Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
41 lines (34 loc) · 6.14 KB

File metadata and controls

41 lines (34 loc) · 6.14 KB

Threat Model Analysis for thoughtbot/factory_bot

  • Description: An attacker could exploit vulnerabilities introduced by insecure code within factory callbacks. If a callback performs sensitive operations, like interacting with external APIs or logging sensitive data, in an insecure manner (e.g., without proper input validation, output encoding, or secure communication protocols), it can create a point of exploitation. An attacker might manipulate these interactions to gain unauthorized access, leak information, or compromise external systems.
  • Impact: Introduction of critical vulnerabilities, significant data leakage including sensitive information and credentials, potential compromise of external systems integrated with the application, arbitrary code execution if callbacks interact with the system in a vulnerable way.
  • Affected Factory Bot Component: Callbacks (after_create, before_create, etc.)
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Coding Practices in Callbacks: Adhere to strict secure coding practices within all callback logic.
    • Thorough Code Review for Callbacks: Mandate rigorous code reviews specifically focusing on the security aspects of factory callbacks.
    • Principle of Least Privilege in Callbacks: Limit the actions performed within callbacks to the bare minimum necessary for test setup. Avoid complex or sensitive operations if possible.
    • Input Validation and Output Encoding: Implement robust input validation and output encoding within callbacks, especially when interacting with external systems or handling user-provided data (even if test data).
    • Secure Logging Practices: Ensure sensitive information is never logged directly in callbacks. Use secure logging mechanisms and sanitize data before logging.
  • Description: Critical vulnerabilities in factory_bot itself or its dependencies could be exploited by an attacker. If the application uses a vulnerable version of factory_bot or its dependencies, an attacker could leverage publicly known exploits to achieve arbitrary code execution on the server, gain unauthorized access to the application and its data, or cause a denial of service. This is especially critical if vulnerabilities are remotely exploitable.
  • Impact: Critical system compromise, arbitrary code execution, complete loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability, potential for widespread data breaches and system downtime, reputational damage and significant financial losses.
  • Affected Factory Bot Component: factory_bot gem, Dependencies of factory_bot
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Proactive and Regular Updates: Implement a strict policy of regularly updating factory_bot and all its dependencies to the latest versions as soon as security patches are released.
    • Automated Dependency Scanning: Integrate automated dependency scanning tools into the CI/CD pipeline to continuously monitor for known vulnerabilities in factory_bot and its dependencies.
    • Security Advisory Monitoring: Actively monitor security advisories and vulnerability databases for factory_bot and its dependency ecosystem. Subscribe to relevant security mailing lists and notifications.
    • Vulnerability Remediation Plan: Have a documented plan for quickly assessing and remediating any identified vulnerabilities in factory_bot or its dependencies, including procedures for patching and deploying updates.
  • Description: If factories are configured to generate highly sensitive data (e.g., PII, financial data, credentials) for testing purposes, and test environments or systems where this data resides are not adequately secured, an attacker gaining access could expose this highly sensitive test data. This could occur through compromised test databases, insecure test environments, or accidental exposure of test data in logs or version control. The attacker could then use this exposed sensitive data for malicious purposes, such as identity theft, fraud, or further attacks.
  • Impact: Critical data breach involving highly sensitive information, severe privacy violations, significant reputational damage, substantial regulatory fines and legal repercussions, loss of customer trust, and potential for real-world harm to individuals whose data is exposed.
  • Affected Factory Bot Component: Factory Definitions, Data Generation Logic
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Eliminate Sensitive Data in Factories: As much as possible, avoid generating or using real or realistic sensitive data in factory definitions. Use sanitized, anonymized, or synthetic data that does not resemble real sensitive information.
    • Data Masking and Pseudonymization: Implement robust data masking or pseudonymization techniques within factory definitions to ensure any generated data that might resemble sensitive information is effectively anonymized and unusable for malicious purposes.
    • Strict Access Control for Test Environments: Implement the principle of least privilege and enforce strict access controls for all test environments, databases, and systems containing factory-generated data. Use strong authentication and authorization mechanisms.
    • Encryption at Rest and in Transit: Encrypt test databases at rest and ensure data in transit within test environments is also encrypted to protect against unauthorized access and interception.
    • Secure Test Environment Infrastructure: Harden the infrastructure supporting test environments, including servers, networks, and storage systems, following security best practices to minimize the attack surface.
    • Regular Security Audits of Test Environments: Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing of test environments to identify and remediate any security weaknesses that could lead to data exposure.