Objective: Unauthorized Access/Action via CanCan
[Attacker's Goal: Unauthorized Access/Action via CanCan]
|
-------------------------------------------------
| |
[[Misconfigured Ability Definitions]] [[Bypassing Ability Checks]]
|*** |***
--------------------------------- ---------------------------------
|*** | |*** |
[[Overly Permissive Rules]] | [[Missing Ability Checks]] |
|*** | |*** |
------------------------- | ------------------------- |
|*** | |*** |
[[Using Wildcards Incorrectly]] | [[Controller Bypass]] |
|*** | |*** |
[[e.g., can :manage, :all
]] | [[No load_and_authorize
]] |
| [[Skipping authorize!
]] |
Attack Tree Path: Misconfigured Ability Definitions
- Description: Errors in the
Ability
class, which defines user permissions, are the root cause of many CanCan vulnerabilities. This is a critical node because it's the foundation of the authorization system. - Likelihood: High/Medium
- Impact: High
- Effort: Low
- Skill Level: Low
- Detection Difficulty: Medium/High
Attack Tree Path: Overly Permissive Rules
- Description: Rules that grant broader access than intended, often due to a misunderstanding of CanCan's syntax or a lack of careful consideration.
- Example:
can :manage, :all
grants complete control over all resources. - Likelihood: Medium
- Impact: High
- Effort: Low
- Skill Level: Low
- Detection Difficulty: Medium
- Actionable Insights:
- Review and replace
can :manage, :all
with specific permissions. - Adhere to the Principle of Least Privilege.
- Conduct regular code reviews of the
Ability
class.
- Review and replace
Attack Tree Path: Using Wildcards Incorrectly
- Description: Misunderstanding or misusing wildcards like
:all
,:read
, etc., leading to unintended access grants. - Example:
can :read, :all
grants read access to every resource, potentially exposing sensitive data. - Likelihood: Medium
- Impact: High
- Effort: Low
- Skill Level: Low
- Detection Difficulty: Medium
- Actionable Insights:
- Define permissions explicitly for each resource.
- Avoid relying heavily on broad wildcards.
- Document the intended behavior of each rule.
Attack Tree Path: Bypassing Ability Checks
- Description: Even with correctly defined abilities, failing to enforce them renders the authorization system useless. This is a critical node.
- Likelihood: High/Medium
- Impact: High
- Effort: Low
- Skill Level: Low
- Detection Difficulty: Medium
Attack Tree Path: Missing Ability Checks
- Description: The most common bypass: forgetting to use
load_and_authorize_resource
(orauthorize!
) in controllers, leaving actions completely unprotected. * Likelihood: High * Impact: High * Effort: Low * Skill Level: Low * Detection Difficulty: Medium * Actionable Insights: * Enforce the use ofload_and_authorize_resource
in all controllers. * Use linters or code analysis tools to detect missing checks. * Applyload_and_authorize_resource
at the controller level.
Attack Tree Path: No load_and_authorize_resource
Attack Tree Path: Controller Bypass
- Description: Intentionally or accidentally disabling authorization checks for specific actions using
skip_before_action :authorize!
orskip_authorize_resource
. * Likelihood: Medium * Impact: High * Effort: Low * Skill Level: Low * Detection Difficulty: Medium * Actionable Insights: * Minimize and strictly review any use ofskip_before_action :authorize!
andskip_authorize_resource
. * Require code review approval for any skipping of authorization.