Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
60 lines (51 loc) · 6.5 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

60 lines (51 loc) · 6.5 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for presidentbeef/brakeman

Mitigation Strategy: Prioritize Brakeman Warnings

  • Description:
    1. After running Brakeman, carefully review the generated report.
    2. Pay close attention to the warning confidence levels (e.g., High, Medium, Low) and vulnerability types (e.g., SQL Injection, XSS, Mass Assignment).
    3. Prioritize addressing warnings with "High" confidence and critical vulnerability types first. These are the most likely and potentially impactful vulnerabilities.
    4. Address "Medium" confidence warnings next, and then "Low" confidence warnings as time and resources permit.
    5. Use Brakeman's output to guide your security remediation efforts, focusing on the most critical issues first.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • All vulnerability types identified by Brakeman (SQL Injection, XSS, Mass Assignment, Command Injection, Insecure Redirects, File Disclosure, etc.). The severity depends on the specific vulnerability type. Prioritization helps focus on the most severe threats first.
  • Impact:
    • All threats: Medium to High reduction in overall risk. By prioritizing, developers efficiently allocate resources to address the most critical vulnerabilities identified by Brakeman, leading to a faster and more impactful reduction in security risk.
  • Currently Implemented: Yes, informally implemented. Development team generally addresses Brakeman warnings, but prioritization could be more structured.
  • Missing Implementation: Formalize a process for prioritizing Brakeman warnings. This could involve creating a checklist or workflow that explicitly outlines the prioritization based on confidence and vulnerability type. Integrate this prioritization into sprint planning and bug tracking.

Mitigation Strategy: Understand Brakeman Warnings

  • Description:
    1. When Brakeman reports a warning, don't just blindly apply a fix. Take the time to thoroughly understand the warning message.
    2. Carefully examine the code snippet provided by Brakeman in the report.
    3. Understand the data flow and how user input is being used in the flagged code.
    4. Research the specific vulnerability type Brakeman is reporting (e.g., SQL Injection, XSS).
    5. Ensure you understand why Brakeman is flagging this code as a potential vulnerability before implementing a mitigation. This deeper understanding leads to more effective and correct fixes.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • All vulnerability types identified by Brakeman. Understanding warnings leads to more effective mitigation, thus reducing the risk of all identified threats.
  • Impact:
    • All threats: Medium to High reduction in risk. Understanding warnings ensures that mitigations are targeted and effective, reducing the chance of ineffective fixes or introducing new issues.
  • Currently Implemented: Yes, partially implemented. Developers generally try to understand warnings, but sometimes might apply quick fixes without full comprehension.
  • Missing Implementation: Encourage and allocate time for developers to deeply understand Brakeman warnings. Provide training on common vulnerability types and how Brakeman detects them. Promote code reviews where understanding of Brakeman warnings is discussed and verified.

Mitigation Strategy: Retest with Brakeman After Mitigation

  • Description:
    1. After implementing a mitigation strategy for a Brakeman warning, re-run Brakeman on the codebase.
    2. Verify that the warning is no longer reported in the updated Brakeman report.
    3. If the warning persists, re-examine the code and the mitigation strategy. It might be that the mitigation was not effective or was not correctly implemented.
    4. Retesting with Brakeman ensures that the applied fix actually addresses the vulnerability as detected by the tool.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • All vulnerability types identified by Brakeman. Retesting ensures that mitigations are effective in addressing the identified vulnerabilities.
  • Impact:
    • All threats: High reduction in risk. Retesting provides verification that the implemented mitigations are successful in resolving the vulnerabilities flagged by Brakeman, significantly reducing the risk of those specific issues.
  • Currently Implemented: Yes, partially implemented. Developers are generally expected to fix Brakeman warnings, but retesting with Brakeman after fixes is not always consistently enforced or verified.
  • Missing Implementation: Make retesting with Brakeman a mandatory step in the bug fixing workflow for security vulnerabilities identified by Brakeman. Integrate Brakeman into the CI/CD pipeline to automatically re-run Brakeman after code changes and verify that warnings are resolved.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Brakeman Scans

  • Description:
    1. Integrate Brakeman into your development workflow to run regularly.
    2. Run Brakeman scans as part of the Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipeline. This ensures that Brakeman is run automatically on every code commit or pull request.
    3. Schedule regular Brakeman scans (e.g., daily or weekly) even outside of the CI/CD pipeline to catch any issues that might have been missed or introduced outside of the standard development flow.
    4. Treat Brakeman warnings as bugs and address them promptly as part of the regular development process.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • All vulnerability types identified by Brakeman. Regular scans help to proactively identify and mitigate vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle, reducing the window of opportunity for attackers.
  • Impact:
    • All threats: High reduction in risk. Regular scans enable early detection and mitigation of vulnerabilities, preventing them from reaching production and reducing the overall attack surface of the application.
  • Currently Implemented: Yes, partially implemented. Brakeman is run manually occasionally, but not yet integrated into the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Missing Implementation: Fully integrate Brakeman into the CI/CD pipeline to run automatically on every code change. Establish a schedule for regular Brakeman scans outside of CI/CD. Set up notifications to alert developers of new Brakeman warnings promptly.