Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
170 lines (141 loc) · 16.8 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

170 lines (141 loc) · 16.8 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for docusealco/docuseal

Objective: To gain unauthorized access to sensitive documents managed by the application using Docuseal, potentially leading to data breaches, manipulation of signed documents, or disruption of the document signing process.

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Application Using Docuseal

AND 1. Exploit Docuseal Vulnerabilities
    OR 1.1. Authentication and Authorization Bypass
        OR 1.1.1. Credential Stuffing/Brute Force (if Docuseal manages users directly) **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** **[CRITICAL NODE]**

    OR 1.2. Input Validation Vulnerabilities
        OR 1.2.1. Malicious Document Upload (Exploiting Document Parsing) **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** **[CRITICAL NODE]**

    OR 1.3. Document Manipulation Vulnerabilities
        OR 1.3.1. Signature Forgery/Bypass **[CRITICAL NODE]**

    OR 1.4. Data Exposure Vulnerabilities
        OR 1.4.1. Insecure Document Storage **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** **[CRITICAL NODE]**

    OR 1.5. Denial of Service (DoS) Vulnerabilities
        OR 1.5.1. Resource Exhaustion (e.g., Document Processing, Storage) **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**

    OR 1.6. Dependency Vulnerabilities **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** **[CRITICAL NODE]**
        OR 1.6.1. Exploiting Vulnerable Libraries/Frameworks used by Docuseal

AND 2. Exploit Docuseal Integration Weaknesses (Application-Side)
    OR 2.1. Insecure Integration Logic
        OR 2.1.3. Exposing Docuseal API Keys/Secrets in Application Code **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** **[CRITICAL NODE]**

AND 3. Exploit Docuseal Configuration Issues
    OR 3.1. Default/Weak Configuration
        OR 3.1.1. Using Default Credentials for Docuseal Admin/Accounts **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** **[CRITICAL NODE]**

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.1. Credential Stuffing/Brute Force (if Docuseal manages users directly) [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector:
    • If Docuseal manages its own user accounts (separate from the main application), attackers can attempt to guess user credentials through brute-force attacks (trying many passwords for a single username) or credential stuffing (using lists of username/password pairs leaked from other breaches).
  • Potential Consequences:
    • Successful credential compromise grants attackers unauthorized access to Docuseal functionalities and potentially sensitive documents managed within Docuseal.
    • This can be a stepping stone to further attacks, such as data exfiltration, document manipulation, or denial of service.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement Strong Password Policies: Enforce minimum password length, complexity requirements, and regular password changes.
    • Enable Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Add an extra layer of security beyond passwords, requiring users to verify their identity through a second factor (e.g., OTP, authenticator app).
    • Implement Rate Limiting: Limit the number of login attempts from a single IP address or user account within a specific timeframe to slow down or prevent brute-force attacks.
    • Account Lockout: Temporarily lock user accounts after a certain number of failed login attempts.
    • Monitor Login Attempts: Log and monitor login attempts for suspicious activity, such as a high volume of failed attempts from a single source.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2.1. Malicious Document Upload (Exploiting Document Parsing) [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector:
    • Attackers upload specially crafted documents (e.g., PDFs, DOCX) designed to exploit vulnerabilities in Docuseal's document parsing libraries or its own document processing logic.
    • These malicious documents can contain exploits that trigger buffer overflows, format string vulnerabilities, or other parsing errors.
  • Potential Consequences:
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Malicious documents can consume excessive resources (CPU, memory) during parsing, leading to service disruption or crashes.
    • Remote Code Execution (RCE): In severe cases, successful exploitation can allow attackers to execute arbitrary code on the Docuseal server, gaining full control of the system.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Robust Input Validation and Sanitization: Thoroughly validate and sanitize all uploaded documents before processing. Check file types, sizes, and content for anomalies.
    • Use Secure Document Parsing Libraries: Utilize well-vetted and actively maintained document parsing libraries. Keep these libraries updated to patch known vulnerabilities.
    • Sandboxing Document Processing: Isolate document processing in a sandboxed environment with limited privileges to contain the impact of potential exploits.
    • Resource Limits: Implement resource limits (CPU, memory, time) for document processing to prevent resource exhaustion DoS attacks.
    • Regular Security Testing: Conduct regular security testing, including fuzzing and penetration testing, specifically targeting document upload and processing functionalities.

