Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
183 lines (140 loc) · 18.2 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

183 lines (140 loc) · 18.2 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for varvet/pundit

Mitigation Strategy: Thoroughly Test Policy Logic

  • Description:

    1. Unit Tests for Policies: For each Pundit policy class, write dedicated unit tests specifically targeting the policy logic.
    2. Test Each Policy Action: Within each policy test, create test cases for every action (e.g., index?, show?, create?) defined in the policy.
    3. Test Policy Logic with Different User Contexts: Simulate different user roles and permissions within the policy tests to ensure the logic correctly handles various user contexts as understood by Pundit.
    4. Integration Tests for Policy Enforcement: Write integration tests that verify Pundit policies are correctly invoked and enforced within controllers and views using authorize and policy_scope methods.
    5. Code Reviews of Policy Implementations: Conduct code reviews specifically focused on the logic and correctness of Pundit policy implementations.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Unauthorized Access (High Severity): Flawed Pundit policy logic can grant access to resources or actions that users should not be able to access due to incorrect authorization rules.
      • Data Manipulation (High Severity): Incorrect Pundit policies might allow unauthorized users to create, update, or delete data because the authorization logic is flawed.
      • Privilege Escalation (Medium Severity): Logic errors within Pundit policies could lead to users gaining higher privileges than intended, bypassing intended authorization boundaries.

    • Impact:

      • Unauthorized Access: High Risk Reduction
      • Data Manipulation: High Risk Reduction
      • Privilege Escalation: Medium Risk Reduction

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Unit tests for PostPolicy and CommentPolicy are implemented in spec/policies directory, focusing on testing Pundit policy methods.
      • Basic integration tests for PostsController are present in spec/controllers, verifying Pundit's authorize calls.
      • Code reviews are performed for major feature branches, including review of Pundit policies within those features.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Comprehensive unit tests are missing for some complex policy actions, especially around edge cases and nuanced Pundit policy logic.
      • Integration tests need to be expanded to cover all controllers and actions that rely on Pundit for authorization enforcement.
      • Code reviews should consistently include a dedicated focus on the correctness and security of Pundit policy implementations, even for minor changes.

Mitigation Strategy: Enforce Policy Checks Consistently using Pundit's authorize and policy_scope

  • Description:

    1. Controller authorize Usage: In every controller action requiring authorization, explicitly call Pundit's authorize @resource (or authorize ResourceClass) before proceeding with the action.
    2. View policy Helper Usage: In views, consistently use Pundit's policy(@resource).action? helper to conditionally render UI elements based on user permissions determined by Pundit.
    3. Code Review Focus on Pundit Calls: Create a code review checklist that specifically includes verifying the presence and correct usage of Pundit's authorize and policy calls in relevant controllers and views.
    4. Static Analysis for Pundit Usage: Configure static analysis tools or linters to detect missing or incorrect usage of Pundit's authorize or policy_scope methods in controllers and views.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Bypass Pundit Authorization (High Severity): Forgetting to implement Pundit's authorize checks leaves endpoints unprotected by Pundit, allowing anyone to perform actions that should be authorized.
      • Unauthorized Data Access (High Severity): Without Pundit's authorization checks, users can access data that Pundit policies are designed to protect.
      • Unauthorized Data Modification (High Severity): Missing Pundit checks can lead to unauthorized creation, update, or deletion of data, bypassing Pundit's intended authorization controls.

    • Impact:

      • Bypass Pundit Authorization: High Risk Reduction
      • Unauthorized Data Access: High Risk Reduction
      • Unauthorized Data Modification: High Risk Reduction

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Pundit's authorize is generally used in controllers for standard CRUD actions on Post and Comment resources.
      • Basic view authorization using Pundit's policy helper is implemented for showing edit/delete links for posts.
      • Code reviews sometimes check for Pundit usage, but not as a primary, consistent focus.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Pundit's authorize checks are sometimes missed in less common controller actions or newly added endpoints, especially when developers are not explicitly thinking about Pundit.
      • View authorization using Pundit's policy helper is not consistently applied across all views and UI elements where authorization is relevant.
      • Static analysis tools are not specifically configured to check for comprehensive and correct Pundit usage.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Robust policy_scope Usage in Pundit Policies

  • Description:

