Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
28 lines (23 loc) · 4.56 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

28 lines (23 loc) · 4.56 KB

Threat Model Analysis for mame/quine-relay

Threat: Polyglot Injection

  • Description: An attacker crafts malicious input to the initial language in the relay. This input is designed to be processed through the chain in such a way that it becomes executable code in a subsequent language. The attacker exploits the data transfer and interpretation between different language stages to inject commands, scripts, or code. This is possible due to insufficient input validation or insecure data handling at language boundaries within the quine-relay mechanism.
  • Impact: Arbitrary code execution within the application's environment. This can lead to full system compromise, data breaches, data manipulation, or denial of service. The severity depends on the privileges of the process executing the vulnerable language stage.
  • Affected Component: Inter-language communication mechanism, input processing logic in each language stage of the relay.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Input Validation and Sanitization: Implement rigorous input validation and sanitization at every stage where data transitions between languages. This should include whitelisting allowed characters, formats, and data structures.
    • Secure Data Serialization: Utilize secure and well-defined data serialization formats (e.g., JSON, Protocol Buffers) for inter-language communication instead of relying on raw strings or ad-hoc formats.
    • Context-Aware Output Encoding: Apply context-aware encoding and escaping to data before passing it to the next language stage. This ensures that data is interpreted as data, not code, in the receiving language's context.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Run each language stage of the quine-relay with the minimum necessary privileges to limit the impact of successful exploitation.
    • Sandboxing: Consider sandboxing individual language execution environments to further isolate them and restrict the potential damage from code execution vulnerabilities.

Threat: Unexpected Language Interaction Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Due to the complex interplay of multiple programming languages within quine-relay, unforeseen vulnerabilities can emerge from the interactions between them. These vulnerabilities are not inherent to any single language but arise from the specific combination and data flow within the relay. An attacker could exploit subtle differences in language behavior, data type handling, or execution environments at the language boundaries to trigger unexpected and potentially harmful actions. This could involve bypassing security checks, corrupting data, or causing unintended code execution paths.
  • Impact: Unpredictable and potentially severe security consequences. This could range from subtle data corruption to complete system compromise, depending on the nature of the unexpected interaction and how it is exploited. The complexity makes these vulnerabilities difficult to anticipate and detect.
  • Affected Component: Inter-language communication logic, overall relay execution flow, language-specific interpreters/compilers when interacting within the relay.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Extensive Polyglot Testing: Conduct rigorous testing specifically focused on the interactions between languages in the relay. This includes fuzzing, integration testing, and edge case testing with diverse inputs and language combinations.
    • Security Code Review by Polyglot Experts: Involve security experts with deep knowledge of all programming languages used in the quine-relay for thorough code reviews. Focus on identifying potential interaction vulnerabilities and unexpected behaviors.
    • Robust Error Handling and Fail-Safes: Implement comprehensive error handling and fail-safe mechanisms at each language stage and during inter-language communication. This helps to prevent unexpected interactions from leading to exploitable states.
    • Monitoring and Anomaly Detection: Implement detailed monitoring of the quine-relay execution flow and inter-language communication. Establish baselines for normal behavior and set up alerts for anomalies that might indicate exploitation attempts or unexpected interactions.
    • Regular Security Audits: Conduct periodic security audits specifically targeting the polyglot aspects of the quine-relay to proactively identify and address potential interaction vulnerabilities.