Attack Tree Path: 1.3.1. Signature Forgery/Bypass [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector:
    • Attackers attempt to exploit weaknesses in Docuseal's digital signature implementation, cryptographic algorithms, or verification processes to forge signatures or bypass signature requirements.
    • This could involve cryptographic attacks, flaws in key management, or logical errors in signature verification code.
  • Potential Consequences:
    • Undermining Trust and Legal Validity: Successful signature forgery completely undermines the trust and legal validity of documents signed using Docuseal.
    • Legal and Financial Liabilities: Forged signatures can lead to significant legal and financial liabilities for organizations relying on Docuseal for document signing.
    • Data Manipulation with Impunity: Attackers could manipulate document content after forging signatures, making it appear legitimately signed.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Thorough Review of Signature Logic: Conduct a rigorous security review of Docuseal's signature generation and verification logic by cryptography experts.
    • Use Strong Cryptographic Algorithms and Libraries: Employ well-established and secure cryptographic algorithms and libraries for signature generation and verification.
    • Secure Key Management: Implement secure key generation, storage, and access control for cryptographic keys used in signing.
    • Regular Cryptographic Audits: Perform regular cryptographic audits to ensure the ongoing security and integrity of the signature implementation.
    • Compliance with Digital Signature Standards: Ensure Docuseal's signature implementation complies with relevant digital signature standards and regulations (e.g., eIDAS, PAdES).

Attack Tree Path: 1.4.1. Insecure Document Storage [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector:
    • Docuseal stores sensitive documents. Insecure storage practices can expose these documents to unauthorized access. This could include:
      • Lack of Encryption at Rest: Documents are stored without encryption, making them easily accessible if storage is compromised.
      • Weak Encryption: Using weak or broken encryption algorithms that can be easily cracked.
      • Improper Access Controls: Insufficient access controls on document storage, allowing unauthorized users or processes to access documents.
      • Storage in Publicly Accessible Locations: Storing documents in publicly accessible cloud storage buckets or directories without proper security configurations.
  • Potential Consequences:
    • Data Breach: Unauthorized access to document storage directly leads to a data breach, exposing sensitive and confidential information.
    • Compliance Violations: Data breaches can result in violations of data privacy regulations (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA) and significant fines and legal repercussions.
    • Reputational Damage: Data breaches severely damage an organization's reputation and erode customer trust.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strong Encryption at Rest: Encrypt all documents at rest using strong encryption algorithms (e.g., AES-256) and robust key management practices.
    • Access Control Lists (ACLs): Implement strict access control lists (ACLs) on document storage to restrict access to only authorized users and processes.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Grant only the necessary permissions to users and processes accessing document storage.
    • Secure Storage Infrastructure: Utilize secure and reputable storage infrastructure providers with strong security certifications and practices.
    • Regular Security Audits of Storage: Conduct regular security audits of document storage configurations and access controls to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Path: 1.5.1. Resource Exhaustion (e.g., Document Processing, Storage) [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector:
    • Attackers intentionally send a large volume of resource-intensive requests to Docuseal, aiming to exhaust its resources (CPU, memory, storage, network bandwidth).
    • This can be achieved by:
      • Uploading very large or complex documents.
      • Sending a flood of document processing requests.
      • Filling up storage space with junk data.
  • Potential Consequences:
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Resource exhaustion leads to service degradation or complete service outage, preventing legitimate users from accessing Docuseal functionalities.
    • Business Disruption: DoS attacks can disrupt critical business processes that rely on document signing, causing financial losses and operational delays.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Resource Limits: Implement resource limits for document processing (e.g., maximum file size, processing time) and storage (e.g., storage quotas).
    • Rate Limiting: Limit the rate of requests from individual users or IP addresses to prevent request floods.
    • Input Validation and Sanitization: Validate and sanitize inputs to prevent processing of excessively large or complex documents.
    • Content Delivery Network (CDN): Use a CDN to distribute static content and absorb some of the network traffic, mitigating network-level DoS attacks.
    • Monitoring and Alerting: Implement robust monitoring of resource usage and set up alerts to detect and respond to resource exhaustion attacks in real-time.