    1. Correct Filtering Logic in policy_scope: Ensure that policy_scope methods within Pundit policies correctly implement filtering logic to return only authorized records based on user permissions as defined by Pundit.
    2. Test policy_scope Methods Specifically: Write unit tests dedicated to testing policy_scope methods in Pundit policies, verifying they return the expected filtered subset of records for different user roles and authorization scenarios within Pundit's context.
    3. Consistent Use of policy_scope in Controllers: Consistently use Pundit's policy_scope(ResourceClass) in controller index actions and any other actions that return collections of resources, ensuring Pundit's filtering is applied.
    4. Avoid Bypassing Pundit's policy_scope: Train developers to always utilize Pundit's policy_scope when fetching collections to ensure Pundit-driven authorization filtering is applied and avoid direct database queries that bypass Pundit.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Unauthorized Data Exposure via Collections (Medium Severity): Incorrect Pundit policy_scope implementations can expose lists of resources that users should not be aware of, even if individual record authorization via Pundit is in place.
      • Information Disclosure through Pundit Bypass (Medium Severity): Exposing unauthorized resource lists due to flawed Pundit policy_scope can leak sensitive information about the application's data structure or content, undermining Pundit's intended data protection.

    • Impact:

      • Unauthorized Data Exposure via Collections: Medium Risk Reduction
      • Information Disclosure through Pundit Bypass: Medium Risk Reduction

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Pundit's policy_scope is implemented in PostPolicy and CommentPolicy to filter index actions, leveraging Pundit's scope resolution.
      • Basic tests exist for policy_scope in PostPolicy, verifying Pundit's scope filtering.
      • Controllers generally use Pundit's policy_scope for index actions to apply Pundit's authorization at the collection level.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • policy_scope tests are not comprehensive and might not cover all filtering scenarios and edge cases within Pundit's scope resolution logic.
      • Pundit's policy_scope might be missed in some controller actions that return collections, especially in newer features or less frequently used endpoints where Pundit integration might be overlooked.

Mitigation Strategy: Handle Pundit's NotAuthorizedError Gracefully and Securely

  • Description:

    1. Global Exception Handler for Pundit::NotAuthorizedError: In your application's exception handling, specifically add a handler for Pundit's Pundit::NotAuthorizedError exception.
    2. Generic User-Facing Error Message for Pundit Failures: Within the handler for Pundit::NotAuthorizedError, return a generic, user-friendly error message like "You are not authorized to perform this action." or "Access Denied." Avoid revealing specific details about why Pundit authorization failed.
    3. Detailed Logging of Pundit Exceptions: Log the full exception details of Pundit::NotAuthorizedError, including policy name, action, user information, and backtrace, to server logs for debugging and security auditing related to Pundit authorization failures.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Information Leakage via Pundit Errors (Low Severity): Detailed error messages from Pundit's NotAuthorizedError could inadvertently reveal information about application structure or resource existence to unauthorized users by exposing internal Pundit authorization details.
      • Security Through Obscurity (related to Pundit errors) (Low Severity): While not a primary security mechanism, preventing detailed Pundit error messages reduces potential information available to attackers about the Pundit authorization system.

    • Impact:

      • Information Leakage via Pundit Errors: Low Risk Reduction
      • Security Through Obscurity (related to Pundit errors): Low Risk Reduction

    • Currently Implemented:

      • A global exception handler for Pundit::NotAuthorizedError is implemented in ApplicationController, specifically to handle Pundit authorization failures.
      • A generic "Access Denied" message is displayed to users when Pundit authorization fails.
      • Exceptions, including Pundit::NotAuthorizedError, are logged to log/production.log, capturing details of Pundit authorization failures.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Logging of Pundit::NotAuthorizedError might not consistently include sufficient user context or Pundit policy details for effective debugging and auditing of Pundit authorization issues.
      • Log access control needs to be reviewed to ensure only authorized personnel can access sensitive error logs containing details of Pundit authorization failures.

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Review and Update Pundit Policies

  • Description:

    1. Scheduled Reviews of Pundit Policies: Establish a recurring schedule for reviewing all Pundit policies to ensure they remain accurate and aligned with current authorization requirements.
    2. Policy Reviews Triggered by Authorization Changes: Incorporate Pundit policy reviews into the development lifecycle, specifically when adding new features, modifying existing features, or changing user roles and permissions that directly impact Pundit authorization rules.
    3. Documentation of Pundit Policy Rationale: Document the reasoning and intent behind each Pundit policy rule to facilitate understanding and future reviews of Pundit authorization logic.
    4. Version Control for Pundit Policies: Track all changes to Pundit policies in version control (Git) to enable rollback and maintain an audit history of Pundit authorization rule modifications.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Pundit Policy Drift (Medium Severity): Pundit policies becoming outdated and misaligned with current application requirements, leading to either overly permissive or restrictive access due to outdated Pundit rules.
      • Accumulated Errors in Pundit Policies (Medium Severity): Small errors in Pundit policies accumulating over time and becoming significant vulnerabilities in the Pundit authorization system.
      • Authorization Gaps due to Pundit Neglect (Medium Severity): New features or changes introduced without corresponding updates to Pundit policies, creating authorization gaps in the Pundit-managed authorization framework.

