Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
66 lines (47 loc) · 7.67 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

66 lines (47 loc) · 7.67 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for thoughtbot/bourbon

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update Bourbon

  • Description:

    1. Identify Current Bourbon Version: Check your project's dependency file (e.g., Gemfile, package.json) to determine the currently installed Bourbon version.
    2. Check for Updates: Visit the official Bourbon GitHub repository (https://github.com/thoughtbot/bourbon) or relevant package registry (e.g., RubyGems, npm) to see if a newer stable version is available.
    3. Review Changelog/Release Notes: Examine the changelog or release notes for the new version, looking for bug fixes or any changes that might indirectly impact security or CSS behavior.
    4. Update Bourbon Dependency: Update the Bourbon version in your project's dependency file to the latest stable version.
    5. Run Dependency Update Command: Execute the appropriate command for your package manager (e.g., bundle update bourbon, npm update bourbon, yarn upgrade bourbon).
    6. Test Application: Thoroughly test your application after updating Bourbon to ensure no CSS regressions or unexpected behavior have been introduced due to the Bourbon update.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Outdated Bourbon Bugs (Low Severity): While direct security vulnerabilities in Bourbon are unlikely, older versions might contain bugs that could lead to unexpected CSS behavior or compatibility issues, which could indirectly be exploited or cause minor disruptions.
    • Indirect Dependency Issues (Low Severity): Keeping Bourbon updated can ensure compatibility with updated versions of its underlying dependencies (like Sass), reducing potential indirect issues arising from dependency mismatches.

  • Impact:

    • Outdated Bourbon Bugs: Low risk reduction. Minimizes potential for bugs in older Bourbon versions to cause issues.
    • Indirect Dependency Issues: Low risk reduction. Maintains compatibility and reduces potential for dependency-related problems.

  • Currently Implemented: Not implemented systematically for Bourbon specifically. General dependency updates might occur, but not necessarily with a focus on Bourbon version currency.

  • Missing Implementation: Implement a process for regularly checking and updating Bourbon versions as part of routine dependency maintenance.

Mitigation Strategy: Review and Audit Bourbon Usage within the Project

  • Description:

    1. Identify Bourbon Mixin Instances: Use code search tools to locate all instances where Bourbon mixins are used in your project's Sass/CSS files (e.g., @include bourbon-*).
    2. Code Review for Complexity: Conduct code reviews focusing on the complexity and clarity of Bourbon mixin usage. Assess if mixins are used appropriately and if the resulting CSS is understandable and maintainable.
    3. Analyze Generated CSS: For complex Bourbon mixin applications, inspect the generated CSS output. Verify that it aligns with intended behavior and doesn't create overly complex or inefficient CSS. Use browser developer tools to examine the CSS.
    4. Ensure Proper Mixin Parameter Usage: Review how parameters are passed to Bourbon mixins. Ensure that parameters are used as intended and are not leading to unexpected or overly permissive CSS rules.
    5. Document Bourbon Best Practices: Create internal guidelines or documentation outlining best practices for using Bourbon mixins within the project to promote consistent and secure usage.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Maintainability Issues Leading to Security Oversights (Medium Severity): Complex or poorly understood CSS generated by Bourbon can become harder to maintain and audit for potential security issues over time. Regular reviews improve maintainability and reduce the risk of overlooking vulnerabilities in the CSS.
    • Unintended CSS Behavior due to Misuse (Low Severity): Incorrect or overly complex usage of Bourbon mixins could lead to unintended CSS behavior, which in rare cases might have minor security implications (e.g., broken layouts, unexpected interactions).

  • Impact:

    • Maintainability Issues Leading to Security Oversights: Medium risk reduction. Improves code quality and maintainability, making security audits more effective for CSS.
    • Unintended CSS Behavior due to Misuse: Low risk reduction. Catches potential errors in how Bourbon mixins are applied.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented through general code reviews, but not specifically focused on Bourbon mixin usage or the security implications of generated CSS complexity.

  • Missing Implementation: Implement dedicated code review steps or checklists that specifically include reviewing Bourbon mixin usage and the resulting CSS for complexity, clarity, and potential for misuse, especially during feature development involving CSS changes.

Mitigation Strategy: Limit Bourbon's Scope and Usage (Considered Approach)

  • Description:

    1. Analyze Bourbon Dependency: Review the project's overall dependency on Bourbon. Identify areas where Bourbon mixins are heavily used and areas where they are not.
    2. Evaluate Necessity of Mixins: For each Bourbon mixin usage, assess if it is truly necessary or if the same CSS functionality can be achieved using standard CSS or more targeted, potentially simpler CSS techniques (e.g., CSS variables, utility classes, more specific CSS rules).
    3. Refactor to Reduce Bourbon Usage: Where feasible and beneficial, refactor stylesheets to replace Bourbon mixins with standard CSS or more targeted CSS solutions. Focus on areas where Bourbon usage adds unnecessary abstraction or complexity.
    4. Prioritize Standard CSS for New Features: For new features and CSS development, prioritize using standard CSS or more modular CSS approaches over relying on Bourbon mixins whenever possible.
    5. Document Rationale for Bourbon Usage: Document the reasons for retaining Bourbon mixins in specific areas, especially if alternatives are considered and rejected. This helps maintain clarity and consistency in the project's CSS architecture.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Maintainability Issues Leading to Security Oversights (Medium Severity): Reducing the overall complexity of the CSS codebase by limiting Bourbon usage makes it more maintainable and easier to audit for security vulnerabilities in the long term. A simpler codebase is generally easier to secure.
    • Dependency Management Complexity (Low Severity): Reducing dependencies, even utility libraries like Bourbon, can slightly simplify dependency management and reduce the overall attack surface associated with supply chain risks, although the impact is minor for a library like Bourbon.

  • Impact:

    • Maintainability Issues Leading to Security Oversights: Medium risk reduction. Simplifies the CSS codebase and improves long-term maintainability and auditability.
    • Dependency Management Complexity: Low risk reduction. Minor simplification of project dependencies.

  • Currently Implemented: Not actively implemented. The project likely uses Bourbon as initially adopted, without a deliberate strategy to minimize its usage over time.

  • Missing Implementation: Implement this as a long-term strategy for CSS codebase evolution. Incorporate into CSS refactoring efforts and guidelines for new feature development to encourage minimizing reliance on Bourbon where appropriate.