Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
201 lines (178 loc) · 15.9 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

201 lines (178 loc) · 15.9 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for fluent/fluentd

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Input Plugin Configuration

  • Description:
    1. For each input plugin used in Fluentd (e.g., in_forward, in_http, in_tail), review its configuration parameters for security implications within fluent.conf.
    2. For network-based input plugins (in_forward, in_http):
      • Enable authentication mechanisms (e.g., shared_secret_key, TLS client certificates) within the plugin configuration to verify log senders.
      • Implement TLS/SSL encryption by configuring ssl_cert, ssl_key, etc., in the input plugin to secure network communication.
      • Restrict listening interfaces and ports using bind and port parameters in the plugin configuration.
    3. For file-based input plugins (in_tail):
      • Configure path parameter to point to log files with appropriate file system permissions already in place (this part is external, but configuration within Fluentd is about which files to monitor).
    4. Regularly audit input plugin configurations in fluent.conf to ensure adherence to security best practices.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Log Injection (High Severity): Attackers can inject arbitrary logs into the system via unsecured input plugins.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks (Medium Severity): Without encryption configured in input plugins, network traffic containing logs can be intercepted.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized Log Injection: High reduction - authentication in input plugins prevents unauthorized sources.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: High reduction - encryption in input plugins protects log data confidentiality and integrity during transmission.
  • Currently Implemented: TLS/SSL encryption is configured for in_forward input in fluent.conf.
  • Missing Implementation: Authentication mechanisms for in_forward are not fully configured within fluent.conf.

Mitigation Strategy: Rate Limiting and Throttling

  • Description:
    1. Identify input sources susceptible to log flooding.
    2. Implement rate limiting mechanisms within Fluentd using plugins or plugin features.
    3. Configure plugins with rate limiting capabilities (e.g., using rate_limit parameters if available in input plugins or using dedicated rate limiting filter plugins).
    4. Set thresholds and actions (e.g., drop, buffer) for exceeding rate limits within the plugin configuration in fluent.conf.
    5. Monitor rate limiting metrics exposed by Fluentd or plugins to adjust configurations as needed.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Denial-of-Service (DoS) Attacks via Log Flooding (High Severity): Attackers flood Fluentd with excessive log data.
    • Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Unintentional log floods consume excessive resources on the Fluentd server.
  • Impact:
    • Denial-of-Service (DoS) Attacks via Log Flooding: High reduction - rate limiting in Fluentd prevents overwhelming the system.
    • Resource Exhaustion: Medium reduction - mitigates resource exhaustion caused by log floods.
  • Currently Implemented: No rate limiting is currently configured directly within Fluentd.
  • Missing Implementation: Rate limiting and throttling need to be implemented within Fluentd using appropriate plugins and configurations in fluent.conf.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Fluentd Configuration Files

  • Description:
    1. Store Fluentd configuration files (fluent.conf) in a secure location on the server.
    2. Set file system permissions to restrict access to the configuration files.
    3. Avoid storing sensitive information directly in fluent.conf.
    4. Utilize environment variables within fluent.conf using ${ENV_VAR} syntax to inject sensitive configuration values at runtime.
    5. For more robust secret management, consider using plugins that integrate with external secret management solutions and configure them within fluent.conf.
    6. Implement version control for fluent.conf files to track changes.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Exposure of Sensitive Information (High Severity): Storing credentials in plaintext fluent.conf files.
    • Unauthorized Configuration Changes (Medium Severity): If fluent.conf is not protected, unauthorized users could modify it.
  • Impact:
    • Exposure of Sensitive Information: High reduction - using environment variables and secret management plugins prevents credentials in fluent.conf.
    • Unauthorized Configuration Changes: High reduction - restricted file permissions and version control for fluent.conf.
  • Currently Implemented: Configuration files are stored in a protected directory. Environment variables are used in fluent.conf for some sensitive data.
  • Missing Implementation: Integration with a dedicated secret management solution via a Fluentd plugin is missing.

