Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
182 lines (136 loc) · 15.5 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

182 lines (136 loc) · 15.5 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for presidentbeef/brakeman

Mitigation Strategy: Secure System Command Execution (Brakeman: Command Injection)

  • Description (Brakeman-Driven):

    1. Run Brakeman: Execute Brakeman against the codebase (brakeman or brakeman -o output.json).
    2. Analyze Command Injection Warnings: Examine the Brakeman report (either the console output or the JSON output) for warnings categorized as "Command Injection." Note the file, line number, and the specific code snippet flagged.
    3. Evaluate Necessity (Guided by Brakeman): For each flagged instance, determine if the system call is absolutely necessary. Brakeman's output helps pinpoint the exact location, making this evaluation efficient.
    4. Choose Safe Alternatives (Brakeman Context): If a system call is unavoidable, replace direct calls with safer alternatives (e.g., Open3.capture3). Brakeman's warning often shows the vulnerable code, making it easier to refactor.
    5. Implement Strict Whitelisting (Brakeman-Informed): If user input must be used, create a whitelist. Brakeman's identification of the input source helps define the scope of the whitelist.
    6. Sanitize Arguments (Brakeman-Specific): Sanitize arguments using a dedicated library or careful escaping. Brakeman's context helps determine the appropriate escaping method.
    7. Re-run Brakeman: After implementing mitigations, re-run Brakeman to confirm that the warnings have been resolved. This is crucial for verification.
    8. Test thoroughly: Create unit and integration tests.

  • Threats Mitigated (Brakeman Focus):

    • Command Injection (High Severity): Directly flagged by Brakeman.
    • Privilege Escalation (High Severity): Often a consequence of command injection.
    • Data Breach (High Severity): Possible through command injection.
    • Denial of Service (Medium Severity): Possible through command injection.

  • Impact (Brakeman-Related):

    • Brakeman's confidence level (High, Medium, Weak) for each warning provides an initial impact assessment. Mitigation aims to eliminate the warning, reducing the risk to Very Low.

  • Currently Implemented / Missing Implementation: (This section would be specific to your project, referencing files and lines identified by Brakeman.)

Mitigation Strategy: Comprehensive XSS Protection (Brakeman: Cross-Site Scripting)

  • Description (Brakeman-Driven):

    1. Run Brakeman: Execute Brakeman.
    2. Analyze XSS Warnings: Examine the report for warnings categorized as "Cross-Site Scripting." Note the file, line number, context (e.g., "Unescaped Output"), and confidence level.
    3. Verify Escaping (Brakeman-Guided): For each flagged instance, check if the appropriate Rails escaping helper is being used correctly for the output context. Brakeman identifies the specific output location and often the problematic variable.
    4. Address raw and html_safe (Brakeman Focus): Brakeman specifically flags the use of raw and html_safe. Each instance must be reviewed and justified. If the content is not absolutely safe, refactor to use proper escaping.
    5. CSP Review (Brakeman-Assisted): While Brakeman doesn't directly configure CSP, it can identify potential CSP violations (e.g., inline scripts). Use Brakeman's output to inform your CSP configuration.
    6. Re-run Brakeman: After implementing mitigations, re-run Brakeman to confirm that the XSS warnings have been resolved.
    7. Test thoroughly: Create unit and integration tests.

  • Threats Mitigated (Brakeman Focus):

    • Stored XSS (High Severity): Directly flagged by Brakeman.
    • Reflected XSS (Medium Severity): Directly flagged by Brakeman.
    • DOM-based XSS (Medium Severity): Brakeman can sometimes detect patterns that might lead to DOM-based XSS.
    • Session Hijacking (High Severity): A consequence of XSS.
    • Phishing (Medium Severity): A consequence of XSS.

  • Impact (Brakeman-Related): Brakeman's confidence level provides an initial impact assessment. Mitigation aims to eliminate the warning.

  • Currently Implemented / Missing Implementation: (Project-specific, based on Brakeman's output.)

Mitigation Strategy: Preventing SQL Injection (Brakeman: SQL Injection)

  • Description (Brakeman-Driven):

    1. Run Brakeman: Execute Brakeman.
    2. Analyze SQL Injection Warnings: Examine the report for warnings categorized as "SQL Injection." Note the file, line number, and the specific code snippet.
    3. Verify ActiveRecord Usage (Brakeman-Guided): For each flagged instance, confirm that ActiveRecord (or another ORM) is being used correctly. Brakeman identifies the exact location of the potential vulnerability.
    4. Refactor Raw SQL (Brakeman Focus): Brakeman specifically flags raw SQL queries (e.g., find_by_sql, connection.execute) that use string interpolation. These must be refactored to use ActiveRecord or parameterized queries.
    5. Re-run Brakeman: After implementing mitigations, re-run Brakeman to confirm that the SQL injection warnings have been resolved.
    6. Test thoroughly: Create unit and integration tests.

