Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
247 lines (226 loc) · 28.2 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

247 lines (226 loc) · 28.2 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for opf/openproject

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Plugin Vetting and Review

  • Mitigation Strategy: Strict Plugin Vetting and Review
  • Description:
    1. Establish a Plugin Review Board/Process: Designate a team or individual responsible for reviewing all plugin requests for OpenProject.
    2. Plugin Source Verification: Prioritize plugins from the official OpenProject marketplace or reputable developers. Verify the plugin developer's reputation and history within the OpenProject ecosystem.
    3. Code Analysis (Static and Dynamic): If possible, obtain the plugin source code and perform static code analysis for common vulnerabilities relevant to OpenProject plugins (e.g., potential interactions with OpenProject core, data handling within OpenProject context). In a staging OpenProject environment, perform dynamic testing to observe plugin behavior and interactions with OpenProject.
    4. Permission Review: Analyze the permissions requested by the plugin within the OpenProject context. Ensure they are necessary and not excessive for the plugin's stated functionality within OpenProject.
    5. Security Testing in Staging (OpenProject): Install and thoroughly test the plugin in a staging OpenProject environment that mirrors production. Conduct security scans and penetration testing focused on plugin-related functionalities within OpenProject.
    6. Documentation Review: Check for clear and up-to-date plugin documentation, including security considerations and update policies specific to OpenProject.
    7. Approval and Documentation: Document the review process, approval status, and any identified risks or mitigation steps for each plugin within the OpenProject context.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Malicious Plugin Installation (High Severity): Installation of plugins containing malware, backdoors, or vulnerabilities that can directly impact the OpenProject application.
    • Vulnerable Plugin Exploitation (High Severity): Exploitation of known or zero-day vulnerabilities in plugins leading to data breaches, system compromise within OpenProject, or denial of service of OpenProject.
    • Privilege Escalation via Plugins (Medium Severity): Plugins gaining excessive permissions within OpenProject and allowing unauthorized actions within the application.
  • Impact:
    • Malicious Plugin Installation: High Risk Reduction
    • Vulnerable Plugin Exploitation: High Risk Reduction
    • Privilege Escalation via Plugins: Medium Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Likely informal vetting based on plugin popularity and description within the OpenProject community. Formal code analysis and dedicated security testing specific to OpenProject interactions are probably missing.
    • Location: Plugin installation process within OpenProject, potentially informal team discussions related to OpenProject features.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Formal Plugin Review Board/Process focused on OpenProject plugins.
    • Automated or systematic code analysis of plugins in the context of OpenProject.
    • Dedicated security testing of plugins in a staging OpenProject environment.
    • Formal documentation of plugin review and approval within the OpenProject project documentation.

Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Plugin Usage

  • Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Plugin Usage
  • Description:
    1. Functionality Review (OpenProject): Regularly review all installed plugins within the OpenProject instance and their functionalities.
    2. Needs Assessment (OpenProject Features): Determine if each plugin is still actively required for business operations or user needs within OpenProject.
    3. Core Feature Consideration (OpenProject): Evaluate if plugin functionalities can be achieved through OpenProject core features, custom development within OpenProject, or alternative secure solutions integrated with OpenProject.
    4. Plugin Removal (OpenProject): Uninstall and remove any plugins from OpenProject that are no longer necessary or provide redundant functionality.
    5. Documentation Update (OpenProject): Update OpenProject documentation to reflect the reduced plugin set and any changes in functionality within the OpenProject application.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Increased Attack Surface (Medium Severity): Each plugin adds to the overall attack surface of the OpenProject application, increasing the potential entry points for attackers targeting OpenProject.
    • Plugin Maintenance Burden (Medium Severity): More plugins mean more updates to manage and potential compatibility issues within OpenProject, increasing the risk of outdated and vulnerable plugins affecting OpenProject.
  • Impact:
    • Increased Attack Surface: Medium Risk Reduction
    • Plugin Maintenance Burden: Medium Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Plugins are likely installed as needed in OpenProject, but regular reviews and proactive minimization might be lacking within the OpenProject management process.
    • Location: Plugin management section in OpenProject administration.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Scheduled periodic reviews of installed plugins within OpenProject.
    • Formal process for justifying and documenting the need for each plugin in OpenProject.
    • Proactive exploration of core OpenProject features or custom solutions as alternatives to plugins within the OpenProject development context.

