Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
38 lines (31 loc) · 5.49 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

38 lines (31 loc) · 5.49 KB

Threat Model Analysis for mame/quine-relay

Threat: Chain Modification (Injection)

  • Description: An attacker intercepts the process of generating or storing the next program in the quine-relay sequence. They replace a legitimate program with a malicious one, or insert a new malicious program into the chain. This leverages the core functionality of the quine-relay – the generation and execution of the next program in the sequence. The attacker exploits the handoff between stages.
    • Impact: Arbitrary code execution in the context of the quine-relay application. The attacker can potentially steal data, modify system behavior, launch further attacks, or cause a denial of service. The integrity of the quine-relay is completely compromised.
    • Affected Component: The program storage mechanism (file system, database, network transit – if used by the quine-relay for program transfer), and the program loading/execution function (e.g., exec(), eval(), or language-specific equivalents) as used within the quine-relay's program transition logic.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Cryptographic Hashing: Before executing any program in the chain, calculate its cryptographic hash (SHA-256 or stronger) and compare it to a pre-calculated, securely stored "known good" hash. Reject execution if the hashes don't match. This is the primary defense.
      • Secure Storage (if applicable): If the quine-relay design itself uses file system or database storage for intermediate programs, use strong access controls.
      • Secure Transmission (if applicable): If the quine-relay design itself transmits programs over a network, use TLS/SSL with strong ciphers and certificate validation.
      • Input Validation (Indirect): Even if there's no direct user input, validate any data used internally by the quine-relay to construct the next program in the chain.

Threat: Core Logic Tampering

  • Description: An attacker modifies the code of the quine-relay itself (not a program within the chain, but the code that generates the chain). This involves altering the logic that determines how the next program is created, potentially introducing subtle vulnerabilities or backdoors into the generation process. This is a direct attack on the quine-relay's core functionality.
    • Impact: The attacker can subtly alter the behavior of the entire quine-relay, potentially leading to future code execution vulnerabilities, information disclosure, or denial of service. The attacker gains control over the evolution of the chain, making future attacks easier.
    • Affected Component: The core quine-relay code, specifically the functions responsible for generating the next program in the sequence. This is language-agnostic, affecting the overall logic of program generation.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Code Reviews: Rigorous code reviews of the quine-relay implementation, with a specific focus on the code generation logic and any potential for injection or manipulation.
      • Static Analysis: Use static analysis tools to identify potential vulnerabilities in the code generation process, particularly those related to code injection or unsafe string handling.
      • Immutable Infrastructure: Deploy the quine-relay in an immutable environment (e.g., a container) to prevent modification after deployment. This makes it harder to tamper with the core logic.
      • Integrity Monitoring: Monitor the integrity of the quine-relay code itself (e.g., using file integrity monitoring tools or checksums) to detect unauthorized changes.

Threat: Resource Exhaustion (DoS) via Quine Amplification

  • Description: While resource exhaustion is a general threat, the quine-relay introduces a specific amplification risk. A malicious program within the chain could be designed to consume resources, and because it generates the next program, it can ensure that the next program also consumes resources, creating a cascading or exponential resource exhaustion attack. This is distinct from a simple DoS; it's a DoS amplified by the quine mechanism.
    • Impact: Denial of service. The quine-relay application becomes unresponsive or crashes, preventing legitimate use. The cascading nature can make recovery more difficult.
    • Affected Component: The execution environment of each program in the chain, but the vulnerability is triggered and amplified by the quine-relay's program generation logic.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Resource Limits: Enforce strict resource limits on each program's execution. This is crucial, and the limits must be low enough to prevent cascading effects.
      • Timeouts: Impose strict timeouts on the execution of each program. Terminate any program that exceeds the timeout.
      • Sandboxing: Use a sandboxing solution that provides robust resource control capabilities, specifically designed to prevent runaway processes.
      • Generation Logic Review: Specifically review the quine generation logic to ensure it cannot be abused to create an exponentially resource-consuming chain. This might involve limiting the "complexity" or "size" of generated programs.