Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
56 lines (47 loc) · 6.14 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

56 lines (47 loc) · 6.14 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for shakacode/react_on_rails

Attack Surface: Server-Side Rendering (SSR) Node.js Exploits

  • Description: Exploitation of vulnerabilities in the Node.js environment specifically used for react_on_rails's server-side rendering.
  • react_on_rails Contribution: react_on_rails directly introduces and manages the Node.js runtime for SSR, making this its responsibility.
  • Example: An outdated Node.js package, required by react_on_rails's SSR setup, has a known RCE vulnerability. An attacker crafts a malicious React component to trigger it.
  • Impact: RCE on the server, complete server compromise, data breaches, denial of service.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regularly Update Node.js (SSR Context): Keep the Node.js runtime used by react_on_rails for SSR up-to-date. This might be separate from your main Rails application's runtime.
    • Dependency Auditing (SSR Context): Use npm audit, yarn audit, etc., specifically within the Node.js environment used for SSR. Focus on dependencies listed in the package.json used for SSR.
    • Least Privilege (SSR Process): Run the react_on_rails SSR Node.js process with minimal privileges. Never as root.
    • Resource Limits (SSR Process): Configure CPU and memory limits for the react_on_rails SSR process to prevent DoS.
    • Containerization (SSR): Isolate the react_on_rails SSR environment using containers (e.g., Docker) to limit the blast radius.
    • WAF (Targeting SSR): Configure your WAF to specifically filter requests that might target known SSR vulnerabilities or patterns.

Attack Surface: XSS via Props (Serialization/Deserialization)

  • Description: XSS vulnerabilities arising from react_on_rails's handling of prop serialization and deserialization between Rails and React.
  • react_on_rails Contribution: The gem is the bridge that handles the data transfer, making its serialization/deserialization logic a critical point for XSS prevention.
  • Example: Unsanitized user input in Rails is passed as a prop. react_on_rails's default serialization doesn't sanitize it, and the React component renders it without escaping.
  • Impact: Execution of arbitrary JavaScript in the user's browser, session hijacking, data theft.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Input Validation (Rails): Always sanitize user input on the Rails side before passing it as props, regardless of react_on_rails's behavior.
    • Output Encoding (Rails & React): Use Rails' h helper (or similar) for HTML encoding on the Rails side. Rely on React's built-in escaping.
    • Avoid dangerouslySetInnerHTML: Minimize or eliminate its use. If unavoidable, double-check sanitization on both Rails and React sides.
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strong CSP to limit the impact of any XSS that might slip through.
    • Review react_on_rails Serializer: If using a custom serializer with react_on_rails, thoroughly audit it for proper escaping and security. Prefer the built-in serializers unless absolutely necessary.

Attack Surface: CSRF Protection Bypass (Specific to react_on_rails Integration)

  • Description: Bypassing CSRF protection specifically in the interactions managed by react_on_rails between React components and Rails controllers.
  • react_on_rails Contribution: The gem provides helpers for CSRF token management, and incorrect usage of these helpers is the direct cause of this vulnerability.
  • Example: A React component makes an AJAX request, but the developer forgets to use react_on_rails's authenticityToken() helper, or uses it incorrectly.
  • Impact: Attackers can forge requests on behalf of users, leading to unauthorized actions.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Correctly Use react_on_rails Helpers: Always use the provided react_on_rails helpers (e.g., authenticityToken()) for including CSRF tokens in requests from React components. Follow the official documentation precisely.
    • Server-Side Validation (Rails): Ensure Rails controllers always rigorously validate the authenticity token, even if react_on_rails helpers are used. This is a defense-in-depth measure.
    • Test react_on_rails CSRF Integration: Write specific tests to verify that CSRF protection is working correctly for all interactions between React components and Rails controllers through react_on_rails.

Attack Surface: Sensitive Data Exposure via SSR

  • Description: Unintentional leakage of sensitive data included in the server-side rendered HTML generated by react_on_rails.
  • react_on_rails Contribution: react_on_rails's SSR process is directly responsible for generating the initial HTML, making it the point where this leakage can occur.
  • Example: An API key is accidentally passed as a prop during SSR and ends up in the HTML source code.
  • Impact: Exposure of sensitive data (API keys, tokens, internal URLs), leading to unauthorized access.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Data Control for SSR: Be extremely careful about what data is passed to React components during react_on_rails's SSR process. Never pass sensitive data unless absolutely necessary for the initial render.
    • Data Transformation (Server-Side): Before passing data to React components for SSR, transform it to remove or redact any sensitive information.
    • Client-Side Data Fetching: For sensitive data that needs to be displayed, fetch it after the initial render on the client-side, using secure API calls. Don't include it in the SSR payload.
    • Environment Variables: Store sensitive configuration outside of the codebase, using environment variables.