Mitigation Strategy: Configuration Validation and Auditing

  • Description:
    1. Implement a process for validating Fluentd configurations (fluent.conf) before deployment.
    2. Use configuration linters or schema validation tools (if available for Fluentd configuration syntax) to detect errors in fluent.conf.
    3. Develop and maintain security best practices for fluent.conf configurations.
    4. Regularly audit existing fluent.conf configurations against best practices.
    5. Track changes to fluent.conf files using version control.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Misconfiguration Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): Incorrectly configured plugins or settings in fluent.conf.
    • Configuration Drift (Low Severity): fluent.conf configurations drifting from security best practices.
    • Operational Errors (Low Severity): Errors in fluent.conf leading to logging failures.
  • Impact:
    • Misconfiguration Vulnerabilities: Medium reduction - validation and auditing of fluent.conf prevent misconfigurations.
    • Configuration Drift: Medium reduction - regular audits of fluent.conf ensure alignment with best practices.
    • Operational Errors: Medium reduction - validation of fluent.conf prevents configuration errors.
  • Currently Implemented: Basic syntax checks are performed before deploying fluent.conf changes.
  • Missing Implementation: Automated configuration validation using linters or schema validation for fluent.conf is not fully implemented. Regular security audits of fluent.conf are not consistently performed.

Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Plugin Usage and Follow Least Privilege

  • Description:
    1. Review the list of installed Fluentd plugins and identify unnecessary plugins.
    2. Uninstall or disable unnecessary plugins to reduce the attack surface within Fluentd.
    3. When selecting plugins, prioritize official Fluentd plugins or reputable sources.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Plugin Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): Vulnerabilities in installed Fluentd plugins.
    • Attack Surface Reduction (Low Severity): Minimizing plugins reduces the attack surface of Fluentd itself.
  • Impact:
    • Plugin Vulnerabilities: Medium reduction - minimizing plugin usage reduces potential plugin vulnerabilities in Fluentd.
    • Attack Surface Reduction: Low reduction - reduces the attack surface of Fluentd.
  • Currently Implemented: Effort is made to only install necessary plugins.
  • Missing Implementation: A formal review process for plugin usage within Fluentd is not fully implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: Data Masking and Redaction

  • Description:
    1. Identify sensitive data within log messages that should be masked or redacted.
    2. Implement data masking or redaction techniques within Fluentd configurations using filter plugins in fluent.conf.
    3. Utilize Fluentd filter plugins like fluent-plugin-record-modifier, fluent-plugin-rewrite-tag-filter, or custom filter plugins configured in fluent.conf to perform masking and redaction.
    4. Configure these plugins in fluent.conf to identify sensitive data patterns using regular expressions or other techniques.
    5. Apply masking or redaction techniques within the plugin configuration in fluent.conf.
    6. Test and validate data masking and redaction configurations in fluent.conf.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Exposure of Sensitive Data in Logs (High Severity): Logs can contain sensitive information that should be masked.
    • Compliance Violations (Medium Severity): Storing unmasked sensitive data in logs may violate data privacy regulations.
  • Impact:
    • Exposure of Sensitive Data in Logs: High reduction - data masking in Fluentd reduces the risk of exposing sensitive data.
    • Compliance Violations: High reduction - masking in Fluentd helps comply with data privacy regulations.
  • Currently Implemented: Basic masking is applied for certain fields using fluent-plugin-record-modifier in fluent.conf.
  • Missing Implementation: More comprehensive identification and masking/redaction of sensitive data within Fluentd configurations are needed.

Mitigation Strategy: Output Plugin Security

  • Description:
    1. Carefully select and vet output plugins before using them in fluent.conf.
    2. Prioritize official Fluentd output plugins or reputable sources.
    3. Keep output plugins updated to the latest versions.
    4. Review the security implications of output plugin configurations in fluent.conf.
    5. Ensure output plugins are configured in fluent.conf to use secure communication protocols (e.g., HTTPS, TLS/SSL) when interacting with external services.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Output Plugin Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): Vulnerabilities in output plugins.
    • Data Exfiltration via Malicious Plugins (Medium Severity): Malicious output plugins could exfiltrate data.
  • Impact:
    • Output Plugin Vulnerabilities: Medium reduction - careful plugin selection and updates reduce plugin vulnerabilities in Fluentd.
    • Data Exfiltration via Malicious Plugins: Medium reduction - vetting plugins mitigates the risk of malicious plugins in Fluentd.
  • Currently Implemented: Plugins are generally selected from reputable sources. Plugin updates are performed periodically.
  • Missing Implementation: A formal plugin vetting process for Fluentd plugins is not fully defined. Regular security reviews of output plugin configurations in fluent.conf are not consistently performed.

