Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
181 lines (149 loc) · 14.7 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

181 lines (149 loc) · 14.7 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for mikel/mail

Objective: To compromise the application by exploiting vulnerabilities in the mail gem or its usage, leading to unauthorized access to sensitive data, code execution on the server, or disruption of application services.

Attack Tree Visualization

  • Attack Goal: Compromise Application via Mail Gem Exploitation
      1. Exploit Email Parsing Vulnerabilities (Incoming Emails) HIGH RISK PATH
      • 1.2. Body Parsing Exploits HIGH RISK PATH
        • 1.2.1. HTML Email Exploits (If application renders HTML emails) HIGH RISK PATH
          • 1.2.1.1. Goal: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) CRITICAL NODE
        • 1.2.2. Plain Text Exploits (Less common, but possible)
          • 1.2.2.1. Goal: Command Injection (If application processes email body as commands - highly unlikely but consider edge cases) CRITICAL NODE
      • 1.3. Attachment Exploits HIGH RISK PATH CRITICAL NODE
        • 1.3.1. Malicious File Upload CRITICAL NODE
          • 1.3.1.1. Goal: Code Execution via Uploaded Executable CRITICAL NODE
          • 1.3.1.2. Goal: Exploit Vulnerabilities in File Processing CRITICAL NODE
      1. Exploit Email Generation Vulnerabilities (Outgoing Emails - if application sends emails)
      • 2.1. Insecure Data Inclusion in Emails HIGH RISK PATH
        • 2.1.1. Goal: Information Disclosure CRITICAL NODE
          • 2.1.1.1. Goal: Leak Sensitive User Data CRITICAL NODE
        • 2.1.2. Goal: Account Takeover via Password Reset/Verification Emails HIGH RISK PATH
          • 2.1.2.1. Goal: Predictable/Reusable Tokens CRITICAL NODE
          • 2.1.2.2. Goal: Token Leakage in Email Source CRITICAL NODE
      • 2.2. Email Spoofing/Phishing (Configuration/Usage related, not directly mail gem vulnerability, but relevant) HIGH RISK PATH
        • 2.2.1. Goal: Impersonate Application/Legitimate Users HIGH RISK PATH
          • 2.2.1.1. Goal: Phishing Attacks against Users HIGH RISK PATH
      1. Dependency Vulnerabilities in mail Gem (Less likely, but must be considered)
      • 3.1. Vulnerabilities in mail gem itself
        • 3.1.1. Goal: Code Execution via Gem Vulnerability CRITICAL NODE
      • 3.2. Vulnerabilities in mail gem's Dependencies
        • 3.2.1. Goal: Code Execution via Dependency Vulnerability CRITICAL NODE

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Email Parsing Vulnerabilities (Incoming Emails) - HIGH RISK PATH

  • General Description: This path focuses on vulnerabilities arising from the application's processing of incoming emails, specifically the body and attachments. If the application doesn't properly sanitize and validate email content, attackers can inject malicious payloads.

    • 1.2. Body Parsing Exploits - HIGH RISK PATH

      • General Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities in how the application parses and processes the email body. HTML emails are particularly risky.

        • 1.2.1. HTML Email Exploits (If application renders HTML emails) - HIGH RISK PATH

          • General Description: If the application renders HTML emails, attackers can inject malicious HTML and JavaScript.

            • 1.2.1.1. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - CRITICAL NODE
              • Goal: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - Execute malicious JavaScript in the user's browser when they view the email content through the application.
              • Action: Inject malicious JavaScript within the HTML email body.
              • Likelihood: Medium
              • Impact: Major (Account takeover, data theft, malicious actions on behalf of user)
              • Effort: Low
              • Skill Level: Low to Medium
              • Detection Difficulty: Medium
              • Mitigation: Sanitize HTML content using a robust library (e.g., sanitize gem in Ruby), use sandboxed HTML rendering, implement Content Security Policy (CSP).

        • 1.2.2. Plain Text Exploits (Less common, but possible)

          • General Description: While less common, vulnerabilities can arise even from processing plain text email bodies, especially if the application naively interprets the content.

            • 1.2.2.1. Command Injection - CRITICAL NODE
              • Goal: Command Injection - Execute arbitrary commands on the server by injecting shell commands within the email body.
              • Action: Inject shell commands in the email body if the application naively processes it as commands.
              • Likelihood: Very Low (Extremely poor application design)
              • Impact: Critical (Full server compromise, code execution)
              • Effort: Low
              • Skill Level: Low
              • Detection Difficulty: Very Easy
              • Mitigation: Never execute commands based on email body content without extreme caution and rigorous sanitization. Ideally, avoid processing email body content as commands altogether.

    • 1.3. Attachment Exploits - HIGH RISK PATH & CRITICAL NODE

      • General Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities through malicious attachments. Attachments can contain malware, exploits for file processing libraries, or be used for path traversal attacks.

        • 1.3.1. Malicious File Upload - CRITICAL NODE

          • General Description: Uploading malicious files as attachments to compromise the application or server.

            • 1.3.1.1. Code Execution via Uploaded Executable - CRITICAL NODE

              • Goal: Code Execution - Execute arbitrary code on the server by uploading an executable file as an attachment.
              • Action: Attach an executable file (e.g., .exe, .sh, .py) disguised as another file type.
              • Likelihood: Low to Medium
              • Impact: Critical (Code execution, server compromise)
              • Effort: Low
              • Skill Level: Low
              • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Medium
              • Mitigation: File type validation (whitelist only safe types), antivirus/malware scanning, sandboxed processing, limit file sizes, secure storage, principle of least privilege for file access.

