Objective: To cause a denial-of-service (DoS) or achieve arbitrary code execution (ACE) in a Ruby application by exploiting vulnerabilities or misconfigurations related to the concurrent-ruby
library.
Compromise Application (DoS or ACE)
|
|--- Exploit Misconfiguration/Misuse (Likelihood: M, Impact: H)
| |
| |--- Resource Exhaustion (L: H, I: H, E: L, S: I, DD: M) (CRITICAL)
| | |
| | |--- ThreadPool - Unbounded Queue (L: H, I: VH, E: L, S: N, DD: M) (CRITICAL)
| | |
| | |--- ThreadPool - Excessive Threads (L: M, I: VH, E: L, S: N, DD: M) (CRITICAL)
| | |
| | |--- Resource Exhaustion - General (L: H, I: H, E: L, S: I, DD: M) (CRITICAL)
| |
| |--- Future/Promise (L: M, I: H)
| |
| |--- Long-Running Operations Blocking Threads (L: H, I: H, E: L, S: I, DD: M) (CRITICAL)
Attack Tree Path: Exploit Misconfiguration/Misuse
- Description: This branch represents the most common attack surface. Developers often misuse concurrency features due to a lack of understanding or oversight, leading to vulnerabilities. This is not a flaw in
concurrent-ruby
itself, but rather in how it's used. - Mitigation:
- Thorough code reviews focusing on concurrency aspects.
- Training developers on safe concurrency practices.
- Use of static analysis tools to detect potential issues.
Attack Tree Path: Resource Exhaustion (CRITICAL)
- Description: This is a broad category encompassing various ways an attacker can consume excessive resources (CPU, memory, file handles, network connections), leading to a denial-of-service. It's a critical node because it's a common consequence of many concurrency-related misconfigurations.
- Mitigation:
- Implement robust input validation and rate limiting to prevent resource flooding.
- Use bounded resources (e.g., limited-size thread pools, connection pools).
- Monitor resource usage and set alerts for unusual activity.
- Implement timeouts for operations to prevent indefinite blocking.
Attack Tree Path: ThreadPool - Unbounded Queue (CRITICAL)
- Description: An attacker sends a large number of tasks to a thread pool configured with an unbounded queue. The queue grows indefinitely, consuming all available memory and leading to an application crash.
- Mitigation:
- Always use a bounded queue. Set a reasonable
max_queue
size forThreadPoolExecutor
and similar constructs. - Monitor queue length and trigger alerts if it grows beyond a threshold.
- Consider using a thread pool that automatically rejects tasks when the queue is full (e.g., using a
RejectedExecutionHandler
).
- Always use a bounded queue. Set a reasonable
Attack Tree Path: ThreadPool - Excessive Threads (CRITICAL)
- Description: The application is configured to create a very large number of threads, either statically or dynamically. This overwhelms the system's resources (CPU, memory), leading to slowdowns or a crash.
- Mitigation:
- Carefully tune the
max_threads
parameter of thread pools. Consider the number of CPU cores and the nature of the tasks. - Use a thread pool that dynamically adjusts the number of threads based on load, if available.
- Monitor the number of active threads and system resource usage.
- Carefully tune the
Attack Tree Path: Resource Exhaustion - General (CRITICAL)
- Description: This is a catch-all for other ways an attacker might exhaust resources, such as creating many
Future
objects that never complete, or leaking resources within threads. - Mitigation:
- Implement comprehensive resource management. Ensure that all acquired resources (files, sockets, database connections, etc.) are properly released, even in error conditions.
- Use
ensure
blocks or similar mechanisms to guarantee resource cleanup. - Profile the application to identify resource leaks and bottlenecks.
Attack Tree Path: Future/Promise - Long-Running Operations Blocking Threads (CRITICAL)
- Description: A developer uses a
Future
orPromise
to execute a long-running or blocking operation (e.g., a large file read, a slow network request) without using a dedicated thread pool or asynchronous I/O. This blocks a thread from the main thread pool, reducing the application's capacity to handle other requests, leading to a denial of service.- Mitigation:
- Use asynchronous I/O operations whenever possible within
Future
andPromise
blocks. - If blocking operations are unavoidable, offload them to a separate, dedicated thread pool with appropriate size limits.
- Implement timeouts to prevent a single long-running operation from blocking a thread indefinitely.
- Use non-blocking alternatives where available (e.g., non-blocking I/O libraries).
- Use asynchronous I/O operations whenever possible within
- Mitigation: