Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
210 lines (155 loc) · 22.3 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

210 lines (155 loc) · 22.3 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for realm/jazzy

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Code Comment Reviews

Description:

  1. Establish Jazzy Comment Guidelines: Define clear guidelines for developers regarding what types of information are permissible in code comments that will be processed by Jazzy for documentation. Emphasize avoiding sensitive data like API keys, internal URLs, PII, and proprietary logic within comments intended for public Jazzy documentation.
  2. Jazzy Comment Focused Review Stage: Integrate a dedicated code comment review stage into the development workflow, specifically before Jazzy documentation generation is triggered. This can be part of the standard code review process or a separate, focused review on comments intended for Jazzy.
  3. Jazzy Comment Review Checklist: Create a checklist for reviewers to specifically look for sensitive information in comments that Jazzy will process. This checklist should align with the established Jazzy comment guidelines.
  4. Manual Inspection of Jazzy Comments: Reviewers manually inspect code comments in pull requests or code changes, specifically looking at comments that will be parsed by Jazzy, and checking for violations of the guidelines and checklist.
  5. Feedback and Remediation for Jazzy Comments: Provide feedback to developers on identified sensitive information in comments intended for Jazzy and require them to remediate by removing or redacting the sensitive data before merging the code and generating Jazzy documentation.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Information Disclosure (High Severity): Accidental exposure of sensitive information through publicly accessible documentation generated by Jazzy from code comments.

Impact:

  • Information Disclosure (High Reduction): Significantly reduces the risk of information disclosure by proactively identifying and removing sensitive data from comments before Jazzy generates documentation.

Currently Implemented:

  • Partially implemented. Code reviews are conducted, but without specific focus on comments intended for Jazzy and potential sensitive information within them. Guidelines on comment content for Jazzy are not formally documented.

Missing Implementation:

  • Formal documentation of comment guidelines specifically for Jazzy documentation.
  • Specific checklist for comment review during code reviews, focusing on Jazzy comments.
  • Explicit step in the workflow to ensure comment review for sensitive information in Jazzy comments before documentation generation.

Mitigation Strategy: Automated Secret Scanning for Jazzy Comments

Description:

  1. Tool Selection for Comment Scanning: Choose a suitable secret scanning tool that can be integrated into the development pipeline and configured to specifically scan code comments that Jazzy will process.
  2. Tool Configuration for Jazzy Comments: Configure the chosen tool to scan code comments within the project repository, focusing on comments that Jazzy will parse. Define patterns and keywords relevant to sensitive information (e.g., "API Key", "password", "internal.url") within comments.
  3. Pipeline Integration for Jazzy Documentation Build: Integrate the secret scanning tool into the CI/CD pipeline, specifically within the Jazzy documentation generation stage. Run the scanner on each commit or pull request that might trigger Jazzy documentation updates.
  4. Failure Condition for Jazzy Documentation Build: Configure the pipeline to fail the Jazzy documentation generation build if the secret scanner detects potential secrets in code comments intended for Jazzy.
  5. Reporting and Remediation for Jazzy Comment Secrets: Generate reports from the secret scanner output, focusing on findings within Jazzy comments. Developers review the reports, investigate flagged comments, and remediate by removing or redacting sensitive information before Jazzy documentation is regenerated.
  6. Exception Handling (Carefully) for Jazzy Comment Scanning: Implement a mechanism for whitelisting or ignoring legitimate cases where patterns might be flagged incorrectly within Jazzy comments, but use this sparingly and with careful review, especially in the context of Jazzy documentation.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Information Disclosure (High Severity): Automates the detection of accidentally committed secrets in comments that Jazzy processes, reducing the risk of exposure in the generated documentation.

Impact:

  • Information Disclosure (High Reduction): Provides a strong automated layer of defense against accidental secret leaks in comments processed by Jazzy, significantly reducing the risk in Jazzy documentation.

Currently Implemented:

  • Not implemented. Secret scanning is not currently integrated into the CI/CD pipeline or specifically configured to scan code comments intended for Jazzy documentation.

Missing Implementation:

  • Selection and configuration of a secret scanning tool for code comments.
  • Integration of the tool into the CI/CD pipeline within the Jazzy documentation generation process.
  • Configuration to specifically scan code comments intended for Jazzy.
  • Workflow for handling scanner reports and remediation of secrets found in Jazzy comments.

