Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
135 lines (105 loc) · 14.6 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

135 lines (105 loc) · 14.6 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of delayed_job, based on the provided security design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the delayed_job library and its integration within a Ruby application, focusing on identifying potential vulnerabilities, assessing their impact, and recommending mitigation strategies. The analysis will cover key components like job enqueuing, worker execution, data handling, and interaction with the database and external services.
  • Scope: This analysis focuses on the delayed_job library itself, its interaction with the host Ruby application (assumed to be Rails, but applicable to others), and the database backend used for job persistence. It does not cover the security of the application's business logic except where that logic directly interacts with delayed_job. We assume a cloud-based deployment (AWS Elastic Beanstalk, as per the design document), but the principles apply to other environments. External service security is only considered in the context of how delayed_job interacts with them.
  • Methodology:
    1. Codebase and Documentation Review: Analyze the delayed_job codebase (available on GitHub) and its official documentation to understand its internal workings, data flow, and dependencies.
    2. Architecture Inference: Based on the provided C4 diagrams and descriptions, infer the system architecture, components, and data flow.
    3. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats based on the identified components, data flow, and known vulnerabilities associated with background job processing. We'll use a combination of STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and common attack patterns.
    4. Vulnerability Analysis: Assess the likelihood and impact of each identified threat.
    5. Mitigation Recommendations: Provide specific, actionable recommendations to mitigate the identified vulnerabilities, tailored to delayed_job and its typical usage.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of the key components identified in the design review:

  • Job Enqueuer (Component):

    • Security Concerns:
      • Input Validation: This is the most critical area. The enqueuer is responsible for serializing data into the job payload. If unsanitized user input is directly included in the payload, it creates a significant vulnerability. This could lead to:
        • Code Injection: If the worker deserializes and executes arbitrary code from the payload (e.g., using eval or similar). This is a high-severity risk.
        • Data Corruption: Malicious input could corrupt the database or lead to unexpected behavior in the worker.
        • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) / Other Injection Attacks: If the job payload data is later used in a web context without proper escaping, it could lead to XSS or other injection attacks. This is an indirect consequence, but still important.
      • Data Sanitization: Related to input validation, the enqueuer must ensure that data is properly encoded and escaped before being serialized.
      • Authorization: The enqueuer should only allow authorized users/processes to enqueue jobs. This is primarily the application's responsibility, but the enqueuer's design should facilitate this.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strict Input Validation: Implement rigorous validation before enqueuing any data. Use whitelisting (allow only known-good data) rather than blacklisting (attempting to block known-bad data). Validate data types, lengths, formats, and allowed characters.
      • Data Sanitization: Use appropriate escaping and encoding techniques to prevent injection attacks. For example, use Rails' built-in sanitization helpers if applicable.
      • Parameterization: If the job involves database queries, use parameterized queries (prepared statements) to prevent SQL injection. Never construct SQL queries by concatenating strings with user input.
      • Avoid eval and Similar: Do not use eval, instance_eval, send, or other methods that execute arbitrary code based on the job payload. Use well-defined methods and classes for job execution.
      • Principle of Least Privilege: Ensure the enqueuer component itself operates with the minimum necessary privileges.

  • Delayed Job Workers (Container):

    • Security Concerns:
      • Code Injection (Deserialization): The worker deserializes the job payload. This is the point where code injection vulnerabilities are most likely to be exploited. If the payload contains malicious code, and the worker executes it, the attacker gains control.
      • Privilege Escalation: Workers typically run with the same privileges as the application. If the application has excessive privileges, a compromised worker can do more damage.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): A malicious job could consume excessive resources (CPU, memory, database connections), leading to a denial of service. Long-running jobs, infinite loops, or large data processing could all be used for DoS.
      • Data Leakage: If the worker handles sensitive data and logs it insecurely (e.g., to standard output without redaction), it could expose that data.
      • External Service Interactions: If the worker interacts with external services, it needs to do so securely (using API keys, authentication tokens, etc.). Compromised credentials could lead to attacks on those services.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Safe Deserialization: Use a safe deserialization method. YAML, the default serializer in older versions of delayed_job, is notoriously vulnerable to code injection. Use a safer serializer like JSON, or a carefully configured YAML parser that restricts allowed classes. This is critical.
      • Resource Limits: Implement resource limits on worker processes. This can be done at the operating system level (e.g., using ulimit on Linux) or through containerization (e.g., Docker resource limits). This helps prevent DoS attacks.
      • Timeout Limits: Set reasonable timeouts for job execution. delayed_job has built-in timeout mechanisms. This prevents jobs from running indefinitely.
      • Dedicated User: Run worker processes under a dedicated, low-privilege user account. This limits the damage a compromised worker can do. This is a highly recommended practice.
      • Secure Logging: Implement a secure logging strategy. Log to a secure location, redact sensitive data, and monitor logs for suspicious activity.
      • Secure External Service Interactions: Use secure methods for interacting with external services (e.g., HTTPS, API keys stored securely). Rotate API keys regularly.
      • Monitoring and Alerting: Monitor worker performance, queue lengths, and error rates. Set up alerts for unusual activity.

