Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
222 lines (176 loc) · 162 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

222 lines (176 loc) · 162 KB

Okay, let's perform the deep security analysis based on the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the key components of the Puppet configuration management system, as described in the design review. This analysis aims to identify potential vulnerabilities, assess their impact, and propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies. The focus is on the Puppet Master, Agent, communication protocols, data storage (PuppetDB), and the build/deployment process. We will also consider the interaction with external systems like Puppet Forge and secrets management solutions.

  • Scope: The analysis covers the following:

    • Puppet Master components (Agent Communication Service, Catalog Compiler, File Server, Certificate Authority, PuppetDB).
    • Puppet Agent.
    • Communication between Master and Agent.
    • Data flow and storage.
    • Build and deployment process (CI/CD, artifact repositories).
    • Integration with external systems (Puppet Forge, Secrets Management).
    • Deployment architectures (specifically the multi-master with load balancer scenario).

    The analysis excludes the following:

    • Security of the underlying operating system (except where Puppet directly interacts with it).
    • Network-level security (firewalls, IDS/IPS) except where directly relevant to Puppet's communication.
    • Physical security of servers.
    • Detailed code review of every line of Puppet's source code.

  • Methodology:

    1. Component Breakdown: Analyze each component identified in the C4 diagrams and deployment description.
    2. Threat Identification: For each component, identify potential threats based on its function, interactions, and data handled. We'll use the STRIDE model (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) as a guide.
    3. Vulnerability Assessment: Assess the likelihood and impact of each identified threat, considering existing security controls.
    4. Mitigation Recommendations: Propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies for each identified vulnerability. These recommendations will be tailored to Puppet's architecture and functionality.
    5. Data Flow Analysis: Trace the flow of sensitive data through the system and identify potential points of exposure.
    6. Build Process Analysis: Examine the security controls in the build process and identify potential weaknesses.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each key component, applying the STRIDE model and considering the provided information.

2.1 Puppet Master

  • 2.1.1 Agent Communication Service:

    • Threats:

      • Spoofing: An attacker could impersonate a legitimate agent or the master.
      • Tampering: An attacker could intercept and modify communication between the agent and master.
      • Information Disclosure: An attacker could eavesdrop on communication to obtain sensitive data.
      • Denial of Service: An attacker could flood the service with requests, preventing legitimate agents from connecting.
      • Elevation of Privilege: If the service has vulnerabilities, an attacker could exploit them to gain higher privileges on the master.

    • Vulnerabilities:

      • Weak TLS configuration (e.g., using outdated ciphers).
      • Vulnerabilities in the communication protocol implementation.
      • Improper handling of agent certificates (e.g., weak validation, compromised CA).

    • Mitigation:

      • Enforce strong TLS configuration: Use only strong ciphers and protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3). Regularly review and update TLS settings.
      • Implement robust certificate validation: Verify the entire certificate chain, check for revocation (CRL or OCSP), and ensure the CA is trusted.
      • Rate limiting: Implement rate limiting to mitigate DoS attacks.
      • Regular security audits and penetration testing: Identify and address vulnerabilities in the service.
      • Run the service with least privilege: Avoid running the service as root. Use a dedicated user account with minimal permissions.
      • Monitor for anomalous connections: Track connection attempts, failed authentications, and unusual traffic patterns.

  • 2.1.2 Catalog Compiler:

    • Threats:

      • Tampering: An attacker could modify Puppet manifests or modules to inject malicious code.
      • Information Disclosure: Poorly written manifests could expose sensitive data.
      • Elevation of Privilege: Vulnerabilities in the compiler could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code.
      • Injection Attacks: If user-supplied input (e.g., facts) is not properly validated, it could be used to inject malicious code into the catalog.

    • Vulnerabilities:

      • Unvalidated input from facts or external data sources.
      • Vulnerabilities in the Puppet language parser or compiler.
      • Insecure use of external commands or scripts within manifests.
      • Use of vulnerable third-party modules.

