Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
192 lines (146 loc) · 12.6 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

192 lines (146 loc) · 12.6 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for thoughtbot/paperclip

Mitigation Strategy: Strict File Type Validation

Description:

  1. Open the relevant Rails model file (e.g., app/models/user.rb) where you've defined your Paperclip attachment.
  2. Locate the has_attached_file definition for the attachment (e.g., :profile_image).
  3. Within the has_attached_file block, add the content_type validation option.
  4. Use a regular expression to define the allowed content types. Be specific and avoid overly broad types like application/* or image/*. For example, to allow only JPEG and PNG images: content_type: /\Aimage\/(jpe?g|png)\z/.
  5. Save the model file.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Malicious File Upload (High Severity): Attackers upload executable files, scripts, or other malicious content disguised as allowed file types to compromise the server or other users.

Impact: High. Significantly reduces the risk of malicious file uploads by enforcing strict type checking based on MIME type.

Currently Implemented: Yes, implemented in app/models/user.rb for the profile_image attachment, allowing only image/jpeg and image/png.

Missing Implementation: Not yet implemented for the document attachment in app/models/report.rb, which currently accepts application/*.

Mitigation Strategy: Validate File Extensions

Description:

  1. Open the same Rails model file where your Paperclip attachment is defined.
  2. Below the validates_attachment_content_type line (if implemented), add validates_attachment_file_name.
  3. Use the matches option with a regular expression or an array of allowed file extensions to whitelist permitted extensions. For example, to allow .jpg and .png: matches: [/png\z/, /jpe?g\z/].
  4. Save the model file.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Bypassing Content Type Validation (Medium Severity): Attackers might attempt to bypass content type validation by manipulating file extensions.
  • Social Engineering Attacks (Low Severity): Misleading file extensions could be used in social engineering attacks.

Impact: Medium. Adds a secondary layer of defense against basic file type manipulation attempts.

Currently Implemented: Partially implemented in app/models/user.rb for profile_image, checking for .jpg and .png extensions.

Missing Implementation: Missing for the document attachment in app/models/report.rb. Also, the extension validation in app/models/user.rb could be made more robust by ensuring case-insensitivity.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Magic Number Validation (Content Sniffing Prevention)

Description:

  1. Add the mimemagic gem to your Gemfile: gem 'mimemagic'. Run bundle install.
  2. Create a custom validator (e.g., app/validators/magic_number_validator.rb): 
    class MagicNumberValidator < ActiveModel::EachValidator
  def validate_each(record, attribute, value)
    return unless value.present?

    detected_mime_type = MimeMagic.by_magic(File.open(value.queued_for_write[:original].path))&.type
    allowed_mime_types = options[:allowed_types] || []

    unless allowed_mime_types.include?(detected_mime_type)
      record.errors.add(attribute, :invalid_magic_number, message: options[:message] || "is not an allowed file type")
    end
  rescue StandardError => e # Handle potential errors during file processing
    record.errors.add(attribute, :magic_number_validation_failed, message: "could not be validated")
    Rails.logger.error("Magic Number Validation Error: #{e.message}") # Log the error for debugging
  end
end
  3. In your model, use the custom validator: 
    class User < ApplicationRecord
  has_attached_file :avatar
  validates_attachment :avatar, magic_number: { allowed_types: ['image/jpeg', 'image/png'] }
end
  4. Save the files.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Content Type Spoofing (High Severity): Attackers bypass content type validation by crafting files with misleading MIME headers but malicious content.
  • MIME Confusion Attacks (Medium Severity): Exploiting inconsistencies in MIME type detection to trigger unexpected behavior in browsers or applications.

Impact: High. Significantly strengthens file type validation and effectively prevents content type spoofing attacks.

Currently Implemented: No, magic number validation is not currently implemented in the project.

Missing Implementation: Missing for all Paperclip attachments across all models (User, Report, etc.). This is a critical missing security feature.

Mitigation Strategy: Sanitize Filenames

Description:

  1. In your Paperclip configuration (e.g., config/initializers/paperclip.rb or within the model), customize the filename_processing option.
  2. Use a sanitization method to remove or replace potentially harmful characters. You can use a gem like stringex or write custom logic. Example using Stringex (add gem 'stringex' to Gemfile and bundle install): 
    Paperclip.interpolates :sanitized_file_name do |attachment, style|
  attachment.instance.read_attribute(attachment.name).gsub(/[^a-zA-Z0-9\.\-\+_]/, '_').to_url
end

Paperclip::Attachment.default_options[:path] = ':rails_root/storage/:class/:attachment/:id_partition/:style/:sanitized_file_name.:extension'
Paperclip::Attachment.default_options[:url] = '/storage/:class/:attachment/:id_partition/:style/:sanitized_file_name.:extension'
  3. Alternatively, within your model, you can override the assign_attributes method to sanitize the filename before Paperclip processes it.
  4. Save the configuration/model file.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Path Traversal Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): Malicious filenames containing path traversal sequences (../) could be used to access or overwrite files outside the intended storage directory.
  • File System Command Injection (Low Severity): In rare cases, unsanitized filenames could be exploited for command injection if filenames are used in shell commands.
  • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Filenames (Low Severity): Unsanitized filenames displayed in the UI could potentially lead to XSS if not properly handled during output encoding.

