Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
112 lines (101 loc) · 12.5 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

112 lines (101 loc) · 12.5 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for skwp/dotfiles

Mitigation Strategy: Never Store Secrets Directly in Dotfiles

Description:

  1. Audit existing dotfiles: Review all dotfiles (e.g., .bashrc, .zshrc, .vimrc, application-specific configuration files) for any hardcoded secrets like API keys, passwords, tokens, database credentials, private keys, etc.
  2. Remove hardcoded secrets: Delete all instances of hardcoded secrets directly from the dotfiles.
  3. Replace with placeholders: Substitute the removed secrets with placeholders that indicate where the secret should be retrieved from. Common placeholders are designed for environment variables (e.g., $SECRET_NAME) or secret management tools.
  4. Document the change: Add comments in the dotfiles explaining that secrets are intentionally not stored directly and reference the chosen secret management method (e.g., environment variables, secret vault).
  5. Educate developers: Train developers on the critical security risk of storing secrets in dotfiles and emphasize the importance of using secure secret management practices.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Secret Exposure (High Severity): Prevents accidental or intentional exposure of sensitive credentials when dotfiles are committed to version control, shared, or accessed by unauthorized individuals.

Impact:

  • Secret Exposure: High reduction. Eliminates the most direct and easily exploitable method of secret exposure through dotfiles.

Currently Implemented:

Not currently implemented in a project directly adopting skwp/dotfiles. The template itself may not explicitly enforce this, and users need to actively implement this practice.

Missing Implementation:

  • Dotfile repository content: The project's dotfile repository needs to be actively audited and cleaned of any existing hardcoded secrets.
  • Developer workstations: Developers need to be trained and adopt this practice in their local dotfile configurations.
  • Project onboarding documentation: Documentation should clearly state this policy and guide new developers.

Mitigation Strategy: Utilize Environment Variables for Secrets in Dotfiles

Description:

  1. Identify secrets in dotfiles: Determine which configuration values within dotfiles are sensitive and should be treated as secrets (e.g., API keys, passwords, tokens).
  2. Define environment variable names: Choose clear and consistent names for environment variables that will hold these secrets (e.g., DATABASE_PASSWORD, GITHUB_API_TOKEN).
  3. Modify dotfiles to reference environment variables: Update dotfiles to use these environment variables instead of hardcoded values. Use shell syntax like $VARIABLE_NAME or ${VARIABLE_NAME} within dotfiles to access them.
  4. Document environment variable usage: Provide clear instructions within the project's documentation on how developers and users should set these environment variables in their environments (development, testing, production).
  5. Provide examples: Include example dotfile snippets demonstrating how to correctly reference environment variables for secrets.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Secret Exposure (High Severity): Reduces the risk of secret exposure by separating secrets from the dotfile repository itself. Secrets are less likely to be accidentally committed to version control.

Impact:

  • Secret Exposure: Medium reduction. While environment variables are a better approach than hardcoding, secrets can still be exposed if environment configurations are not managed securely. However, it's a significant improvement for dotfile security.

Currently Implemented:

Partially implemented. Developers might be using environment variables for some configurations, but it's likely not a consistently enforced and documented practice when starting with a template like skwp/dotfiles.

Missing Implementation:

  • Standardized environment variable naming: Establish project-wide conventions for naming environment variables that hold secrets to ensure consistency.
  • Enforced usage in dotfiles: Make it a mandatory practice to use environment variables for all secrets referenced in dotfiles.
  • Documentation completeness: Create comprehensive documentation specifically for dotfile configurations and environment variable usage for secrets.
  • Dotfile templates: Update or create dotfile templates that demonstrate and encourage the use of environment variables for secrets.

Mitigation Strategy: Scan Dotfiles for Secrets Before Committing

Description:

  1. Choose a local secret scanning tool: Select a command-line secret scanning tool that can be run locally (e.g., git-secrets, trufflehog).
  2. Integrate as a pre-commit hook: Configure the chosen secret scanning tool as a Git pre-commit hook for the dotfile repository. This will automatically run the scanner before each commit.
  3. Configure the scanner: Configure the secret scanner to specifically scan dotfile file types and content for patterns that resemble secrets (API keys, passwords, etc.) using regular expressions and entropy detection.
  4. Educate developers on usage: Train developers on how to use the pre-commit hook and how to handle findings from the secret scanner.
  5. Enforce pre-commit hook usage: Ensure that all developers have the pre-commit hook installed and active for the dotfile repository.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Secret Exposure (High Severity): Proactively detects accidentally introduced secrets in dotfiles before they are committed to the repository, preventing them from being shared or exposed in version history.

Impact:

  • Secret Exposure: High reduction. Provides an immediate, local safety net to prevent accidental secret commits directly from developer workstations.

Currently Implemented:

Not currently implemented in a project starting with skwp/dotfiles. This is a proactive security measure that needs to be intentionally added to the development workflow.

