Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
89 lines (71 loc) · 8.86 KB

File metadata and controls

89 lines (71 loc) · 8.86 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for drapergem/draper

Objective: To gain unauthorized access to sensitive data or manipulate application behavior by exploiting vulnerabilities arising from the use of Draper decorators.

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application via Draper Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]
└── 2. Exploit Data Handling Issues in Decorators [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    └── 2.1. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Decorator Output [CRITICAL NODE]
        └── 2.1.2. Exploiting Lack of Output Encoding in Decorators [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
└── 3. Exploit Misconfiguration or Misuse of Draper [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    └── 3.2. Inconsistent Decoration or Missing Decoration [CRITICAL NODE]
        └── 3.2.1. Forgetting to Decorate Data in Specific Views [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
  • Description: This is the root goal. Attackers aim to compromise the application specifically by exploiting weaknesses related to the use of Draper decorators.
  • Likelihood: Overall likelihood depends on the presence of vulnerabilities in the Draper implementation within the application.
  • Impact: Successful compromise can lead to unauthorized access, data breaches, manipulation of application behavior, and reputational damage.
  • Effort: Effort varies depending on the specific vulnerability exploited.
  • Skill Level: Skill level varies depending on the specific vulnerability exploited.
  • Detection Difficulty: Detection difficulty varies depending on the specific vulnerability exploited and security monitoring in place.
  • Description: Attackers target vulnerabilities related to how decorators handle and present data. This is a high-risk area because decorators are directly involved in rendering data in views, making them a prime location for presentation-layer vulnerabilities.
  • Likelihood: Medium to High - Data handling vulnerabilities, especially XSS, are common in web applications.
  • Impact: High - Data breaches, account compromise, malware distribution, defacement.
  • Effort: Low to Medium - Exploiting data handling issues can range from simple input manipulation to more complex injection techniques.
  • Skill Level: Low to Medium - Basic to intermediate web security knowledge.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Detectable with proper security measures, but requires vigilance.
  • Description: Attackers aim to inject malicious scripts into data that is processed and displayed by decorators without proper sanitization, leading to XSS vulnerabilities in the application's views. This is a primary critical node within data handling issues.
  • Likelihood: Medium to High - XSS is a prevalent web vulnerability, and decorators, if not handled carefully, can be a source.
  • Impact: High - Full account compromise, data theft, malware distribution, defacement.
  • Effort: Low to Medium - Exploiting XSS can be relatively easy if output encoding is missing.
  • Skill Level: Low to Medium - Basic to intermediate web security knowledge.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Detectable with security scanning and code reviews, but requires consistent effort.
  • Description: This is the most critical and high-risk attack vector. Attackers exploit situations where decorators fail to properly escape or encode data before rendering it in views, especially user-generated content or data from untrusted sources.
  • Likelihood: High - Developers may forget or neglect output encoding, especially when dealing with dynamic data in decorators.
  • Impact: High - Full account compromise, data theft, malware distribution, defacement.
  • Effort: Low - Simply providing malicious input to vulnerable fields.
  • Skill Level: Low - Basic understanding of web application vulnerabilities.
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Medium - Output encoding issues are often detectable with automated scanners and code reviews.
  • Mitigation:
    • Mandatory Output Encoding: Enforce strict output encoding (e.g., HTML escaping) within all decorators when rendering data. Use Rails' h helper or similar methods consistently.
    • Code Reviews: Specifically review decorator code to ensure output encoding is always implemented correctly.
    • Automated Security Scanning: Use security scanners that can detect potential XSS vulnerabilities, including those related to output encoding.
    • Developer Training: Train developers on the importance of output encoding and how to implement it correctly in decorators.
  • Description: Attackers leverage vulnerabilities arising from incorrect implementation or configuration of Draper within the application. Misuse, especially leading to inconsistent decoration, is a high-risk path.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Misconfiguration and misuse are common in software development.
  • Impact: High - Can lead to XSS vulnerabilities, information disclosure, and other security issues.
  • Effort: Low to Medium - Exploiting misconfigurations can range from simple observation to more targeted attacks.
  • Skill Level: Low to Medium - Basic to intermediate web security knowledge.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Detectable through code reviews, security audits, and penetration testing.
  • Description: Inconsistent application of decorators across the application or forgetting to decorate data in certain views can lead to vulnerabilities. This is a critical node within misconfiguration/misuse.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Inconsistency and oversights are common in larger projects or teams.
  • Impact: High - XSS vulnerabilities if unescaped data is rendered due to missing decoration.
  • Effort: Low to Medium - Identifying missing decoration can be done through code analysis and application testing.
  • Skill Level: Low to Medium - Basic to intermediate web security knowledge.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Can be detected through code reviews, security scanning, and penetration testing, but requires thorough coverage.
  • Description: This is a highly specific and high-risk attack vector. Developers overlooking the need to decorate data in certain views, leading to raw, unescaped data being rendered, directly resulting in potential XSS.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Common oversight in development, especially in larger applications or during rapid development cycles.
  • Impact: High - XSS vulnerabilities if unescaped data is rendered.
  • Effort: Low - Simply finding views where data is not decorated.
  • Skill Level: Low - Basic understanding of web application vulnerabilities.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Can be detected through code reviews, security scanning, and penetration testing, but requires thorough coverage of all views.
  • Mitigation:
    • Consistent Decoration Strategy: Establish clear guidelines and patterns for when and how to use decorators throughout the application. Document these guidelines clearly.
    • Code Reviews: Specifically check for consistent decoration practices during code reviews.
    • Automated Checks (Linters/Static Analysis): Explore the possibility of using linters or static analysis tools to detect instances where data might be rendered without decoration (though this can be challenging to implement effectively).
    • Thorough Testing: Test all views and data rendering paths to ensure consistent and secure decoration. Penetration testing should specifically target views for missing decoration vulnerabilities.