Mitigation Strategy: Keep Plugins Updated

  • Mitigation Strategy: Keep Plugins Updated
  • Description:
    1. Plugin Update Monitoring (OpenProject): Regularly check for plugin updates within the OpenProject administration interface or plugin marketplace.
    2. Subscription to Security Announcements (OpenProject Plugins): Subscribe to plugin developer mailing lists, security announcement feeds, or forums to receive notifications about security updates and vulnerabilities specifically for OpenProject plugins.
    3. Staging Environment Updates (OpenProject): Before applying plugin updates to production OpenProject, test them thoroughly in a staging OpenProject environment to ensure compatibility and stability within OpenProject.
    4. Automated Update Mechanisms (If Available and Safe for OpenProject Plugins): Explore and implement automated plugin update mechanisms provided by OpenProject or plugin managers, if they are reliable and secure within the OpenProject ecosystem.
    5. Patching Process (OpenProject Plugins): Establish a documented process for applying plugin updates promptly within OpenProject, especially security-related updates.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of Known Plugin Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Attackers exploiting publicly disclosed vulnerabilities in outdated plugins within OpenProject.
  • Impact:
    • Exploitation of Known Plugin Vulnerabilities: High Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Manual checks for updates might occur within OpenProject, but a systematic and proactive approach is likely missing. Automated updates for OpenProject plugins might not be configured or trusted.
    • Location: Plugin management section in OpenProject administration.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Automated plugin update monitoring and notification system within OpenProject.
    • Formal process and schedule for plugin updates in OpenProject, especially security patches.
    • Clear communication channels for security announcements related to OpenProject plugins.

Mitigation Strategy: Enforce Strong Password Policies

  • Mitigation Strategy: Enforce Strong Password Policies
  • Description:
    1. Configure Password Policy Settings (OpenProject): Utilize OpenProject's built-in password policy settings to enforce complexity requirements (minimum length, character types, etc.) for OpenProject users.
    2. Password Expiration (Optional, OpenProject): Consider enabling password expiration policies within OpenProject to encourage regular password changes (with caution to avoid user fatigue and weak password reuse).
    3. Account Lockout Policy (OpenProject): Configure account lockout policies in OpenProject to prevent brute-force password attacks against OpenProject user accounts.
    4. Password Strength Meter (OpenProject): Ensure the OpenProject password creation/change process includes a password strength meter to guide users in creating strong passwords for their OpenProject accounts.
    5. User Education (OpenProject Users): Educate OpenProject users about password security best practices, the importance of strong, unique passwords for their OpenProject accounts, and the risks of weak passwords within the context of accessing OpenProject.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Brute-Force Password Attacks (High Severity): Attackers attempting to guess OpenProject user passwords through automated or manual brute-force methods targeting OpenProject accounts.
    • Credential Stuffing Attacks (High Severity): Attackers using stolen credentials from other breaches to gain access to OpenProject accounts.
    • Weak Password Exploitation (High Severity): Easily guessable or common passwords for OpenProject accounts being compromised.
  • Impact:
    • Brute-Force Password Attacks: High Risk Reduction
    • Credential Stuffing Attacks: Medium Risk Reduction (strong passwords make stolen credentials less effective for OpenProject)
    • Weak Password Exploitation: High Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Likely Partially Implemented. Basic password complexity settings might be configured in OpenProject, but advanced policies and user education specific to OpenProject might be lacking.
    • Location: OpenProject administration settings related to authentication and security.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Regular review and adjustment of password policies within OpenProject to align with current best practices.
    • Proactive user education campaigns on password security for OpenProject users.
    • Implementation of more advanced policies like password history or dictionary checks within OpenProject (if supported).