  • Database (Container):

    • Security Concerns:
      • SQL Injection: If the application or delayed_job itself constructs SQL queries insecurely, it could be vulnerable to SQL injection.
      • Data Breach: The database contains the job queue, which may include sensitive data. Unauthorized access to the database could lead to a data breach.
      • Denial of Service: The database could be a target for DoS attacks, either directly or through excessive load from the workers.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Parameterized Queries: Use parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database interactions. This is the primary defense against SQL injection.
      • Database Access Controls: Restrict database access to only the necessary users and processes. Use strong passwords and follow the principle of least privilege.
      • Encryption at Rest: Encrypt the database at rest to protect data in case of physical theft or unauthorized access to the storage.
      • Regular Backups: Implement regular database backups to protect against data loss.
      • Database Firewall: Use a database firewall to restrict network access to the database.
      • Monitoring and Auditing: Monitor database activity and audit logs for suspicious events.

  • Web Application (Container):

    • Security Concerns: While the web application's overall security is outside the direct scope, its interaction with delayed_job is crucial. Vulnerabilities in the web application can lead to vulnerabilities in the background job processing.
    • Mitigation Strategies: The web application must implement robust security controls, including authentication, authorization, input validation, and output encoding. It should follow secure coding practices and be regularly updated to address security patches.

  • External Services (Software System):

    • Security Concerns: The security of external services is largely outside the control of delayed_job. However, delayed_job workers may interact with these services, and insecure interactions can create vulnerabilities.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Secure Communication: Use HTTPS for all communication with external services.
      • Secure Credential Storage: Store API keys and other credentials securely (e.g., using environment variables, a secrets management system, or encrypted configuration files). Never hardcode credentials in the application code.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting to prevent abuse of external services.
      • Input Validation (for API calls): Validate and sanitize any data sent to external services.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow (Inferred)

The C4 diagrams and descriptions provide a good overview. The key data flow is:

  1. User Action: A user interacts with the web application.
  2. Job Enqueuing: The web application (specifically, the Job Enqueuer component) creates a job and serializes the necessary data into a payload. This payload is then stored in the database.
  3. Job Retrieval: A Delayed Job Worker process retrieves a job from the database.
  4. Job Execution: The worker deserializes the payload and executes the job logic. This may involve interacting with the database, external services, or other parts of the application.
  5. Result Handling: The worker may update the database with the results of the job, or it may simply mark the job as completed.
  6. Error Handling: If an error occurs, the worker may retry the job (up to a configured limit) or mark it as failed.

4. Security Considerations Tailored to Delayed Job

The most critical security considerations for delayed_job are:

  • Safe Deserialization: This is paramount. The default YAML serializer in older versions is a major vulnerability. Switch to JSON or a properly configured YAML parser.
  • Input Validation and Sanitization: The application must rigorously validate and sanitize all data that is included in job payloads. This is the primary defense against code injection and other injection attacks.
  • Resource Limits and Timeouts: Implement resource limits and timeouts to prevent DoS attacks.
  • Principle of Least Privilege: Run worker processes under a dedicated, low-privilege user account.
  • Monitoring and Alerting: Monitor job queues, worker performance, and error rates.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Tailored to Delayed Job)

Here's a prioritized list of actionable mitigation strategies:

  1. IMMEDIATE ACTION: Change Serializer (if using YAML): If you are using the default YAML serializer, immediately switch to JSON or a secure YAML configuration. This is the single most important step. Add this to your config/application.rb or an initializer:

    Delayed::Worker.backend = :active_record # Or your chosen backend
Delayed::Worker.destroy_failed_jobs = false
Delayed::Worker.sleep_delay = 60
Delayed::Worker.max_attempts = 3
Delayed::Worker.max_run_time = 5.minutes
Delayed::Worker.read_ahead = 10
Delayed::Worker.default_queue_name = 'default'
Delayed::Worker.delay_jobs = !Rails.env.test?
Delayed::Worker.raise_signal_exceptions = :term
Delayed::Worker.logger = Logger.new(File.join(Rails.root, 'log', 'delayed_job.log'))

# Use JSON for serialization
Delayed::Worker.serializer = :json

  2. HIGH PRIORITY: Input Validation and Sanitization: Review all code that enqueues jobs. Implement strict input validation and sanitization for all data included in job payloads. Use whitelisting and appropriate escaping techniques.

  3. HIGH PRIORITY: Dedicated Worker User: Create a dedicated, low-privilege user account for running delayed_job worker processes. This is a crucial security best practice. Configure your deployment environment (e.g., Elastic Beanstalk) to run the workers under this user.

  4. HIGH PRIORITY: Resource Limits and Timeouts: Configure resource limits (CPU, memory) and timeouts for worker processes. Use delayed_job's built-in timeout settings (max_run_time) and consider operating system-level limits or containerization.

  5. MEDIUM PRIORITY: Monitoring and Alerting: Implement robust monitoring and alerting for job queues, worker performance, and error rates. Use tools like Prometheus, Grafana, New Relic, Datadog, or similar. Set up alerts for high failure rates, long queue lengths, and slow processing times.

  6. MEDIUM PRIORITY: Secure Logging: Implement a secure logging strategy. Log to a secure location, redact sensitive data, and monitor logs for suspicious activity.

  7. MEDIUM PRIORITY: Database Security: Ensure your database is properly secured (access controls, encryption at rest, parameterized queries).

  8. MEDIUM PRIORITY: Dependency Updates: Regularly update delayed_job and all its dependencies to address security patches. Use tools like Bundler Audit to scan for known vulnerabilities.

  9. LOW PRIORITY (but important): Review External Service Interactions: Review how your workers interact with external services. Ensure secure communication (HTTPS) and secure credential storage.

  10. LOW PRIORITY (but important): Code Review: Conduct regular code reviews, focusing on security aspects, especially around job enqueuing and worker execution.

By implementing these mitigation strategies, you can significantly improve the security of your application using delayed_job. Remember that security is an ongoing process, and regular reviews and updates are essential.