Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
95 lines (84 loc) · 15.6 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

95 lines (84 loc) · 15.6 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for puppetlabs/puppet

Mitigation Strategy: Enforce HTTPS for Puppet Communications

  • Mitigation Strategy: Enforce HTTPS for Puppet Communications
  • Description:
    1. Configure Puppet Master for HTTPS: Ensure the Puppet Master (Puppet Server) is configured to serve Puppet Agent requests exclusively over HTTPS. This involves configuring the web server component of Puppet Server (Jetty) to use TLS/SSL.
    2. Generate and Install Puppet TLS Certificates: Generate valid TLS certificates specifically for Puppet communication. Utilize the Puppet Certificate Authority (CA) functionality or an external CA. Install the server certificate on the Puppet Master and ensure the Puppet CA certificate is distributed to all Puppet Agents for trust validation.
    3. Configure Puppet Agents for HTTPS: Configure Puppet Agents to communicate with the Puppet Master using the server_list setting in puppet.conf and explicitly specify the https protocol in the server address.
    4. Verify HTTPS Enforcement in Puppet: Use Puppet tools and logs (e.g., Puppet Server logs, Agent logs with debug level) to verify that all communication attempts are indeed using HTTPS and that HTTP connections are rejected or redirected.
    5. Disable HTTP Listener (Puppet Server): If Puppet Server configuration allows, explicitly disable the HTTP listener (port 8080 by default) to prevent any accidental or fallback communication over unencrypted HTTP.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (High Severity): Without HTTPS, communication between Puppet Agents and the Master is in plaintext, allowing attackers to intercept and potentially modify Puppet configurations, steal secrets transmitted by Puppet, or inject malicious code into Puppet catalogs.
    • Data Exposure in Transit (High Severity): Sensitive data, including Puppet configurations, facts, reports, and secrets managed by Puppet, transmitted over unencrypted HTTP connections can be easily intercepted and exposed.
  • Impact: High Reduction for Man-in-the-Middle Attacks and Data Exposure in Transit.
  • Currently Implemented: Implemented. Puppet Master and Agents are configured to use HTTPS. Puppet's built-in CA is used for certificate management.
    • Where Implemented: HTTPS is enforced in Puppet Server's webserver.conf and Agent puppet.conf files. Puppet CA infrastructure manages certificates.
  • Missing Implementation: Automated checks specifically within Puppet to verify HTTPS enforcement (beyond basic connectivity tests) are not yet in place.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) in Puppet Enterprise

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) in Puppet Enterprise
  • Description:
    1. Define Puppet-Specific Roles: Identify roles based on Puppet responsibilities (e.g., Puppet Admin, Environment Operator, Module Developer). Define granular permissions within Puppet Enterprise RBAC that align with these roles, focusing on access to Puppet environments, node groups, catalogs, and Puppet APIs.
    2. Configure RBAC in Puppet Enterprise Console: Utilize the Puppet Enterprise console to create roles and assign specific Puppet-related permissions. Focus on limiting access to sensitive Puppet resources and actions based on the principle of least privilege.
    3. Assign Users to Puppet Roles: Assign users to the defined Puppet-specific roles within the Puppet Enterprise RBAC system.
    4. Regularly Audit Puppet RBAC Permissions: Periodically review and audit the configured RBAC roles and permissions within Puppet Enterprise to ensure they remain appropriate and aligned with current security and operational needs.
    5. Enforce RBAC for Puppet APIs: Ensure that RBAC is enforced for all Puppet APIs (Node Classifier API, PuppetDB API, etc.) to control programmatic access to Puppet functionality and data.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Access to Puppet Resources (Medium Severity): Without RBAC, all users with Puppet Enterprise access might have overly broad permissions within Puppet, potentially leading to unauthorized modifications of Puppet configurations, environments, or access to sensitive Puppet data.
    • Privilege Escalation within Puppet (Medium Severity): Lack of granular RBAC can allow users to escalate their privileges within the Puppet system beyond their intended responsibilities, potentially leading to security breaches or misconfigurations.
    • Accidental Misconfigurations due to Excessive Puppet Permissions (Medium Severity): Overly broad Puppet permissions increase the risk of accidental misconfigurations by users who should not have access to certain Puppet environments or resources.
  • Impact: Medium Reduction for Unauthorized Access to Puppet Resources, Privilege Escalation within Puppet, and Accidental Misconfigurations due to Excessive Puppet Permissions.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Basic roles for Puppet administrators and operators are defined in Puppet Enterprise, but granular permissions for specific Puppet environments and resources are not fully configured.
    • Where Implemented: Basic RBAC roles are set up in Puppet Enterprise console.
  • Missing Implementation: Fine-grained Puppet-specific permissions for environments, node groups, and Puppet APIs are not fully configured. Regular audit process for Puppet RBAC is not formalized.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Secrets Management in Puppet using Hiera with Secure Backends