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Review User Permissions and Roles

  • Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Review User Permissions and Roles
  • Description:
    1. Permission Audit Schedule (OpenProject): Establish a schedule (e.g., quarterly, bi-annually) for reviewing user permissions and roles within OpenProject.
    2. Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) Review (OpenProject): Examine the defined roles in OpenProject and ensure they accurately reflect required access levels for different user groups within OpenProject.
    3. User Permission Verification (OpenProject): For each OpenProject user, verify that their assigned roles and permissions are still appropriate for their current responsibilities and project involvement within OpenProject.
    4. Principle of Least Privilege (OpenProject): Apply the principle of least privilege by removing unnecessary permissions and roles within OpenProject. Grant only the minimum access required for each user to perform their tasks within OpenProject.
    5. Documentation of Changes (OpenProject): Document any changes made to user permissions and roles during the review process within OpenProject's user management documentation.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Access (Medium Severity): OpenProject users having access to resources or functionalities beyond their needs within OpenProject, potentially leading to data breaches or misuse of OpenProject data.
    • Insider Threats (Medium Severity): Reduced potential for malicious insiders to exploit excessive permissions within OpenProject.
    • Lateral Movement (Medium Severity): Limiting the impact of compromised OpenProject accounts by restricting their access to only necessary resources within OpenProject.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized Access: Medium Risk Reduction
    • Insider Threats: Medium Risk Reduction
    • Lateral Movement: Medium Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Initial role setup is likely done in OpenProject, but regular reviews and adjustments are probably infrequent or missing within OpenProject administration.
    • Location: User and role management sections in OpenProject administration.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Scheduled and documented permission review process within OpenProject administration.
    • Tools or scripts to assist in auditing and reporting on user permissions within OpenProject.
    • Clear guidelines and documentation on role definitions and permission assignments within OpenProject's user management documentation.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure API Access and Authentication

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure API Access and Authentication
  • Description:
    1. API Authentication Method Selection (OpenProject API): Choose a robust API authentication method for the OpenProject API such as API keys, OAuth 2.0, or JWT, based on security requirements and API usage patterns.
    2. API Key Management (If Applicable, OpenProject API): If using API keys for the OpenProject API, implement secure generation, storage, and rotation of API keys. Avoid embedding keys directly in code or public repositories accessing the OpenProject API.
    3. OAuth 2.0 Implementation (If Applicable, OpenProject API): Properly implement OAuth 2.0 flows for the OpenProject API, including secure token handling and authorization server configuration.
    4. JWT Verification (If Applicable, OpenProject API): Implement robust JWT verification for the OpenProject API, including signature validation and expiration checks.
    5. Rate Limiting (OpenProject API): Implement rate limiting on OpenProject API endpoints to prevent abuse, denial-of-service attacks, and brute-force attempts.
    6. API Access Control (OpenProject API): Enforce granular access control to OpenProject API endpoints, restricting access based on user roles, permissions, or API client authorization within OpenProject.
    7. API Documentation and Security Guidelines (OpenProject API): Provide clear API documentation for the OpenProject API that includes security guidelines and best practices for API usage.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized API Access (High Severity): Attackers gaining access to the OpenProject API without proper authentication, leading to data breaches, manipulation of OpenProject data, or system compromise of OpenProject.
    • API Abuse and Denial of Service (Medium Severity): Attackers overwhelming the OpenProject API with excessive requests, causing performance degradation or denial of service of OpenProject API.
    • API Key Compromise (High Severity): Stolen or leaked API keys being used for unauthorized access to the OpenProject API.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized API Access: High Risk Reduction
    • API Abuse and Denial of Service: Medium Risk Reduction
    • API Key Compromise: High Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. OpenProject API access might be enabled, but robust authentication and authorization mechanisms, rate limiting, and secure key management might be lacking for the OpenProject API.
    • Location: OpenProject API configuration, potentially application code interacting with the API.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Formal API authentication strategy and implementation for the OpenProject API (beyond basic API keys if used).
    • Rate limiting on OpenProject API endpoints.
    • Granular API access control based on roles and permissions within OpenProject API.
    • Secure API key management practices for OpenProject API keys.
    • Comprehensive API security documentation for developers and users of the OpenProject API.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement File Type Restrictions and Validation

