Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
105 lines (83 loc) · 12.2 KB

File metadata and controls

105 lines (83 loc) · 12.2 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for bkeepers/dotenv

Objective: Compromise application using dotenv by exploiting weaknesses related to its usage and configuration.

Attack Tree Visualization

└── Compromise Application Using dotenv └── [CRITICAL NODE] Misconfiguration & Misuse of dotenv [HIGH RISK PATH START] └── [CRITICAL NODE] Using dotenv in Production Environment [HIGH RISK PATH] └── [CRITICAL NODE] Expose Sensitive Data in Production [HIGH RISK PATH] ├── [CRITICAL NODE] .env file accidentally deployed to production server [HIGH RISK PATH] └── [CRITICAL NODE] Web server misconfiguration exposes .env file [HIGH RISK PATH] └── [CRITICAL NODE] Insecure .env File Management [HIGH RISK PATH START] └── [CRITICAL NODE] .env file not properly secured in development/staging environments [HIGH RISK PATH] ├── [CRITICAL NODE] Unauthorized access to development/staging server allows reading .env [HIGH RISK PATH] └── [CRITICAL NODE] .env file accidentally committed to public version control repository [HIGH RISK PATH] [HIGH RISK PATH END]

  • Attack Vector: This is the overarching category encompassing improper usage of dotenv, primarily using it in environments it's not designed for (production) and mishandling .env files.
  • Why High-Risk: Misconfiguration is a very common source of vulnerabilities. Developers may misunderstand the purpose of dotenv or make mistakes in deployment and file management. This node is critical because it's the root cause of the most significant risks associated with dotenv.
  • Actionable Insights & Mitigations:
    • Developer Education: Thoroughly educate developers on the intended use of dotenv (development/local environments only) and the dangers of using it in production.
    • Enforce Policies: Implement organizational policies that explicitly prohibit the use of dotenv in production environments.
    • Code Reviews: Include checks for dotenv usage in production configurations during code reviews.
  • Attack Vector: Directly using dotenv to load environment variables in a production application. This means the .env file, containing sensitive secrets, is present on the production server.
  • Why High-Risk: Production environments are publicly accessible and are the primary target for attackers. Having sensitive configuration directly deployed in production significantly increases the attack surface. If the .env file is exposed, the entire application and its data are at risk.
  • Actionable Insights & Mitigations:
    • Eliminate .dotenv in Production: Completely remove dotenv from production deployment processes.
    • Use Production-Ready Configuration: Implement secure and robust environment variable management solutions designed for production environments (e.g., platform-specific environment variables, secret management services like Vault, AWS KMS, Azure Key Vault).
    • Deployment Pipeline Automation: Automate deployment pipelines to ensure .env files are never included in production builds or deployments.
  • Attack Vector: This is the direct consequence of using dotenv in production. Sensitive data, such as database credentials, API keys, and encryption secrets, stored in the .env file becomes accessible if the file is exposed.
  • Why High-Risk: Exposure of sensitive data is a critical security breach. It can lead to:
    • Data Breaches: Attackers can access and exfiltrate sensitive application data and user data.
    • Account Takeover: Exposed API keys or credentials can allow attackers to impersonate the application or its users.
    • System Compromise: Database credentials can grant attackers full access to the application's database.
  • Actionable Insights & Mitigations:
    • Prevent .env Exposure (Primary Mitigation): Focus on preventing the root causes: avoid using dotenv in production and secure web server configurations.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Even in non-production environments, apply the principle of least privilege. Avoid storing highly sensitive secrets in .env if possible, even for development.
    • Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits of production deployments to identify and remediate any potential .env exposure risks.
  • Attack Vector: Human error during the deployment process leads to the .env file being included in the production deployment package and placed on the production server.
  • Why High-Risk: Accidental deployment is a common mistake, especially in manual or less mature deployment processes. It's a low-effort attack vector for attackers if the deployed .env is accessible.
  • Actionable Insights & Mitigations:
    • Automated Deployment Pipelines: Implement fully automated deployment pipelines that explicitly exclude .env files.
    • Deployment Checklists: Use deployment checklists to ensure all steps are followed correctly and .env files are excluded.
