Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
96 lines (77 loc) · 8.66 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

96 lines (77 loc) · 8.66 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for ddollar/foreman

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Environment Variable Handling

  • Description:

    1. Identify Sensitive Data: Create a comprehensive list of all sensitive data used by the application, including API keys, database credentials, secret keys, and any other confidential information that foreman will manage via environment variables.
    2. .gitignore Configuration: Ensure that the .gitignore file explicitly includes .env (and any variations like .env.local, .env.development, etc.). This prevents accidental commits of files that foreman uses to load environment variables.
    3. Restrict .env File Permissions: On Unix-like systems, use chmod 600 .env (and for any other .env.* files used by foreman). This sets restrictive permissions.
    4. Environment Variable Validation: Within the application code (e.g., in a configuration file or initialization script), implement validation checks for all environment variables loaded by foreman. This is crucial because foreman is the entry point for these variables. This includes:
      • Type checking: Ensure variables are of the expected data type.
      • Length restrictions: Limit lengths to prevent buffer overflows.
      • Character whitelisting/blacklisting: Restrict allowed characters to prevent injection attacks.
      • Format validation: Use regular expressions or libraries for specific formats (emails, URLs).
    5. Secrets Management (Production): For production, integrate a secrets management solution (HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, etc.). Configure foreman to read environment variables set by these tools, not from .env files in production. This is a critical step, as foreman is often used in deployment.
    6. Environment-Specific Configuration: Create separate .env files (or vault configurations) for different environments (development, staging, production). Use foreman's features (if available) or environment variables (e.g., FOREMAN_ENV) to load the correct configuration. This prevents accidental exposure of production credentials.
    7. Principle of Least Privilege: Ensure the user account under which foreman itself runs has only the minimum necessary permissions. Avoid running foreman as root.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Threat: Exposure of Sensitive Data (Severity: Critical) - foreman directly handles sensitive data via environment variables.
    • Threat: Command Injection (Severity: Critical) - If environment variables loaded by foreman contain user input and are used unsafely, this is a direct vulnerability.
    • Threat: Privilege Escalation (Severity: High) - If foreman runs with excessive privileges, a compromised process it manages inherits those privileges.
    • Threat: Accidental Disclosure (Severity: Medium) - Committing .env files, which foreman uses, is a direct risk.

  • Impact:

    • Exposure of Sensitive Data: Risk significantly reduced by all the steps, especially using a secrets manager with foreman.
    • Command Injection: Risk significantly reduced by sanitizing variables that foreman loads.
    • Privilege Escalation: Risk reduced by limiting foreman's own privileges.
    • Accidental Disclosure: Risk eliminated by preventing .env file commits.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • .gitignore configuration: Implemented.
    • Restrict .env File Permissions: Implemented via a post-install script.
    • Basic Environment Variable Validation: Implemented (presence checks only).

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Comprehensive Environment Variable Validation: Missing robust type checking, length restrictions, and character validation.
    • Secrets Management (Production): Not yet implemented. Production still relies on .env files loaded by foreman.
    • Environment-Specific Configuration: Partially implemented; needs a more robust loading mechanism.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Partially implemented; needs further review of foreman's user permissions.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Procfile Configuration

  • Description:

    1. Command Review: Carefully examine each command defined in the Procfile, which foreman uses to start processes. Ensure each command is necessary and safe.
    2. Avoid User Input in Commands: Never directly embed user-supplied data within commands in the Procfile. This is critical because foreman executes these commands. Use:
      • Standard Input: Pipe data to the process.
      • Command-Line Arguments: Pass data as arguments, with proper escaping.
      • Environment Variables: Set validated environment variables (see previous strategy) and have the process read them.
    3. Parameterization: Instead of hardcoding values in the Procfile, use environment variables (managed securely by foreman, as above) to parameterize commands.
    4. Avoid Shell Interpolation (where possible): If using environment variables within the Procfile, avoid direct shell interpolation if the variable might contain user-supplied data. This is a direct interaction with how foreman executes commands.
    5. Regular Audits: Periodically review the Procfile (used by foreman) during code reviews and security audits.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Threat: Command Injection (Severity: Critical) - foreman executes the commands in the Procfile; improper handling of user input here is a direct vulnerability.
    • Threat: Unauthorized Actions (Severity: High) - Poorly configured commands in the Procfile (executed by foreman) can lead to unauthorized actions.
    • Threat: Information Disclosure (Severity: Medium) - Commands that expose sensitive information (e.g., printing environment variables) are a risk, especially as foreman manages the process environment.

  • Impact:

    • Command Injection: Risk significantly reduced by avoiding user input and using safe data passing methods within the foreman-managed Procfile.
    • Unauthorized Actions: Risk reduced by careful review and restriction of commands in the Procfile.
    • Information Disclosure: Risk reduced by avoiding commands that expose sensitive information.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic Command Review: An initial review was conducted.
    • Parameterization with Environment Variables: Most commands are parameterized.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Avoid User Input in Commands: Needs a thorough review to ensure no user input is directly embedded in Procfile commands executed by foreman. High priority.
    • Regular Audits: No formal process for regular Procfile audits.
    • Avoid Shell Interpolation: Need to check all commands and refactor.

Mitigation Strategy: Dependency Management and Updates (for foreman itself)

  • Description:

    1. Regular Updates: Use bundle update foreman regularly to install the latest versions of foreman. This is crucial because vulnerabilities in foreman itself can impact the entire application.
    2. Vulnerability Scanning: Integrate a vulnerability scanning tool (bundler-audit, Snyk, Dependabot) and configure it to scan foreman and its dependencies.
    3. Automated Alerts: Set up alerts for newly discovered vulnerabilities in foreman.
    4. Prompt Remediation: Address any identified vulnerabilities in foreman promptly.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Threat: Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities (in foreman) (Severity: High to Critical) - Vulnerabilities in foreman itself can be exploited.
    • Threat: Supply Chain Attacks (targeting foreman) (Severity: High) - Compromised foreman dependencies are a risk.

  • Impact:

    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities: Risk significantly reduced by keeping foreman updated.
    • Supply Chain Attacks: Risk reduced by updating foreman and its dependencies.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Regular Updates: foreman is updated periodically, but not on a strict schedule.
    • Vulnerability Scanning: bundler-audit is included, but automated scanning/alerts are not configured.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Automated Alerts: No automated alerts for new vulnerabilities in foreman.
    • Prompt Remediation: No formal process for addressing vulnerabilities in foreman.
    • Strict Update Schedule: Need a more consistent schedule for updating foreman.