Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
49 lines (44 loc) · 5.92 KB

File metadata and controls

49 lines (44 loc) · 5.92 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for sj26/mailcatcher

Mitigation Strategy: Bind to Loopback Interface

  • Mitigation Strategy: Bind to Loopback Interface (127.0.0.1)
  • Description:
    1. Access Mailcatcher's configuration settings. This might involve command-line arguments when starting Mailcatcher or a configuration file if one is used.
    2. Configure the IP address that Mailcatcher listens on to 127.0.0.1 (loopback address). This setting applies to both the SMTP server component and the web UI component of Mailcatcher. For example, when starting Mailcatcher from the command line, you might use options like --ip 127.0.0.1 for both services if available, or configure similar settings in a configuration file if Mailcatcher supports it.
    3. Restart the Mailcatcher service after making the configuration changes to ensure they are applied.
    4. Verify the configuration. Use network utilities like netstat or ss on the server where Mailcatcher is running to confirm that Mailcatcher is actively listening only on the IP address 127.0.0.1 for both its web UI port (default 1080) and SMTP port (default 1025).
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Network Access within the Development Network (Medium Severity): Prevents other machines on the development network from directly connecting to Mailcatcher's web UI or SMTP service. This restricts access to only the local machine where Mailcatcher is running.
    • Accidental Exposure due to Misconfiguration (Low to Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of unintentionally making Mailcatcher accessible across the network due to configuration errors in other network security measures.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized Network Access: Medium Impact. Significantly reduces the attack surface by limiting access to Mailcatcher to the local machine. An attacker would need to compromise the specific machine running Mailcatcher to access it.
    • Accidental Exposure: Medium Impact. Provides a strong default secure configuration, minimizing the risk of accidental network exposure.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Implemented: Mailcatcher is configured to bind to the loopback interface by default in our development environment setup.
    • Location: Mailcatcher service startup scripts and potentially configuration management system.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Explicit Configuration Management: While the default is loopback, there's no explicit configuration management in place to ensure this setting is consistently enforced and prevent accidental changes to a wider binding address.
    • Automated Verification: No automated checks are in place to regularly verify that Mailcatcher is indeed bound to the loopback interface and alert if the binding configuration changes unexpectedly.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Email Clearing

  • Mitigation Strategy: Regular Email Clearing
  • Description:
    1. Utilize Mailcatcher's API to programmatically delete captured emails. Mailcatcher provides an API endpoint (typically /messages) that can be used to retrieve and delete emails.
    2. Develop a script or use a tool that interacts with Mailcatcher's API to delete emails. This script should be scheduled to run automatically at regular intervals.
    3. Define a suitable email retention policy for Mailcatcher. Determine how frequently emails should be cleared. Options include:
      • Time-based clearing: Delete emails older than a certain period (e.g., 1 hour, 1 day, end of workday).
      • Event-based clearing: Delete emails after each development session or test execution.
      • Size-based clearing: Delete emails when Mailcatcher's storage reaches a certain limit (less relevant for in-memory storage, but could be for disk-based persistence if enabled, which is not recommended).
    4. Schedule the email clearing script to run automatically. Use system scheduling tools like cron (on Linux/macOS) or Task Scheduler (on Windows) to execute the script according to the defined retention policy.
    5. Monitor the email clearing process to ensure it is running as expected and that emails are being deleted regularly.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Data Leakage Window Reduction (Medium Severity): Reduces the duration for which captured emails are stored in Mailcatcher. This minimizes the window of opportunity for unauthorized access to potentially sensitive data if a security breach occurs.
    • Storage Overflow (Low Severity): Prevents Mailcatcher's storage (especially if configured for persistent storage, though in-memory is recommended) from becoming full with accumulated emails, which could impact performance or stability.
  • Impact:
    • Data Leakage Window Reduction: Medium Impact. Significantly decreases the time frame during which captured emails are vulnerable to exposure.
    • Storage Overflow: Low Impact. Improves the reliability and stability of Mailcatcher by preventing potential storage-related issues.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Not Implemented: Currently, there is no automated or scheduled email clearing mechanism in place for Mailcatcher. Emails are retained until manually deleted or Mailcatcher is restarted.
    • Location: N/A
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Email Clearing Script Development: A script needs to be developed that utilizes Mailcatcher's API to delete emails based on a defined policy.
    • Scheduling of Clearing Task: The developed script needs to be scheduled to run automatically using system scheduling tools to enforce regular email clearing.
    • Monitoring of Clearing Process: Implementation of monitoring to ensure the scheduled clearing task is executing successfully and emails are being deleted as intended.