Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
153 lines (125 loc) · 16.2 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

153 lines (125 loc) · 16.2 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of Actix-web based on the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the Actix-web framework, focusing on its key components, identifying potential vulnerabilities, and providing actionable mitigation strategies. The analysis aims to identify weaknesses in the framework itself, not general web application vulnerabilities that developers might introduce. We'll focus on how Actix-web could be vulnerable, even when used "correctly" according to its documentation, and how to prevent misuse.

  • Scope: The analysis will cover the following key areas, inferred from the design document and Actix-web's known features:

    • Request Handling: Parsing, routing, parameter extraction, and dispatching.
    • Middleware System: Security implications of middleware execution order, error handling, and potential bypasses.
    • Data Handling: Serialization/deserialization, interaction with databases (through external libraries, but focusing on Actix-web's role), and potential data leaks.
    • Concurrency Model: Actix-web's actor-based concurrency and its implications for security (race conditions, deadlocks, etc.).
    • Error Handling: How errors are propagated and handled, and potential information disclosure.
    • Dependency Management: The framework's approach to managing dependencies and mitigating supply chain risks.
    • TLS/SSL: How Actix-web handles secure connections.
    • Default Configuration: Security of default settings.

  • Methodology:

    1. Code Review (Inferred): While we don't have direct access to the codebase, we'll infer potential vulnerabilities based on the design document, Actix-web's documentation, known Rust security best practices, and common web application attack vectors. We'll assume a "secure by default" approach is attempted, but we'll look for areas where this might fail.
    2. Documentation Analysis: We'll thoroughly examine the official Actix-web documentation for security-relevant features, recommendations, and potential pitfalls.
    3. Threat Modeling: We'll consider common attack vectors (OWASP Top 10, etc.) and how they might apply to Actix-web's architecture.
    4. Best Practice Comparison: We'll compare Actix-web's features and recommendations against established security best practices for web frameworks.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each key component:

  • Web Server (Actix-web Core):

    • Threats:
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Slowloris attacks, resource exhaustion (connections, memory, CPU), HTTP/2-specific attacks (if supported). Actix-web's asynchronous nature helps mitigate some DoS, but doesn't eliminate it. Improperly configured timeouts are a major risk.
      • Request Smuggling: Ambiguities in how Actix-web and any underlying HTTP parser handle malformed requests (e.g., conflicting Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers).
      • Header Injection: If Actix-web doesn't properly sanitize or validate incoming headers, attackers might inject malicious headers (e.g., for cross-site scripting or response splitting).
      • TLS/SSL Misconfiguration: Weak cipher suites, improper certificate validation, or failure to enforce HTTPS.
    • Mitigation:
      • DoS Protection: Implement robust connection limits and timeouts (both read and write timeouts). Use a reverse proxy (e.g., Nginx, HAProxy) in front of Actix-web to handle connection management and rate limiting. Consider using a Web Application Firewall (WAF). Specifically, investigate Actix-web's actix-web::middleware::BodyLimit and configure it appropriately. Monitor resource usage and set alerts.
      • Request Smuggling Prevention: Ensure Actix-web uses a robust and up-to-date HTTP parser. If using a reverse proxy, ensure it's configured to prevent request smuggling. Specifically, research how Actix-web handles Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length discrepancies.
      • Header Validation: Actix-web should provide mechanisms for validating and sanitizing headers. Developers must use these. Specifically, look for header parsing functions in the documentation and ensure they handle invalid characters and encodings correctly. Avoid blindly trusting header values.
      • TLS/SSL Configuration: Use strong cipher suites and protocols (TLS 1.3, potentially with fallbacks to TLS 1.2). Validate certificates properly. Enforce HTTPS using middleware or reverse proxy configuration. Specifically, review Actix-web's TLS configuration options and ensure they're set to secure defaults.

