Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
158 lines (118 loc) · 13.8 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

158 lines (118 loc) · 13.8 KB

Brakeman Deep Security Analysis

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

This deep analysis aims to thoroughly examine the security posture of the Brakeman static analysis tool itself, focusing on its key components, potential vulnerabilities, and mitigation strategies. The objective is to identify weaknesses within Brakeman that could be exploited to compromise its functionality, produce incorrect results, or potentially affect the systems on which it runs. This is not an analysis of how Brakeman finds vulnerabilities in other Rails applications, but rather a security review of Brakeman's own codebase and design.

Scope:

This analysis covers the following aspects of Brakeman:

  • Code Parsing and Analysis Engine: The core components responsible for parsing Ruby and Rails code, building an Abstract Syntax Tree (AST), and identifying potential vulnerabilities.
  • Check Implementation: The individual checks that implement the vulnerability detection logic.
  • Configuration Handling: How Brakeman processes and uses configuration files.
  • Dependency Management: The security implications of Brakeman's dependencies.
  • Reporting Mechanism: How Brakeman generates and presents reports.
  • Build and Deployment Process: Security considerations related to building and distributing Brakeman.

Methodology:

  1. Code Review: Manual review of the Brakeman source code (available on GitHub) to identify potential vulnerabilities and weaknesses. This will focus on areas identified in the scope.
  2. Dependency Analysis: Examination of Brakeman's dependencies (using bundler-audit or similar tools) to identify known vulnerabilities.
  3. Architectural Inference: Based on the codebase, documentation, and C4 diagrams provided, we will infer the overall architecture, data flow, and component interactions.
  4. Threat Modeling: Identification of potential threats and attack vectors against Brakeman.
  5. Mitigation Strategy Recommendation: Providing specific, actionable recommendations to address identified vulnerabilities and improve Brakeman's security posture.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

2.1 Code Parsing and Analysis Engine

  • Component Description: Brakeman uses the ruby_parser gem (and potentially others) to parse Ruby code and generate an Abstract Syntax Tree (AST). It then traverses this AST, applying various checks to identify potential vulnerabilities.
  • Security Implications:
    • Vulnerabilities in ruby_parser: A vulnerability in the parsing library itself could be exploited to cause Brakeman to crash, produce incorrect results, or potentially execute arbitrary code. This is a critical area of concern. An attacker could craft a malicious Ruby file that, when parsed by Brakeman, triggers a vulnerability in ruby_parser.
    • Incorrect AST Traversal: Errors in Brakeman's AST traversal logic could lead to missed vulnerabilities (false negatives) or incorrect identification of vulnerabilities (false positives).
    • Resource Exhaustion: A maliciously crafted Ruby file could be designed to consume excessive resources (CPU, memory) during parsing or analysis, leading to a denial-of-service (DoS) condition against Brakeman itself. This could be achieved through deeply nested structures, large files, or other techniques that stress the parser.
    • Logic Errors in Analysis: Flaws in the logic that analyzes the AST could lead to incorrect vulnerability identification.

2.2 Check Implementation

  • Component Description: Brakeman includes a large number of individual checks, each designed to identify a specific type of vulnerability (e.g., SQL injection, cross-site scripting, command injection). These checks are implemented as Ruby classes that analyze the AST.
  • Security Implications:
    • Incomplete or Incorrect Checks: If a check is not comprehensive or contains errors, it may fail to detect vulnerabilities or report false positives.
    • Regular Expression Vulnerabilities: Many checks likely use regular expressions to match patterns in the code. Poorly crafted regular expressions can be vulnerable to ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service) attacks, where a specially crafted input string causes the regular expression engine to consume excessive resources.
    • Logic Errors: Flaws in the check's logic could lead to incorrect vulnerability identification.

2.3 Configuration Handling

  • Component Description: Brakeman allows users to configure its behavior through command-line options and configuration files.
  • Security Implications:
    • Insecure Configuration Defaults: If Brakeman has insecure default settings, users who do not explicitly configure it may be vulnerable.
    • Configuration File Injection: If Brakeman does not properly validate or sanitize configuration file input, an attacker could potentially inject malicious code or settings into the configuration file. This is less likely than code injection in the target application, but still a consideration.
    • Overly Permissive Configuration: Configuration options that disable security checks or allow for unsafe behavior could be misused, leading to missed vulnerabilities.

2.4 Dependency Management

  • Component Description: Brakeman relies on a number of third-party Ruby gems (dependencies).
  • Security Implications:
    • Vulnerable Dependencies: If Brakeman's dependencies contain known vulnerabilities, an attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities to compromise Brakeman or the system on which it is running. This is a high-priority concern.

2.5 Reporting Mechanism

  • Component Description: Brakeman generates reports in various formats (text, HTML, JSON, etc.) that list the identified vulnerabilities.
  • Security Implications:
    • Information Disclosure: The reports themselves could contain sensitive information about the analyzed application. While this is the intended behavior, it's important to ensure that the reports are handled securely and not exposed to unauthorized parties.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in HTML Reports: If Brakeman does not properly sanitize the data included in HTML reports, it could be vulnerable to XSS attacks. This is unlikely, as Brakeman is generating the report, not displaying user-supplied data, but it's still a good practice to ensure proper encoding.