            • 1.3.1.2. Exploit Vulnerabilities in File Processing - CRITICAL NODE

              • Goal: Code Execution or other impacts - Exploit vulnerabilities in libraries used to process attachments (e.g., image processing, document parsing).
              • Action: Attach files that exploit vulnerabilities in file processing libraries.
              • Likelihood: Low to Medium
              • Impact: Major to Critical (Code execution, DoS, information disclosure)
              • Effort: Medium to High
              • Skill Level: Medium to High
              • Detection Difficulty: Hard
              • Mitigation: Regularly update file processing libraries, use sandboxed processing, input validation on file content, principle of least privilege for file access.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Email Generation Vulnerabilities (Outgoing Emails) - HIGH RISK PATH

  • General Description: This path focuses on vulnerabilities related to the application's generation and sending of emails. Insecure practices can lead to information disclosure and account takeover.

    • 2.1. Insecure Data Inclusion in Emails - HIGH RISK PATH

      • General Description: Unintentionally including sensitive data in outgoing emails due to coding errors or insecure templates.

        • 2.1.1. Information Disclosure - CRITICAL NODE

          • General Description: Leaking sensitive information through emails.

            • 2.1.1.1. Leak Sensitive User Data - CRITICAL NODE
              • Goal: Information Disclosure - Leak sensitive user data (passwords, API keys, PII) in email content.
              • Action: Unintentionally include sensitive data in email content (body, subject, headers) due to coding errors.
              • Likelihood: Medium
              • Impact: Moderate to Major (Data breach, privacy violation, reputational damage)
              • Effort: Very Low (Accidental coding errors)
              • Skill Level: Very Low (Unintentional)
              • Detection Difficulty: Hard
              • Mitigation: Data minimization, careful review of email templates, avoid hardcoding sensitive data, use placeholders and secure data retrieval, code review processes.

        • 2.1.2. Account Takeover via Password Reset/Verification Emails - HIGH RISK PATH

          • General Description: Vulnerabilities in password reset or account verification email mechanisms that can lead to account takeover.

            • 2.1.2.1. Predictable/Reusable Tokens - CRITICAL NODE

              • Goal: Account Takeover - Gain unauthorized access to user accounts by guessing or reusing predictable password reset/verification tokens.
              • Action: If password reset tokens are predictable or reusable, attacker can guess/reuse them.
              • Likelihood: Low to Medium
              • Impact: Major (Account takeover, unauthorized access)
              • Effort: Medium
              • Skill Level: Medium
              • Detection Difficulty: Medium
              • Mitigation: Use strong, unpredictable, single-use tokens, secure token generation and storage, HTTPS for email links, rate limiting on password reset requests.

            • 2.1.2.2. Token Leakage in Email Source - CRITICAL NODE

              • Goal: Account Takeover - Gain unauthorized access to user accounts by extracting password reset/verification tokens from the email source code.
              • Action: If tokens are visible in email source code (e.g., HTML comments), attacker can extract them.
              • Likelihood: Low (Poor coding practice)
              • Impact: Major (Account takeover, unauthorized access)
              • Effort: Very Low
              • Skill Level: Very Low
              • Detection Difficulty: Very Hard
              • Mitigation: Ensure tokens are not exposed in email source code, use secure templating practices, avoid embedding sensitive data directly in HTML comments or client-side scripts.

    • 2.2. Email Spoofing/Phishing (Configuration/Usage related) - HIGH RISK PATH

      • General Description: Improperly configured email sending infrastructure can allow attackers to spoof emails appearing to originate from the application, leading to phishing attacks.

        • 2.2.1. Impersonate Application/Legitimate Users - HIGH RISK PATH

          • General Description: Attackers impersonating the application or legitimate users to deceive recipients.

            • 2.2.1.1. Phishing Attacks against Users - HIGH RISK PATH
              • Goal: Phishing - Trick users into revealing credentials or performing malicious actions by sending spoofed emails that appear to be from the application.
              • Action: Send emails appearing to be from the application to trick users into revealing credentials or performing malicious actions.
              • Likelihood: Medium to High
              • Impact: Major (Credential theft, malware distribution, reputational damage)
              • Effort: Low
              • Skill Level: Low
              • Detection Difficulty: Hard
              • Mitigation: Properly configure SPF, DKIM, DMARC records for the sending domain, use a dedicated sending domain, educate users about phishing, implement email authentication best practices.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Dependency Vulnerabilities in mail Gem - CRITICAL NODE

  • General Description: Vulnerabilities within the mail gem itself or its dependencies can be exploited for code execution and server compromise.

    • 3.1. Vulnerabilities in mail gem itself

      • General Description: Exploiting potential security vulnerabilities directly within the mail gem library.

        • 3.1.1. Code Execution via Gem Vulnerability - CRITICAL NODE
          • Goal: Code Execution - Execute arbitrary code on the server by exploiting a vulnerability in the mail gem.
          • Action: Exploit known vulnerabilities in the mail gem (if any exist and are unpatched).
          • Likelihood: Very Low * Impact: Critical (Code execution, full server compromise) * Effort: High * Skill Level: High to Very High * Detection Difficulty: Very Hard * Mitigation: Regularly update the mail gem to the latest version, monitor security advisories for the gem.

    • 3.2. Vulnerabilities in mail gem's Dependencies

      • General Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities in libraries that the mail gem depends on.

        • 3.2.1. Code Execution via Dependency Vulnerability - CRITICAL NODE
          • Goal: Code Execution - Execute arbitrary code on the server by exploiting a vulnerability in a dependency of the mail gem. * Action: Exploit vulnerabilities in libraries that mail gem depends on. * Likelihood: Low * Impact: Critical (Code execution, full server compromise) * Effort: Medium to High * Skill Level: Medium to High * Detection Difficulty: Hard * Mitigation: Regularly update dependencies, use dependency scanning tools (e.g., Bundler Audit, Dependabot), monitor security advisories for dependencies.