Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
56 lines (48 loc) · 4.36 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

56 lines (48 loc) · 4.36 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for faker-ruby/faker

Objective: To cause denial of service or data leakage by exploiting the faker-ruby/faker gem.

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application using Faker | ------------------------------------------------- | | Denial of Service (DoS) Data Leakage / Privacy Violation | | | Resource Exhaustion Deterministic Data Exposure | | Large Data Generation {CRITICAL} Use of Faker::Config.locale {CRITICAL} | | Accidental Exposure {CRITICAL} (e.g., logging, error messages)

Attack Tree Path: Denial of Service (DoS) via Resource Exhaustion

  • Attack Vector: Large Data Generation {CRITICAL}
    • Description: An attacker exploits a vulnerability in the application where user input controls the amount of data generated by Faker. By providing a very large input value, the attacker triggers the generation of an excessive amount of data, consuming server resources (CPU, memory) and leading to a denial of service.
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: High
    • Effort: Low
    • Skill Level: Intermediate
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium
    • Mitigation:
      • Implement strict input validation on any user-supplied values that influence the quantity of data generated by Faker. Set reasonable limits on the number of items, string lengths, etc.
      • Enforce resource limits (e.g., memory limits, timeouts) within the application to prevent runaway processes.
      • Monitor application resource usage (CPU, memory) to detect potential DoS attempts.

Attack Tree Path: Data Leakage / Privacy Violation via Deterministic Data Exposure

  • Attack Vector: Use of Faker::Config.locale {CRITICAL} to generate sensitive data, followed by Accidental Exposure {CRITICAL}.
    • Description: The application uses Faker::Config.locale to generate data that is considered sensitive (e.g., addresses, phone numbers, names associated with a specific locale). This data is then unintentionally exposed through various means, such as:
      • Logging: Sensitive Faker-generated data is included in application logs.
      • Error Messages: Error messages displayed to users inadvertently reveal Faker-generated data.
      • Debugging Output: Debugging information containing Faker data is left enabled in production.
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: Medium (can be High depending on the specific data exposed)
    • Effort: Very Low (for accidental exposure); Low (for finding the locale usage)
    • Skill Level: Novice (for accidental exposure); Intermediate (for finding the locale usage)
    • Detection Difficulty: Easy (for accidental exposure); Medium (for finding the locale usage)
    • Mitigation:
      • Review Locale Usage: Carefully review all instances where Faker::Config.locale is used. Avoid using it to generate data that will be exposed to users or logged in production. Consider using a default, generic locale if possible, or no locale at all.
      • Data Minimization: Only generate the minimum amount of Faker data required. Don't generate unnecessary fields.
      • Secure Logging: Configure logging to never include sensitive data, including Faker-generated data. Use a logging library that supports redaction or masking of sensitive fields.
      • Robust Error Handling: Implement robust error handling that returns generic error messages to users. Never expose internal details, including Faker-generated data, in error messages.
      • Disable Debugging Output: Ensure that all debugging output is disabled in production environments.
      • Sanitize Output: Before displaying any Faker-generated data to users, or including it in logs, sanitize the data. This might involve redacting sensitive parts or replacing them with placeholders.