Attack Tree Path: 1.6. Dependency Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector:
    • Docuseal, like most software, relies on third-party libraries and frameworks. These dependencies may contain known vulnerabilities.
    • Attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities if Docuseal uses vulnerable versions of its dependencies.
    • Exploitation can occur through various means, depending on the specific vulnerability, such as sending crafted requests, uploading malicious documents, or other attack vectors.
  • Potential Consequences:
    • Wide Range of Impacts: The impact of dependency vulnerabilities can vary greatly depending on the vulnerability itself and the affected dependency. Impacts can range from DoS and data breaches to remote code execution and full system compromise.
    • Supply Chain Risk: Dependency vulnerabilities represent a supply chain risk, as vulnerabilities in third-party components can directly impact the security of Docuseal.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Software Bill of Materials (SBOM): Maintain a comprehensive SBOM that lists all of Docuseal's dependencies and their versions.
    • Dependency Vulnerability Scanning: Regularly scan Docuseal's dependencies for known vulnerabilities using automated vulnerability scanning tools.
    • Timely Patching and Updates: Promptly patch and update vulnerable dependencies to the latest secure versions.
    • Dependency Management Tools: Utilize dependency management tools to automate dependency updates and vulnerability tracking.
    • Security Monitoring for Dependency Vulnerabilities: Subscribe to security advisories and monitor for newly disclosed vulnerabilities in Docuseal's dependencies.

Attack Tree Path: 2.1.3. Exposing Docuseal API Keys/Secrets in Application Code [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector:
    • Developers may inadvertently or carelessly embed Docuseal API keys, secrets, or other sensitive credentials directly into the application's source code.
    • If this code is committed to version control systems (like Git), publicly accessible repositories, or otherwise exposed, attackers can easily extract these credentials.
  • Potential Consequences:
    • Full System Compromise: Exposed API keys can grant attackers full, unauthorized access to Docuseal's APIs and functionalities, potentially leading to complete system compromise.
    • Data Breach and Manipulation: Attackers can use exposed keys to access, exfiltrate, or manipulate sensitive documents and data managed by Docuseal.
    • Account Takeover: In some cases, exposed keys might grant access to administrative accounts or functionalities within Docuseal.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Never Hardcode Secrets: Strictly avoid hardcoding API keys, secrets, passwords, or any sensitive credentials directly into application code.
    • Secure Configuration Management: Utilize secure configuration management practices to store and manage sensitive credentials outside of the codebase.
    • Environment Variables: Use environment variables to inject sensitive configuration values into the application at runtime.
    • Secrets Management Vaults: Employ dedicated secrets management vaults (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager) to securely store, access, and rotate secrets.
    • Code Review and Static Analysis: Implement code review processes and static code analysis tools to detect and prevent accidental hardcoding of secrets.
    • Credential Scanning in Repositories: Regularly scan code repositories for accidentally committed secrets using automated credential scanning tools.

Attack Tree Path: 3.1.1. Using Default Credentials for Docuseal Admin/Accounts [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector:
    • Many software applications, including Docuseal, may come with default administrative accounts or credentials (e.g., default username and password).
    • If administrators fail to change these default credentials during deployment, attackers can easily find and use them to gain unauthorized administrative access.
  • Potential Consequences:
    • Full Administrative Access: Default credentials grant attackers complete administrative control over Docuseal, allowing them to:
      • Access and manipulate all documents.
      • Modify configurations and settings.
      • Create or delete user accounts.
      • Potentially compromise the underlying system.
    • Data Breach and System Takeover: Administrative access can be leveraged to exfiltrate sensitive data, manipulate documents, or completely take over the Docuseal system and potentially the application it supports.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Mandatory Password Change on First Login: Force administrators to change default passwords immediately upon first login.
    • Remove or Disable Default Accounts: If possible, remove or disable default administrative accounts altogether.
    • Strong Password Policies for Admin Accounts: Enforce strong password policies for all administrative accounts, including minimum length, complexity, and regular password changes.
    • Security Configuration Checklist: Implement a security configuration checklist that includes changing default credentials as a mandatory step during deployment.
    • Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits to verify that default credentials have been changed and that strong password policies are enforced.