Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
55 lines (46 loc) · 8.14 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

55 lines (46 loc) · 8.14 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for imathis/octopress

Attack Surface: Vulnerable Ruby Gems and Dependencies

  • Description: Outdated or vulnerable Ruby gems, which Octopress relies on (including Jekyll itself and plugin dependencies), can contain critical security flaws.
  • Octopress Contribution: Octopress's functionality is built upon the Ruby gem ecosystem. Using Octopress inherently means relying on these gems, making it vulnerable to gem-related vulnerabilities.
  • Example: A critical remote code execution vulnerability is discovered in a widely used gem dependency of Jekyll or a popular Octopress plugin. Exploiting this vulnerability during Octopress site generation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the developer's machine or the build server.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), Server Compromise, Data Breach, Supply Chain Compromise.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Mandatory Gem Updates: Implement a strict policy of regularly updating all Ruby gems using bundle update.
    • Automated Vulnerability Scanning: Integrate bundle audit or similar tools into the development and CI/CD pipeline to automatically detect and flag vulnerable gems before deployment.
    • Dependency Pinning with Gemfile.lock: Ensure Gemfile.lock is consistently used and committed to version control to guarantee consistent gem versions and prevent unexpected updates that might introduce vulnerabilities.
    • Proactive Security Monitoring: Subscribe to security advisories for Ruby gems and Jekyll to be immediately informed of critical vulnerabilities and apply patches promptly.

Attack Surface: Malicious or Compromised Ruby Gems

  • Description: Malicious actors could introduce compromised or fake Ruby gems into the gem ecosystem, targeting Octopress users. Installing such gems can lead to severe security breaches.
  • Octopress Contribution: Octopress's reliance on gems makes it susceptible to supply chain attacks via malicious gems. If a developer unknowingly installs a malicious gem intended for Octopress, it can compromise the entire site generation process and potentially the generated website.
  • Example: A highly popular Octopress plugin gem repository is compromised, and a malicious version of the gem is released. Developers updating their plugins unknowingly install the compromised version. This malicious gem contains code that injects a backdoor into the generated static site, allowing attackers to deface the website or inject malicious scripts after deployment.
  • Impact: Website Defacement, Backdoor Installation, Supply Chain Compromise, Remote Code Execution (if malicious gem targets build process), Data Breach (if malicious gem steals configuration or content).
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Gem Source Verification: Primarily use the official RubyGems.org repository and exercise extreme caution when considering adding other gem sources.
    • Reputation and Author Verification: Thoroughly verify the reputation and trustworthiness of gem authors and maintainers before installing any gem, especially for critical plugins.
    • Code Review of Gems (for critical projects): For highly sensitive projects, conduct security code reviews of all gems, especially those with network access or significant privileges, before incorporating them into the Octopress project.
    • Dependency Scanning and SBOM: Utilize advanced dependency scanning tools that can detect suspicious gem behaviors and consider implementing Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) for enhanced supply chain visibility and security.

Attack Surface: Vulnerabilities in Octopress Plugins and Themes

  • Description: Octopress plugins and themes, often developed by third parties, can contain critical security vulnerabilities due to insecure coding practices or malicious intent.
  • Octopress Contribution: Octopress's architecture encourages the use of plugins and themes for extending functionality and customizing appearance. This directly introduces the risk of vulnerabilities within these extensions.
  • Example: A popular Octopress theme contains a critical cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in its JavaScript code. Any website using this theme becomes vulnerable to XSS attacks, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts into users' browsers, potentially leading to account hijacking or data theft. Another example could be a plugin with a code injection flaw that allows arbitrary code execution during site generation if exploited.
  • Impact: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Code Injection, Remote Code Execution (if vulnerability exploitable during generation), Website Defacement, Data Breach.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the vulnerability type and the plugin/theme's prevalence and privileges).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Prioritize Security-Focused Plugins/Themes: Select plugins and themes from well-known, reputable developers or organizations with a demonstrated commitment to security.
    • Security Code Audits of Plugins/Themes: Conduct thorough security code audits of all plugins and themes before deployment, focusing on common web vulnerabilities like XSS, code injection, and insecure data handling.
    • Regular Plugin/Theme Updates and Monitoring: Implement a system for regularly checking for and applying updates to plugins and themes. Monitor security advisories related to Octopress plugins and themes.
    • Minimize Plugin/Theme Usage: Reduce the number of plugins and themes used to the absolute minimum necessary to decrease the overall attack surface.
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strict Content Security Policy (CSP) in the generated website to significantly mitigate the impact of XSS vulnerabilities originating from themes or plugins by controlling the sources of content the browser is allowed to load.

Attack Surface: Underlying Jekyll Core Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Critical security vulnerabilities within the core Jekyll framework, upon which Octopress is built, directly impact the security of Octopress websites.
  • Octopress Contribution: Octopress is fundamentally dependent on Jekyll. Any critical vulnerability in Jekyll's core components, such as the Liquid templating engine or Markdown parser, becomes a critical attack surface for Octopress.
  • Example: A critical Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) vulnerability is discovered in Jekyll's Liquid templating engine. If an Octopress site, even indirectly through plugin usage or custom templates, processes any attacker-controlled data using Liquid, this vulnerability could be exploited to achieve remote code execution on the server during site generation or potentially even on the deployed static site in certain scenarios.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI), Server Compromise, Data Breach.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Immediate Jekyll Updates: Prioritize and immediately apply security updates released by the Jekyll team. Implement automated update mechanisms where possible.
    • Proactive Jekyll Security Monitoring: Actively monitor Jekyll's official security channels, mailing lists, and GitHub repository for security announcements and vulnerability disclosures.
    • Security Hardening based on Jekyll Recommendations: Implement any security hardening recommendations provided by the Jekyll project to minimize the risk from known or potential Jekyll vulnerabilities.
    • Consider Alternative Static Site Generators (for extreme risk scenarios): In situations where security is paramount and Jekyll demonstrates a pattern of critical vulnerabilities, evaluate migrating to alternative static site generators with a stronger security track record and architecture.