  • Threats Mitigated (Brakeman Focus):

    • SQL Injection (Critical Severity): Directly flagged by Brakeman.
    • Data Breach (High Severity): A consequence of SQL injection.
    • Data Modification/Deletion (High Severity): A consequence of SQL injection.
    • Authentication Bypass (High Severity): Possible through SQL injection.
    • Privilege Escalation (High Severity): Possible through SQL injection.

  • Impact (Brakeman-Related): Brakeman's confidence level is crucial here. Mitigation aims to eliminate the warning.

  • Currently Implemented / Missing Implementation: (Project-specific, based on Brakeman's output.)

Mitigation Strategy: Addressing Denial of Service Risks (Brakeman: Denial of Service)

  • Description (Brakeman-Driven):

    1. Run Brakeman: Execute Brakeman.
    2. Analyze Denial of Service Warnings: Examine the report for warnings categorized as "Denial of Service." This includes subcategories like "ReDoS" (Regular Expression Denial of Service) and warnings related to unbounded queries.
    3. ReDoS Mitigation (Brakeman-Guided): For ReDoS warnings, Brakeman identifies the specific regular expression and the input source. Simplify the regex, add timeouts, and validate input length/format before applying the regex.
    4. Unbounded Query Mitigation (Brakeman-Assisted): Brakeman may flag queries that could potentially return a large number of results. Implement pagination and set maximum result limits.
    5. Re-run Brakeman: After implementing mitigations, re-run Brakeman. While Brakeman might not completely eliminate all DoS warnings (especially for general resource exhaustion), it should help reduce the number and severity of ReDoS and unbounded query warnings.
    6. Test thoroughly: Create unit and integration tests.

  • Threats Mitigated (Brakeman Focus):

    • Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) (Medium Severity): Directly flagged by Brakeman.
    • Unbounded Query DoS (Medium Severity): Brakeman can provide warnings related to this.
    • Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Brakeman's ReDoS and unbounded query checks contribute to mitigating this broader category.

  • Impact (Brakeman-Related): Brakeman's confidence level is important for ReDoS warnings.

  • Currently Implemented / Missing Implementation: (Project-specific, based on Brakeman's output.)

Mitigation Strategy: Enforcing Mass Assignment Protection (Brakeman: Mass Assignment)

  • Description (Brakeman-Driven):

    1. Run Brakeman: Execute Brakeman.
    2. Analyze Mass Assignment Warnings: Examine the report for warnings categorized as "Mass Assignment." Note the file, line number, and the affected model.
    3. Verify Strong Parameters (Brakeman-Guided): For each flagged instance, check if strong parameters (params.require(...).permit(...)) are being used correctly in the corresponding controller. Brakeman identifies the model and often the controller action.
    4. Address Missing Strong Parameters (Brakeman Focus): If strong parameters are missing or incomplete, implement them immediately.
    5. Re-run Brakeman: After implementing mitigations, re-run Brakeman to confirm that the mass assignment warnings have been resolved.
    6. Test thoroughly: Create unit and integration tests.

  • Threats Mitigated (Brakeman Focus):

    • Mass Assignment (High Severity): Directly flagged by Brakeman.
    • Privilege Escalation (High Severity): A consequence of mass assignment.
    • Data Corruption (Medium Severity): A consequence of mass assignment.

  • Impact (Brakeman-Related): Brakeman's confidence level is important. Mitigation aims to eliminate the warning.

  • Currently Implemented / Missing Implementation: (Project-specific, based on Brakeman's output.)

Mitigation Strategy: Securing Redirects and File Access (Brakeman: Redirect, File Access)

  • Description (Brakeman-Driven):

    1. Run Brakeman: Execute Brakeman.
    2. Analyze Redirect and File Access Warnings: Examine the report for warnings categorized as "Redirect" and "File Access." Note the file, line number, and the specific code snippet.
    3. Address Open Redirects (Brakeman-Guided): For "Redirect" warnings, Brakeman identifies the redirect_to call and often the source of the URL. Implement whitelisting, use relative paths, or avoid user input in the URL.
    4. Address File Access Vulnerabilities (Brakeman Focus): For "File Access" warnings, Brakeman identifies the file operation (e.g., File.open, send_file) and often the source of the file path. Never use user input directly in file paths. Implement whitelisting and sanitize file names.
    5. Re-run Brakeman: After implementing mitigations, re-run Brakeman to confirm that the warnings have been resolved.
    6. Test thoroughly: Create unit and integration tests.