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Secrets Management in Puppet using Hiera with Secure Backends
  • Description:
    1. Integrate Hiera with a Secure Secrets Backend: Configure Puppet's Hiera data lookup system to use a dedicated secure secrets management backend (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault). This involves installing and configuring the appropriate Hiera backend plugin for Puppet.
    2. Store Secrets Externally in Secure Backend: Store all sensitive information intended for use within Puppet (passwords, API keys, certificates, etc.) in the chosen secure secrets backend, organized in a structured manner accessible via Hiera.
    3. Retrieve Secrets Dynamically in Puppet Code via Hiera: Modify Puppet manifests and modules to retrieve secrets dynamically at runtime using Hiera lookup functions (e.g., hiera(), lookup()). Puppet code should only reference secret names in Hiera, not the secret values themselves.
    4. Eliminate Hardcoded Secrets in Puppet: Completely remove any hardcoded secrets from Puppet code, Hiera data files (outside of the secure backend), Puppet templates, or any configuration files managed by Puppet.
    5. Implement Secret Rotation within Puppet Workflow: Establish a process for rotating secrets stored in the secure backend and ensure Puppet configurations are updated to use the rotated secrets seamlessly.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Hardcoded Secrets Exposure in Puppet Code (High Severity): Hardcoded secrets within Puppet code or configuration files are easily discoverable (e.g., in version control, backups, Puppet catalogs) and can lead to widespread compromise of systems managed by Puppet if exposed.
    • Secret Sprawl and Management Overhead within Puppet (Medium Severity): Managing secrets directly within Puppet configurations (even encrypted) leads to sprawl, versioning issues, and increased management complexity, increasing the risk of leaks and misconfigurations.
  • Impact: High Reduction for Hardcoded Secrets Exposure in Puppet Code. Medium Reduction for Secret Sprawl and Management Overhead within Puppet.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Hiera is used for configuration data, but secrets are still partially managed in encrypted Hiera data files using eyaml, which is not a dedicated secure backend.
    • Where Implemented: Hiera is configured and used for general Puppet configuration management. eyaml is used for encrypting some secrets within Hiera data.
  • Missing Implementation: Full integration with a dedicated secure secrets backend like HashiCorp Vault is missing. Migration of all secrets from eyaml to a secure backend and adoption of dynamic secret retrieval in Puppet code are required.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Secure Puppet Coding Practices and Code Reviews