Mitigation Strategy: Plugin Vetting and Selection

  • Description:
    1. Establish a formal process for vetting and selecting Fluentd plugins before use.
    2. This process should include:
      • Verifying the plugin's source and maintainer reputation.
      • Checking for community support.
      • Reviewing plugin documentation and code.
      • Searching for known vulnerabilities.
    3. Prioritize official Fluentd plugins or reputable sources.
    4. Avoid plugins from unknown sources.
    5. Document the vetting process.
    6. Regularly review and re-vet plugins.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Malicious Plugins (Medium Severity): Using plugins from untrusted sources in Fluentd.
    • Plugin Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): Poorly maintained or insecure Fluentd plugins.
    • Supply Chain Attacks (Low Severity): Compromised plugin repositories.
  • Impact:
    • Malicious Plugins: Medium reduction - vetting plugins reduces the risk of malicious plugins in Fluentd.
    • Plugin Vulnerabilities: Medium reduction - vetting reduces the likelihood of vulnerable plugins in Fluentd.
    • Supply Chain Attacks: Low reduction - vetting helps, but supply chain attacks are complex.
  • Currently Implemented: Informal vetting is performed based on plugin popularity and source.
  • Missing Implementation: A formal, documented plugin vetting process for Fluentd plugins is not yet established.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Plugin Updates

  • Description:
    1. Establish a process for regularly updating Fluentd plugins.
    2. Monitor plugin repositories and security advisories for updates.
    3. Implement a system for tracking installed plugin versions.
    4. Schedule regular maintenance to apply plugin updates.
    5. Test plugin updates in non-production before production.
    6. Automate plugin updates where possible.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of Known Plugin Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Outdated Fluentd plugins may contain known vulnerabilities.
  • Impact:
    • Exploitation of Known Plugin Vulnerabilities: High reduction - regular updates patch known vulnerabilities in Fluentd plugins.
  • Currently Implemented: Plugin updates are performed periodically, but manually.
  • Missing Implementation: Automated plugin update process and systematic tracking of plugin versions are not yet implemented for Fluentd plugins.

Mitigation Strategy: Dependency Scanning

  • Description:
    1. Identify dependencies of Fluentd plugins.
    2. Implement dependency scanning tools to scan plugin dependencies for vulnerabilities.
    3. Use vulnerability databases and scanners to identify vulnerable dependencies.
    4. Prioritize remediation by updating dependencies or finding alternatives.
    5. Integrate dependency scanning into the deployment pipeline.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Vulnerabilities in Plugin Dependencies (Medium Severity): Plugins may rely on vulnerable dependencies.
    • Supply Chain Attacks via Dependencies (Low Severity): Compromised dependencies.
  • Impact:
    • Vulnerabilities in Plugin Dependencies: Medium reduction - dependency scanning helps mitigate vulnerabilities in Fluentd plugin dependencies.
    • Supply Chain Attacks via Dependencies: Low reduction - dependency scanning can detect some supply chain attacks.
  • Currently Implemented: No dependency scanning is currently performed for Fluentd plugins.
  • Missing Implementation: Dependency scanning tools and processes need to be implemented for Fluentd plugin dependencies.

Mitigation Strategy: Monitoring and Logging Fluentd Activity

  • Description:
    1. Enable Fluentd's internal logging to monitor its activity.
    2. Configure Fluentd to log important events (configuration changes, plugin installations, errors).
    3. Forward Fluentd's internal logs to a separate logging system.
    4. Set up alerts for critical events in Fluentd logs.
    5. Regularly review Fluentd logs.
    6. Monitor Fluentd's resource usage.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Unnoticed Security Incidents (Medium Severity): Security incidents affecting Fluentd may go undetected without monitoring.
    • Operational Issues (Medium Severity): Monitoring helps identify operational issues in Fluentd.
  • Impact:
    • Unnoticed Security Incidents: Medium reduction - monitoring improves detection of security incidents in Fluentd.
    • Operational Issues: Medium reduction - monitoring helps maintain Fluentd's operational stability.
  • Currently Implemented: Basic Fluentd internal logging is enabled and forwarded.
  • Missing Implementation: More comprehensive monitoring of Fluentd's internal logs and resource usage is needed. Alerting for critical Fluentd events is not fully configured.