  • Request Handlers:

    • Threats:
      • Injection Vulnerabilities (XSS, SQLi, etc.): If request handlers don't properly validate and sanitize user input, they're vulnerable to various injection attacks. This is primarily the developer's responsibility, but Actix-web's design can influence it.
      • Logic Errors: Flaws in the handler's logic can lead to security vulnerabilities (e.g., bypassing authentication, unauthorized access to data).
      • Improper Error Handling: Revealing sensitive information in error messages.
    • Mitigation:
      • Input Validation: Use a robust validation library (e.g., validator crate in Rust). Validate all input, including headers, query parameters, and request bodies. Specifically, Actix-web's extractors (Path, Query, Json, Form) should be used with careful validation of the extracted data. Don't assume extractors provide any security guarantees beyond basic parsing.
      • Output Encoding: Encode all output to prevent XSS. Use a templating engine (if applicable) that automatically escapes output. Specifically, if using Actix-web with a templating engine, ensure it's configured for secure output encoding.
      • Parameterized Queries: Use parameterized queries or an ORM to prevent SQL injection when interacting with databases. This is crucial even though it's outside Actix-web's direct control. Actix-web's documentation should emphasize this.
      • Secure Error Handling: Return generic error messages to users. Log detailed error information for debugging, but never expose internal details to the client. Specifically, use Actix-web's error handling mechanisms to customize error responses and prevent information leakage.

  • Middleware:

    • Threats:
      • Middleware Bypass: If middleware is not correctly configured or if there are vulnerabilities in the middleware itself, attackers might bypass security checks. Order of middleware execution is critical.
      • Logic Errors in Middleware: Flaws in custom middleware can introduce vulnerabilities.
      • Timing Attacks: Middleware that performs time-dependent operations (e.g., comparing passwords) might be vulnerable to timing attacks.
    • Mitigation:
      • Careful Middleware Ordering: Place authentication and authorization middleware before any middleware that handles user input or accesses sensitive data. Specifically, document the recommended order of middleware for common security scenarios.
      • Thorough Middleware Testing: Test middleware extensively to ensure it functions correctly and doesn't introduce vulnerabilities. Use unit and integration tests.
      • Use Established Middleware: Prefer well-tested and widely used middleware libraries over custom implementations whenever possible.
      • Constant-Time Comparisons: Use constant-time comparison functions for sensitive operations (e.g., password verification) to prevent timing attacks. Specifically, recommend using libraries like constant_time_eq in Rust.

  • Business Logic & Data Access Layer:

    • Threats: (Similar to Request Handlers, but at a different layer of abstraction)
      • Injection Vulnerabilities: If data isn't properly sanitized before being used in database queries or other operations.
      • Logic Errors: Flaws in business rules can lead to security vulnerabilities.
      • Data Leakage: Exposing sensitive data through APIs or other interfaces.
    • Mitigation:
      • Parameterized Queries: (As mentioned above) Essential for preventing SQL injection.
      • Data Validation: Validate data at multiple levels (input, business logic, data access layer).
      • Principle of Least Privilege: Database users should have only the necessary permissions to access and modify data.
      • Data Encryption: Encrypt sensitive data at rest and in transit.

  • Concurrency Model (Actors):

    • Threats:
      • Race Conditions: If actors access and modify shared data without proper synchronization, race conditions can occur, leading to unpredictable behavior and potential vulnerabilities.
      • Deadlocks: If actors are waiting for each other indefinitely, the application can become unresponsive.
      • Message Tampering: If messages between actors are not properly authenticated and validated, attackers might be able to inject malicious messages.
    • Mitigation:
      • Immutability: Prefer immutable data structures to avoid race conditions.
      • Message Passing: Use message passing instead of shared memory for communication between actors.
      • Careful Synchronization: If shared mutable state is unavoidable, use appropriate synchronization primitives (e.g., mutexes, channels) to protect it. Specifically, Actix-web's documentation should provide clear guidance on how to safely manage shared state in an actor-based system.
      • Message Validation: Validate all messages received by actors to ensure they're from a trusted source and haven't been tampered with. Consider using message signing or encryption if necessary.

  • Error Handling:

    • Threats:
      • Information Disclosure: Revealing sensitive information (e.g., stack traces, database queries, internal error messages) in error responses.
      • Error Handling Bypass: Attackers might be able to trigger specific errors to bypass security checks or gain information about the system.
    • Mitigation:
      • Generic Error Messages: Return generic error messages to users.
      • Detailed Logging: Log detailed error information for debugging, but never expose it to the client.
      • Custom Error Handlers: Use Actix-web's error handling mechanisms to customize error responses and prevent information leakage. Specifically, implement custom ErrorHandlers to control the format and content of error responses.
      • Fail Securely: Ensure that the application fails securely in case of errors. For example, if authentication fails, the user should be denied access, not granted default access.