    • Impact:

      • Pundit Policy Drift: Medium Risk Reduction
      • Accumulated Errors in Pundit Policies: Medium Risk Reduction
      • Authorization Gaps due to Pundit Neglect: Medium Risk Reduction

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Pundit policies are under version control, allowing tracking of changes to Pundit authorization rules.
      • Pundit policy changes are sometimes discussed during code reviews for related features, considering the impact on Pundit authorization.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • No formal schedule for regular reviews of Pundit policies exists, leading to potential neglect of Pundit authorization rules over time.
      • Documentation of Pundit policy rationale is inconsistent, making reviews and updates of Pundit authorization logic more challenging.
      • Policy review checklist specifically for Pundit policies is not defined, potentially missing key aspects of Pundit authorization review.
      • Pundit policy reviews are not consistently triggered by application changes that impact authorization, potentially leading to outdated Pundit rules.

Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Pundit Policy Complexity

  • Description:

    1. Keep Pundit Policies Concise and Readable: Strive for clear and concise policy logic within Pundit policies. Avoid overly complex conditional statements or deeply nested logic in Pundit rules.
    2. Break Down Complex Pundit Policies: If a Pundit policy becomes too complex, break it down into smaller, more manageable policy classes or helper methods to improve the clarity of Pundit authorization logic.
    3. Refactor Pundit Policies for Readability: Regularly refactor Pundit policies to improve readability and remove redundancy in Pundit authorization rules. Use meaningful method names and comments within Pundit policies.
    4. Helper Methods/Service Objects for Pundit Logic: Encapsulate complex authorization logic used within Pundit policies into helper methods or dedicated service objects called from policies to improve organization and testability of Pundit authorization rules.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Logic Errors in Pundit Policies (Medium Severity): Complex Pundit policies are more prone to logical errors in their authorization rules that can lead to vulnerabilities in the Pundit authorization system.
      • Maintainability Issues with Pundit Policies (Medium Severity): Complex Pundit policies are harder to understand, test, and maintain, increasing the risk of introducing errors during updates to Pundit authorization rules.

    • Impact:

      • Logic Errors in Pundit Policies: Medium Risk Reduction
      • Maintainability Issues with Pundit Policies: Medium Risk Reduction

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Pundit policies are generally kept relatively simple in the current implementation.
      • Basic refactoring of Pundit policies is sometimes done during code reviews.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • No formal guidelines or metrics for Pundit policy complexity are defined, potentially leading to inconsistent complexity levels in Pundit authorization rules.
      • Proactive refactoring specifically for Pundit policy simplification is not regularly performed, potentially allowing Pundit authorization logic to become unnecessarily complex over time.

Mitigation Strategy: Keep Pundit Updated

  • Description:

    1. Regular Pundit Updates: Establish a process for regularly updating the Pundit library itself to benefit from bug fixes, security patches, and potential improvements in Pundit.
    2. Security Monitoring for Pundit: Monitor security advisories and release notes specifically for Pundit to stay informed about potential vulnerabilities and necessary updates in the Pundit library.
    3. Prompt Patching of Pundit Vulnerabilities: When vulnerabilities are identified in Pundit, prioritize patching and updating Pundit promptly to mitigate known security risks in the authorization library.
    4. Testing After Pundit Updates: After updating Pundit, run comprehensive tests (unit, integration, system) to ensure no regressions or compatibility issues are introduced by the Pundit update, especially in authorization behavior.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Known Pundit Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Using outdated versions of Pundit exposes the application to known security vulnerabilities within the Pundit library itself that have been publicly disclosed and potentially exploited.
      • Zero-Day Pundit Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity - Reduced Risk): While updates don't prevent zero-day vulnerabilities in Pundit, staying up-to-date reduces the window of exposure and increases the likelihood of receiving timely patches for newly discovered Pundit vulnerabilities.

    • Impact:

      • Known Pundit Vulnerabilities: High Risk Reduction
      • Zero-Day Pundit Vulnerabilities: Medium Risk Reduction

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Dependencies, including Pundit, are updated periodically, but not on a strict schedule specifically focused on Pundit security updates.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • No formal process for monitoring security advisories and prioritizing updates specifically for Pundit exists, potentially delaying critical Pundit security patches.
      • Testing after Pundit updates is not always comprehensive, potentially missing regressions or compatibility issues introduced by Pundit updates that could affect authorization.