simplifying communication with Elasticsearch and providing a Ruby-friendly API.
    • Elasticsearch Cluster is the backend data store and search engine, requiring robust security configurations.

4. Specific Security Recommendations Tailored to Searchkick

Based on the analysis, here are specific and tailored security recommendations for the Searchkick application:

  1. Mandatory Input Validation and Sanitization:

    • Recommendation: Implement strict input validation and sanitization for all user-provided search queries within the Ruby Application's Application Logic before they are passed to Searchkick.
    • Specific Action: Use a whitelist approach to define allowed characters, data types, and patterns for search inputs. Reject any input that deviates from these rules. Leverage input validation libraries in Ruby to enforce these rules effectively.

  2. Secure Query Construction with Searchkick DSL:

    • Recommendation: Always use Searchkick's query builders and DSL to construct search queries. Avoid manual construction of raw Elasticsearch queries using string interpolation or concatenation.
    • Specific Action: Train developers on the secure usage of Searchkick's DSL. Enforce code review practices to ensure that raw query construction is prohibited and only Searchkick's safe query building methods are used.

  3. Implement Application-Level Authorization for Search:

    • Recommendation: Implement robust authorization checks within the Ruby Application's Application Logic to control access to search functionality and the data being searched.
    • Specific Action: Integrate authorization logic into the search request handling flow. Before executing a search query via Searchkick, verify that the authenticated user has the necessary permissions to access the data they are trying to search. Use role-based access control (RBAC) or attribute-based access control (ABAC) mechanisms as appropriate for your application's needs.

  4. Secure Elasticsearch Cluster Configuration:

    • Recommendation: Harden the Elasticsearch cluster according to security best practices.
    • Specific Action:
      • Enable Elasticsearch Security Features: Implement Elasticsearch's built-in security features, including authentication (e.g., using native realm, LDAP, or Active Directory) and authorization (role-based access control).
      • Network Isolation: Ensure the Elasticsearch cluster is deployed within a private network (VPC private subnet) and is not directly accessible from the public internet. Use security groups and network ACLs to restrict network access to only authorized components (Application Servers).
      • Enable TLS/SSL: Enforce TLS/SSL encryption for all communication between the Ruby Application, Searchkick, and Elasticsearch. Configure both Elasticsearch and Searchkick client to use TLS/SSL.
      • Enable Encryption at Rest: Enable Elasticsearch's encryption at rest feature to protect data stored on disk.
      • Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits of the Elasticsearch cluster configuration to identify and remediate any misconfigurations or vulnerabilities.

  5. Dependency Management and Vulnerability Scanning in Build Process:

    • Recommendation: Integrate dependency scanning and vulnerability management into the application's build and deployment pipeline.
    • Specific Action:
      • Automated Dependency Scanning: Integrate tools like bundler-audit or brakeman into the CI/CD pipeline to automatically scan Ruby dependencies (including Searchkick and its dependencies) for known vulnerabilities during each build.
      • Dependency Updates: Establish a process for regularly updating dependencies, including Searchkick, to the latest versions with security patches.
      • Gem Integrity Verification: Implement mechanisms to verify the integrity of the Searchkick gem and other dependencies during the build process, ensuring they are obtained from trusted sources and have not been tampered with.

  6. Rate Limiting and Request Throttling for Search Endpoints:

    • Recommendation: Implement rate limiting and request throttling for search endpoints in the Web Server or Application Logic to mitigate DoS attacks.
    • Specific Action: Configure the Web Server (e.g., Nginx, Apache) or use a Ruby gem (e.g., rack-attack) to implement rate limiting based on IP address or user session. Set appropriate limits to prevent abuse while allowing legitimate user traffic.

  7. Comprehensive Logging and Monitoring of Search Activities:

    • Recommendation: Implement comprehensive logging and monitoring of search-related activities across all components (Ruby Application, Searchkick, Elasticsearch).
    • Specific Action:
      • Log Search Queries: Log sanitized search queries received by the application and the queries sent to Elasticsearch (by Searchkick).
      • Log Authorization Events: Log successful and failed authorization attempts related to search operations.
      • Elasticsearch Audit Logging: Enable Elasticsearch's audit logging feature to track security-related events within the cluster.
      • Centralized Logging and Monitoring: Aggregate logs from all components into a centralized logging system (e.g., ELK stack, Splunk) and set up alerts for suspicious activities, errors, and security events related to search functionality.

5. Actionable and Tailored Mitigation Strategies

| Identified Threat | Actionable Mitigation Strategy
| Elasticsearch Injection Attacks | Input Validation & Sanitization: Implement strict input validation and sanitization in the Ruby Application before passing queries to Searchkick. Use Searchkick's query builders exclusively.