Mitigation Strategy: Selective Documentation Generation using Jazzy Configuration

Description:

  1. Jazzy Configuration Review: Review the project's Jazzy configuration file (.jazzy.yaml) or command-line arguments used for Jazzy execution.
  2. Utilize Jazzy Exclusion Flags: Employ Jazzy's --exclude flag to specify files, directories, or specific code elements that should be excluded from Jazzy documentation generation. Target areas known to contain sensitive code or comments that should not be in public documentation.
  3. Control Jazzy Inclusion Flags: Carefully manage --include-extended-documentation and --include-undocumented flags in Jazzy configuration. Consider disabling or limiting these if verbose comments, which Jazzy might include, are deemed a higher risk for information disclosure.
  4. Custom Jazzy Configuration for Exclusion: Leverage custom Jazzy configuration options within .jazzy.yaml to fine-tune documentation generation. Explore options to exclude specific comment blocks or code elements based on patterns or annotations that Jazzy recognizes.
  5. Regular Jazzy Configuration Audit: Periodically audit the Jazzy configuration to ensure exclusions and inclusions are still relevant and effective as the codebase and documentation needs evolve.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Information Disclosure (Medium Severity): Reduces the surface area for potential information leaks in Jazzy documentation by intentionally omitting risky sections from the generated output using Jazzy's configuration.

Impact:

  • Information Disclosure (Medium Reduction): Moderately reduces the risk by controlling what Jazzy includes in documentation through configuration. Effectiveness depends on accurate identification and exclusion of risky areas within Jazzy's scope. May impact documentation completeness if overused.

Currently Implemented:

  • Partially implemented. Jazzy is configured with basic settings, but --exclude flags are not actively used to specifically remove potentially sensitive sections from Jazzy documentation.

Missing Implementation:

  • Analysis of codebase to identify sections that should be excluded from Jazzy documentation.
  • Implementation of --exclude flags in Jazzy configuration to target identified sections for Jazzy documentation.
  • Regular review and update of Jazzy exclusion rules.

Mitigation Strategy: Documentation Output Review of Jazzy Generated Content in Staging Environment

Description:

  1. Staging Environment Setup for Jazzy Documentation: Ensure a dedicated staging environment mirrors the production documentation deployment setup for Jazzy generated content.
  2. Automated Jazzy Generation in Staging: Configure the CI/CD pipeline to automatically generate Jazzy documentation and deploy it to the staging environment after each build or release candidate that includes documentation updates.
  3. Manual Review of Jazzy Output in Staging: Before deploying Jazzy documentation to production, conduct a manual review of the generated Jazzy documentation in the staging environment. Focus on verifying no sensitive information is present in the HTML output produced by Jazzy.
  4. Automated Scanning of Jazzy Output in Staging (Optional): Consider implementing automated scanning of the generated HTML output from Jazzy in staging for potential information leaks. This could involve custom scripts or specialized tools to search for patterns or keywords in the Jazzy output.
  5. Approval Gate for Jazzy Documentation Deployment: Implement an approval gate in the deployment process. Jazzy documentation deployment to production should only proceed after successful review and approval in the staging environment, confirming the Jazzy output is safe.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Information Disclosure (High Severity): Catches any missed sensitive information that might have slipped through code reviews or automated scanning after Jazzy has generated the documentation, but before it is publicly released.

Impact:

  • Information Disclosure (High Reduction): Provides a crucial final check of Jazzy's output before public release, significantly reducing the risk of accidental information disclosure in the documentation generated by Jazzy.

Currently Implemented:

  • Partially implemented. A staging environment exists for application testing, but it is not currently used for dedicated review of Jazzy documentation output before production deployment. Jazzy documentation is deployed directly to production after build.

Missing Implementation:

  • Configuration of CI/CD pipeline to deploy Jazzy documentation to staging.
  • Establishment of a manual review process specifically for Jazzy generated documentation in staging.
  • Implementation of an approval gate for Jazzy documentation deployment from staging to production.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Jazzy and Dependency Updates

Description:

  1. Jazzy Dependency Tracking: Maintain a clear record of Jazzy and its Ruby gem dependencies (e.g., using Gemfile.lock).
  2. Jazzy Update Monitoring: Regularly monitor for new releases of Jazzy and its dependencies. Utilize tools like bundle outdated or dependency monitoring services (e.g., Dependabot) specifically for Jazzy's dependencies.
  3. Testing Jazzy Updates: Before applying updates to production, test them thoroughly in a development or staging environment to ensure compatibility with Jazzy and prevent regressions in documentation generation.
  4. Automated Jazzy Updates (with caution): Consider automating dependency updates for Jazzy using tools like Dependabot, but configure them to create pull requests for review rather than automatically merging updates, especially for major version updates of Jazzy or its core dependencies.
  5. Patching Jazzy Vulnerabilities: Prioritize applying security patches and updates that address known vulnerabilities in Jazzy or its dependencies to ensure the security of the documentation generation process.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Dependency Vulnerabilities (Medium to High Severity): Reduces the risk of exploiting known vulnerabilities in Jazzy or its dependencies that could compromise the documentation generation process or potentially the generated documentation itself.