  • Threats Mitigated (Brakeman Focus):

    • Open Redirect (Medium Severity): Directly flagged by Brakeman.
    • Local File Inclusion (LFI) (High Severity): Directly flagged by Brakeman.
    • Remote File Inclusion (RFI) (High Severity): Less common in Rails, but Brakeman can help detect patterns.
    • Directory Traversal (High Severity): Directly flagged by Brakeman.

  • Impact (Brakeman-Related): Brakeman's confidence level is crucial.

  • Currently Implemented / Missing Implementation: (Project-specific, based on Brakeman's output.)

Mitigation Strategy: Preventing Dynamic Render Path Vulnerabilities (Brakeman: Render Path)

  • Description (Brakeman-Driven):

    1. Run Brakeman: Execute Brakeman.
    2. Analyze Render Path Warnings: Examine the report for warnings categorized as "Render Path." Note the file, line number, and the specific render call.
    3. Eliminate User Input (Brakeman-Guided): Brakeman identifies the render call and often the source of the dynamic path. Refactor the code to avoid using user input to determine the template or partial.
    4. Implement Whitelisting (Brakeman Focus): If dynamic rendering is necessary, create a whitelist of allowed template names.
    5. Re-run Brakeman: After implementing mitigations, re-run Brakeman to confirm that the warnings have been resolved.
    6. Test thoroughly: Create unit and integration tests.

  • Threats Mitigated (Brakeman Focus):

    • Information Disclosure (Medium Severity): Directly flagged by Brakeman.
    • Code Execution (High Severity - Less Common): Brakeman helps prevent this.

  • Impact (Brakeman-Related): Brakeman's confidence level is important.

  • Currently Implemented / Missing Implementation: (Project-specific, based on Brakeman's output.)

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Session Management (Brakeman: Session Setting)

  • Description (Brakeman-Driven):

    1. Run Brakeman: Execute Brakeman.
    2. Analyze Session Setting Warnings: Examine the report for warnings categorized as related to "Session Setting". Note the file, line number, and the specific code.
    3. Eliminate User Input in Keys (Brakeman-Guided): Brakeman identifies the session assignment. Refactor to avoid using user input as session keys.
    4. Validate and Sanitize Values (Brakeman Focus): If user data must be stored, validate and sanitize it before storing it in the session.
    5. Re-run Brakeman: After implementing mitigations, re-run Brakeman.
    6. Test thoroughly: Create unit and integration tests.

  • Threats Mitigated (Brakeman Focus):

    • Data Tampering (Medium Severity): Directly related to how user input is handled in sessions.
    • Session Fixation (High Severity): While Brakeman doesn't directly check session ID regeneration, it helps ensure safe session data handling, which is a prerequisite for preventing fixation.
    • Session Hijacking (High Severity): Similar to fixation, Brakeman contributes to overall session security.

  • Impact (Brakeman-Related): Brakeman helps identify unsafe session data handling.

  • Currently Implemented / Missing Implementation: (Project-specific, based on Brakeman's output.)

Mitigation Strategy: Safe Method Invocation (Brakeman: Dangerous Send)

  • Description (Brakeman-Driven):
    1. Run Brakeman: Execute Brakeman.
    2. Analyze Dangerous Send Warnings: Examine the report for warnings categorized as "Dangerous Send." Note the file, line number, and the specific send or public_send call.
    3. Eliminate User Input (Brakeman-Guided): Brakeman identifies the send/public_send call and often the source of the method name. Refactor to avoid using user input.
    4. Implement Whitelisting (Brakeman Focus): If dynamic method invocation is necessary, create a whitelist of allowed method names (symbols).
    5. Re-run Brakeman: After implementing mitigations, re-run Brakeman to confirm that the warnings have been resolved.
  1. Test thoroughly: Create unit and integration tests.

  • Threats Mitigated (Brakeman Focus):

    • Arbitrary Method Execution (High Severity): Directly flagged by Brakeman.
    • Information Disclosure (Medium Severity): Possible through arbitrary method execution.
    • Denial of Service (Medium Severity): Possible through arbitrary method execution.

  • Impact (Brakeman-Related): Brakeman's confidence level is crucial.

  • Currently Implemented / Missing Implementation: (Project-specific, based on Brakeman's output.)