2.6 Build and Deployment Process

  • Component Description: Brakeman is built and distributed as a Ruby gem.
  • Security Implications:
    • Compromised Build Server: If the build server or CI/CD pipeline used to build Brakeman is compromised, an attacker could inject malicious code into the Brakeman gem.
    • Unsigned Gems: If the Brakeman gem is not digitally signed, it is more difficult to verify its integrity and authenticity. An attacker could potentially distribute a modified version of Brakeman.
    • Dependency Tampering: During the build process, an attacker could potentially tamper with Brakeman's dependencies, replacing them with malicious versions.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow (Inferred)

Based on the provided C4 diagrams and the nature of the tool, we can infer the following:

  • Architecture: Brakeman follows a relatively straightforward pipeline architecture:

    1. Input: Ruby on Rails application code and optional configuration files.
    2. Parsing: The ruby_parser gem (and potentially others) parses the code into an AST.
    3. Analysis: Brakeman's core engine traverses the AST and applies a series of checks.
    4. Reporting: The results are formatted and outputted to the user.

  • Key Components:

    • lib/brakeman.rb: Likely the main entry point for the Brakeman gem.
    • lib/brakeman/scanner.rb: Likely handles the scanning process, including parsing and AST traversal.
    • lib/brakeman/checks/: Likely contains the individual check classes.
    • lib/brakeman/report/: Likely handles report generation.
    • ruby_parser (external gem): Crucial for parsing Ruby code.
    • Other dependencies (external gems): Provide supporting functionality.

  • Data Flow:

    1. User runs Brakeman CLI, providing the path to the Rails application.
    2. Brakeman reads the application code and any configuration files.
    3. ruby_parser parses the code and generates an AST.
    4. Brakeman's scanner traverses the AST.
    5. Checks analyze the AST and report potential vulnerabilities.
    6. The report generator formats the findings.
    7. The report is outputted to the console or a file.

4. Specific Security Considerations for Brakeman

Given the nature of Brakeman as a static analysis tool, the following security considerations are particularly important:

  • Input Validation (of Target Application Code): Brakeman must be robust against maliciously crafted Ruby code designed to exploit vulnerabilities in the parser or analysis engine. This is the primary attack vector against Brakeman.
  • Dependency Security: Brakeman's dependencies are a critical attack surface. Regular dependency scanning and updates are essential.
  • Regular Expression Security: Careful attention must be paid to the regular expressions used in checks to avoid ReDoS vulnerabilities.
  • Resource Management: Brakeman should be designed to handle large or complex codebases without excessive resource consumption.
  • Secure Build Process: The build process should be secured to prevent the injection of malicious code into the Brakeman gem.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies

The following mitigation strategies are tailored to Brakeman and address the identified threats:

  1. Dependency Scanning and Management:

    • Action: Integrate bundler-audit (or a similar tool) into the CI/CD pipeline to automatically scan for known vulnerabilities in Brakeman's dependencies on every build.
    • Action: Establish a policy for promptly updating dependencies to address known vulnerabilities. Consider using automated dependency update tools (e.g., Dependabot).
    • Action: Regularly review and minimize the number of dependencies to reduce the attack surface.

  2. Fuzz Testing of Parser and Checks:

    • Action: Implement fuzz testing using a tool like AFL or libFuzzer to test the ruby_parser gem and Brakeman's parsing and analysis logic. This involves providing random, malformed, or unexpected input to identify crashes, hangs, or other unexpected behavior.
    • Action: Create a corpus of malicious Ruby code snippets designed to test specific vulnerabilities (e.g., ReDoS, deeply nested structures, large files).
    • Action: Integrate fuzz testing into the CI/CD pipeline to run automatically on every build.

  3. Regular Expression Review and Hardening:

    • Action: Conduct a thorough review of all regular expressions used in Brakeman's checks.
    • Action: Use a regular expression testing tool to identify potential ReDoS vulnerabilities.
    • Action: Rewrite vulnerable regular expressions to be more robust and less susceptible to ReDoS attacks. Consider using techniques like atomic grouping and possessive quantifiers.
    • Action: Implement timeouts for regular expression matching to prevent excessive resource consumption.

  4. Code Coverage Analysis and Improvement:

    • Action: Use a code coverage tool (e.g., SimpleCov) to measure the code coverage of Brakeman's test suite.
    • Action: Identify areas of low code coverage and write additional tests to improve coverage, particularly for critical code paths related to parsing, analysis, and check implementation.

  5. Secure Configuration Handling:

    • Action: Review and harden Brakeman's configuration options. Ensure that default settings are secure.
    • Action: Implement input validation and sanitization for configuration file input.
    • Action: Avoid overly permissive configuration options that could disable security checks or allow for unsafe behavior.

  6. Secure Build and Release Process:

    • Action: Sign the Brakeman gem file using gem cert to ensure its integrity and authenticity.
    • Action: Use a secure CI/CD pipeline (e.g., GitHub Actions with appropriate security settings) to build and release Brakeman.
    • Action: Implement two-factor authentication for access to the RubyGems.org account used to publish Brakeman.
    • Action: Regularly review and audit the build and release process to identify and address potential security weaknesses.

  7. Security Documentation:

    • Action: Create a SECURITY.md file in the Brakeman repository to document secure development practices, vulnerability reporting procedures, and guidance for users.
    • Action: Provide clear instructions on how to report vulnerabilities found in Brakeman itself.
    • Action: Document the limitations of Brakeman and the types of vulnerabilities it may not detect.

  8. Continuous Monitoring and Improvement:

    • Action: Regularly review security advisories and vulnerability databases for new threats that may affect Brakeman or its dependencies.
    • Action: Stay up-to-date with the latest security best practices for Ruby and Rails development.
    • Action: Encourage community contributions and feedback to help identify and address security issues.

By implementing these mitigation strategies, the Brakeman project can significantly improve its security posture and reduce the risk of being compromised or used to exploit vulnerabilities in other applications. This is crucial for maintaining the trust and reputation of the tool and ensuring its continued effectiveness in helping developers build secure Ruby on Rails applications.