Impact:

  • Dependency Vulnerabilities (High Reduction): Significantly reduces the risk of exploitation by proactively addressing known vulnerabilities in Jazzy and its dependencies through timely updates.

Currently Implemented:

  • Partially implemented. Dependency updates for the project are performed periodically, but not on a regular, automated schedule specifically for Jazzy and its dependencies. Vulnerability scanning is not routinely performed for Jazzy dependencies.

Missing Implementation:

  • Establishment of a regular schedule for Jazzy and its dependency updates.
  • Integration of automated dependency update monitoring (e.g., Dependabot) specifically for Jazzy.
  • Implementation of a process for testing and applying Jazzy updates, especially security patches.

Mitigation Strategy: Dependency Vulnerability Scanning for Jazzy Dependencies

Description:

  1. Tool Selection for Jazzy Dependency Scanning: Choose a dependency vulnerability scanning tool suitable for Ruby gems (e.g., bundler-audit, brakeman, or integrated security scanners in CI/CD platforms) to specifically scan Jazzy's dependencies.
  2. Tool Integration for Jazzy Build: Integrate the chosen tool into the CI/CD pipeline, specifically within the Jazzy documentation build process. Run the scanner on each build or regularly scheduled basis to check Jazzy's dependencies.
  3. Vulnerability Reporting for Jazzy Dependencies: Configure the tool to generate reports detailing identified vulnerabilities in Jazzy's dependencies, including severity levels and recommended actions.
  4. Vulnerability Remediation for Jazzy Dependencies: Establish a process for reviewing vulnerability reports related to Jazzy dependencies, prioritizing remediation based on severity, and taking action to update dependencies or apply recommended mitigations to secure Jazzy.
  5. False Positive Management for Jazzy Dependency Scanning: Implement a mechanism to handle false positives reported by the scanner for Jazzy dependencies, ensuring they are investigated and appropriately dismissed to avoid alert fatigue in the context of Jazzy security.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Dependency Vulnerabilities (Medium to High Severity): Proactively identifies known vulnerabilities in Jazzy's dependencies, allowing for timely remediation before exploitation could affect the documentation generation process.

Impact:

  • Dependency Vulnerabilities (High Reduction): Significantly reduces the risk of exploitation of Jazzy through its dependencies by providing early detection and enabling proactive remediation of vulnerabilities.

Currently Implemented:

  • Not implemented. Dependency vulnerability scanning is not currently performed for Jazzy or its dependencies.

Missing Implementation:

  • Selection and integration of a dependency vulnerability scanning tool for Ruby gems.
  • Configuration of the tool to specifically scan Jazzy's dependencies.
  • Establishment of a process for reviewing and remediating vulnerability reports related to Jazzy dependencies.

Mitigation Strategy: Pin Dependency Versions for Jazzy

Description:

  1. Gemfile.lock Usage for Jazzy: Ensure Gemfile.lock is consistently used and committed to version control for the project, including Jazzy and its dependencies. This file precisely records the versions of all dependencies used in a Jazzy build.
  2. Explicit Versioning in Gemfile for Jazzy: In the Gemfile, consider using explicit version constraints (e.g., gem 'jazzy', '~> 0.14.0') for Jazzy and its key dependencies instead of overly broad version ranges. This provides more control over Jazzy dependency updates.
  3. Controlled Jazzy Updates: When updating Jazzy or its dependencies, review the changes in Gemfile.lock carefully to understand the impact of version changes on Jazzy. Test updates thoroughly before deploying to production documentation generation.
  4. Regular Review and Update Cycle for Jazzy Dependencies: While pinning versions provides stability for Jazzy, it's crucial to regularly review and update pinned versions to incorporate security patches and bug fixes for Jazzy and its dependencies. Don't let pinned versions of Jazzy dependencies become outdated for extended periods.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Dependency Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): Provides a degree of control over Jazzy dependency versions, preventing unexpected issues from automatic updates and allowing for controlled updates that can be tested with Jazzy.
  • Supply Chain Attacks (Low to Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of unknowingly pulling in compromised Jazzy dependency versions through automatic updates, although it doesn't eliminate the risk entirely if the initially pinned version is compromised.