    • File Exclusion Mechanisms: Utilize build tools and deployment scripts to automatically exclude .env files from production artifacts (e.g., using .dockerignore, .npmignore, build configurations).
  • Attack Vector: The web server (e.g., Nginx, Apache) is misconfigured to serve static files, and the .env file is placed in a publicly accessible directory within the web server's document root.
  • Why High-Risk: Web server misconfigurations are relatively common. Attackers can easily discover and access publicly served .env files by directly requesting them via HTTP.
  • Actionable Insights & Mitigations:
    • Secure Web Server Configuration: Review and harden web server configurations to ensure static file serving is properly restricted.
    • Restrict Access to .env: Place .env files outside of the web server's document root or configure the web server to explicitly deny access to .env files (e.g., using .htaccess or Nginx configuration directives).
    • Regular Security Scans: Perform regular web server security scans to identify misconfigurations and exposed files.
  • Attack Vector: This encompasses poor practices in handling .env files, particularly in development and staging environments, leading to unauthorized access or exposure.
  • Why High-Risk: While development and staging environments are not production, they often contain sensitive data or provide a stepping stone to production access. Insecure management of .env in these environments increases the risk of secrets leakage.
  • Actionable Insights & Mitigations:
    • Treat Dev/Staging Seriously: Apply security best practices to development and staging environments, not just production.
    • Access Control: Implement access control on development and staging servers to restrict who can access the file system and read .env files.
    • Secure Storage: Store .env files securely, even in development. Avoid storing them in publicly accessible locations.
  • Attack Vector: Development or staging servers lack proper access controls, allowing unauthorized individuals (including potential attackers who gain initial access) to read the .env file.
  • Why High-Risk: Development and staging environments are often less secured than production, making them easier targets. If an attacker compromises a dev/staging server, reading the .env file is a straightforward way to obtain sensitive credentials.
  • Actionable Insights & Mitigations:
    • Implement Access Control: Configure operating system-level access controls on development and staging servers to restrict access to .env files to authorized users only.
    • Regular Security Audits (Dev/Staging): Conduct security audits of development and staging environments to identify and remediate access control weaknesses.
  • Attack Vector: An attacker gains unauthorized access to a development or staging server through various means (e.g., exploiting vulnerabilities in applications running on the server, weak credentials, social engineering). Once inside, they can read the .env file.
  • Why High-Risk: Compromising development/staging servers is a common attacker tactic. Reading .env is a simple and direct way to escalate the attack and potentially gain access to production systems if credentials are shared or similar.
  • Actionable Insights & Mitigations:
    • Harden Dev/Staging Servers: Apply security hardening measures to development and staging servers, including:
      • Regular patching and updates.
      • Strong password policies and multi-factor authentication.
      • Firewall configurations.
      • Intrusion detection systems.
    • Minimize Attack Surface: Reduce the attack surface of dev/staging servers by removing unnecessary services and applications.
  • Attack Vector: Developers accidentally commit the .env file to a public version control repository (e.g., GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket). This makes the secrets in the .env file publicly accessible to anyone with internet access.
  • Why High-Risk: Public repository exposure is a very common and highly damaging mistake. Automated bots and attackers actively scan public repositories for exposed secrets. Once committed, secrets are often indexed and easily discoverable.
  • Actionable Insights & Mitigations:
    • .gitignore and Git Hooks (Crucial): Ensure .env is always included in .gitignore files. Implement Git hooks (pre-commit hooks) to automatically prevent commits of .env files.
    • Secret Scanning Tools: Use automated secret scanning tools to regularly scan repositories (both public and private) for accidentally committed secrets.
    • Developer Training (Git Best Practices): Train developers on Git best practices, emphasizing the importance of .gitignore and avoiding committing sensitive files.
    • Repository Monitoring: Monitor public repositories for any accidental commits of sensitive files related to your projects.