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement File Type Restrictions and Validation
  • Description:
    1. Define Allowed File Types (OpenProject): Identify and define a list of allowed file types for uploads within OpenProject based on application requirements and security considerations. Restrict to only necessary and safe formats for OpenProject usage.
    2. Client-Side Validation (Optional, for User Experience in OpenProject): Implement client-side validation within OpenProject to provide immediate feedback to users about allowed file types, but do not rely solely on client-side validation for security in OpenProject.
    3. Server-Side Validation (Mandatory, OpenProject): Implement robust server-side validation within OpenProject to strictly enforce file type restrictions. Verify file types based on file content (magic numbers, MIME types) and not just file extensions within OpenProject's file handling logic.
    4. File Extension Filtering (OpenProject): Filter file uploads based on allowed file extensions within OpenProject, but ensure this is combined with content-based validation to prevent bypasses in OpenProject.
    5. File Scanning (Antivirus/Malware, OpenProject): Integrate file scanning solutions (antivirus or dedicated malware scanners) to scan uploaded files for malicious content before storage and access within OpenProject's file handling workflow.
    6. Error Handling (OpenProject File Uploads): Implement proper error handling for invalid file uploads within OpenProject, providing informative messages to users without revealing sensitive information.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Malicious File Upload (High Severity): Uploading malicious files (e.g., malware, web shells) through OpenProject that can compromise the server or other OpenProject users.
    • File Upload Exploits (High Severity): Exploiting vulnerabilities in OpenProject's file upload handling to gain unauthorized access or execute arbitrary code within OpenProject or the server.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via File Uploads (Medium Severity): Uploading files containing malicious scripts through OpenProject that can be executed in other OpenProject users' browsers when accessed through OpenProject.
  • Impact:
    • Malicious File Upload: High Risk Reduction
    • File Upload Exploits: High Risk Reduction
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via File Uploads: Medium Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Basic file extension filtering might be in place within OpenProject, but robust content-based validation and file scanning are likely missing in OpenProject's file handling.
    • Location: File upload handling logic in OpenProject backend, potentially configuration settings within OpenProject.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Content-based file type validation (magic number/MIME type checks) within OpenProject.
    • Integration of file scanning/antivirus solutions with OpenProject file uploads.
    • Regular review and updates of allowed file type lists within OpenProject configuration.
    • Comprehensive error handling for file upload failures within OpenProject.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure File Storage and Access Control

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure File Storage and Access Control
  • Description:
    1. Secure Storage Location (OpenProject): Store files uploaded through OpenProject in a secure location on the server file system or a dedicated secure storage service. Restrict direct web access to this storage location outside of OpenProject's access control.
    2. Access Control Configuration (OpenProject): Configure OpenProject's access control mechanisms to manage access to uploaded files. Ensure that access is granted based on OpenProject user roles, project permissions, and file ownership within OpenProject.
    3. Indirect File Access (OpenProject): Serve files through OpenProject's application logic, enforcing access control checks before allowing file downloads or access through OpenProject. Avoid direct links to file storage locations bypassing OpenProject's access control.
    4. Regular Access Audits (OpenProject File Access): Periodically audit file access logs within OpenProject or related logs to detect any unauthorized access attempts or suspicious activity related to OpenProject files.
    5. Data Encryption at Rest (Optional, Enhanced Security for OpenProject Files): Consider encrypting stored files at rest for enhanced data protection, especially for sensitive data uploaded through OpenProject.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized File Access (High Severity): Attackers or unauthorized OpenProject users gaining access to uploaded files without proper authorization within OpenProject.
    • Data Breaches via File Storage (High Severity): Compromise of file storage used by OpenProject leading to data breaches and exposure of sensitive information managed within OpenProject.
    • Data Leakage (Medium Severity): Accidental or intentional leakage of sensitive information through improperly secured file access within OpenProject.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized File Access: High Risk Reduction
    • Data Breaches via File Storage: High Risk Reduction
    • Data Leakage: Medium Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. OpenProject likely has basic access control for files, but secure storage location configuration specific to OpenProject files, indirect access enforcement, and regular audits might be missing.
    • Location: File storage configuration in OpenProject, access control logic in the application.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Configuration of a dedicated secure file storage location for OpenProject files.
    • Strict enforcement of indirect file access through OpenProject application logic.
    • Regular file access audits and monitoring related to OpenProject files.
    • Implementation of data encryption at rest for file storage used by OpenProject (if required by security policies).