    • Mitigation:

      • Strict input validation: Validate all input from external sources (facts, Hiera data, user-provided parameters) against expected types and formats. Use Puppet's data types and validation functions.
      • Secure coding practices: Avoid using exec resources unless absolutely necessary, and carefully sanitize any input passed to external commands.
      • Use trusted modules: Thoroughly vet any modules downloaded from the Puppet Forge. Consider using only signed modules and verifying their signatures.
      • Regularly update Puppet: Apply security patches to address vulnerabilities in the compiler.
      • Least Privilege: Ensure the catalog compiler runs with the least necessary privileges.
      • Code Review: Implement a code review process for all Puppet manifests and modules.

  • 2.1.3 File Server:

    • Threats:

      • Information Disclosure: Unauthorized access to files served by the file server.
      • Tampering: Modification of files served by the file server.
      • Denial of Service: An attacker could flood the file server with requests.

    • Vulnerabilities:

      • Misconfigured file permissions.
      • Vulnerabilities in the file server implementation.
      • Lack of access controls.

    • Mitigation:

      • Strict file permissions: Ensure that files are only accessible to authorized users and processes. Use the principle of least privilege.
      • Regularly update the file server software: Apply security patches.
      • Implement access controls: Restrict access to specific files and directories based on agent identity. Consider using fileserver.conf to define mount points and access rules.
      • Monitor file access logs: Track who is accessing which files.
      • Rate limiting: Implement rate limiting to mitigate DoS attacks.

  • 2.1.4 Certificate Authority (CA):

    • Threats:

      • Spoofing: An attacker could compromise the CA and issue fraudulent certificates.
      • Tampering: An attacker could modify the CA's configuration or CRL.
      • Information Disclosure: Exposure of the CA's private key.

    • Vulnerabilities:

      • Weak protection of the CA's private key.
      • Lack of physical security for the CA server.
      • Vulnerabilities in the CA software.

    • Mitigation:

      • Protect the CA's private key: Store the private key securely, ideally using a Hardware Security Module (HSM) or a dedicated, highly secured server. Use strong encryption and access controls.
      • Implement strict access controls: Limit access to the CA server to authorized personnel only.
      • Regularly audit the CA: Review logs, configuration, and security practices.
      • Use a dedicated CA server: Do not run the CA on the same server as other Puppet Master components.
      • Implement a robust certificate revocation process: Ensure that compromised certificates can be quickly and reliably revoked.
      • Offline Root CA: Consider using an offline root CA and online intermediate CAs for issuing agent certificates. This minimizes the exposure of the root CA's private key.

  • 2.1.5 PuppetDB:

    • Threats:

      • Information Disclosure: Unauthorized access to data stored in PuppetDB (facts, reports, catalogs).
      • Tampering: Modification of data in PuppetDB.
      • Denial of Service: An attacker could flood PuppetDB with requests.

    • Vulnerabilities:

      • Weak database access controls.
      • Vulnerabilities in the PuppetDB software.
      • Lack of encryption at rest.

    • Mitigation:

      • Strong database access controls: Use strong passwords, restrict access to authorized users and processes, and use the principle of least privilege.
      • Regularly update PuppetDB: Apply security patches.
      • Enable encryption at rest: Encrypt the data stored in PuppetDB.
      • Use TLS for communication with PuppetDB: Ensure that all communication between Puppet Master components and PuppetDB is encrypted.
      • Monitor PuppetDB logs: Track database queries and access attempts.
      • Implement database firewall: Restrict network access to the PuppetDB port.
      • Regular Backups: Implement a robust backup and recovery plan for PuppetDB.

2.2 Puppet Agent

  • Threats:

    • Spoofing: An attacker could impersonate the Puppet Master.
    • Tampering: An attacker could modify the agent's configuration or the catalogs it receives.
    • Elevation of Privilege: An attacker could exploit vulnerabilities in the agent to gain higher privileges on the managed node.
    • Information Disclosure: The agent could leak sensitive information (e.g., facts) to an attacker.