Missing Implementation:

  • Pre-commit hook setup: Configure and distribute the secret scanning pre-commit hook for the dotfile repository.
  • Tool configuration for dotfiles: Configure the chosen secret scanning tool to effectively scan dotfile content.
  • Developer training: Train developers on how to install, use, and respond to the pre-commit hook.
  • Enforcement mechanism: Establish a process to ensure all developers are using the pre-commit hook (e.g., through documentation, scripts, or repository settings).

Mitigation Strategy: Thorough Code Review of Dotfile Changes

Description:

  1. Include dotfiles in code review: Explicitly include all changes to dotfiles in the standard code review process for the project.
  2. Train reviewers on dotfile security: Educate code reviewers on the specific security risks associated with dotfiles, focusing on malicious code injection and secret exposure within configuration files.
  3. Focus review on security aspects: During dotfile code reviews, reviewers should specifically examine:
    • Presence of hardcoded secrets.
    • Potentially malicious or unnecessary scripts or commands.
    • Obfuscated or unclear code within dotfiles.
    • External dependencies or scripts sourced from untrusted URLs within dotfiles.
    • Overly permissive or insecure configurations defined in dotfiles.
  4. Mandatory reviews for dotfile changes: Enforce mandatory code reviews for all modifications to dotfiles before they are merged into the main branch or deployed to any environment.
  5. Utilize static analysis tools as aid: Integrate static analysis tools like ShellCheck into the code review process to automatically identify potential security vulnerabilities and coding errors in shell scripts within dotfiles before manual review.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Malicious Code Injection (High Severity): Reduces the risk of introducing malicious code through dotfiles by manual inspection during code review.
  • Secret Exposure (Medium Severity): Helps to catch accidentally committed secrets during the code review process by human reviewers.
  • Configuration Drift (Low Severity): Ensures that changes to dotfiles are reviewed and understood, reducing the risk of unintended or insecure configuration changes.

Impact:

  • Malicious Code Injection: Medium reduction. Human review is effective but not foolproof and can be time-consuming.
  • Secret Exposure: Medium reduction. Human review can miss secrets, especially if they are subtly introduced or obfuscated.
  • Configuration Drift: Low reduction. Primarily focuses on security aspects, less directly on general configuration drift management.

Currently Implemented:

Partially implemented. General code review processes might be in place, but it's unlikely that dotfiles are specifically targeted for rigorous security-focused reviews when starting with a general template like skwp/dotfiles.

Missing Implementation:

  • Formal dotfile code review process: Establish a documented and enforced code review process specifically for dotfiles, highlighting security considerations.
  • Security-focused reviewer training: Provide training to code reviewers on dotfile-specific security vulnerabilities and best practices.
  • Integration with static analysis for review: Integrate static analysis tools into the dotfile code review workflow to automate initial checks.
  • Enforcement of mandatory reviews for dotfiles: Ensure that all dotfile changes are subject to mandatory code review before integration.

Mitigation Strategy: Source Dotfiles from a Vetted Internal Repository

Description:

  1. Create an internal dotfile repository: Establish a dedicated, internal repository to host approved and vetted dotfiles for the project or organization.
  2. Vet and curate dotfiles: Populate this internal repository with dotfiles that have been thoroughly reviewed for security and best practices. Initially, this might involve adapting and securing dotfiles from sources like skwp/dotfiles, but with a strong focus on security hardening.
  3. Restrict external dotfile usage: Discourage or strictly prohibit the direct use of dotfiles from public, external repositories (like directly cloning skwp/dotfiles into production or shared environments).
  4. Promote internal repository usage: Make the internal dotfile repository the primary and recommended source for developers and systems to obtain dotfile configurations.
  5. Regularly update and maintain internal dotfiles: Implement a process to regularly update and maintain the internal dotfile repository, incorporating security patches, best practices, and addressing any newly identified vulnerabilities.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Malicious Code Injection (High Severity): Significantly reduces the risk of introducing malicious code by controlling the source of dotfiles to a trusted, internally managed repository.
  • Configuration Drift (Medium Severity): Promotes consistency and reduces the risk of configuration drift by centralizing dotfile management and providing a single source of truth.

Impact:

  • Malicious Code Injection: High reduction. Proactively prevents the introduction of malicious code from untrusted external sources.
  • Configuration Drift: Medium reduction. Centralization helps with consistency, but requires ongoing maintenance and version control within the internal repository.

Currently Implemented:

Not currently implemented when starting with a public repository like skwp/dotfiles. The initial approach is likely to be more ad-hoc and less centrally managed.

Missing Implementation:

  • Creation of internal dotfile repository: The primary missing step is the creation and population of a secure, internal repository for vetted dotfiles.
  • Vetting and curation process: Define a clear process for vetting, curating, and updating dotfiles within the internal repository.
  • Policy on external dotfile sources: Establish a clear policy that restricts or discourages the use of external, unvetted dotfile sources.
  • Developer adoption and migration: Plan and execute a migration strategy for developers and systems to transition to using the internal dotfile repository.