Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
87 lines (72 loc) · 9.1 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

87 lines (72 loc) · 9.1 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for shakacode/react_on_rails

Attack Surface: Server-Side Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via SSR

  • Description: Injection of malicious scripts into server-rendered HTML, leading to script execution on the server during the rendering process.
  • How react_on_rails Contributes: react_on_rails enables Server-Side Rendering (SSR) of React components. If user-provided or untrusted data is directly embedded into React components during SSR without proper sanitization, it creates a direct entry point for server-side XSS due to the SSR mechanism facilitated by react_on_rails.
  • Example: A blog application using react_on_rails renders user comments server-side. If a comment contains <script>alert('XSS')</script> and is not sanitized before being rendered by the React component on the server, this script could execute on the server during the SSR process. This might lead to server-side information leakage or manipulation.
  • Impact: Server compromise, information disclosure, denial of service, potential for further attacks on backend systems.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Input Sanitization: Sanitize all user-provided data and data from untrusted sources before rendering it in React components on the server.
    • Context-Aware Output Encoding: Employ context-aware output encoding when rendering data in React components server-side.
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strict Content Security Policy to limit script sources.

Attack Surface: Resource Exhaustion during SSR

  • Description: Malicious requests designed to consume excessive server resources during Server-Side Rendering, leading to Denial of Service (DoS).
  • How react_on_rails Contributes: react_on_rails's architecture relies on Node.js for SSR. Complex React components or inefficient data handling during SSR, within the react_on_rails context, can be resource-intensive and exploitable for DoS.
  • Example: An e-commerce application using react_on_rails renders product pages server-side. If a product page component is poorly optimized and involves heavy computations during SSR, an attacker could send a flood of requests for such pages, overwhelming the Node.js SSR server.
  • Impact: Application unavailability, degraded performance.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Optimize React Components for SSR Performance: Profile and optimize React components to minimize SSR resource usage.
    • Implement Rate Limiting: Limit incoming requests to prevent overwhelming the SSR server.
    • Caching: Implement caching for server-rendered HTML.
    • Resource Limits for Node.js SSR Process: Configure resource limits for the Node.js SSR process.

Attack Surface: Information Disclosure via SSR Errors

  • Description: Sensitive information is exposed through error messages, logs, or debugging outputs generated during Server-Side Rendering.
  • How react_on_rails Contributes: The integration of Node.js and Rails by react_on_rails for SSR creates a specific context where errors during SSR, or data transfer between Rails and Node.js, can expose sensitive details if error handling is not carefully managed within the react_on_rails setup.
  • Example: During SSR, a database connection error occurs in the Rails backend, and this error message, including database connection strings, is propagated to the Node.js SSR process and inadvertently logged or displayed in a generic error page.
  • Impact: Exposure of sensitive configuration details, internal paths, code snippets.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Error Handling: Implement robust error handling in React components and the Node.js SSR environment. Avoid displaying detailed errors in production.
    • Centralized Logging and Monitoring: Use secure centralized logging, redact sensitive information in logs.
    • Custom Error Pages: Implement user-friendly custom error pages without technical details.

Attack Surface: Client-Side XSS Amplified by Hydration

  • Description: Client-Side Cross-Site Scripting vulnerabilities are exacerbated by the hydration process if server-rendered HTML contains unsanitized data.
  • How react_on_rails Contributes: react_on_rails utilizes hydration. If server-rendered HTML, intended for initial display, contains unsanitized data, the hydration process, a core feature of react_on_rails, can trigger malicious script execution when React takes over client-side control.
  • Example: A user profile page rendered with react_on_rails displays a user's "bio" field. Flawed server-side sanitization allows <img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')> in the HTML. Hydration might execute this script when React mounts.
  • Impact: Client-side account compromise, session hijacking, data theft.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Consistent Sanitization: Ensure consistent and robust sanitization both server-side and client-side.
    • Strict Client-Side Sanitization: Implement strong client-side sanitization in React components.
    • Regular Security Testing: Conduct security testing for XSS vulnerabilities.

Attack Surface: Exposure of Sensitive Data in Initial Props/State

  • Description: Sensitive data is inadvertently included in the initial props or Redux state passed from Rails backend to React frontend during SSR.
  • How react_on_rails Contributes: react_on_rails's data passing mechanism from Rails to React for SSR and hydration is the direct context. Unintentional inclusion of sensitive data in this transfer, facilitated by react_on_rails, creates exposure.
  • Example: An application passes user profile data, including sensitive fields like email address, as initial props to a React component during SSR. This data becomes visible in the page source.
  • Impact: Information disclosure, privacy violations, potential account takeover.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Minimize Data Transfer: Only transfer necessary data from backend to frontend for initial rendering.
    • Data Filtering and Transformation: Filter and transform backend data to remove or mask sensitive information before frontend transfer.
    • Secure Data Handling in Frontend: Handle sensitive data securely in the frontend, avoid unnecessary logging or display.

Attack Surface: Vulnerabilities in react_on_rails Gem and Dependencies

  • Description: Security vulnerabilities present in the react_on_rails gem itself or its dependencies (Ruby gems and JavaScript packages).
  • How react_on_rails Contributes: Using react_on_rails introduces dependencies on the react_on_rails gem and its ecosystem. Vulnerabilities in these specific dependencies directly impact applications using react_on_rails.
  • Example: A vulnerability is discovered in a specific version of the react_on_rails gem or a core dependency like webpacker. Applications using the vulnerable version are at risk.
  • Impact: Application compromise, data breaches, denial of service.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regular Dependency Updates: Keep react_on_rails and all dependencies up-to-date.
    • Dependency Scanning: Use dependency scanning tools to identify vulnerabilities.
    • Security Audits of Dependencies: Periodically audit dependencies for security.

Attack Surface: Insecure Configuration of Node.js SSR Environment

  • Description: The Node.js environment used for SSR is not securely configured.
  • How react_on_rails Contributes: react_on_rails requires a Node.js environment for SSR. The security of this specific Node.js environment, integral to react_on_rails functionality, is crucial and directly impacts the application's security.
  • Example: The Node.js SSR process runs with excessive privileges, or unnecessary services are enabled on the SSR server, increasing the attack surface.
  • Impact: Server compromise, information disclosure, denial of service.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Node.js Security Hardening: Apply security hardening practices to the Node.js SSR environment (least privilege, disable unnecessary services, updates, etc.).
    • Regular Security Audits of SSR Environment: Audit the security configuration of the Node.js SSR environment.
    • Monitoring and Intrusion Detection: Implement monitoring for suspicious activity in the SSR environment.