  • Vulnerabilities:

    • Weak TLS configuration.
    • Vulnerabilities in the agent software.
    • Insecure handling of downloaded files and catalogs.
    • Running the agent with excessive privileges (e.g., as root).

  • Mitigation:

    • Enforce strong TLS configuration: Use only strong ciphers and protocols. Verify the Puppet Master's certificate.
    • Regularly update the agent software: Apply security patches.
    • Run the agent with least privilege: Avoid running the agent as root. Use a dedicated user account with minimal permissions.
    • Validate downloaded files and catalogs: Verify their integrity and authenticity before applying them.
    • Limit the agent's access to system resources: Use security features like SELinux or AppArmor to restrict the agent's capabilities.
    • Secure Fact Handling: Be mindful of custom facts that might expose sensitive information. Review and sanitize fact data.

2.3 Communication (Master-Agent)

  • Threats:

    • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks: An attacker could intercept and modify communication between the master and agent.
    • Replay Attacks: An attacker could capture and replay legitimate communication.

  • Vulnerabilities:

    • Weak TLS configuration.
    • Lack of mutual authentication.
    • Vulnerabilities in the communication protocol.

  • Mitigation:

    • Strong TLS with mutual authentication: Use TLS 1.2 or 1.3 with client certificates. Ensure that both the master and agent authenticate each other.
    • Use a secure communication protocol: Puppet's built-in protocol is designed to be secure, but it's important to keep it updated.
    • Protect private keys: Securely store the private keys used for TLS communication.
    • Network Segmentation: Isolate the Puppet Master and agents on a separate network segment to limit exposure.

2.4 Data Flow and Storage

  • Sensitive Data: Secrets (passwords, API keys), configuration data (server roles, software versions), facts (system information), reports (configuration changes).

  • Potential Exposure Points:

    • Plaintext secrets in manifests.
    • Unencrypted communication between master and agent.
    • Unencrypted data at rest in PuppetDB.
    • Unsecured access to the Puppet Master's file server.
    • Compromised Puppet modules.

  • Mitigation:

    • Secrets Management Integration: Use a dedicated secrets management solution (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Conjur) to store and retrieve secrets. Do not store secrets in plain text in manifests.
    • Encryption in transit: Use TLS for all communication.
    • Encryption at rest: Encrypt data stored in PuppetDB.
    • Secure file server access: Implement strict access controls and permissions.
    • Module vetting: Thoroughly vet any modules downloaded from the Puppet Forge.
    • Hiera best practices: Use Hiera to separate data from code and to manage secrets securely (e.g., using eyaml or a secrets management backend).

2.5 Build and Deployment Process

  • Threats:

    • Compromised CI/CD pipeline: An attacker could inject malicious code into the build process.
    • Vulnerable dependencies: The build process could include vulnerable third-party libraries.
    • Unauthorized access to artifact repositories: An attacker could modify or replace legitimate artifacts.

  • Vulnerabilities:

    • Weak authentication to the CI/CD pipeline or artifact repositories.
    • Lack of security scanning in the pipeline.
    • Insecure configuration of the CI/CD pipeline.

  • Mitigation:

    • Strong authentication: Use strong passwords and 2FA for access to the CI/CD pipeline and artifact repositories.
    • SAST and SCA: Integrate static and software composition analysis into the pipeline to identify vulnerabilities.
    • Secure pipeline configuration: Use secure coding practices and follow the principle of least privilege when configuring the pipeline.
    • Signed artifacts: Sign build artifacts to ensure their integrity and authenticity.
    • Regularly review and update the pipeline: Apply security patches and update dependencies.
    • Dependency Management: Use tools like Bundler and Leiningen to manage dependencies and pin versions. Regularly audit dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
    • Code Review: Enforce mandatory code reviews for all changes to the Puppet codebase and infrastructure-as-code.

3. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Summary)

The following table summarizes the key mitigation strategies, categorized by component:

| Component | Mitigation Strategy