Attack Surface: Dependency Vulnerabilities (Gems)
- Description: Exploitable weaknesses in Ruby Gems used by Octopress.
- Octopress Contribution: Octopress's reliance on a defined set of Gems (Jekyll, plugins, etc.) in its
Gemfile
creates this vulnerability. The specific versions and interdependencies are crucial. - Example: A known CVE in an older version of a Gem like
kramdown
(Markdown parser) allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code during the build by crafting a malicious Markdown document. - Impact: Compromise of the build environment, injection of malicious code into the generated site, potential data exfiltration.
- Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the specific Gem vulnerability).
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Developers: Regularly run
bundle update
. Usebundler-audit
(or similar) to scan for vulnerabilities. Pin Gem versions to known-good releases inGemfile
(balance security with updates). Consider a Gem dependency proxy. Review Gemfile and Gemfile.lock. - Users (if building locally): Follow the same practices as developers. Keep your Ruby and Gem environment updated.
- Developers: Regularly run
Attack Surface: Plugin Vulnerabilities
- Description: Security flaws in Octopress/Jekyll plugins, especially third-party ones.
- Octopress Contribution: Octopress's plugin architecture allows for extensibility, directly introducing the risk of using vulnerable or malicious plugins.
- Example: A poorly written plugin processing user data (even for static comments) without proper sanitization could be vulnerable to XSS, injecting malicious JavaScript during the build.
- Impact: Code injection, data breaches, potential compromise of the build environment.
- Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the plugin and vulnerability).
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Developers: Thoroughly vet all third-party plugins (code review, reputation, updates). Minimize plugin usage. Regularly update plugins. Consider sandboxing the build environment (e.g., Docker).
- Users: If installing plugins, follow the same precautions as developers.
Attack Surface: Configuration File Exposure (_config.yml
)
- Description: Accidental exposure of sensitive information in Octopress configuration files.
- Octopress Contribution: Octopress uses
_config.yml
and similar files for site settings. Direct web access to these files leaks sensitive data. - Example: A misconfigured web server allows direct access to
/_config.yml
, revealing API keys or other secrets. - Impact: Leakage of API keys, deployment credentials, leading to unauthorized access to services or the deployment environment.
- Risk Severity: High to Critical.
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Developers: Configure the web server to deny access to files starting with
_
and specific directories (_includes
,_layouts
,_plugins
). Store sensitive data in environment variables, not in_config.yml
. Use a.env
file anddotenv
for local development. - Users: Ensure your web server is properly configured. Verify security settings with your hosting provider.
- Developers: Configure the web server to deny access to files starting with
Attack Surface: Build Process Manipulation
- Description: An attacker gaining control of the Octopress build process to inject malicious code.
- Octopress Contribution: The Octopress build process (using
rake
and Ruby) is the direct target. Compromising this process allows complete control over the output. - Example: An attacker compromises a developer's workstation and modifies the
Rakefile
to include a malicious payload in the generated HTML. - Impact: Complete compromise of the generated static site; the attacker can inject arbitrary code.
- Risk Severity: Critical.
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Developers: Secure the build environment (strong passwords, MFA, updated software). Use a dedicated, isolated build server (CI/CD). Implement code signing. Monitor build logs.
- Users: If building locally, follow the same security practices as developers for your workstation.