  • Dependency Management:

    • Threats:
      • Supply Chain Attacks: Vulnerabilities in third-party dependencies can be exploited to compromise the application.
      • Outdated Dependencies: Using outdated dependencies with known vulnerabilities.
    • Mitigation:
      • SCA Tools: Use Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools to identify and manage vulnerabilities in dependencies.
      • Regular Updates: Keep dependencies up to date. Use cargo update regularly.
      • Dependency Pinning: Pin dependencies to specific versions to prevent unexpected updates that might introduce vulnerabilities or break compatibility. Use Cargo.lock effectively.
      • Auditing Dependencies: Review the source code of critical dependencies for potential vulnerabilities.
      • Minimal Dependencies: Use only the necessary dependencies to reduce the attack surface.

  • TLS/SSL:

    • Threats:
      • Using outdated protocols (SSLv3, TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1).
      • Weak cipher suites.
      • Improper certificate validation.
      • Lack of HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security).
    • Mitigation:
      • Use TLS 1.3 (and possibly 1.2): Configure Actix-web to use only strong TLS protocols.
      • Strong Cipher Suites: Use a restricted set of strong cipher suites.
      • Proper Certificate Validation: Ensure that Actix-web correctly validates server certificates.
      • HSTS: Enable HSTS using middleware to force clients to use HTTPS. Specifically, use the actix-web-middleware-secure-headers crate or similar, and configure it to set the Strict-Transport-Security header.

  • Default Configuration:

    • Threats: Insecure default settings that could leave applications vulnerable if not explicitly configured.
    • Mitigation:
      • Secure by Default: Actix-web should strive for secure defaults wherever possible. This includes things like enabling HSTS by default (if TLS is enabled), setting secure HTTP headers, and using reasonable timeouts.
      • Clear Documentation: The documentation should clearly state the default settings and their security implications. It should also provide guidance on how to change these settings if necessary.
      • Security Checklist: Provide a security checklist for developers to follow when deploying Actix-web applications.

3. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Tailored to Actix-web)

These are specific, actionable steps, building on the mitigations above:

  1. Mandatory Security Training: Require all developers using Actix-web to complete training on secure Rust development and web application security best practices. This training should specifically cover Actix-web's security features and how to use them correctly.

  2. Enforce Code Reviews: Implement mandatory code reviews for all changes to Actix-web applications, with a focus on security. Use a checklist that includes the points mentioned above.

  3. Automated Security Scanning: Integrate SAST, DAST, and SCA tools into the CI/CD pipeline. Specifically, use tools like:

    • SAST: Clippy (with security-related lints enabled), cargo audit.
    • SCA: cargo audit, Dependabot (or similar).
    • DAST: OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite.

  4. Fuzz Testing: Regularly fuzz test Actix-web's core components, particularly the request parsing and routing logic. Use tools like cargo fuzz.

  5. Penetration Testing: Conduct regular penetration testing of Actix-web applications to identify vulnerabilities that might be missed by automated tools.

  6. Security Audits: Conduct periodic security audits of the Actix-web codebase and its dependencies.

  7. Develop Secure Coding Guidelines: Create a document that outlines secure coding guidelines for Actix-web applications. This document should include specific examples and recommendations for using Actix-web's features securely.

  8. Contribute to Actix-web Security: Encourage developers to contribute to Actix-web's security by reporting vulnerabilities and suggesting improvements.

  9. Monitor Actix-web Security Advisories: Stay informed about security advisories related to Actix-web and its dependencies. Apply patches promptly.

  10. Configuration Hardening:

    • Disable Unused Features: If certain Actix-web features (e.g., specific middleware) are not needed, disable them to reduce the attack surface.
    • Review and Harden Default Settings: Examine all default settings and adjust them as needed to enhance security.
    • Use a Reverse Proxy: Deploy Actix-web applications behind a reverse proxy (e.g., Nginx, HAProxy) for additional security and performance benefits. Configure the reverse proxy to handle TLS termination, rate limiting, and other security-related tasks.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for Actix-web, focusing on potential vulnerabilities within the framework itself and providing actionable mitigation strategies. The key is to combine Actix-web's built-in features with secure coding practices and robust security testing to build secure and resilient applications.