Impact: Medium. Reduces the risk of path traversal and other filename-related vulnerabilities.

Currently Implemented: No, filename sanitization is not explicitly implemented. Paperclip's default handling provides some basic safety, but explicit sanitization is missing.

Missing Implementation: Missing globally for all Paperclip attachments. Should be implemented in config/initializers/paperclip.rb or a similar configuration file to apply to all attachments.

Mitigation Strategy: Store Uploaded Files Outside of the Web Root

Description:

  1. In your Paperclip configuration (e.g., config/initializers/paperclip.rb or within the model), modify the path option.
  2. Ensure the path points to a directory outside of your public/ directory. A common practice is to use a storage/ directory at the application root. Example: 
    Paperclip::Attachment.default_options[:path] = ':rails_root/storage/:class/:attachment/:id_partition/:style/:filename'
Paperclip::Attachment.default_options[:url] = '/download/:class/:attachment/:id/:style/:filename' # Define a download URL pattern
  3. Adjust your web server configuration (e.g., Nginx, Apache) to prevent direct access to the storage/ directory.
  4. Save the configuration file.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Direct File Access (High Severity): Attackers directly access uploaded files by guessing or knowing their paths if stored within the web root. This can expose sensitive data or allow execution of malicious files.

Impact: High. Prevents direct web access to uploaded files, forcing access through application-controlled mechanisms.

Currently Implemented: No, currently files are stored in public/system/, which is within the web root and directly accessible.

Missing Implementation: Needs to be implemented globally by changing the default path in config/initializers/paperclip.rb and adjusting web server configuration.

Mitigation Strategy: Utilize Private Cloud Storage (If Applicable)

Description:

  1. If using cloud storage (AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, Azure Blob Storage) with Paperclip, ensure your cloud storage bucket/container is configured for private access by default.
  2. Configure Paperclip to generate signed URLs (pre-signed URLs) for accessing files. Paperclip can be configured to do this using the s3_server_side_encryption, s3_url_options, etc., options for S3, and similar options for other cloud providers.
  3. Generate signed URLs in your controller actions when serving files for download. These URLs provide temporary, controlled access.
  4. Example Paperclip configuration for S3 with signed URLs: 
    Paperclip::Attachment.default_options.merge!({
  storage: :s3,
  s3_credentials: {
    bucket: ENV['S3_BUCKET_NAME'],
    access_key_id: ENV['AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID'],
    secret_access_key: ENV['AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY'],
    region: ENV['AWS_REGION']
  },
  s3_url_options: { expires_in: 3600, use_ssl: true }, # Signed URL options, expires in 1 hour
  url: ':s3_domain_url',
  path: '/:class/:attachment/:id_partition/:style/:filename',
  s3_server_side_encryption: :aes256
})
  5. In your download controller action, generate the signed URL and redirect to it: 
    def download_document
  # ... (authentication and authorization checks) ...
  if @report.document.present?
    redirect_to @report.document.expiring_url(3600) # Generate signed URL with 1-hour expiry
  else
    # ...
  end
end

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Publicly Accessible Files in Cloud Storage (High Severity): If cloud storage buckets are misconfigured as public, anyone can access uploaded files directly, leading to data breaches.
  • Unauthorized Access to Cloud Storage (High Severity): Even with private buckets, misconfigured access policies or leaked credentials can lead to unauthorized access.

Impact: High. Leverages cloud provider security features and ensures files are not publicly accessible by default, providing controlled access through signed URLs.

Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Cloud storage (AWS S3) is used, but buckets might not be strictly private, and signed URLs are not consistently used for all file access.

Missing Implementation: Needs to ensure all S3 buckets are private and consistently use signed URLs for all file downloads from S3. Review S3 bucket policies and Paperclip configuration.

Mitigation Strategy: Limit Image Processing Options

Description:

  1. Define a fixed set of image styles in your Paperclip configuration (e.g., in the styles option of has_attached_file).
  2. Avoid allowing users to dynamically specify image processing parameters through user input or URL parameters.
  3. If dynamic processing is absolutely necessary, carefully validate and sanitize any user-provided parameters before passing them to ImageMagick. Use whitelisting of allowed options and values.
  4. Example of fixed styles: 
    has_attached_file :avatar, styles: { thumb: "100x100#", small: "200x200>", medium: "300x300>" }

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Command Injection via Image Processing (Medium Severity): Prevents attackers from injecting malicious commands into image processing operations if user input is directly used in processing commands.
  • Denial of Service (DoS) via Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Attackers could potentially craft requests that cause excessive resource consumption during image processing if processing options are not limited.

Impact: Medium. Reduces the risk of command injection and DoS attacks related to image processing by limiting user control over processing options.

Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Styles are predefined in models, but there might be areas where dynamic processing or user-controlled parameters are unintentionally used.

Missing Implementation: Review all Paperclip usage to ensure dynamic image processing options are not being used or are properly validated and sanitized if absolutely necessary. Enforce fixed styles consistently.