Mitigation Strategy: Content Security Policy (CSP) for File Handling

  • Mitigation Strategy: Content Security Policy (CSP) for File Handling
  • Description:
    1. CSP Header Configuration (OpenProject): Configure the web server or OpenProject application to send a Content Security Policy (CSP) header in HTTP responses, especially when serving or handling user-uploaded files within OpenProject.
    2. Restrict Script Sources (OpenProject CSP): Use CSP directives like script-src to restrict the sources from which scripts can be loaded and executed in the context of OpenProject file handling. Disallow unsafe-inline and unsafe-eval where possible.
    3. Restrict Object Sources (OpenProject CSP): Use CSP directives like object-src to restrict the sources for plugins and embedded content related to OpenProject file handling.
    4. Restrict Frame Ancestors (OpenProject CSP): Use CSP directives like frame-ancestors to prevent clickjacking attacks targeting OpenProject.
    5. Report-Uri/Report-To (Optional, for Monitoring OpenProject CSP): Configure report-uri or report-to directives to receive reports of CSP violations, allowing for monitoring and refinement of the policy within the OpenProject context.
    6. Testing and Refinement (OpenProject CSP): Thoroughly test the CSP implementation for OpenProject to ensure it doesn't break legitimate application functionality and refine the policy as needed.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via File Uploads (Medium Severity): Mitigating the execution of malicious scripts embedded in user-uploaded files within OpenProject, even if they bypass file validation.
    • Clickjacking (Medium Severity): Preventing clickjacking attacks targeting the OpenProject application.
    • Injection Attacks (Medium Severity): Reducing the impact of various injection attacks within OpenProject by limiting the resources the browser is allowed to load.
  • Impact:
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via File Uploads: Medium Risk Reduction
    • Clickjacking: Medium Risk Reduction
    • Injection Attacks: Medium Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Likely Missing or Partially Implemented. CSP might not be configured at all for OpenProject, or a very basic CSP might be in place without specific considerations for OpenProject file handling.
    • Location: Web server configuration (e.g., Apache, Nginx) serving OpenProject, or application-level configuration in OpenProject.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Implementation of a comprehensive CSP header, specifically tailored for OpenProject and file handling.
    • CSP directives to restrict script and object sources, and frame ancestors within OpenProject's CSP.
    • CSP reporting mechanisms for monitoring and policy refinement for OpenProject.
    • Testing and validation of CSP implementation for OpenProject across different browsers and scenarios.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Security Updates and Patching of OpenProject

  • Mitigation Strategy: Regular Security Updates and Patching of OpenProject
  • Description:
    1. Update Monitoring (OpenProject): Regularly check for new OpenProject releases and security announcements on the official OpenProject website, mailing lists, or security feeds.
    2. Security Announcement Subscription (OpenProject): Subscribe to OpenProject security announcement channels to receive timely notifications about vulnerabilities and security updates for OpenProject.
    3. Staging Environment Updates (OpenProject): Before applying updates to production OpenProject, thoroughly test them in a staging OpenProject environment to ensure compatibility and stability within OpenProject.
    4. Patching Process (OpenProject): Establish a documented process for applying OpenProject updates and security patches promptly.
    5. Automated Update Mechanisms (If Available and Safe for OpenProject): Explore and implement automated update mechanisms provided by OpenProject or package managers, if they are reliable and secure for OpenProject updates.
    6. Rollback Plan (OpenProject Updates): Have a rollback plan in place in case an OpenProject update causes issues in production.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of Known OpenProject Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Attackers exploiting publicly disclosed vulnerabilities in outdated OpenProject versions.
  • Impact:
    • Exploitation of Known OpenProject Vulnerabilities: High Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Manual checks for updates might occur for OpenProject, but a systematic and proactive approach, automated updates, and a formal patching process are likely missing for OpenProject.
    • Location: OpenProject administration interface (for update notifications), server administration for applying updates.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Automated OpenProject update monitoring and notification system.
    • Formal process and schedule for OpenProject updates, especially security patches.
    • Clear communication channels for security announcements related to OpenProject.
    • Automated update mechanisms for OpenProject (if feasible and secure).
    • Documented rollback plan for OpenProject updates.