Objective: To cause unintended application behavior, resource exhaustion, or information disclosure by manipulating command-line arguments processed by clap
.
Attacker's Goal:
Cause Unintended Application Behavior,
Resource Exhaustion, or Information Disclosure
via Clap Argument Manipulation
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |
Sub-Goal 1: [CRITICAL] Sub-Goal 2: [CRITICAL]
Trigger Unexpected Cause Resource Exhaustion
Application Logic
| |
--------------------- ------------------------
| | |
A2: Exploit [CRITICAL] B1: Overflow
Argument Allocations/
Validation Buffers [HIGH RISK]
Bypass
|
--------------------------------
| |
A2.1: Fuzz with A2.2: Leverage [HIGH RISK]
Invalid Argument Poorly Defined
Types/Values Argument Constraints
[HIGH RISK] (e.g., missing
range checks)
|
Sub-Goal 3:
Disclose Sensitive
Information
|
---------------------
|
C1: Trigger Verbose/
Debug Output [HIGH RISK]
(if enabled)
Attack Tree Path: Sub-Goal 1: Trigger Unexpected Application Logic [CRITICAL]
- Description: The attacker aims to make the application behave in ways not intended by the developers. This is a critical sub-goal because it encompasses a wide range of potential vulnerabilities and is often the starting point for more serious attacks. Weak argument validation is a primary enabler.
Attack Tree Path: A2: Exploit Argument Validation Bypass [CRITICAL]
- Description: The attacker attempts to circumvent the validation checks implemented by the application, either those built into
clap
or custom validators. This is a critical node because it's the gateway to many specific vulnerabilities.
Attack Tree Path: A2.1: Fuzz with Invalid Argument Types/Values [HIGH RISK]
- Description: The attacker uses a fuzzer to send a large number of invalid or unexpected inputs to the application, targeting the argument parsing logic. This is high-risk due to the effectiveness of fuzzing in finding vulnerabilities, especially in custom validation code.
- Likelihood: Medium to High
- Impact: Medium to Very High (ranging from crashes to potential code execution)
- Effort: Low to Medium
- Skill Level: Intermediate
- Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard
Attack Tree Path: A2.2: Leverage Poorly Defined Argument Constraints [HIGH RISK]
- Description: The attacker provides argument values that are technically valid according to
clap
's basic type checking but violate the intended constraints or assumptions of the application. This is high-risk because it's a very common developer oversight.- Likelihood: High
- Impact: Low to Medium
- Effort: Very Low
- Skill Level: Novice
- Detection Difficulty: Medium
Attack Tree Path: Sub-Goal 2: Cause Resource Exhaustion [CRITICAL]
- Description: The attacker aims to consume excessive resources (CPU, memory), leading to a denial-of-service (DoS) condition. This is critical because it directly impacts application availability.
Attack Tree Path: B1: Overflow Allocations/Buffers [HIGH RISK]
- Description: The attacker provides an argument value that is used to determine the size of a memory allocation. By providing a very large value, the attacker can trigger an overflow, leading to a crash or potentially other vulnerabilities. This is high-risk due to its potential for severe impact.
- Likelihood: Medium
- Impact: High to Very High
- Effort: Low
- Skill Level: Intermediate
- Detection Difficulty: Easy to Medium
Attack Tree Path: Sub-Goal 3: Disclose Sensitive Information
- Description: The attacker aims to obtain sensitive information through argument manipulation.
Attack Tree Path: C1: Trigger Verbose/Debug Output (if enabled) [HIGH RISK]
- Description: If the application has a verbosity flag (e.g.,
--verbose
) and the verbose output contains sensitive information, the attacker can simply enable this flag to obtain the data. This is high risk because of the potential for significant data breaches.- Likelihood: Low to Medium
- Impact: Medium to Very High
- Effort: Very Low
- Skill Level: Novice
- Detection Difficulty: Very Easy