Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
98 lines (77 loc) · 9.75 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

98 lines (77 loc) · 9.75 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for github/markup

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Input Sanitization Before Markup Processing

  • Mitigation Strategy: Strict Input Sanitization Before Markup Processing

  • Description:

    1. Identify Input Points: Pinpoint all locations in your application where user-provided or external markup content is received before being processed by github/markup.
    2. Define Sanitization Rules: Create a set of rules to identify and neutralize potentially harmful markup constructs before they reach `github/markup*. Focus on stripping or encoding elements and attributes known to be risky in markup contexts, such as inline JavaScript event handlers, dangerous URLs, and malicious HTML tags.
    3. Implement Sanitization Logic: Write code (or use a dedicated input sanitization library) to process the input content according to your defined rules. This typically involves stripping unsafe tags, encoding harmful characters, filtering attributes, and validating URLs.
    4. Apply Sanitization at Input: Integrate the sanitization logic at the earliest possible point in your application's data flow, right after receiving the input and before passing it to github/markup.
    5. Regularly Review and Update Rules: Periodically review and update your sanitization rules as new attack vectors emerge or as your application's markup requirements evolve.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected (High Severity): Prevents attackers from injecting malicious scripts into the application through user input that is immediately reflected back to the user.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - Stored (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of stored XSS by sanitizing input before it is stored.
    • HTML Injection (Medium Severity): Prevents attackers from injecting arbitrary HTML content.

  • Impact:

    • XSS - Reflected (High Impact): Significantly reduces the risk by preventing malicious scripts from being introduced at the input stage.
    • XSS - Stored (Medium Impact): Reduces the risk, but output sanitization is still crucial for stored XSS.
    • HTML Injection (High Impact): Effectively prevents basic HTML injection attacks.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented in the project. Input sanitization is applied to user comments in blog posts, using a basic regex-based filter to remove <script> tags.

  • Missing Implementation: Input sanitization is missing in user profile descriptions, forum post content, file upload descriptions, and API endpoints that accept markup content. A dedicated input sanitization library is not used, relying on basic regex which is less robust. URL validation in attributes is not consistently applied.

Mitigation Strategy: Mandatory HTML Output Sanitization After github/markup Rendering

  • Mitigation Strategy: Mandatory HTML Output Sanitization After github/markup Rendering

  • Description:

    1. Choose a Robust Sanitization Library: Select a well-vetted and actively maintained HTML sanitization library appropriate for your application's backend language (e.g., DOMPurify, jsoup, Bleach).
    2. Integrate Sanitization Library: Incorporate the chosen sanitization library into your application's rendering pipeline, immediately after github/markup has generated the HTML output and before this HTML is displayed.
    3. Configure Sanitization Library: Configure the library with a strict whitelist of allowed HTML tags and attributes. Start with a minimal set and only add more if absolutely required after careful security review.
    4. Apply Sanitization to Output: Apply the sanitization function to the HTML string generated by github/markup.
    5. Regularly Update Sanitization Library: Keep the sanitization library updated to the latest version.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected (High Severity): Provides a second layer of defense against reflected XSS.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - Stored (High Severity): Essential for mitigating stored XSS vulnerabilities.
    • DOM-Based XSS (Medium Severity): Can help mitigate some forms of DOM-based XSS.
    • HTML Injection (Medium Severity): Effectively prevents HTML injection.

  • Impact:

    • XSS - Reflected (High Impact): Provides a strong defense, significantly reducing the risk even if input sanitization fails.
    • XSS - Stored (High Impact): Crucial for preventing the exploitation of stored XSS vulnerabilities.
    • DOM-Based XSS (Medium Impact): Reduces the risk, but may not fully eliminate all DOM-based XSS vectors.
    • HTML Injection (High Impact): Effectively eliminates HTML injection attacks.

  • Currently Implemented: Not implemented at all in the project. Raw HTML output from github/markup is directly rendered.

  • Missing Implementation: Output sanitization is missing across the entire application wherever github/markup is used to render content, including blog posts, user profiles, forum discussions, and help documentation.

Mitigation Strategy: Context-Aware Output Encoding

  • Mitigation Strategy: Context-Aware Output Encoding

  • Description:

    1. Identify Output Contexts: Determine all the different contexts where the sanitized HTML output from github/markup will be inserted (HTML body, HTML attributes, JavaScript strings, etc.).
    2. Choose Appropriate Encoding Functions: Select encoding functions specific to each output context (HTML entity encoding, HTML attribute encoding, JavaScript string encoding, URL encoding).
    3. Apply Encoding in Templating/Rendering Logic: Integrate the appropriate encoding functions into your application's templating engine or rendering logic.
    4. Review and Test Encoding: Thoroughly review your templating code and test different output contexts to verify correct encoding.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected (Medium Severity): Provides an additional layer of defense against reflected XSS.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - Stored (Medium Severity): Offers a supplementary defense for stored XSS.
    • HTML Injection (Low Severity): Provides a minor additional layer of defense against HTML injection.

  • Impact:

    • XSS - Reflected (Medium Impact): Adds a valuable layer of defense, reducing the risk further.
    • XSS - Stored (Medium Impact): Provides an extra safety net, making it harder to exploit stored XSS.
    • HTML Injection (Low Impact): Minimal impact on preventing basic HTML injection, as sanitization is the primary defense.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. The templating engine provides default HTML entity encoding for body content, but attribute encoding and JavaScript string encoding are not consistently applied.

  • Missing Implementation: Context-aware output encoding is missing or inconsistently applied in HTML attribute values, JavaScript code dynamically generating HTML, and custom components rendering github/markup output.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement a Strict Content Security Policy (CSP)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement a Strict Content Security Policy (CSP)

  • Description:

    1. Define a Strict Policy: Start with a very restrictive CSP like default-src 'none'.
    2. Whitelist Necessary Sources: Gradually add directives to whitelist only essential sources for scripts (script-src 'self'), styles (style-src 'self'), images (img-src 'self' data:), and restrict other resource types (object-src 'none', frame-ancestors 'none', etc.).
    3. Deploy CSP Header: Configure your web server to send the CSP header with every HTTP response.
    4. Test and Refine CSP: Thoroughly test your application with the CSP enabled and resolve any violations.
    5. Monitor CSP Reports: Enable CSP reporting to collect reports of violations and monitor them.
    6. Regularly Review and Update CSP: Periodically review and update your CSP as your application evolves.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected (High Severity): Significantly reduces the impact of reflected XSS.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - Stored (High Severity): Crucially mitigates stored XSS.
    • DOM-Based XSS (Medium Severity): Can limit the impact of some DOM-based XSS vulnerabilities.
    • Clickjacking (Medium Severity): frame-ancestors 'none' directive prevents clickjacking attacks.

  • Impact:

    • XSS - Reflected (High Impact): Provides a very strong defense against XSS.
    • XSS - Stored (High Impact): Crucial for mitigating stored XSS, making it extremely difficult to exploit.
    • DOM-Based XSS (Medium Impact): Reduces the impact, but may not fully eliminate all DOM-based XSS vectors.
    • Clickjacking (Medium Impact): Effectively prevents clickjacking attacks.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. A basic CSP is in place, but it is not very strict and uses 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' directives, weakening its effectiveness. frame-ancestors is not set.

  • Missing Implementation: CSP is not strict enough and needs to be tightened. 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' directives need to be removed or minimized. frame-ancestors 'none' needs to be implemented. CSP reporting is not enabled, and CSP is not regularly reviewed and updated.