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement Secure Puppet Coding Practices and Code Reviews
  • Description:
    1. Establish Puppet Secure Coding Guidelines: Develop and document specific secure coding guidelines for Puppet development, focusing on:
      • Secret Management: Mandatory use of secure secret backends and avoidance of hardcoding.
      • Principle of Least Privilege in Puppet: Designing Puppet code to apply the minimum necessary permissions to resources and avoid running commands as root unless absolutely required.
      • Input Validation in Puppet Templates: Sanitizing and validating data received from external sources or Puppet facts before using it in Puppet templates to prevent injection vulnerabilities.
      • Secure Resource Defaults in Puppet Modules: Setting secure default configurations for resources within Puppet modules and allowing users to override them explicitly when necessary.
      • Avoiding Shell Command Execution in Puppet: Minimizing the use of exec resources and shell commands in Puppet code, preferring native Puppet resources or idempotent modules.
    2. Conduct Security-Focused Puppet Code Reviews: Implement mandatory code reviews for all Puppet code changes before deployment. Train reviewers to specifically look for security vulnerabilities and adherence to secure Puppet coding guidelines.
    3. Utilize Puppet Static Code Analysis Tools: Integrate static code analysis tools specifically designed for Puppet code (e.g., puppet-lint with security plugins, custom rules) into the development pipeline to automatically identify potential security issues and coding errors in Puppet manifests and modules.
    4. Automate Security Checks in Puppet CI/CD: Integrate security checks (static analysis, vulnerability scanning of modules) into the Puppet CI/CD pipeline to automatically detect and prevent the deployment of vulnerable Puppet code.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Introduction of Vulnerable Puppet Code (Medium Severity): Human errors and lack of security awareness during Puppet code development can introduce vulnerabilities in Puppet configurations that could be exploited to compromise managed systems.
    • Configuration Errors Leading to Security Issues (Medium Severity): Code reviews and static analysis can catch configuration errors in Puppet code that could lead to security misconfigurations, weakened security controls, or unintended vulnerabilities.
    • Supply Chain Vulnerabilities in Puppet Modules (Medium Severity): Using vulnerable or malicious Puppet modules from external sources can introduce vulnerabilities into the managed infrastructure.
  • Impact: Medium Reduction for Introduction of Vulnerable Puppet Code, Configuration Errors, and Supply Chain Vulnerabilities in Puppet Modules.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Code reviews are mandatory, but security focus is not consistently emphasized. Basic puppet-lint is used, but security-specific rules and module vulnerability scanning are missing.
    • Where Implemented: Code review process is in place using GitLab Merge Requests. Basic puppet-lint checks are integrated into CI.
  • Missing Implementation: Formal Puppet secure coding guidelines are not documented. Security-focused training for Puppet code reviewers is lacking. Advanced static analysis tools with security rules and Puppet module vulnerability scanning are not implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Configuration Drift Detection and Remediation within Puppet

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement Configuration Drift Detection and Remediation within Puppet
  • Description:
    1. Utilize Puppet's Reporting and Compliance Features: Leverage Puppet Enterprise's built-in reporting and compliance features to track configuration changes and detect drift from the desired state defined by Puppet.
    2. Define Baseline Puppet Configurations: Ensure Puppet manifests and modules accurately define the desired secure configuration state for managed nodes. These Puppet configurations serve as the baseline for drift detection.
    3. Schedule Regular Puppet Runs and Reporting: Schedule regular Puppet agent runs on managed nodes to enforce configurations and generate reports. Utilize Puppet Enterprise's reporting dashboards and APIs to monitor configuration status and identify drift.
    4. Automate Drift Remediation with Puppet: Configure Puppet to automatically remediate detected drift by re-applying the desired configurations. This can be achieved through scheduled Puppet runs, event-driven Puppet executions, or integration with orchestration tools.
    5. Alert on Persistent or Security-Critical Drift: Configure alerts based on Puppet reporting to notify administrators of persistent drift or drift affecting security-critical configurations.
    6. Investigate Drift within Puppet Context: When drift is detected, investigate within the Puppet context to determine if the drift is due to unauthorized changes outside of Puppet, errors in Puppet configurations, or intended deviations that need to be incorporated into Puppet code.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Configuration Changes Outside of Puppet (Medium Severity): Drift detection helps identify unauthorized changes made directly on managed nodes or through other means that bypass Puppet, which could introduce security vulnerabilities or weaken security controls managed by Puppet.
    • Configuration Degradation Over Time due to Drift (Low to Medium Severity): Configuration drift can accumulate over time, leading to inconsistencies and potential security weaknesses if system configurations deviate from the intended secure state defined and enforced by Puppet.
    • Compliance Violations due to Configuration Drift (Medium Severity): Configuration drift can lead to violations of security compliance policies and standards if systems deviate from required configurations that are supposed to be managed by Puppet.
  • Impact: Medium Reduction for Unauthorized Configuration Changes Outside of Puppet and Compliance Violations due to Configuration Drift. Low to Medium Reduction for Configuration Degradation Over Time due to Drift.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Puppet Enterprise reporting is used to identify configuration changes, but automated drift remediation workflows within Puppet are not fully in place.
    • Where Implemented: Puppet Enterprise reporting provides visibility into configuration changes managed by Puppet.
  • Missing Implementation: Automated drift remediation workflows triggered by Puppet reporting are not implemented. Alerting on security-critical drift detected by Puppet is not fully configured.