Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
66 lines (55 loc) · 5.81 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

66 lines (55 loc) · 5.81 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for presidentbeef/brakeman

Attack Surface: 1. Dependency Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Brakeman relies on external Ruby gems. Vulnerabilities in these dependencies can be directly exploited when Brakeman is executed.
  • How Brakeman Contributes: Brakeman's core functionality depends on these potentially vulnerable components. The act of running Brakeman triggers the execution of these dependencies.
  • Example: A gem used for parsing Ruby code within Brakeman has a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability. An attacker crafts a malicious Ruby file that, when scanned by Brakeman, triggers the RCE, compromising the CI/CD server.
  • Impact: Compromise of the system running Brakeman (CI/CD server, developer workstation), leading to access to source code, credentials, and sensitive data. Potential for lateral movement.
  • Risk Severity: High (Potentially Critical if Brakeman runs with elevated privileges in CI/CD).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regular Updates: Keep Brakeman and all its dependencies updated using bundle update brakeman and bundle update.
    • Dependency Scanning: Use tools like bundler-audit, gemnasium, or Dependabot to automatically detect and report known vulnerabilities.
    • Gemfile.lock: Use a Gemfile.lock for consistent dependency versions.
    • Vulnerability Monitoring: Actively monitor security advisories for Ruby gems and Brakeman.

Attack Surface: 2. Supply Chain Attacks on Dependencies

  • Description: An attacker compromises the source of one of Brakeman's dependencies, injecting malicious code. This malicious code is executed when Brakeman runs.
  • How Brakeman Contributes: Using Brakeman means implicitly trusting its dependency chain. A compromised dependency becomes a direct attack vector through Brakeman's execution.
  • Example: An attacker compromises a gem author's account and publishes a malicious version of a gem used by Brakeman. When Brakeman runs, it executes the compromised gem's code.
  • Impact: System compromise, data breaches, and potential lateral movement, all triggered by running Brakeman with the compromised dependency.
  • Risk Severity: High.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Signed Gems: Preferentially use digitally signed gems (where available).
    • Dependency Monitoring (Advanced): Monitor for suspicious activity related to Brakeman's dependencies.
    • Vendoring (Extreme): Consider vendoring critical dependencies for highly sensitive environments.
    • Review Dependency Maintainers: Evaluate security practices of maintainers.

Attack Surface: 3. Insecure Report Storage

  • Description: Brakeman generates reports detailing potential vulnerabilities. Insecure storage of these Brakeman-generated reports exposes sensitive information.
  • How Brakeman Contributes: Brakeman creates these reports; their security is a direct consequence of using the tool. The vulnerability exists because of Brakeman's output.
  • Example: Brakeman reports are automatically saved to a publicly accessible S3 bucket.
  • Impact: Attackers gain a roadmap of the application's vulnerabilities, facilitating exploitation.
  • Risk Severity: High.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Access Control: Store reports with strict access controls (private S3 buckets, secure file shares).
    • Encryption: Encrypt reports at rest.
    • .gitignore: Add Brakeman report files to .gitignore.
    • Secure Sharing: Implement a secure process for sharing reports.
    • Short Retention: Implement a policy for automatic deletion of old reports.

Attack Surface: 4. Ignoring High-Confidence Warnings

  • Description: Developers disregard high-confidence warnings generated by Brakeman, leaving known vulnerabilities unaddressed.
  • How Brakeman Contributes: This risk is directly tied to the output of Brakeman. The warnings exist because Brakeman found them.
  • Example: Brakeman reports a high-confidence SQL injection vulnerability, but it's ignored.
  • Impact: The application remains vulnerable to the attacks Brakeman identified.
  • Risk Severity: High (Potentially Critical depending on the vulnerability).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • CI/CD Integration: Block builds with high-confidence warnings.
    • Policy Enforcement: Establish clear policies for addressing warnings.
    • Vulnerability Tracking: Use a system to track and monitor resolution.
    • Security Champions: Appoint champions to advocate for security.

Attack Surface: 5. Compromised Execution Environment (CI/CD)

  • Description: The CI/CD server where Brakeman runs is compromised, allowing attackers to manipulate Brakeman or access its results.
  • How Brakeman Contributes: Brakeman's security is directly tied to the security of its execution environment. If the environment is compromised, Brakeman is compromised.
  • Example: An attacker gains access to the CI/CD server and modifies Brakeman's configuration to suppress warnings.
  • Impact: Attackers can access source code, credentials, and manipulate scan results, potentially hiding vulnerabilities.
  • Risk Severity: High (Potentially Critical).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Server Hardening: Implement strong security measures for CI/CD servers: patching, access control, intrusion detection, least privilege.
    • Isolated Environments: Run Brakeman in a dedicated, isolated environment (container, VM).