Impact:

  • Dependency Vulnerabilities (Medium Reduction): Moderately reduces risk for Jazzy by enabling controlled updates and preventing unexpected changes in Jazzy's dependencies. Requires active management to ensure versions are updated regularly.
  • Supply Chain Attacks (Low to Medium Reduction): Offers a limited level of protection against supply chain attacks related to Jazzy dependencies by controlling versions, but relies on the integrity of the initially pinned versions.

Currently Implemented:

  • Implemented. Gemfile.lock is used and committed to version control. Gemfile uses version constraints, but not necessarily the most restrictive for Jazzy and its dependencies.

Missing Implementation:

  • Review and potentially tighten version constraints in Gemfile specifically for Jazzy and its core dependencies.
  • Establish a process for regularly reviewing and updating pinned dependency versions for Jazzy.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Jazzy Configuration Management

Description:

  1. Version Control for Jazzy Configuration: Store the Jazzy configuration file (.jazzy.yaml) in version control (e.g., Git) alongside the codebase.
  2. Access Control for Jazzy Configuration: Restrict write access to the repository and specifically to the Jazzy configuration file to authorized personnel only. Use branch protection rules in Git to control changes to Jazzy configuration.
  3. Jazzy Configuration Review Process: Implement code review processes for any changes to the Jazzy configuration file.
  4. Avoid Hardcoding Secrets in Jazzy Configuration: Do not hardcode any sensitive information (e.g., API keys, credentials) directly within the Jazzy configuration file. Use environment variables or secure secret management solutions if secrets are needed in Jazzy configuration (though this is less common for Jazzy).
  5. Regular Audit of Jazzy Configuration Access: Periodically audit access to the repository and the Jazzy configuration file to ensure access controls are still appropriate for Jazzy configuration management.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Unauthorized Jazzy Configuration Changes (Low to Medium Severity): Prevents unauthorized modifications to the Jazzy configuration that could potentially lead to unintended information disclosure in documentation or documentation generation issues.
  • Information Disclosure (Low Severity): Reduces the risk of accidentally committing secrets if they were to be hardcoded in the Jazzy configuration file (though less likely in Jazzy context).

Impact:

  • Unauthorized Jazzy Configuration Changes (Medium Reduction): Moderately reduces the risk by controlling access and requiring reviews for Jazzy configuration changes.
  • Information Disclosure (Low Reduction): Minimally reduces risk, primarily by preventing accidental hardcoding of secrets in Jazzy configuration.

Currently Implemented:

  • Implemented. .jazzy.yaml is in version control. Repository access is controlled via GitLab roles. Code reviews are generally required for code changes, including potentially Jazzy configuration.

Missing Implementation:

  • Explicit branch protection rules specifically for the Jazzy configuration file (if deemed necessary).
  • Formalized review process specifically highlighting security aspects of Jazzy configuration changes.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Sanitization for Jazzy Execution (Limited Context)

Description:

  1. Identify Jazzy External Inputs: Analyze how Jazzy is executed in the project and identify any external inputs that directly influence Jazzy's behavior. This includes command-line arguments passed to Jazzy, environment variables used by Jazzy, or configuration file values that are derived from external sources (e.g., user input, external APIs).
  2. Input Validation for Jazzy: Implement validation for any identified external inputs to Jazzy to ensure they conform to expected formats and values. Reject invalid inputs to Jazzy execution.
  3. Input Sanitization/Escaping for Jazzy: If external inputs are used in commands or configuration that could be interpreted as code or commands by Jazzy or its plugins (though less common in typical Jazzy usage), sanitize or escape these inputs to prevent potential injection vulnerabilities in the Jazzy execution context.
  4. Principle of Least Privilege for Jazzy Execution: Run Jazzy with the minimum necessary privileges to reduce the potential impact of any successful injection attack that might target Jazzy's execution environment.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Command Injection (Low Severity - Limited Jazzy Context): While less of a direct threat for typical Jazzy usage, input sanitization can mitigate potential command injection vulnerabilities if Jazzy or its plugins were to process untrusted external inputs in a vulnerable way during documentation generation.

Impact:

  • Command Injection (Low Reduction): Minimally reduces risk, as command injection is not a primary threat vector for typical Jazzy usage. Provides a general security best practice applicable even in limited Jazzy input scenarios.

Currently Implemented:

  • Not explicitly implemented for Jazzy inputs. General input validation practices are applied in other parts of the application, but not specifically focused on Jazzy execution inputs.

Missing Implementation:

  • Analysis of Jazzy execution within the project to identify potential external input points.
  • Implementation of input validation and sanitization for identified external inputs to Jazzy (if any are found to be relevant to Jazzy's security).